Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

强迫症
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管有几项研究检查了强迫症(OCD)与五大人格特质之间的关系(即,神经质,外向,开放性,令人愉快,和责任心),结果不一致。因此,这项荟萃分析全面检查了强迫症与这些特征之间的关系。总的来说,对30,138名参与者的23项研究(29个独立数据集)进行了分析。神经质的合并效应大小为0.34(95%置信区间[CI]:0.28,0.40),-0.14(95%CI:-0.18,-0.10)为外向性,-0.04(95%CI:-0.09,0.02)对于开放性,同意性-0.10(95%CI:-0.16,-0.04),认真程度为-0.03(95%CI:-0.11,0.05),这表明强迫症与神经质得分较高、外向性和随和性得分较低相关。Meta回归和亚组分析表明,异质性主要是由于样本类型和OCD测量仪器的差异。敏感性分析表明,荟萃分析的结果是稳健的。总的来说,神经质是一种适应不良的特征,而外向性和随和性是强迫症的适应性特征。尽管结果可能是特定于样品和仪器的,我们的研究结果可能为OCD症状的预防和干预提供依据.
    Although several studies have examined the relationships between obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and the Big Five personality traits (i.e., neuroticism, extraversion, openness, agreeableness, and conscientiousness), the results have been inconsistent. Therefore, this meta-analysis comprehensively examined the relationships between OCD and these traits. In total, 23 studies (29 independent datasets) with 30,138 participants were analyzed. The pooled effect size was 0.34 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.28, 0.40) for neuroticism, -0.14 (95% CI: -0.18, -0.10) for extraversion, -0.04 (95% CI: -0.09, 0.02) for openness, -0.10 (95% CI: -0.16, -0.04) for agreeableness, and -0.03 (95% CI: -0.11, 0.05) for conscientiousness, indicating that OCD was associated with higher scores for neuroticism and lower scores for extraversion and agreeableness. Meta-regression and subgroup analyses indicated that heterogeneity was mainly due to differences in sample types and OCD measurement instruments. Sensitivity analysis showed that the results of the meta-analysis were robust. Overall, neuroticism was a maladaptive trait, whereas extraversion and agreeableness were adaptive traits for OCD. Although the results could be sample- and instrument-specific, our findings may inform preventions and interventions for OCD symptoms.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    Wolfram综合征1(WS1)是一种罕见的,以尿崩症为特征的常染色体隐性神经退行性疾病,胰岛素依赖型糖尿病,视神经萎缩,和由WFS1基因功能丧失遗传变异导致的耳聋。患有WS1的个体表现出一系列神经精神疾病。这里,我们报道了一例WS1的儿科病例,该病例源于一种新的双等位基因WFS1功能丧失遗传变异.最初表现为强迫症的个体,由氟伏沙明成功管理。两个月后,孩子表现出白天过度嗜睡。临床评估和睡眠记录显示诊断为2型发作性睡病。哌醋甲酯改善了白天过度嗜睡。据我们所知,这是WS1发作性睡病的首例报道,发作性睡病可能发生在进行性神经退行性过程中.我们强调需要深入筛查WS1的神经精神表型和睡眠相关疾病,以进行临床管理,这显著提高了生活质量。
    UNASSIGNED: Wolfram syndrome 1 (WS1) is a rare, autosomal recessive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by diabetes insipidus, insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, optic atrophy, and deafness resulting from loss-of-function genetic variants in the WFS1 gene. Individuals with WS1 manifest a spectrum of neuropsychiatric disorders. Here, we report a pediatric case of WS1, which stemmed from a novel biallelic WFS1 loss-of-function genetic variant. The individual initially presented with obsessive-compulsive disorder, which was successfully managed by fluvoxamine. After 2 months, the child manifested excessive daytime sleepiness. Clinical evaluation and sleep recordings revealed a diagnosis of narcolepsy type 2. Excessive daytime sleepiness was improved with methylphenidate. