Laparoscopy

腹腔镜检查
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:随着人口老龄化,越来越多的老年人前来做手术。与年龄相关的生理储备和功能能力下降会导致手术后的虚弱和不良结局。因此,优化老年患者的围手术期护理势在必行。增强术后恢复(ERAS)途径和微创手术(MIS)可能会影响手术结果,但目前对老年患者的使用和影响尚不清楚.这项研究的目的是为接受大型腹部手术的老年人的围手术期护理提供循证建议。
    方法:专家共识确定了与围手术期护理相关的关键术语和指标的工作定义。使用PubMed进行了系统的文献综述和荟萃分析,Embase,科克伦图书馆,以及Clinicaltrials.gov数据库,提供24个预先定义的康复主题领域的关键问题,MIS,和ERAS在腹部大手术中(结直肠,上消化道(UGI),疝,和肝胰胆管(HPB))以根据GRADE方法生成循证建议。
    结果:老年人被定义为65岁及以上。最初从搜索参数中检索了超过20,000篇文章。在172项研究的三个主题领域进行了证据综合,对MIS和ERAS主题进行荟萃分析。建议老年患者使用MIS和ERAS,尤其是在接受结直肠手术时。专家意见建议进行康复治疗,停止吸烟和饮酒,纠正所有结直肠贫血,UGI,疝,和老年人的HPB程序。所有建议都是有条件的,证据的确定性低至非常低,结直肠手术中的ERAS项目除外。
    结论:MIS和ERAS适用于接受腹部大手术的老年人,有证据支持在结直肠手术中使用。尽管专家意见支持康复,没有足够的证据支持使用。这项工作已经确定了进一步研究的证据空白,以优化接受大型腹部手术的老年人。
    BACKGROUND: As the population ages, more older adults are presenting for surgery. Age-related declines in physiological reserve and functional capacity can result in frailty and poor outcomes after surgery. Hence, optimizing perioperative care in older patients is imperative. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathways and Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS) may influence surgical outcomes, but current use and impact on older adults patients is unknown. The aim of this study was to provide evidence-based recommendations on perioperative care of older adults undergoing major abdominal surgery.
    METHODS: Expert consensus determined working definitions for key terms and metrics related to perioperative care. A systematic literature review and meta-analysis was performed using the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Clinicaltrials.gov databases for 24 pre-defined key questions in the topic areas of prehabilitation, MIS, and ERAS in major abdominal surgery (colorectal, upper gastrointestinal (UGI), Hernia, and hepatopancreatic biliary (HPB)) to generate evidence-based recommendations following the GRADE methodology.
    RESULTS: Older adults were defined as 65 years and older. Over 20,000 articles were initially retrieved from search parameters. Evidence synthesis was performed across the three topic areas from 172 studies, with meta-analyses conducted for MIS and ERAS topics. The use of MIS and ERAS was recommended for older adult patients particularly when undergoing colorectal surgery. Expert opinion recommended prehabilitation, cessation of smoking and alcohol, and correction of anemia in all colorectal, UGI, Hernia, and HPB procedures in older adults. All recommendations were conditional, with low to very low certainty of evidence, with the exception of ERAS program in colorectal surgery.
