PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
BACKGROUND: As a newly emerged concept and a product of the twenty-first century, health information governance is expanding at a rapid rate. The necessity of information governance in the healthcare industry is evident, given the significance of health information and the current need to manage it. The objective of the present scoping review is to identify the dimensions and components of health information governance to discover how these factors impact the enhancement of healthcare systems and services.
METHODS: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, ProQuest and the Google Scholar search engine were searched from inception to June 2024. Methodological study quality was assessed using CASP checklists for selected documents. Endnote 20 was utilized to select and review articles and manage references, and MAXQDA 2020 was used for content analysis.
RESULTS: A total of 37 documents, including 18 review, 9 qualitative and 10 mixed-method studies, were identified by literature search. Based on the findings, six core categories (including health information governance goals, advantages and applications, principles, components or elements, roles and responsibilities and processes) and 48 subcategories were identified to form a unified general framework comprising all extracted dimensions and components.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on the findings of this scoping review, health information governance should be regarded as a necessity in the health systems of various countries to improve and achieve their goals, particularly in developing and underdeveloped countries. Moreover, in light of the undesirable effects of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in various countries, the development and implementation of health information governance models at organizational, national and international levels are among the pressing concerns. Researchers can use the present findings as a comprehensive model for developing health information governance models. A possible limitation of this study is our limited access to some databases.
METHODS: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, ProQuest and the Google Scholar search engine were searched from inception to June 2024. Methodological study quality was assessed using CASP checklists for selected documents. Endnote 20 was utilized to select and review articles and manage references, and MAXQDA 2020 was used for content analysis.
RESULTS: A total of 37 documents, including 18 review, 9 qualitative and 10 mixed-method studies, were identified by literature search. Based on the findings, six core categories (including health information governance goals, advantages and applications, principles, components or elements, roles and responsibilities and processes) and 48 subcategories were identified to form a unified general framework comprising all extracted dimensions and components.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on the findings of this scoping review, health information governance should be regarded as a necessity in the health systems of various countries to improve and achieve their goals, particularly in developing and underdeveloped countries. Moreover, in light of the undesirable effects of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in various countries, the development and implementation of health information governance models at organizational, national and international levels are among the pressing concerns. Researchers can use the present findings as a comprehensive model for developing health information governance models. A possible limitation of this study is our limited access to some databases.
摘要：
背景：作为一个新出现的概念和二十一世纪的产物，卫生信息治理正在迅速扩展。医疗行业信息治理的必要性是显而易见的，鉴于健康信息的重要性和当前管理它的需求。本范围审查的目的是确定健康信息治理的维度和组成部分，以发现这些因素如何影响医疗保健系统和服务的增强。
方法：PubMed，Scopus,WebofScience,ProQuest和GoogleScholar搜索引擎从开始到2024年6月进行了搜索。方法学研究质量使用CASP清单对选定的文件进行评估。尾注20用于选择和审查文章和管理参考资料，MAXQDA2020用于内容分析。
结果：共37份文件，包括18次审查，9项定性研究和10项混合方法研究，通过文献检索确定。根据调查结果,六个核心类别(包括卫生信息治理目标，优势和应用，原则,组件或元素，角色、责任和流程)和48个子类别被确定，以形成一个统一的总体框架，包括所有提取的维度和组件。
结论：根据本范围审查的结果，卫生信息治理应被视为各国卫生系统改善和实现目标的必要条件，特别是在发展中国家和不发达国家。此外，鉴于2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行在不同国家的不良影响，组织健康信息治理模型的开发和实施，国家和国际层面是紧迫的关切。研究人员可以将当前的发现用作开发健康信息治理模型的综合模型。这项研究的一个可能的限制是我们对某些数据库的访问有限。
方法：PubMed，Scopus,WebofScience,ProQuest和GoogleScholar搜索引擎从开始到2024年6月进行了搜索。方法学研究质量使用CASP清单对选定的文件进行评估。尾注20用于选择和审查文章和管理参考资料，MAXQDA2020用于内容分析。
结果：共37份文件，包括18次审查，9项定性研究和10项混合方法研究，通过文献检索确定。根据调查结果,六个核心类别(包括卫生信息治理目标，优势和应用，原则,组件或元素，角色、责任和流程)和48个子类别被确定，以形成一个统一的总体框架，包括所有提取的维度和组件。
结论：根据本范围审查的结果，卫生信息治理应被视为各国卫生系统改善和实现目标的必要条件，特别是在发展中国家和不发达国家。此外，鉴于2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行在不同国家的不良影响，组织健康信息治理模型的开发和实施，国家和国际层面是紧迫的关切。研究人员可以将当前的发现用作开发健康信息治理模型的综合模型。这项研究的一个可能的限制是我们对某些数据库的访问有限。