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of narcolepsy in WS1, which possibly arose during a progressive neurodegenerative process. We emphasize the need for in-depth screening for neuropsychiatric phenotypes and sleep-related disorders in WS1, for clinical management, which significantly improves the quality of life.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在这项研究中,我们重新检查了先前一项随机对照试验的数据,该试验调查了“技术支持的正念”(TSM)-一项针对强迫症患者的为期8周的治疗干预措施.当前的分析涉及检查反推之间的纵向关系,正念治疗期间的担忧和强迫症症状变化,与waitlist控件相比。
    方法:经历OCD的参与者(n=71)被随机分配到(1)TSM或(2)等待列表控制的8周。我们测试了在急性期治疗期间,沉思(使用反思反应量表)和担忧(使用宾夕法尼亚州立大学担忧问卷)与强迫症症状变化相关的程度,同时(即,在同一纵向模型内)。
    结果:广义线性模型(GLM)结果表明时间显着(第1周与第8周)通过条件相互作用,涉及TSM条件下的沉思减少:F(1,61)=13.37,p=0.001,部分η2=0.18,观察功率=0.94。在TSM条件下,第二个GLM显示出减少的担忧:F(1,69)=37.34,p=0.001,部分η2=0.35,观察功率=0.83。纵向“潜在差异”结构方程分析表明,担忧(但不是沉思)与强迫症症状变化之间存在交叉滞后的关联。
    结论:与等待名单对照相比,在TSM治疗的8周期间,TSM患者的沉思和担忧减少更多。减少的担忧预示着随后的强迫症症状的减少。
    BACKGROUND: In this study, we re-examined data from a previous randomized controlled trial investigating \'technology supported mindfulness\' (TSM)-an 8-week treatment intervention for individuals experiencing OCD. The current analysis involves an examination of the longitudinal relationships between rumination, worry and OCD symptom changes during mindfulness treatment, in comparison to a waitlist control.
    METHODS: Participants experiencing OCD (n = 71) were randomly assigned to 8 weeks of (1) TSM or (2) waitlist control. We tested the extent to which rumination (using the Ruminative Response Scale) and worry (using the Penn State Worry Questionnaire) are associated with OCD symptom changes during the acute phase of treatment, concurrently (i.e., within the same longitudinal model).
    RESULTS: Generalized linear model (GLM) results indicated a significant time (week 1 vs. week 8) by condition interaction involving decreased rumination in the TSM condition: F(1, 61) = 13.37, p = 0.001, partial η2 = 0.18 and observed power = 0.94. A second GLM demonstrated decreased worry in the TSM condition: F(1, 69) = 37.34, p = 0.001, partial η2 = 0.35 and observed power = 0.83. Longitudinal \'latent difference\' structural equation analyses demonstrated a cross-lagged association between worry (but not rumination) and OCD symptom changes.
    CONCLUSIONS: Individuals in the TSM condition experienced greater reductions in rumination and worry during 8 weeks of TSM treatment compared to the waitlist control, and reduced worry predicted subsequent OCD symptom reduction.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:强迫症(OCD)患者的目标导向和习惯性学习系统之间存在不平衡。目前,认知行为疗法(CBT)作为一线疗法与目标导向型和习惯性学习障碍之间的关系尚不清楚.我们试图讨论CBT治疗对强迫症患者的影响,使用基线时目标导向和习惯性学习相关脑区的异常作为预测因子.
    方法:共有71名受试者,包括35名强迫症患者和36名健康对照,被招募。强迫症患者接受了8周的认知行为治疗(CBT)。根据治疗反应将这些患者分为两组(无反应者=18,无反应者=17)。根据疾病持续时间(Nshort=17,Nlong=18)和发病年龄(Elast=14,Nlate=21)进行进一步的亚组分析。我们收集了静息状态ROI-ROI功能连接数据,并应用重复测量的线性混合效应模型来研究不同亚组的差异。
    结果:CBT导致OCD患者症状改善,不同亚组的有效性程度不同。眶额皮质(OFC)和脑岛,目标导向行为和习惯性学习的关键区域,分别,在不同疾病持续时间和发病年龄的亚组中显示出对CBT疗效的显着影响。
    结论:研究结果表明,目标导向系统可能通过目标选择影响CBT的疗效,维护,和情绪调节。此外,我们发现,疾病持续时间和发病年龄可能通过调节目标导向脑区和习惯性学习脑区之间的功能连接而影响治疗结果.