    CONCLUSIONS: MIS and ERAS are recommended in older adults undergoing major abdominal surgery, with evidence supporting use in colorectal surgery. Though expert opinion supported prehabilitation, there is insufficient evidence supporting use. This work has identified evidence gaps for further studies to optimize older adults undergoing major abdominal surgery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    半卧位(SRP)在麻醉出现期间减少术后低氧血症的功效尚不清楚,尽管其广泛使用。
    确定SRP和仰卧位患者术后低氧血症的差异。
    这项随机临床试验于2021年3月20日至2022年5月10日在中国一家三级医院进行。纳入计划在全身麻醉下进行腹腔镜上腹部手术的患者。研究招募和后续工作已完成。
    患者在手术结束时被随机分配到以下位置之一,直到离开麻醉后监护病房:仰卧位(S组),15°SRP(F组),或30°SRP(T组)。
    主要结果是麻醉后监护病房术后低氧血症的发生率。还评估了严重的低氧血症。
    700名患者(364名男性[52.0%];平均[SD]年龄,47.8[11.3]年),233人被随机分配到S组(126名男性[54.1%];平均[SD]年龄,48.2[10.9]年),233人F组(122名男性[52.4%];平均[SD]年龄,48.1[10.9]年),T组234人(118名女性[50.4%];平均[SD]年龄,47.2[12.1]年)。术后低氧血症在3组间差异显著(S组,233人中的109人[46.8%];F组,105/233[45.1%];T组,234人中有76人[32.5%];P=0.002)。T组与S组的差异具有统计学意义(风险比[RR],0.69[95%CI,0.55-0.87];P=0.002)和T组与F组(RR,0.72[95%CI,0.57-0.91];P=.007),但对于F组和S组(RR,0.96[95%CI,0.79-1.17];P=0.78)。严重低氧血症在3组间也有差异(S组,233人中的61人[26.2%];F组,233人中的53人[22.7%];T组,234人中的36人[15.4%];P=0.01)。T组与S组的差异有统计学意义(RR,0.59[95%CI,0.41-0.85];P=.005)。
    在这项腹腔镜上腹部手术患者麻醉恢复期间SRP的随机临床试验中,与F组和S组相比,T组术后低氧血症显著减少
    中国临床试验注册管理机构:ChiCTR2100045087.
    UNASSIGNED: The efficacy of a semirecumbent position (SRP) in reducing postoperative hypoxemia during anesthesia emergence is unclear despite its widespread use.
    UNASSIGNED: To determine the differences in postoperative hypoxemia between patients in an SRP and a supine position.
    UNASSIGNED: This randomized clinical trial was performed at a tertiary hospital in China between March 20, 2021, and May 10, 2022. Patients scheduled to undergo laparoscopic upper abdominal surgery under general anesthesia were enrolled. Study recruitment and follow-up are complete.
    UNASSIGNED: Patients were randomized to 1 of the following positions at the end of the operation until leaving the postanesthesia care unit: supine (group S), 15° SRP (group F), or 30° SRP (group T).
    UNASSIGNED: The primary outcome was the incidence of postoperative hypoxemia in the postanesthesia care unit. Severe hypoxemia was also evaluated.
    UNASSIGNED: Out of 700 patients (364 men [52.0%]; mean [SD] age, 47.8 [11.3] years), 233 were randomized to group S (126 men [54.1%]; mean [SD] age, 48.2 [10.9] years), 233 to group F (122 men [52.4%]; mean [SD] age, 48.1 [10.9] years), and 234 to group T (118 women [50.4%]; mean [SD] age, 47.2 [12.1] years). Postoperative hypoxemia differed significantly among the 3 groups (group S, 109 of 233 [46.8%]; group F, 105 of 233 [45.1%]; group T, 76 of 234 [32.5%]; P = .002). This difference was statistically significant for groups T vs S (risk ratio [RR], 0.69 [95% CI, 0.55-0.87]; P = .002) and groups T vs F (RR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.57-0.91]; P = .007), but not for groups F vs S (RR, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.79-1.17]; P = .78). Severe hypoxemia also differed among the 3 groups (group S, 61 of 233 [26.2%]; group F, 53 of 233 [22.7%]; group T, 36 of 234 [15.4%]; P = .01). This difference was statistically significant for groups T vs S (RR, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.41-0.85]; P = .005).
    UNASSIGNED: In this randomized clinical trial of SRP during anesthesia recovery in patients undergoing laparoscopic upper abdominal surgery, postoperative hypoxemia was significantly reduced in group T compared with group F or group S.
