METHODS: RD was coordinated by an interdisciplinary committee of clinical and non-clinical staff at KFH. Researchers were encouraged to disseminate their research across all disciplines. Abstracts were blind reviewed using a weighted rubric and ranked by overall score. Top researchers were also awarded and recognized for their work, and equity and inclusion was at the forefront of RD programming.
RESULTS: RD had over 100 attendees from KFH and other public, private, and academic institutions. Forty-seven abstracts were submitted from the call for abstracts, with the highest proportion studying cancer (17.02%) and sexual and reproductive health (10.64%). Thirty-seven researchers submitted abstracts, and most of the principal investigators were medical doctors (35.14%), allied health professionals (27.03%), and nurses and midwives (16.22%). Furthermore, 30% of principal investigators were female, with the highest proportion of them being nurses and midwives (36.36%).
CONCLUSIONS: RD is an effective way to disseminate research in a hospital setting. RD has the potential to strengthen the institution\'s research agenda, engage the community in ongoing projects, and provide content-area support to researchers. Equity and inclusion should be at the forefront of research dissemination, including gender equity, authorship representation, and the inclusion of interdisciplinary health professionals. Stakeholder engagement can also be utilized to strengthen institutional research collaboration for greater impact.
方法:RD由KFH的临床和非临床工作人员组成的跨学科委员会协调。鼓励研究人员将他们的研究传播到所有学科。使用加权标题对摘要进行盲目审查,并按总分进行排名。顶尖的研究人员也因他们的工作而获奖和认可,公平和包容是研发规划的最前沿。
结果:RD有来自KFH和其他公众的100多名与会者,私人,和学术机构。摘要征集中提交了47份摘要,研究癌症(17.02%)和性健康和生殖健康(10.64%)的比例最高。37名研究人员提交了摘要,大部分主要调查人员是医生(35.14%),专职医疗专业人员(27.03%),以及护士和助产士(16.22%)。此外,30%的主要调查人员是女性,其中护士和助产士比例最高(36.36%)。
结论:RD是在医院环境中传播研究的有效方法。RD有可能加强该机构的研究议程,让社区参与正在进行的项目,并为研究人员提供内容领域支持。公平和包容应该是研究传播的前沿,包括性别平等,作者代表,并纳入跨学科卫生专业人员。利益相关者的参与也可以用来加强机构研究合作,以产生更大的影响。