Artificial intelligence

人工智能
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:人工智能(AI)具有增强身体活动(PA)干预的潜力。然而,人为因素(HF)在将AI成功集成到移动健康(mHealth)解决方案中以促进PA的发展中发挥着关键作用。理解和优化个人与AI驱动的mHealth应用程序之间的交互对于实现预期结果至关重要。
    目的:本研究旨在回顾和描述AI驱动的数字解决方案中用于增加PA的HF的当前证据。
    方法:我们通过搜索包含与PA相关的术语的出版物进行了范围审查,HFs,和AI在3个数据库中的标题和摘要-PubMed,Embase,和IEEEXplore-和谷歌学者。如果这些研究是描述基于AI的解决方案旨在提高PA的主要研究,并报告了测试溶液的结果。不符合这些标准的研究被排除在外。此外,我们在收录的文章中检索了相关研究的参考文献。从纳入的研究中提取以下数据,并将其纳入定性综合:书目信息,研究特点,人口,干预,比较,结果,与AI相关的信息。纳入研究的证据的确定性采用GRADE(建议评估分级,发展,和评估)。
    结果:2015年至2023年共发表了15项研究,涉及899名年龄在19至84岁之间的参与者。60.7%(546/899)是女性参与者,包括在这次审查中。在纳入的研究中,干预持续了2到26周。推荐系统是PA数字解决方案中最常用的AI技术(10/15研究),其次是对话代理(4/15研究)。用户可接受性和满意度是最频繁评估的HF(每个研究有5/15),其次是可用性(4/15研究)。关于个性化和推荐的自动数据收集,大多数系统涉及健身追踪器(5/15研究)。证据分析的确定性表明AI驱动的数字技术在增加PA方面的有效性具有中等的确定性(例如,步数,远距离行走,或在PA上花费的时间)。此外,人工智能驱动的技术,特别是推荐系统,似乎对PA行为的变化产生积极影响,尽管证据的确定性很低。
    结论:当前的研究强调了AI驱动技术增强PA的潜力,但证据仍然有限。需要进行更长期的研究来评估人工智能驱动的技术对行为改变和习惯形成的持续影响。虽然AI驱动的PA数字解决方案具有重要的前景,进一步探索优化AI对PA的影响并有效整合AI和HF对于更广泛的利益至关重要。因此,对创新管理的影响涉及进行长期研究,优先考虑多样性,确保研究质量,专注于用户体验,并了解AI在PA推广中不断发展的作用。
    BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to enhance physical activity (PA) interventions. However, human factors (HFs) play a pivotal role in the successful integration of AI into mobile health (mHealth) solutions for promoting PA. Understanding and optimizing the interaction between individuals and AI-driven mHealth apps is essential for achieving the desired outcomes.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aims to review and describe the current evidence on the HFs in AI-driven digital solutions for increasing PA.
    METHODS: We conducted a scoping review by searching for publications containing terms related to PA, HFs, and AI in the titles and abstracts across 3 databases-PubMed, Embase, and IEEE Xplore-and Google Scholar. Studies were included if they were primary studies describing an AI-based solution aimed at increasing PA, and results from testing the solution were reported. Studies that did not meet these criteria were excluded. Additionally, we searched the references in the included articles for relevant research. The following data were extracted from included studies and incorporated into a qualitative synthesis: bibliographic information, study characteristics, population, intervention, comparison, outcomes, and AI-related information. The certainty of the evidence in the included studies was evaluated using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation).
    RESULTS: A total of 15 studies published between 2015 and 2023 involving 899 participants aged approximately between 19 and 84 years, 60.7% (546/899) of whom were female participants, were included in this review. The interventions lasted between 2 and 26 weeks in the included studies. Recommender systems were the most commonly used AI technology in digital solutions for PA (10/15 studies), followed by conversational agents (4/15 studies). User acceptability and satisfaction were the HFs most frequently evaluated (5/15 studies each), followed by usability (4/15 studies). Regarding automated data collection for personalization and recommendation, most systems involved fitness trackers (5/15 studies). The certainty of the evidence analysis indicates moderate certainty of the effectiveness of AI-driven digital technologies in increasing PA (eg, number of steps, distance walked, or time spent on PA). Furthermore, AI-driven technology, particularly recommender systems, seems to positively influence changes in PA behavior, although with very low certainty evidence.