    UNASSIGNED: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry Identifier: ChiCTR2100045087.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    <b><br>简介:</b>胃内气球(IGB)插入被用作体重指数(BMI)≥50kg/m2的患者的桥接治疗。我们安排了一项回顾性研究,以评估术前IGB治疗是否影响腹腔镜袖状胃切除术(SG)后围手术期和术后体重减轻的结果,特别是评估IGB后过度体重减轻百分比(%EWL)对术后%EWL的影响。</br><b>br>材料和方法:</b>考虑到IGB术后的EWL%,将接受IGB放置后接受腹腔镜SG的患者分为以下几组:第1组<=10.38%;第2组>10.38%和<=17.27%;第3组收集SG数据后1年。组间比较以下参数:手术时间,总失血量,停留时间和体重,BMI,总重量损失百分比(%TWL),%EWL。</br><b><br>结果:后SG%EWL在中间组2和3中最高。观察到治疗后的结果:第4组的体重和BMI最低,第1组的体重和BMI最高。治疗后的EWL%在第4组中最高,在第1组中最低,并且在随后的组中逐渐增长。</br><b>br>讨论:研究表明,IGB治疗后的%EWL影响SG后的%EWL,最重要的是影响两阶段治疗后的最终%EWL,这可能是这些结果的预示因素。</br><b>br>重要性:这意味着IGB术后EWL%最大的患者更有可能术后体重减轻和总体体重减轻。</br>.
    <b><br>Introduction:</b> Intragastric balloon (IGB) insertion is used as a bridging therapy in patients with body mass index (BMI) ≥ 50 kg/m2 . We arranged a retrospective study to evaluate whether pre-operative IGB treatment influences perioperative and postoperative weight loss outcomes after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG), and especially to evaluate the impact of post - IGB percentage of excessive weight loss (%EWL) on postoperative %EWL.</br> <b><br>Materials and methods:</b> Patients who underwent IGB placement followed by laparoscopic SG were divided into the following groups considering %EWL after IGB: Group 1 <=10.38%; Group 2 >10.38% and <=17.27%; Group 3 >17.27% and <=24.86%; Group 4 >24.86%. 1 year after SG data were collected. The following parameters were compared between groups: operative time, total blood loss, length of stay and weight, BMI, percentage of total weight loss (%TWL), %EWL.</br> <b><br>Results:</b> There were no statistically significant differences between groups in perioperative results. Post-SG %EWL was the highest in intermediate groups: 2 and 3. Post-treatment results were observed: body weight and BMI were the lowest in Group 4 and the highest in Group 1. Post-treatment %EWL was the highest in Group 4, the lowest in Group 1 and grew gradually in subsequent groups.</br> <b><br>Discussion:</b> The study confirmed the impact of weight loss on IGB on postoperative results. The study showed that %EWL after the IGB treatment influences %EWL after SG and most of all affects definitive %EWL after two-stage treatment and it could be a foreshadowing factor of these outcomes.</br> <b><br>Importance:</b> The importance of research for the development of the field %EWL after IGB influences the final BMI and final weight, which means that patients with the greatest %EWL after IGB are more likely to have the greatest postoperative weight loss and overall weight loss.</br>.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    先天性心脏病(CHD)是最常见的先天性疾病,也是婴儿死亡的主要原因。尽管生存率提高了,冠心病患者经常因代谢需求增加而面临营养不良,喂养困难,和胃肠功能紊乱。冠心病患者的营养不良与不良的短期和长期临床结果有关。胃造口术(GT)经常用于长期肠内支持,腹腔镜GT(LGT)在无冠心病儿童中显示出优势。这项研究评估了改良的Georgeson经皮LGT技术及其在冠心病患儿围手术期的并发症。
    我们从2018年至2022年进行了一项分析性回顾性队列研究,包括24个月以下诊断为冠心病且接受LGT的患者。评估的主要结果是手术期间和术后前30天并发症的存在。使用Clavien-Dindo's(CD)分类法对并发症进行分级。社会人口统计学,临床,并收集了与程序相关的变量。使用STATA15进行双变量分析,p<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。
    78名患者符合资格(男性56.41%,中位年龄129.5天,重量:4.83公斤)。中位手术时间为35分钟。并发症发生率为24.36%。最常见的并发症是GT部位感染(10.26%),其次是渗漏(8.97%)和肉芽肿形成(6.41%)。转换为开放手术与术后并发症显着相关(p=0.002)。
    这种改良技术在冠心病患儿中耐受性良好,显示CD3A/3B级并发症发生率低,无4级或5级并发症。
    UNASSIGNED: Congenital Heart Disease (CHD) is the most common congenital disorder and a leading cause of infant mortality. Despite improved survival rates, patients with CHD often face malnutrition due to increased metabolic demands, feeding difficulties, and gastrointestinal dysfunction. Malnutrition in CHD is linked to poor short and long-term clinical outcomes. Gastrostomy (GT) is frequently used for long-term enteral support, and laparoscopic GT (LGT) has demonstrated advantages in children without CHD. This study evaluated a modified Georgeson\'s percutaneous LGT technique and its perioperative complications in children with CHD.
