Abstract：
Using visual spectrographic examination of vowel nasalization to diagnose the syllabic affiliation of phonologically ambisyllabic nasal consonants (e.g., gamma), Durvasula and Huang [(2017). Lang. Sci. 62, 17-36] argued that anticipatory vowel nasalization in these words patterns with word-medial codas. Using nasometry, the current study finds that anticipatory nasalization before monomorphemic and multimorphemic (scammer) ambisyllabic nasals differ from word-medial coda (gamble) and word-final nasals (scam), but not from other intervocalic nasals. Additionally, vowel nasalization is sensitive to the manner of the preceding phoneme. These findings demonstrate that quantifying anticipatory nasalization using nasometry differs from visual spectrographic criteria.
摘要：
使用视觉光谱学检查元音鼻化来诊断语音上的音节鼻音辅音的音节归属（例如，gamma),Durvasula和Huang[（2017）。朗Sci.62，17-36]认为，这些单词中的预期元音鼻音化与单词中间密码子形成了模式。使用鼻测量法，目前的研究发现，单形和多形前的预期鼻化（骗子）Ambisyllabic鼻不同于单词-medialcoda（赌博）和单词-final鼻（骗局），但不是来自其他发音的鼻部。此外,元音鼻化对前面音素的方式敏感。这些发现表明，使用鼻测量法量化预期鼻化与视觉光谱学标准不同。