    CONCLUSIONS: Current research highlights the potential of AI-driven technologies to enhance PA, though the evidence remains limited. Longer-term studies are necessary to assess the sustained impact of AI-driven technologies on behavior change and habit formation. While AI-driven digital solutions for PA hold significant promise, further exploration into optimizing AI\'s impact on PA and effectively integrating AI and HFs is crucial for broader benefits. Thus, the implications for innovation management involve conducting long-term studies, prioritizing diversity, ensuring research quality, focusing on user experience, and understanding the evolving role of AI in PA promotion.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:使用基于深度学习的AI算法评估图像质量对MRI上前列腺癌前列腺外延伸(EPE)检测的影响。
    方法:本回顾性研究,单机构研究纳入了2007年6月至2022年8月接受了mpMRI成像并随后接受根治性前列腺切除术的患者.一名泌尿生殖系统放射科医生使用NCIEPE分级系统对每位患者进行了前瞻性评估。每个T2WI被以前开发的AI算法分类为低质量或高质量。进行Fisher精确检验以比较低质量和高质量图像之间的EPE检测指标。进行单变量和多变量分析以评估图像质量对病理性EPE的预测价值。
    结果:共评估了773名连续患者(中位年龄61[IQR56-67]岁)。在根治性前列腺切除术中,23%(180/773)的患者在病理上有EPE,并且在mpMRI上有41%(131/318)的EPE阳性呼叫被证实患有EPE。AI算法将36%(280/773)的T2WI分类为低质量,将64%(493/773)分类为高质量。对于EPE等级≥1,高质量T2WI显着提高了EPE检测的特异性(72%[95%CI67-76%]与63%[95%CI56-69%],P=0.03),但没有显著影响敏感性(72%[95%CI62-80%]与75%[95%CI63-85%]),阳性预测值(44%[95%CI39-49%]与38%[95%CI32-43%]),或阴性预测值(89%[95%CI86-92%]与89%[95%CI85-93%])。灵敏度,特异性,PPV,EPE≥2级和≥3级的NPV未显示出归因于成像质量的显着差异。对于NCI1级EPE,高质量图像(OR3.05,95%CI1.54-5.86;P<0.001)显示与病理性EPE的相关性强于低质量图像(OR1.76,95%CI0.63-4.24;P=0.24)。
    结论:我们的研究成功地采用了基于深度学习的AI算法对前列腺MRI的图像质量进行分类,并证明了更好的T2WI质量与最终病理时更准确的EPE预测相关。
    OBJECTIVE: To assess impact of image quality on prostate cancer extraprostatic extension (EPE) detection on MRI using a deep learning-based AI algorithm.
    METHODS: This retrospective, single institution study included patients who were imaged with mpMRI and subsequently underwent radical prostatectomy from June 2007 to August 2022. One genitourinary radiologist prospectively evaluated each patient using the NCI EPE grading system. Each T2WI was classified as low- or high-quality by a previously developed AI algorithm. Fisher\'s exact tests were performed to compare EPE detection metrics between low- and high-quality images. Univariable and multivariable analyses were conducted to assess the predictive value of image quality for pathological EPE.