    UNASSIGNED: We performed an analytical retrospective cohort study from 2018 to 2022, including patients younger than 24 months with a diagnosis of CHD who underwent LGT. The primary outcome evaluated was the presence of complications during surgery and the first thirty postoperative days. Complications were graded using Clavien-Dindo\'s (CD) classification. Sociodemographic, clinical, and procedure-related variables were collected. A bivariate analysis was performed using STATA 15, and a p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
    UNASSIGNED: Seventy-eight patients were eligible (male 56.41%, Median age 129.5 days, weight: 4.83 kg). The median surgery time was 35 min. The complication rate was 24.36%. The most frequent complications were GT site infection (10.26%), followed by leakage (8.97%) and granuloma formation (6.41%). Conversion to open surgery was significantly associated with postoperative complications (p = 0.002).
    UNASSIGNED: This modified technique is well-tolerated in children with CHD, demonstrating a low rate of CD grade 3A/3B complications and no grade 4 or 5 complications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管在一些大型肝胆中心已经报道了用于肝门部胆管癌(HCCA)的机器人根治性切除术,胆肠重建(BER)仍然是阻碍手术成功的关键步骤。本研究旨在评估BER在HCCA机器人根治性切除术中的可行性和质量,并提出技术建议。方法对2016年1月至2023年7月在浙江省人民医院接受微创根治术的HCCA患者进行回顾性研究。1:2倾向得分匹配(PSM),广泛用于减少选择偏差,是为了评估结果,特别是与BER相关的数据,在机器人和腹腔镜手术之间。纳入46例HCCA患者;10例接受了机器人辅助切除,而其他人则接受了腹腔镜手术。以1:2的比例进行PSM后,将10和20名患者分配到机器人辅助组和腹腔镜组,分别。两组的基线特征总体上平衡良好。机器人组平均肝切除时间长于腹腔镜组(139.5±38.8vs108.1±35.8min,P=0.036)。然而,前者术中失血较少[200(50-500)vs310(100-850)ml],尽管没有统计学差异(P=0.109)。残余胆管数量分别为2.6±1.3和2.7±1.2(P=0.795),两组吻合口均为1.6±0.7(P=0.965)。误码率时间分别为38.4±13.6和59.1±25.5min(P=0.024),占总手术时间的9.9±2.8%和15.4±4.8%(P=0.001)。虽然腹腔镜组术后胆漏发生率(40%)高于机器人组(10%),两组间差异无统计学意义(P=0.204);拔管分别为6.7±4.4和12.1±11.7天(P=0.019);吻合口狭窄和结石发生率分别为10%和30%(P=0.372),0%和15%(P=0.532),分别。两组均未出现出血或胆漏相关死亡。HCCA的机器人根治性切除术可提供与常规腹腔镜手术相当的围手术期结果,并且在吻合时间和质量方面趋于有利。随着手术技术和经验的提高,我们对其未来的广泛应用持乐观态度。
    Although robotic radical resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA) has been reported in some large hepatobiliary centers, biliary-enteric reconstruction (BER) remains a critical step that hampers the operation\'s success. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and quality of BER in robotic radical resection of HCCA and propose technical recommendations. A retrospective study was conducted on patients with HCCA who underwent minimally invasive radical resection at Zhejiang Provincial People\'s Hospital between January 2016 and July 2023. A 1:2 propensity score matching (PSM), widely used to reduce selection bias, was performed to evaluate the outcomes, especially BER-related data, between the robotic and laparoscopic surgery. Forty-six patients with HCCA were enrolled; ten underwent robotic-assisted resection, while the others underwent laparoscopic surgery. After PSM at a ratio of 1:2, 10 and 20 patients were assigned to the robot-assisted and laparoscopic groups, respectively. The baseline characteristics of both groups were generally well-balanced. The average liver resection time was longer in the robotic group than in the laparoscopic group (139.5 ± 38.8 vs 108.1 ± 35.8 min, P = 0.036). However, the former had less intraoperative blood loss [200 (50-500) vs 310 (100-850) ml], despite no statistical