    BACKGROUND: There is an imbalance between goal-directed and habitual-learning system in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). At present, the relationship between cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) as a first-line therapy and goal-directed and habitual-learning disorder is still unclear. We attempted to discuss the effect of CBT treatment in patients with OCD, using abnormalities in goal-directed and habitual-learning-related brain regions at baseline as predictive factors.
    METHODS: A total of 71 subjects, including 35 OCD patients and 36 healthy controls, were recruited. The OCD patients underwent 8 weeks of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT). These patients were divided into two groups based on treatment response (Nresponders = 18, Nnonresponders = 17). Further subgroup analysis was conducted based on disease duration (Nshort = 17, Nlong = 18) and age of onset (Nearly = 14, Nlate = 21). We collected resting-state ROI-ROI functional connectivity data and apply repeated-measures linear mixed-effects models to investigate the differences of different subgroups.
    RESULTS: CBT led to symptom improvement in OCD patients, with varying degrees of effectiveness across subgroups. The orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) and insula, key regions for goal-directed behavior and habitual-learning, respectively, showed significant impacts on CBT efficacy in subgroups with different disease durations and ages of onset.
    CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that the goal-directed system may influence the efficacy of CBT through goal selection, maintenance, and emotion regulation. Furthermore, we found that disease duration and age of onset may affect treatment outcomes by modulating functional connectivity between goal-directed and habitual-learning brain regions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)是一种安全的,可访问,和有希望的强迫症(OCD)的治疗方法。
    目的:本研究旨在评估tDCS对脑电图(EEG)微观状态的影响,并确定潜在的生物标志物以预测疗效。
    方法:共有24名被诊断为强迫症的患者接受了十次针对眶额皮质的tDCS,而27名健康个体作为对照。微状态A,B,C,在tDCS之前和之后提取D。在强迫症组和健康对照组之间进行了微观状态指标的比较分析,以及tDCS前后的强迫症组内。进行多元线性回归分析以鉴定tDCS的潜在生物标志物。
    结果:与健康对照相比,OCD组显示微状态A的持续时间显著缩短,微状态D的发生率增加。OCD患者和健康对照之间的微状态A和C之间的转变显著不同,在tDCS后不再观察到.多元线性回归分析显示,微状态C的持续时间与tDCS后OCD症状的改善有关。
    结论:结果揭示了可以通过tDCS调节的异常大规模脑电图脑网络。特别是,EEG微状态C的持续时间可能是与tDCS对OCD的治疗效果相关的神经生理学特征。
    BACKGROUND: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a safe, accessible, and promising therapeutic approach for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD).
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of tDCS on electroencephalography (EEG) microstates and identify potential biomarkers to predict efficacy.
    METHODS: A total of 24 individuals diagnosed with OCD underwent ten sessions of tDCS targeting the orbitofrontal cortex, while 27 healthy individuals were included as controls. Microstates A, B, C, and D were extracted before and after tDCS. A comparative analysis of microstate metrics was performed between the OCD and the healthy control groups, as well as within the OCD group before and after tDCS. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to identify potential biomarkers of tDCS.
    RESULTS: Comparison to healthy controls, the OCD group exhibited a significantly reduced duration of microstate A and increased occurrence of microstate D. The transition between microstates A and C was significantly different between patients with OCD and healthy controls and was no longer observed following tDCS. Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that the duration of microstate C was associated with an improvement OCD symptom after tDCS.