    RESULTS: A total of 773 consecutive patients (median age 61 [IQR 56-67] years) were evaluated. At radical prostatectomy, 23% (180/773) of patients had EPE at pathology, and 41% (131/318) of positive EPE calls on mpMRI were confirmed to have EPE. The AI algorithm classified 36% (280/773) of T2WIs as low-quality and 64% (493/773) as high-quality. For EPE grade ≥ 1, high-quality T2WI significantly improved specificity for EPE detection (72% [95% CI 67-76%] vs. 63% [95% CI 56-69%], P = 0.03), but did not significantly affect sensitivity (72% [95% CI 62-80%] vs. 75% [95% CI 63-85%]), positive predictive value (44% [95% CI 39-49%] vs. 38% [95% CI 32-43%]), or negative predictive value (89% [95% CI 86-92%] vs. 89% [95% CI 85-93%]). Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for EPE grades ≥ 2 and ≥ 3 did not show significant differences attributable to imaging quality. For NCI EPE grade 1, high-quality images (OR 3.05, 95% CI 1.54-5.86; P < 0.001) demonstrated a stronger association with pathologic EPE than low-quality images (OR 1.76, 95% CI 0.63-4.24; P = 0.24).
    CONCLUSIONS: Our study successfully employed a deep learning-based AI algorithm to classify image quality of prostate MRI and demonstrated that better quality T2WI was associated with more accurate prediction of EPE at final pathology.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术(LPD)是最具挑战性的手术之一,并且具有很长的学习曲线。术中视频中的人工智能(AI)自动手术阶段识别在手术教育中具有许多潜在的应用,帮助缩短学习曲线,但是没有研究在LPD中取得突破。在这里,我们旨在建立AI模型来识别LPD的手术阶段,并探索AI模型的性能特征。
    方法:在一个手术团队的69个LPD视频中,我们在构建组中使用42个视频来建立模型,在分析组中使用其余27个视频来评估模型的性能特征.我们注释了LPD的13个手术阶段,包括4个关键阶段和9个必要阶段。两名微创胰腺外科医生注释了所有视频。我们为关键阶段和必要的阶段识别建立了两个AI模型,基于卷积神经网络。AI模型的整体性能主要由平均精度(mAP)决定。
    结果:在关键阶段和必要阶段,建筑组测试集中的AI模型的整体分辨率分别为89.7%和84.7%。分别。在27视频分析小组中,总体MAP分别为86.8%和71.2%,最大MAP为98.1%和93.9%。我们发现了模型识别的错误和外科医生注释的差异之间的共性,在解剖变异或病变累及邻近器官的情况下,AI模型表现不佳。
    结论:在LPD中可以实现AI自动手术阶段识别,在选择性案例中表现突出。这一突破可能是在更复杂的手术中迈向基于AI和视频的手术教育的第一步。
    BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy (LPD) is one of the most challenging operations and has a long learning curve. Artificial intelligence (AI) automated surgical phase recognition in intraoperative videos has many potential applications in surgical education, helping shorten the learning curve, but no study has made this breakthrough in LPD. Herein, we aimed to build AI models to recognize the surgical phase in LPD and explore the performance characteristics of AI models.
    METHODS: Among 69 LPD videos from a single surgical team, we used 42 in the building group to establish the models and used the remaining 27 videos in the analysis group to assess the models\' performance characteristics. We annotated 13 surgical phases of LPD, including 4 key phases and 9 necessary phases. Two minimal invasive pancreatic surgeons annotated all the videos. We built two AI models for the key phase and necessary phase recognition, based on convolutional neural networks. The overall performance of the AI models was determined mainly by mean average precision (mAP).
    RESULTS: Overall mAPs of the AI models in the test set of the building group were 89.7% and 84.7% for key phases and necessary phases, respectively. In the 27-video analysis group, overall mAPs were 86.8% and 71.2%, with maximum mAPs of 98.1% and 93.9%. We found commonalities between the error of model recognition and the differences of surgeon annotation, and the AI model exhibited bad performance in cases with anatomic variation or lesion involvement with adjacent organs.
