Abstract：
Surgical residents routinely participate in open and laparoscopic groin hernia repairs. The increasing popularity of robot-assisted groin hernia repair could lead to an educational loss for residents. We aimed to explore the involvement of surgical specialists and surgical residents, i.e., non-specialists, in robot-assisted groin hernia repair. The scoping review was reported according to PRISMA-ScR guideline. A protocol was uploaded at Open Science Framework, and a systematic search was conducted in four databases: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Web of Science. Included studies had to report on robot-assisted groin hernia repairs. Data charting was conducted in duplicate. Of the 67 included studies, 85% of the studies described that the robot-assisted groin hernia repair was performed by a surgical specialist. The rest of the studies had no description of the primary operating surgeon. Only 13% of the included studies reported that a resident attended the robot-assisted groin hernia repair. Thus, robot-assisted groin hernia repair was mainly performed by surgical specialists, and robot-assisted groin hernia repair therefore seems to be underutilized to educate surgical residents.
摘要：
外科住院医师常规参加开放和腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术。机器人辅助腹股沟疝修补术的日益普及可能导致居民的教育损失。我们旨在探讨外科专家和外科住院医师的参与，即，非专业人士,机器人辅助腹股沟疝修补术。根据PRISMA-ScR指南报告范围审查。在开放科学框架上上传了一个协议，在四个数据库中进行了系统的搜索：PubMed，EMBASE,科克伦中部,和WebofScience。纳入的研究必须报告机器人辅助腹股沟疝修补术。数据图表一式两份。在纳入的67项研究中，85%的研究描述机器人辅助腹股沟疝修补术是由外科专家进行的。其余的研究没有对主要手术医生的描述。只有13％的研究报告说，居民参加了机器人辅助腹股沟疝修补术。因此，机器人辅助腹股沟疝修补术主要由外科专家完成，因此，机器人辅助的腹股沟疝修补术似乎未被充分利用来教育外科住院医师。