difference (P = 0.109). The number of residual bile ducts was 2.6 ± 1.3 and 2.7 ± 1.2 (P = 0.795), and anastomoses were both 1.6 ± 0.7 in the two groups (P = 0.965). The time of BER was 38.4 ± 13.6 and 59.1 ± 25.5 min (P = 0.024), accounting for 9.9 ± 2.8% and 15.4 ± 4.8% of the total operation time (P = 0.001). Although postoperative bile leakage incidence in laparoscopic group (40%) was higher than that in robotic group (10%), there was no significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.204); 6.7 ± 4.4 and 12.1 ± 11.7 days were observed for tube drawing (P = 0.019); anastomosis stenosis and calculus rate was 10% and 30% (P = 0.372), 0% and 15% (P = 0.532), respectively. Neither group had hemorrhage- or bile leakage-related deaths. Robotic radical resection for HCCA may offer perioperative outcomes comparable to conventional laparoscopic procedures and tends to be advantageous in terms of anastomosis time and quality. We are optimistic about its wide application in the future with the improvement of surgical techniques and experience.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:在急诊医学的环境中,盆腔和下腹痛反复出现,卵巢扭转在多种病因中构成了巨大的诊断难题。鉴于急性护理环境中对CT的日益依赖,它总是假定首要为主要的成像模式。这项研究试图阐明手术证实的卵巢扭转患者遇到的CT影像学表现,并利用CT来区分坏死。
    方法:回顾性分析(1月,2015-4月,2019)利用医院档案对诊断为卵巢扭转的患者进行了检查,手术后。纳入标准包括在诊断后一周内接受CT检查的患者。包括中线方向的大量CT发现,子宫偏离,卵巢内血肿/肿块,和其他多个系统记录。
    结果:90例患者被诊断为卵巢扭转-53(59%)在诊断后一周内进行了CT检查,41例(77%)进行了IV对比CT,12例(23%)没有进行IV对比。平均年龄为43岁(范围19-77岁),每个卵巢的受累分布几乎相等。平均最大卵巢直径为11.7±6.3cm(4.2~34.8cm)。最常见的影像学特征包括椎弓根增厚(43/53,81%),中线卵巢(41/53,77%),输卵管增厚(31/49,63%),同侧子宫偏位(33/53,62%)。根据同期影像学报告,在25/53研究中诊断出扭转,敏感性为47%。
    结论:卵巢尺寸增大(>3.0cm),增厚的血管蒂或输卵管,卵巢中线配置伴同侧子宫偏位,在手术证实的卵巢扭转病例中,漩涡征的存在是主要的CT成像特征,作为放射科医生的关键诊断助手.合并盆腔游离液和卵巢内血肿表示坏死性改变,指示缺血严重程度和疾病进展。
    OBJECTIVE: In the milieu of emergency medicine, pelvic and lower abdominal pain present recurrently, with ovarian torsion posing a formidable diagnostic quandary amid multifarious etiologies. Given the burgeoning reliance on CT in acute care settings, it invariably assumes primacy as the principal imaging modality. This study endeavors to elucidate the CT imaging manifestations encountered by surgically confirmed ovarian torsion patients and utilizing CT to differentiate necrosis.
    METHODS: A retrospective analysis (January, 2015- April, 2019) utilizing hospital archives was conducted on patients diagnosed with ovarian torsion, post-surgery. Inclusion criteria encompassed patients who underwent CT examinations within one week of diagnosis. A large array of CT findings encompassing midline orientation, uterine deviation, intraovarian hematoma/mass, and multiple others were systematically documented.
    RESULTS: 90 patients were diagnosed with ovarian torsion- 53 (59%) had CT within one week of diagnosis, 41(77%) underwent a CT with IV contrast and 12 (23%) without IV contrast. Mean age was 43 years (range 19-77 years), with near equal distribution of involvement of each ovary. Mean maximum ovarian diameter was 11.7 ± 6.3 cm (4.2-34.8 cm). Most common imaging features include the presence of thickened pedicle (43/53, 81%), midline ovary (41/53, 77%), presence of thickened fallopian tube (31/49, 63%), and ipsilateral uterine deviation (33/53, 62%). Based on contemporaneous imaging report, torsion was diagnosed in 25/ 53 studies giving a sensitivity of 47%.