    CONCLUSIONS: AI automated surgical phase recognition can be achieved in LPD, with outstanding performance in selective cases. This breakthrough may be the first step toward AI- and video-based surgical education in more complex surgeries.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    大型语言模型(LLM)支持的服务由于在许多任务中的出色性能而在各种应用程序中越来越受欢迎,如情绪分析和回答问题。最近,研究一直在探索它们在数字健康环境中的潜在用途,特别是在心理健康领域。然而,实施LLM增强的会话人工智能(CAI)提出了重要的道德,技术,和临床挑战。在这篇观点论文中,我们讨论了2个挑战,这些挑战会影响LLM增强的CAI对于有心理健康问题的个人的使用,专注于抑郁症患者的用例:将LLM增强的CAI人性化的趋势以及他们缺乏情境化的鲁棒性。我们的方法是跨学科的,依靠哲学的考虑,心理学,和计算机科学。我们认为,LLM增强的CAI的人性化取决于对使用LLM模拟“类似人类”特征的含义的反映,以及这些系统在与人类的互动中应该扮演什么角色。Further,确保LLM稳健性的情境化需要考虑抑郁症患者语言产生的特殊性,以及它随时间的演变。最后,我们提供了一系列建议,以促进负责任的设计和部署LLM增强的CAI,为抑郁症患者提供治疗支持.
    UNASSIGNED: Large language model (LLM)-powered services are gaining popularity in various applications due to their exceptional performance in many tasks, such as sentiment analysis and answering questions. Recently, research has been exploring their potential use in digital health contexts, particularly in the mental health domain. However, implementing LLM-enhanced conversational artificial intelligence (CAI) presents significant ethical, technical, and clinical challenges. In this viewpoint paper, we discuss 2 challenges that affect the use of LLM-enhanced CAI for individuals with mental health issues, focusing on the use case of patients with depression: the tendency to humanize LLM-enhanced CAI and their lack of contextualized robustness. Our approach is interdisciplinary, relying on considerations from philosophy, psychology, and computer science. We argue that the humanization of LLM-enhanced CAI hinges on the reflection of what it means to simulate \"human-like\" features with LLMs and what role these systems should play in interactions with humans. Further, ensuring the contextualization of the robustness of LLMs requires considering the specificities of language production in individuals with depression, as well as its evolution over time. Finally, we provide a series of recommendations to foster the responsible design and deployment of LLM-enhanced CAI for the therapeutic support of individuals with depression.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:由于数据可用性的提高和计算能力的提高,人工智能(AI)正在成为我们生活中的重要组成部分。最近推出的AI模式之一,ChatGPT,在世界范围内被广泛用于不同类型的任务。在医学方面,它的用途正在探索临床查询,学术界,研究帮助,等。Further,文献表明,父母使用不同的互联网资源寻求有关孩子健康的信息,并且肯定会转向ChatGPT,因为这个聊天机器人模型很容易使用,生成“一个”响应,并且无需任何订阅即可使用。ChatGPT使用文本提示并在预先出版的文献上应用不同的算法来生成响应,但仍处于幼稚状态;因此,必须验证生成的响应。因此,我们计划这项研究来确定清晰度,正确性,以及有关儿童口腔健康的一些常见问题(FAQ)的完整性,从母亲的角度来看。
    方法:研究设计是一个基于小插图的调查,包括一组23个问题,ChatGPT从一个假想的父母的角度接受了采访。ChatGPT回复的答案被逐字复制,”并设计了Google调查表。调查表经过验证,然后发送给15名儿科牙医,和答复主要是收集在李克特的规模,并提供了一个开放式的问题,旨在确定“什么他们会增加”这个产生的响应作为一个专家在领域专家。
    结果:对Likert量表的回答进行了浓缩,≥4的值被认为“足够且可接受”,而≤3的分数被认为“不足”。参考现有文献,对开放式问题中不同答复者提到的答复和评论进行了批评。
    结论:总体而言,答案被发现是完整的、合乎逻辑的,而且语言清晰,在很少的答案中只报告了一些不足之处。
    BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming an important part of our lives owing to increased data availability and improved power of computing. One of the recently launched modalities of AI, ChatGPT, is being enormously used worldwide for different types of tasks. In medical context, its use is being explored for clinical queries, academia, research help, etc. Further, literature suggests that parents seek information about health of their children using different Internet resources and would surely turn toward ChatGPT for the same, as this chatbot model is easy to use, generates \"one\" response, and is available without any subscription. ChatGPT generates a response using text cues and applying different algorithms on prepublished literature but is still in its naïve state; hence, it is imperative to validate the generated responses. Accordingly, we planned this study to determine the clarity, correctness, and completeness of some Frequently asked questions (FAQs) about child\'s oral health, from a mother\'s perspective.
