METHODS: A total of 108 college students with intellectual disabilities completed the modified questionnaire. Validity and reliability of the questionnaire was examined.
RESULTS: Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated a six-factor model had good model fit. Cronbach\'s alpha values showed acceptable reliability evidence of the instrument as a whole, although some alpha values in subdomains of the instrument were below acceptable values.
CONCLUSIONS: The modified questionnaire was found to have acceptable validity evidence. Further studies are needed with refinement of answer options and the addition of more questions to increase reliability.
方法:共有108名智力残疾大学生完成修改后的问卷。调查问卷的有效性和可靠性。
结果:验证性因素分析表明六因素模型具有良好的模型拟合。Cronbach的alpha值显示了整个仪器的可接受的可靠性证据,尽管仪器子域中的一些α值低于可接受值。
结论:发现修改后的问卷具有可接受的有效性证据。需要进一步研究,完善答案选项,并添加更多问题以提高可靠性。