    CONCLUSIONS: Enlarged ovarian dimensions (> 3.0 cm), thickened vascular pedicle or fallopian tube, midline ovarian disposition with ipsilateral uterine deviation, and the presence of a whirlpool sign emerged as predominant CT imaging features in surgically confirmed ovarian torsion cases, serving as pivotal diagnostic aides for radiologists. Concomitant pelvic free fluid and intraovarian hematoma signify necrotic changes, indicative of ischemic severity and disease progression.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:与腹腔镜直肠癌手术相比,机器人手术的实用性已有报道;然而,关于机器人腹会阴切除术(APR)的报道很少。这项研究的目的是比较机器人和腹腔镜手术的结果,以确定它们在接受术前放化疗(CRT)的局部晚期直肠癌患者中的有效性。
    方法:这项回顾性研究纳入了在2012年12月至2022年9月期间接受了术前CRT和机器人(22例)或腹腔镜APR(21例)的43例局部晚期直肠癌患者。我们检查了机器人组和腹腔镜组的短期和长期结果。
    结果:机器人组和腹腔镜组的中位随访时间分别为36和48个月,分别。手术时间无显著差异,术中失血,或观察总体并发症发生率。然而,机器人手术组的器官/空间手术部位感染(SSI)的发生率明显低于腹腔镜组(9.1%vs.38.1%,p=0.034),机器人手术组的3年总生存率显着高于腹腔镜组(95%vs.67%,p=0.029)。
    结论:机器人APR与器官/空间SSIs的发生率明显低于腹腔镜手术,表明机器人方法的有用性。
    OBJECTIVE: The usefulness of robotic surgery compared to laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer has been reported; however, few reports exist on robotic abdominoperineal resection (APR). The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic surgery to determine their usefulness in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who had undergone preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT).
    METHODS: This retrospective study included 43 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who underwent preoperative CRT and robotic (22 patients) or laparoscopic APR (21 patients) between December 2012 and September 2022. We examined the short- and long-term outcomes in the robotic and laparoscopic groups.
    RESULTS: The median follow-up durations were 36 and 48 months for the robotic and laparoscopic groups, respectively. No significant differences in operative time, intraoperative blood loss, or overall complication rates were observed. However, the incidence of organ/space surgical site infection (SSI) was significantly lower in the robotic surgery group than in the laparoscopic group (9.1% vs. 38.1%, p=0.034) and the 3-year overall survival rate was significantly higher in the robotic surgery group than in the laparoscopic group (95% vs. 67%, p=0.029).
    CONCLUSIONS: Robotic APR was associated with a significantly lower rate of organ/space SSIs than the laparoscopic approach, indicating the usefulness of the robotic approach.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Published Erratum
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:机器人辅助手术是一种选择,进行结直肠手术的快速发展技术。此单中心分析的主要目的是比较选择性腹腔镜和机器人乙状结肠切除术治疗憩室疾病的手术创伤程度和费用。
    方法:从我们的前瞻性临床数据库中进行回顾性分析,以确定2016年1月至2020年12月在我们的三级转诊机构接受择期微创左侧结肠憩室切除术的所有年龄≥18岁的患者。
    结果:总计,83例(女31例,男52例)乙状结肠憩室炎患者行选择性微创乙状结肠切除术,其中42例接受了传统腹腔镜手术(LS)和41例机器人辅助手术(RS)。机器人辅助组(4,03mg/dL)术前和术后的平均C反应蛋白差异显着低于腹腔镜组(7.32mg/dL)(p=0.030)。同样,机器人的血红蛋白差异显著较低(p=0.039).LS组术后第一次排便发生在平均2.19天后,RS组的平均1.63天后(p=0.011)。总体费用的概述显示,机器人方法的每次手术和术后住院时间的总成本显着降低。6058€vs.6142€(p=0.014),不包括两个系统的购置和维护成本。
    结论:机器人结肠切除术治疗憩室病具有成本效益,与传统腹腔镜相比,术中创伤减少,术后C反应蛋白和血红蛋白漂移显著降低。
    OBJECTIVE: Robotic assisted surgery is an alternative, fast evolving technique for performing colorectal surgery. The primary aim of this single center analysis is to compare elective laparoscopic and robotic sigmoid colectomies for diverticular disease on the extent of operative trauma and the costs.