    METHODS: The study design was a vignette-based survey and included a set of 23 questions, for which ChatGPT was interviewed from the perspective of an imaginary parent. The answers responded by ChatGPT were copied \"verbatim,\" and a Google survey form was designed. The survey form was validated and then sent to 15 pediatric dentists, and the responses were mainly collected on the Likert\'s scale with a provision of one open-ended question aiming to determine \"what they would have added\" to this generated response as an expert in the field.
    RESULTS: The responses on Likert\'s scale were condensed and values ≥4 were considered \'adequate and acceptable\' while scores ≤3, were considered \'inadequate\'. The generated responses and comments mentioned by different respondents in the open-ended question were critiqued in reference to the existing literature.
    CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the responses were found to be complete and logical and in clear language, with only some inadequacies being reported in few of the answers.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    对演变或共存的特发性(IIH)和自发性颅内低血压(SIH)的漏诊通常是Chiari畸形(CM)大孔减压后症状持续或恶化的原因。我们首次在文献中探讨了人工智能(AI)/卷积神经网络(CNN)在ChiariI畸形中的联合作用,探索上游和下游磁共振发现作为CM-1的初始筛查剖面。我们还对CM的所有现有亚型进行了综述,并讨论了直立(重力辅助)磁共振成像(MRI)在评估平躺MRI上模棱两可的扁桃体下降中的作用。我们使用上游和下游分析器制定了工作流算法MaChiP1.0(ManjilaChiariProtocol1.0),导致ChiariI畸形从头或恶化,我们计划使用AI实现。
    PRISMA指南用于PubMed数据库文章中的“CM和机器学习和CNN”,遇到了四篇针对该主题的文章。IIH和SIH的放射学标准来自神经外科文献,它们适用于原发性和继发性(获得性)ChiariI畸形。使用现有的文献来表征上游病因,例如IIH或SIH,以及脊柱中孤立的下游病因。我们建议对IIH和SIH分别使用四个选定的标准,大脑和脊柱的MRIT2图像,大脑上游病因中主要是矢状序列,脊柱病变中主要是多平面MRI。
    使用MaChiP1.0(专利/版权未决)概念,我们已经提出了与渐进性ChiariI畸形有关的上游和下游剖面。上游分析器包括大脑下垂的发现,第三心室底的斜率,桥脑间角,mamillopontinedistance,侧脑室角,大脑内静脉-Galen角静脉,和iter的位移,clivus长度,扁桃体下降,等。,暗示SIH。在上游病理中注意到的IIH特征是眼球后部变平,部分空的西拉,视神经鞘变形,和MRI中的视神经弯曲。下游病因涉及硬膜撕裂引起的脊髓脑脊液(CSF)渗漏,脑膜憩室,脑脊液静脉瘘,等。
    人工智能将有助于提供上游和下游病因谱的预测性分析,确保治疗继发性(获得性)ChiariI畸形的安全性和有效性,尤其是与IIH和SIH共存。MaChiP1.0算法可以帮助记录先前诊断的CM-1的恶化,并找到继发性CM-I的确切病因。然而,后颅窝形态测量和cine-flowMRI数据对颅内CSF血流动力学的作用,随着先进的脊髓CSF研究使用动态脊髓CT扫描在继发性CM-I的形成仍在评估中。
    UNASSIGNED: Missed diagnosis of evolving or coexisting idiopathic (IIH) and spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH) is often the reason for persistent or worsening symptoms after foramen magnum decompression for Chiari malformation (CM) I. We explore the role of artificial intelligence (AI)/convolutional neural networks (CNN) in Chiari I malformation in a combinatorial role for the first time in literature, exploring both upstream and downstream magnetic resonance findings as initial screening profilers in CM-1. We have also put together a review of all existing subtypes of CM and discuss the role of upright (gravity-aided) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in evaluating equivocal tonsillar descent on a lying-down MRI. We have formulated a workflow algorithm MaChiP 1.0 (Manjila Chiari Protocol 1.0) using upstream and downstream profilers, that cause de novo or worsening Chiari I malformation, which we plan to implement using AI.