    CONCLUSIONS: The results revealed an aberrant large-scale EEG brain network that could be modulated by tDCS. In particular, the duration of EEG microstate C may be a neurophysiological characteristic associated with the therapeutic effects of tDCS on OCD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    维度强迫症量表(DOCS)广泛用于测量强迫症(OCD)在四个广泛症状维度上的严重程度(即,污染,伤害责任,不可接受的想法,对称)。尽管它已经证明了它的实用性,有理由怀疑,不可接受的思想子量表融合了不同类型的不可接受的思想,这些思想彼此有意义地不同。在目前的研究中,我们首先评估了新开发的DOCS暴力和/或侵略性思想子量表的心理测量特性。然后我们检查了因子结构,心理测量属性,和七个因素版本的DOCS的诊断灵敏度,其中包括四个原始DOCS子量表和三个更具体版本的不可接受思想量表(即,性侵入性的想法,暴力和/或侵略性的想法,和谨慎或宗教思想)。样本包括329名住院病人和密集门诊病人,其中大多数诊断为强迫症(75.2%)。新的不可接受的思想子量表显示出收敛和判别有效性,子量表与抑郁之间具有独特的关联,自杀,以及来自情绪的感知威胁,这些情绪在更广泛的不可接受的思想分量表中不存在。DOCS的七因素版本显示出比原始DOCS略低的诊断灵敏度。因此,建议使用四因素版本的DOCS进行筛查.在DOCS的七因素版本中,40分或更高的分数最好地预测了OCD的诊断。总的来说,另外三个不可接受的思维分量表似乎是在研究和临床环境中具有潜在价值的不同因素.
    The Dimensional Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (DOCS) is widely used to measure obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) severity across four broad symptom dimensions (i.e., contamination, responsibility for harm, unacceptable thoughts, symmetry). Despite its proven utility, there is reason to suspect that the unacceptable thoughts subscale conflates different types of unacceptable thoughts that are meaningfully distinct from one another. In the current study, we first evaluated the psychometric properties of a newly developed DOCS violent and/or aggressive thoughts subscale. We then examined the factor structure, psychometric properties, and diagnostic sensitivity of a seven-factor version of the DOCS that includes the four original DOCS subscales and three more-specific versions of the unacceptable thoughts scale (i.e., sexually intrusive thoughts, violent and/or aggressive thoughts, and scrupulous or religious thoughts). The sample included 329 residential and intensive outpatients, the majority of which had a diagnosis of OCD (75.2%). The new unacceptable thoughts subscales demonstrated convergent and discriminant validity with unique associations between the subscales and depression, suicide, and perceived threat from emotions that were not present in the broader unacceptable thoughts subscale. The seven-factor version of the DOCS demonstrated slightly lower levels of diagnostic sensitivity than the original DOCS. Thus, the four-factor version of the DOCS is recommended for screening purposes. A score of 40 or higher on the seven-factor version of the DOCS best predicted a diagnosis of OCD. Overall, the three additional unacceptable thoughts subscales appear to be distinct factors that have potential value in research and clinical settings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    现有文献研究强迫症(OCD)患者抑郁症的相关性,其特征是结果不一致。本研究的目的是通过探索各种临床和人口统计学因素是否与OCD患者(M年龄=33.00;SD=12.47;74%女性)的大样本(N=243)中抑郁症的发生有关来复制和扩展文献。患有共病抑郁症状[患者健康问卷-9项(PHQ-9)≥10]的强迫症患者在所有强迫症症状亚型上得分均显着较高(p范围<.001-.048),具有更大的强迫性和强迫性严重性(ps<.001),完美主义得分较高(p<.001),与没有共病抑郁症状(PHQ-9<10)的个体相比,厌恶敏感性和倾向评分(ps<.001)更高。在这些变量中,痴迷严重程度(β=0.22,p=0.004),发现强迫症污染亚型(β=0.16,p=0.032)和完美主义(β=0.25,p<.001)与PHQ-9的抑郁症状有关。这项研究的发现有助于理解与强迫症患者抑郁症合并症相关的因素。
