PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
BACKGROUND: Professionalism is fundamental to the existence of professions. In pharmacy, interest in this theme improved with events that examined the resocialization of pharmacists in care. With this, evaluating professionalism can help the operationalization of the theme and, consequently, the development of strategies for pharmacy consolidation before its challenges. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the professionalism of Brazilian pharmacists.
METHODS: To meet the objective, a cross-sectional study was conducted between March 2022 and August 2023. Data were collected using the Brazilian version of the \"Modification of Hall\'s Professionalism Scale for Use with Pharmacists\". The scale has 39 items grouped into the domains: autonomy, vocation, professional council, self-regulation, continuing education, and altruism. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and an ANOVA analysis of variance with post-hoc Hochberg or Games-Howell tests with Bootstrapping was conducted to verify differences between groups.
RESULTS: 600 pharmacists participated in this study. The majority (69%) was female and carried out their professional activities in community pharmacies (50%). Professionalism scores ranged between 14 and 29 points, with an average of 22.8 points. Pharmacists working in outpatient clinics had higher scores in most factors, namely, altruism, continuing education, professional council, vocation, and autonomy. This indicates that the inclination of pharmacists to occupy areas focused on care can be significant to assess professionalism.
CONCLUSIONS: The data obtained indicate that pharmacists working in outpatient clinics had higher professionalism scores compared to others. This corroborates the worldwide trend experienced by pharmacy in recent decades, which is the execution of increasingly patient-centered practice models.
METHODS: To meet the objective, a cross-sectional study was conducted between March 2022 and August 2023. Data were collected using the Brazilian version of the \"Modification of Hall\'s Professionalism Scale for Use with Pharmacists\". The scale has 39 items grouped into the domains: autonomy, vocation, professional council, self-regulation, continuing education, and altruism. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and an ANOVA analysis of variance with post-hoc Hochberg or Games-Howell tests with Bootstrapping was conducted to verify differences between groups.
RESULTS: 600 pharmacists participated in this study. The majority (69%) was female and carried out their professional activities in community pharmacies (50%). Professionalism scores ranged between 14 and 29 points, with an average of 22.8 points. Pharmacists working in outpatient clinics had higher scores in most factors, namely, altruism, continuing education, professional council, vocation, and autonomy. This indicates that the inclination of pharmacists to occupy areas focused on care can be significant to assess professionalism.
CONCLUSIONS: The data obtained indicate that pharmacists working in outpatient clinics had higher professionalism scores compared to others. This corroborates the worldwide trend experienced by pharmacy in recent decades, which is the execution of increasingly patient-centered practice models.
摘要：
背景：专业是职业存在的基础。在药房，通过检查药剂师在护理中的再社会化的事件，对这一主题的兴趣得到了提高。有了这个,评估专业精神可以帮助主题的可操作性，因此,在面临挑战之前制定药房整合战略。因此,这项研究旨在评估巴西药剂师的专业水平。
方法：为了实现目标，一项横断面研究于2022年3月至2023年8月进行.数据是使用巴西版本的“Hall专业人员使用量表的修改”收集的。该量表有39个项目分组到域中：自治，职业,专业理事会,自我调节,继续教育,和利他主义。使用描述性统计学分析数据，并使用事后Hochberg或带有Bootstrapping的Games-Howell检验进行方差分析，以验证组间差异。
结果：600名药剂师参与了这项研究。大多数（69％）是女性，并在社区药房开展专业活动（50％）。专业得分在14到29分之间，平均22.8分。在门诊诊所工作的药剂师在大多数因素上得分较高，即,利他主义,继续教育,专业理事会,职业,和自主性。这表明，药剂师倾向于占据专注于护理的领域对于评估专业水平具有重要意义。
结论：获得的数据表明，在门诊工作的药剂师比其他人有更高的专业得分。这证实了近几十年来药房经历的全球趋势，这是越来越以患者为中心的实践模式的执行。
方法：为了实现目标，一项横断面研究于2022年3月至2023年8月进行.数据是使用巴西版本的“Hall专业人员使用量表的修改”收集的。该量表有39个项目分组到域中：自治，职业,专业理事会,自我调节,继续教育,和利他主义。使用描述性统计学分析数据，并使用事后Hochberg或带有Bootstrapping的Games-Howell检验进行方差分析，以验证组间差异。
结果：600名药剂师参与了这项研究。大多数（69％）是女性，并在社区药房开展专业活动（50％）。专业得分在14到29分之间，平均22.8分。在门诊诊所工作的药剂师在大多数因素上得分较高，即,利他主义,继续教育,专业理事会,职业,和自主性。这表明，药剂师倾向于占据专注于护理的领域对于评估专业水平具有重要意义。
结论：获得的数据表明，在门诊工作的药剂师比其他人有更高的专业得分。这证实了近几十年来药房经历的全球趋势，这是越来越以患者为中心的实践模式的执行。
