PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
The advancement of the sports industry\'s development constitutes a critical concern shared by regional authorities and the scholarly community, reflecting its significant role in economic and social development. This study employs a Fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA) methodology to examine the 31 provincial-level administrative units in China. The objective is to elucidate the influence of technological, organizational, and environmental factors on the industry\'s development level, considering both a holistic national framework and dissected regional approaches (Eastern, Central, and Western China). This paper\'s contribution to the literature is structured around the following core findings: (1) The study establishes that a singular condition does not suffice as an essential prerequisite for achieving a heightened development state within the sports industry. (2) At the national level, there are three pathways to enhance the development level of the sports industry, specifically identified as \"network-human resources dominant pathway,\" \"technological innovation-human resources dominant pathway,\" and \"comprehensive synergistic pathway.\"(3) From a regional perspective, the Eastern region has two pathways for sports industry enhancement: \"network-economic pathway\" and \"comprehensive synergistic pathway.\" The Central region follows a \"technology pathway,\" while the Western region has three pathways: \"organization-environment pathway,\" \"network-organization-environment pathway,\" and \"organization pathway.\"(4) The synthesis of these findings underscores the multifactorial nature of sports industry development, suggesting a paradigm where diverse routes can lead to equivalent outcomes. This heterogeneity indicates that provinces or regions can tailor their development strategies to their unique situational contexts.
摘要：
体育产业发展的进步是地区当局和学术界共同关注的一个关键问题，体现了其在经济和社会发展中的重要作用。本研究采用模糊集定性比较分析（fsQCA）方法来检查中国31个省级行政单位。目的是阐明技术的影响，组织，和环境因素对行业发展水平的影响，考虑到整体的国家框架和解剖的区域方法(东方，中央,和中国西部）。本文对文献的贡献是围绕以下核心发现进行的：（1）研究表明，单一条件不足以作为实现体育产业内高度发展状态的基本前提。（2）在国家层面，提高体育产业发展水平有三条途径，具体标识为“网络-人力资源主导路径”，“技术创新-人力资源主导路径，“和”综合协同途径。“(3)从区域角度来看，东部地区体育产业提升有两条路径:“网络经济路径”和“综合协同路径”。中部地区遵循一条技术路线，而西部地区有三条路径:“组织-环境路径，\"\"网络-组织-环境途径,“和”组织途径。“（4）这些发现的综合强调了体育产业发展的多因素性质，提出了一个不同路线可以导致同等结果的范例。这种异质性表明，各省或地区可以根据其独特的情境环境调整其发展战略。