    UNASSIGNED: The PRISMA guidelines were used for \"CM and machine learning and CNN\" on PubMed database articles, and four articles specific to the topic were encountered. The radiologic criteria for IIH and SIH were applied from neurosurgical literature, and they were applied between primary and secondary (acquired) Chiari I malformations. An upstream etiology such as IIH or SIH and an isolated downstream etiology in the spine were characterized using the existing body of literature. We propose the utility of using four selected criteria for IIH and SIH each, over MRI T2 images of the brain and spine, predominantly sagittal sequences in upstream etiology in the brain and multiplanar MRI in spinal lesions.
    UNASSIGNED: Using MaChiP 1.0 (patent/ copyright pending) concepts, we have proposed the upstream and downstream profilers implicated in progressive Chiari I malformation. The upstream profilers included findings of brain sagging, slope of the third ventricular floor, pontomesencephalic angle, mamillopontine distance, lateral ventricular angle, internal cerebral vein-vein of Galen angle, and displacement of iter, clivus length, tonsillar descent, etc., suggestive of SIH. The IIH features noted in upstream pathologies were posterior flattening of globe of the eye, partial empty sella, optic nerve sheath distortion, and optic nerve tortuosity in MRI. The downstream etiologies involved spinal cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak from dural tear, meningeal diverticula, CSF-venous fistulae, etc.
    UNASSIGNED: AI would help offer predictive analysis along the spectrum of upstream and downstream etiologies, ensuring safety and efficacy in treating secondary (acquired) Chiari I malformation, especially with coexisting IIH and SIH. The MaChiP 1.0 algorithm can help document worsening of a previously diagnosed CM-1 and find the exact etiology of a secondary CM-I. However, the role of posterior fossa morphometry and cine-flow MRI data for intracranial CSF flow dynamics, along with advanced spinal CSF studies using dynamic myelo-CT scanning in the formation of secondary CM-I is still being evaluated.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究的目的是评估生成预训练变压器-4(GPT-4)生成的放电指令在预设阅读水平下的完整性和可读性,以用于常见的儿科急诊室投诉。
    按阅读水平(五年级或八年级)和语言(英语,西班牙语)使用GPT-4产生五倍。具体来说,制作并分析了120份出院说明(6种情况:60份英文,西班牙语60;五年级阅读水平60,八年级阅读水平为60),并比较了完整性和可读性(在语言之间,在阅读水平之间,并按小组和阅读水平分层)。完整性定义为出院说明中包含的文献衍生关键点的比例。可读性使用Flesch-Kincaid(英语)和Fernandez-Huerta(西班牙语)可读性评分进行量化。
    英语GPT生成的放电指令包含的必须包括放电指令的比例明显高于西班牙语(英语:平均值(平均值的标准误差)=62%(3%),西班牙语:53%(3%),P=.02)。在五年级和八年级的条件下,英语和西班牙语输出的完整性没有显着差异。不同语言的可读性没有差异。
    GPT-4在调节文档阅读水平的同时,用英语和西班牙语制作了可读的放电说明。英语的放电指令往往比西班牙语的指令具有更高的完整性。
    在快速工程和GPT-4性能方面的未来研究,一般和多种语言,需要通过语言和阅读水平来减少健康差异的可能性。
    UNASSIGNED: The aim of this study was to assess the completeness and readability of generative pre-trained transformer-4 (GPT-4)-generated discharge instructions at prespecified reading levels for common pediatric emergency room complaints.