    METHODS: Retrospective analysis from our prospective clinical database to identify all consecutive patients aged ≥ 18 years who underwent elective minimally invasive left sided colectomy for diverticular disease from January 2016 until December 2020 at our tertiary referral institution.
    RESULTS: In total, 83 patients (31 female and 52 male) with sigmoid diverticulitis underwent elective minimally invasive sigmoid colectomy, of which 42 underwent conventional laparoscopic surgery (LS) and 41 robotic assisted surgery (RS). The mean C-reactive protein difference between the preoperative and postoperative value was significantly lower in the robotic assisted group (4,03 mg/dL) than in the laparoscopic group (7.32 mg/dL) (p = 0.030). Similarly, the robotic´s hemoglobin difference was significantly lower (p = 0.039). The first postoperative bowel movement in the LS group occurred after a mean of 2.19 days, later than after a mean of 1.63 days in the RS group (p = 0.011). An overview of overall charge revealed significantly lower total costs per operation and postoperative hospital stay for the robotic approach, 6058 € vs. 6142 € (p = 0,014) not including the acquisition and maintenance costs for both systems.
    CONCLUSIONS: Robotic colon resection for diverticular disease is cost-effective and delivers reduced intraoperative trauma with significantly lower postoperative C-reactive protein and hemoglobin drift compared to conventional laparoscopy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    我们报告了一例通过腹外缝合进行初次闭合修复的Morgagni疝。此外,我们回顾了腹腔镜修复的Morgagni疝病例,已知疝气缺损的大小,建立网格利用率的尺寸标准。一名87岁的妇女因右上腹部疼痛和呕吐来到我们医院。她没有腹部手术或外伤史。胸部X线摄影和计算机断层扫描(CT)显示Morgagni疝,胃和横结肠突出进入右胸腔。最初,由于她的年龄,对胃疝进行了内窥镜修复,这是成功的。然而,两天后她复发了,促使我们进行半紧急腹腔镜手术。腹腔镜检查显示有Morgagni缺陷,用网膜,横结肠,胃突出,胃因气腹而缩小。幸运的是,突出的器官可以很容易地重新定位到腹部,没有粘连。疝缺损测量为6x3厘米。我们用腹外缝合进行了初次闭合。未进行囊切除。手术持续98分钟。术后第1天开始口服,患者于术后第3天出院,无并发症。术后1个月胸部X线和CT扫描显示无复发,在9个月的随访检查中,患者仍无症状。根据我们的审查结果,原发性闭合是治疗小疝缺损的有效方法(经验法则:宽度,<4厘米;长度,<7厘米)。
    We report a case of a Morgagni hernia repaired by primary closure with an extra-abdominal suture. Moreover, we reviewed cases of laparoscopically repaired Morgagni hernia, in which the size of the hernia defect was known, to establish a size criterion for mesh utilization. An 87-year-old woman presented to our hospital with right upper abdominal pain and vomiting. She had no history of abdominal surgery or trauma. Chest radiography and computed tomography (CT) revealed a Morgagni hernia, with the stomach and transverse colon herniated into the right chest cavity. Initially, an endoscopic repair was performed for the herniated stomach due to her age, which was successful. However, she had a recurrence 2 days later, prompting us to perform a semi-emergent laparoscopic surgery. Laparoscopic examination revealed a Morgagni defect, with the omentum, transverse colon, and stomach herniated, with the stomach reduced by pneumoperitoneum. Fortunately, the herniated organs could be easily relocated into the abdomen with no adhesions. The hernia defect measured 6 x 3 cm. We performed primary closure with an extra-abdominal suture. No sac resection was performed. The operation lasted 98 min. Oral intake was initiated on postoperative day 1, and the patient was discharged on postoperative day 3 without complications. Chest radiography and CT scans at 1 month postoperatively showed no recurrence, and the patient remained asymptomatic at the 9-month follow-up examination. According to our review findings, primary closure is an efficient method for small hernia defects (rule of thumb: width, <4 cm; length, <7 cm).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号