PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
BACKGROUND: Advancements in technology have enhanced education, training, and application in health care. However, limitations are present surrounding the accessibility and use of simulation technology (eg, simulators) for health profession education. Improving the accessibility of technology developed in university-based research centers by nonprofit organizations (NPOs; eg, hospitals) has the potential to benefit the health of populations worldwide. One example of such technology is 3D-printed simulators.
OBJECTIVE: This scoping review aims to identify how the use of open-source databases for the distribution of simulator designs used for 3D printing can promote credible solutions for health care training while minimizing the risks of commercialization of designs for profit.
METHODS: This scoping review will follow the Arksey and O\'Malley methodological framework and the Joanna Briggs Institute guidance for scoping reviews. Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL, Web of Science, and PsycINFO will be searched with an applied time frame of 2012 to 2022. Additionally, gray literature will be searched along with reference list searching. Papers that explore the use of open-source databases in academic settings and the health care sector for the distribution of simulator designs will be included. A 2-step screening process will be administered to titles and abstracts, then full texts, to establish paper eligibility. Screening and data extraction of the papers will be completed by 2 reviewers (MS and SS) for quality assurance. The scoping review will report information on the facilitation of distributing 3D-printed simulator designs through open-source databases.
RESULTS: The results of this review will identify gaps in forming partnerships with NPOs and university-based research centers to share simulator designs. The scoping review will be initiated in December 2024.
CONCLUSIONS: The information collected will be relevant and useful for stakeholders such as health care providers, researchers, and NPOs for the purpose of overcoming the gaps in research regarding the use and distribution of simulation technology. The scoping review has not been conducted yet. Therefore, there are currently no findings to report on.
UNASSIGNED: PRR1-10.2196/53167.
OBJECTIVE: This scoping review aims to identify how the use of open-source databases for the distribution of simulator designs used for 3D printing can promote credible solutions for health care training while minimizing the risks of commercialization of designs for profit.
METHODS: This scoping review will follow the Arksey and O\'Malley methodological framework and the Joanna Briggs Institute guidance for scoping reviews. Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL, Web of Science, and PsycINFO will be searched with an applied time frame of 2012 to 2022. Additionally, gray literature will be searched along with reference list searching. Papers that explore the use of open-source databases in academic settings and the health care sector for the distribution of simulator designs will be included. A 2-step screening process will be administered to titles and abstracts, then full texts, to establish paper eligibility. Screening and data extraction of the papers will be completed by 2 reviewers (MS and SS) for quality assurance. The scoping review will report information on the facilitation of distributing 3D-printed simulator designs through open-source databases.
RESULTS: The results of this review will identify gaps in forming partnerships with NPOs and university-based research centers to share simulator designs. The scoping review will be initiated in December 2024.
CONCLUSIONS: The information collected will be relevant and useful for stakeholders such as health care providers, researchers, and NPOs for the purpose of overcoming the gaps in research regarding the use and distribution of simulation technology. The scoping review has not been conducted yet. Therefore, there are currently no findings to report on.
UNASSIGNED: PRR1-10.2196/53167.
摘要：
背景：技术的进步增强了教育，培训,以及在医疗保健中的应用。然而,围绕仿真技术的可访问性和使用存在限制(例如，模拟器)用于健康专业教育。提高非营利组织在大学研究中心开发的技术的可及性(非营利组织；例如，医院)有可能造福全球人口的健康。这种技术的一个例子是3D打印模拟器。
目的：本范围审查旨在确定使用开源数据库分发用于3D打印的模拟器设计如何促进可靠的医疗保健培训解决方案，同时最大程度地降低商业化的风险。
方法：此范围审查将遵循Arksey和O\'Malley方法框架以及JoannaBriggsInstitute关于范围审查的指导。OvidMEDLINE,CINAHL,WebofScience,和PsycINFO将以2012年至2022年的应用时间框架进行搜索。此外,灰色文献将与参考列表搜索一起搜索。将包括探索在学术环境和医疗保健部门中使用开源数据库来分发模拟器设计的论文。将对标题和摘要进行两步筛选，然后全文，建立纸质资格。论文的筛选和数据提取将由2名审稿人（MS和SS）完成，以确保质量。范围审查将报告有关通过开源数据库分发3D打印模拟器设计的便利信息。
结果：本次审查的结果将确定与非营利组织和基于大学的研究中心形成伙伴关系以共享模拟器设计的差距。范围审查将于2024年12月启动。
结论：所收集的信息将对医疗保健提供者等利益相关者具有相关性和有用性。研究人员,和非营利组织，以克服有关仿真技术的使用和分布的研究空白。范围审查尚未进行。因此,目前没有可报告的调查结果。
■PRR1-10.2196/53167。
目的：本范围审查旨在确定使用开源数据库分发用于3D打印的模拟器设计如何促进可靠的医疗保健培训解决方案，同时最大程度地降低商业化的风险。
方法：此范围审查将遵循Arksey和O\'Malley方法框架以及JoannaBriggsInstitute关于范围审查的指导。OvidMEDLINE,CINAHL,WebofScience,和PsycINFO将以2012年至2022年的应用时间框架进行搜索。此外,灰色文献将与参考列表搜索一起搜索。将包括探索在学术环境和医疗保健部门中使用开源数据库来分发模拟器设计的论文。将对标题和摘要进行两步筛选，然后全文，建立纸质资格。论文的筛选和数据提取将由2名审稿人（MS和SS）完成，以确保质量。范围审查将报告有关通过开源数据库分发3D打印模拟器设计的便利信息。
结果：本次审查的结果将确定与非营利组织和基于大学的研究中心形成伙伴关系以共享模拟器设计的差距。范围审查将于2024年12月启动。
结论：所收集的信息将对医疗保健提供者等利益相关者具有相关性和有用性。研究人员,和非营利组织，以克服有关仿真技术的使用和分布的研究空白。范围审查尚未进行。因此,目前没有可报告的调查结果。
■PRR1-10.2196/53167。