    The existing literature examining the correlates of depression in individuals with obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) is characterized by inconsistent results. The aim of the current study was to replicate and extend the literature by exploring whether various clinical and demographic factors are related to the occurrence of depression in a large sample (N = 243) of individuals with OCD (M age = 33.00; SD = 12.47; 74% female). Individuals with OCD who had elevated comorbid depressive symptoms [Patient Health Questionnaire-9 item (PHQ-9) ≥10] scored significantly higher on all OCD symptom subtypes (p range < .001-.048), had greater obsessive and compulsive severity (ps < .001), scored higher on perfectionism (p < .001), and had higher disgust sensitivity and propensity scores (ps < .001) compared with individuals who did not have comorbid depressive symptoms (PHQ-9 < 10). Of these variables, obsession severity (β = 0.22, p = .004), OCD contamination subtype (β = 0.16, p = .032) and perfectionism (β = 0.25, p < .001) were found to be associated with depressive symptoms on the PHQ-9. The findings of this study contribute to the understanding of factors which are associated with depression comorbidity in individuals with OCD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:强迫症(OCD)是一种非常普遍的神经精神障碍。最近,研究促炎细胞因子与强迫症发病机制之间的关系越来越受到关注.然而,针对强迫症患者白细胞介素-1β(IL-1β)和白细胞介素-6(IL-6)的研究有限.因此,本研究旨在探讨促炎细胞因子IL-1β和IL-6在OCD病理生理和发生发展中的潜在作用。
    方法:这项研究招募了58名强迫症患者和30名年龄性别匹配的健康对照(HCs)。一名合格的精神科医生根据《精神健康疾病诊断和统计手册》诊断了强迫症患者并评估了HCs,第5版(DSM-5)标准。我们使用耶鲁-布朗强迫症量表(Y-BOCS)测量了强迫症的严重程度。按照适当的方法使用ELISA试剂盒测量血清IL-1β和IL-6水平。
    结果:结果显示,与HCs相比,OCD患者的血清IL-1β水平显着升高(23.68±1.65pg/mlvs.15.75±1.02pg/ml;p=0.002)。同样,强迫症患者的血清IL-6水平明显高于HCs(44.97±0.73pg/mlvs.37.04±0.35pg/ml;p<0.001)。我们观察到两种细胞因子与强迫症患者的Y-BOCS评分呈正相关(IL-1β:r=0.380,p=0.015;IL-6:r=0.324,p=0.026),这表明它们在疾病病理生理中的作用。
    结论:这些结果表明,血清IL-1β和IL-6水平可能与OCD的病理生理有关。此外,血液样本中的这些细胞因子水平可作为OCD发展的早期风险评估工具.我们建议在大量同质人群中进行进一步研究,以支持这些发现。
    BACKGROUND: Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a highly prevalent neuropsychiatric disorder. Recently, there has been a growing interest in investigating the association between pro-inflammatory cytokines and the pathogenesis of OCD. However, studies targeting interleukin-1β (IL-1β) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) in OCD are limited. Therefore, the present study aimed to explore the potential role of pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1β and IL-6 in the pathophysiology and development of OCD.
    METHODS: This study recruited 58 OCD patients and 30 age-sex-matched healthy controls (HCs). A qualified psychiatrist diagnosed OCD patients and assessed HCs based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Health Disorders, 5th edition (DSM-5) criteria. We measured the severity of OCD using the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS). Serum IL-1β and IL-6 levels were measured using ELISA kits following the appropriate methods.
    RESULTS: The results showed that serum IL-1β levels were significantly elevated in OCD patients compared to HCs (23.68±1.65 pg/ml vs. 15.75±1.02 pg/ml; p = 0.002). Similarly, OCD patients exhibited significantly higher serum IL-6 levels than HCs (44.97±0.73 pg/ml vs. 37.04±0.35 pg/ml; p<0.001). We observed both cytokines were positively correlated with the Y-BOCS scores in OCD patients (IL-1β: r = 0.380, p = 0.015; IL-6: r = 0.324, p = 0.026) which indicates their role in disease pathophysiology.
    CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that serum IL-1β and IL-6 levels may be associated with the pathophysiology of OCD. Also, these cytokines levels in blood samples can serve as early risk assessment tools for the development of OCD. We recommend further studies in a large and homogeneous population to support these findings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号