    UNASSIGNED: The outputs for 6 discharge scenarios stratified by reading level (fifth or eighth grade) and language (English, Spanish) were generated fivefold using GPT-4. Specifically, 120 discharge instructions were produced and analyzed (6 scenarios: 60 in English, 60 in Spanish; 60 at a fifth-grade reading level, 60 at an eighth-grade reading level) and compared for completeness and readability (between language, between reading level, and stratified by group and reading level). Completeness was defined as the proportion of literature-derived key points included in discharge instructions. Readability was quantified using Flesch-Kincaid (English) and Fernandez-Huerta (Spanish) readability scores.
    UNASSIGNED: English-language GPT-generated discharge instructions contained a significantly higher proportion of must-include discharge instructions than those in Spanish (English: mean (standard error of the mean) = 62% (3%), Spanish: 53% (3%), P = .02). In the fifth-grade and eighth-grade level conditions, there was no significant difference between English and Spanish outputs in completeness. Readability did not differ across languages.
    UNASSIGNED: GPT-4 produced readable discharge instructions in English and Spanish while modulating document reading level. Discharge instructions in English tended to have higher completeness than those in Spanish.
    UNASSIGNED: Future research in prompt engineering and GPT-4 performance, both generally and in multiple languages, is needed to reduce potential for health disparities by language and reading level.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    呼吸期间胸腹器官(诸如肺)的动态特性的定量分析可以导致针对诸如胸廓功能不全综合征(TIS)的病症的更准确的手术计划。该分析可以从上述器官在胸腹部身体区域的扫描中的半自动描绘来完成。动态磁共振成像(dMRI)是这种应用的实用和首选成像模式,尽管自动分割这些图像中的器官是非常具有挑战性的。在本文中,我们描述了一个自动分割系统,该系统基于来自95名健康受试者的dMRI采集数据构建和评估.对于三种识别方法,该系统实现了肺的约1体素的最佳平均位置误差(LE)。LE的标准偏差(SD)约为1-2个体素。对于划定方法,肺的平均骰子系数(DC)约为0.95。对于肺,DC的标准偏差约为0.01至0.02。该系统似乎能够应对低分辨率带来的挑战,运动模糊,对比度不足,和图像强度非标准相当好。我们正在测试其对TIS患者dMRI数据和包括肝脏在内的其他胸腹器官的有效性,肾脏,还有脾脏.
    Quantitative analysis of the dynamic properties of thoraco-abdominal organs such as lungs during respiration could lead to more accurate surgical planning for disorders such as Thoracic Insufficiency Syndrome (TIS). This analysis can be done from semi-automatic delineations of the aforesaid organs in scans of the thoraco-abdominal body region. Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) is a practical and preferred imaging modality for this application, although automatic segmentation of the organs in these images is very challenging. In this paper, we describe an auto-segmentation system we built and evaluated based on dMRI acquisitions from 95 healthy subjects. For the three recognition approaches, the system achieves a best average location error (LE) of about 1 voxel for the lungs. The standard deviation (SD) of LE is about 1-2 voxels. For the delineation approach, the average Dice coefficient (DC) is about 0.95 for the lungs. The standard deviation of DC is about 0.01 to 0.02 for the lungs. The system seems to be able to cope with the challenges posed by low resolution, motion blur, inadequate contrast, and image intensity non-standardness quite well. We are in the process of testing its effectiveness on TIS patient dMRI data and on other thoraco-abdominal organs including liver, kidneys, and spleen.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号