METHODS: In this pilot study, two physicians with expertise in diabetes care and rehabilitative treatment in Republic of Korea discussed and determined the 14 most asked questions on exercise for managing type 2 diabetes by patients in clinical practice. Each question was inputted into ChatGPT (V.4.0), and the answers from ChatGPT were assessed. The Likert scale was calculated for each category of validity (1-4), safety (1-4) and utility (1-4) based on position statements of the American Diabetes Association and American College of Sports Medicine.
RESULTS: Regarding validity, 4 of 14 ChatGPT (28.6%) responses were scored as 3, indicating accurate but incomplete information. The other 10 responses (71.4%) were scored as 4, indicating complete accuracy with complete information. Safety and utility scored 4 (no danger and completely useful) for all 14 ChatGPT responses.
CONCLUSIONS: ChatGPT can be used as supplementary educational material for diabetic exercise. However, users should be aware that ChatGPT may provide incomplete answers to some questions on exercise for type 2 diabetes.
方法:在这项试点研究中,韩国两位在糖尿病护理和康复治疗方面具有专业知识的医师讨论并确定了临床实践中患者管理2型糖尿病的14个最常见问题.每个问题都输入到ChatGPT(V.4.0)中,并对ChatGPT的答案进行了评估。李克特量表是为每个效度类别(1-4)计算的,安全性(1-4)和实用性(1-4)基于美国糖尿病协会和美国运动医学学院的立场声明。
结果:关于有效性,14个ChatGPT应答中有4个(28.6%)得分为3,表明信息准确但不完整。其他10个回答(71.4%)得分为4,表明具有完整信息的完全准确性。所有14种ChatGPT反应的安全性和实用性得分为4分(无危险且完全有用)。
结论:ChatGPT可作为糖尿病运动的补充教材。然而,用户应该意识到,ChatGPT可能对2型糖尿病运动的一些问题提供不完整的答案.