Abstract：
The escalating global concerns surrounding radicalization and violent extremism necessitate a comprehensive understanding and explanation. Identifying the risk factors associated with radicalism and violent extremism is critical to the development of risk assessment, prevention, and intervention strategies. It is imperative to distinguish these risks from civic responsibilities (i.e., activism) to safeguard individual rights. This study aims to examine the association between well-established risk factors for violence-personality disorder symptoms-and violent extremist attitudes, radicalism, and activism. Findings indicate that antisocial personality disorder symptoms were linked to violent extremist attitudes and radicalism, whereas obsessive-compulsive disorder symptoms were related to activism. This suggests that obsessive-compulsive personality disorder may signify a readiness for legal and nonviolent political action; in contrast, antisocial personality disorder symptoms signify a readiness for extremist violence and illegal political action.
摘要：
围绕激进化和暴力极端主义的全球关切不断升级，需要全面理解和解释。识别与激进主义和暴力极端主义相关的风险因素对于风险评估的发展至关重要，预防,和干预策略。必须将这些风险与公民责任(即，行动主义)来维护个人权利。这项研究旨在研究暴力-人格障碍症状-和暴力极端主义态度的既定风险因素之间的关联。激进主义,和激进主义。研究结果表明，反社会人格障碍症状与暴力极端主义态度和激进主义有关，而强迫症症状与行动主义有关。这表明强迫性人格障碍可能意味着准备采取法律和非暴力政治行动；相比之下，反社会人格障碍症状表示准备极端主义暴力和非法政治行动。
