Hernia, Inguinal

疝, 腹股沟
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:探讨单孔腹腔镜下行双改良疝穿刺针腹膜外闭合术(SLPEC组)和两孔腹腔镜下经皮腹膜外闭合术(TLPEC组)治疗小儿巨大腹股沟斜疝的疗效。我们对2019年1月至2021年12月在福建省儿童医院行腹腔镜疝囊高位结扎术的所有巨大腹股沟斜疝(内环口直径≥1.5cm)患儿进行了回顾性分析。我们从所有儿童的病历中收集数据,并分析了他们的临床特征以及与手术相关的和随访信息。总的来说,这项研究纳入了219例孤立性巨大腹股沟疝患者的队列,这些患者有完整的临床资料,并在我们中心接受了腹腔镜疝囊高位结扎术.在我们中心,对106例接受SLPEC的患者和113例接受TLPEC的患者成功进行了所有手术。患者年龄差异无统计学意义,性别,体重,SLPEC组与TLPEC组之间的随访时间或腹股沟疝侧(分别为P=0.123、0.613、0.121、0.076和0.081)。然而,出血量有显著差异,视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分,术后活动时间两组比较(P≤0.001)。TLPEC组手术时间明显长于SLPEC组(P=0.048),但两组间住院时间和住院费用无显著差异(P=0.244和0.073).SLPEC组2例,TLPEC组9例,切口瘢痕,两组间差异有统计学意义(P=0.04)。然而,同侧疝复发的发生率,手术部位感染,两组间缝合结反应和慢性腹股沟痛无显著差异(分别为P=0.332,0.301,0.332和0.599).SLPEC组仅有1名男童发生术后鞘膜积液,TLPEC组无男童发生术后鞘膜积液,两组间差异无统计学意义(P=0.310)。在这项研究中,没有睾丸萎缩或医源性睾丸上升的病例。与TLPEC组比拟,SLPEC组具有隐匿切口的优势,轻度疤痕,最小的侵入性,减少操作时间,出血最少,轻度疼痛和快速恢复。总之,SLPEC使用双改良疝针进行水切开和疝囊高位结扎术是一种安全的,有效和微创手术。美容效果令人印象深刻,后续成果很有希望。
    The objective was to explore the efficacy of single-port laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure using double-modified hernia needles with hydrodissection (SLPEC group) and two-port laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure (TLPEC group) for the treatment of giant indirect inguinal hernias in children. We performed a retrospective review of all children with giant indirect inguinal hernias (inner ring orifice diameter ≥ 1.5 cm) who underwent laparoscopic high ligation of the hernia sac at FuJian Children\'s Hospital from January 2019 to December 2021. We collected data from the medical records of all the children and analysed their clinical characteristics and operation-related and follow-up information. Overall, this study included a cohort of 219 patients with isolated giant inguinal hernias who had complete clinical data and who had undergone laparoscopic high ligation of the hernia sac at our centre. All procedures were successfully performed for the 106 patients who underwent SLPEC and for the 113 patients who underwent TLPEC at our centre. There were no statistically significant differences in patient age, sex, body weight, follow-up time or the side of inguinal hernia between the SLPEC group and the TLPEC group (P = 0.123, 0.613, 0.121, 0.076 and 0.081, respectively). However, there were significant differences in the bleeding volume, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, and postoperative activity time between the two groups (P ≤ 0.001). The operation times in the TLPEC group were significantly longer than those in the SLPEC group (P = 0.048), but there were no significant differences in hospital length of stay or hospitalization costs between the two groups (P = 0.244 and 0.073, respectively). Incision scars were found in 2 patients in the SLPEC group and 9 patients in the TLPEC group, and there was a significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.04). However, the incidence of ipsilateral hernia recurrence, surgical site infection, suture-knot reactions and chronic inguinodynia did not significantly differ between the two groups (P = 0.332, 0.301, 0.332 and 0.599, respectively). Postoperative hydrocele occurred in only 1 male child in the SLPEC group and in no male children in the TLPEC group, and there was no difference between the two groups (P = 0.310). In this study, there were no cases of testicular atrophy or iatrogenic ascent of the testis. Compared with the TLPEC group, the SLPEC group had the advantages of a concealed incision, light scarring, minimal invasiveness, a reduced operation time, minimal bleeding, mild pain and rapid recovery. In conclusion, SLPEC using double-modified hernia needles with hydrodissection and high ligation of the hernia sac is a safe, effective and minimally invasive surgery. The cosmetic results are impressive, and the follow-up results are promising.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Comparative Study
    背景:当肠的一部分通过腹肌突出时,就会发生腹股沟疝。在成年人中,男性比女性更容易患这种常见病。腹股沟疝可以通过“观察等待”进行监测,但如果症状持续或恶化,通常需要手术,可以是开放式或腹腔镜。成人腹股沟疝的腹腔镜(锁孔)修复通常使用经腹腹膜前(TAPP)或完全腹膜外(TEP)方法进行。两种方法都包括使用放置在腹壁腹膜衬里前面的网片,但是对于TAPP技术,需要进入腹腔放置网孔,对于TEP技术,整个过程是在腹壁的腹膜衬里外侧进行的。一种方法是否优于另一种方法尚未确定,关于它们的相对好处和危害存在争议。TEP的一个优点是它避免了腹腔;缺点是它需要临床医生更陡峭的学习曲线。TAPP被认为更简单,可以检查对侧,但与TEP相比,TAPP可能有更高的内脏损伤风险.这是对2005年首次发布的Cochrane评论的更新。
    目的:比较腹腔镜TAPP技术与腹腔镜TEP技术在成人腹股沟疝修补术中的利弊。
    方法:2022年10月25日,作者在Cochrane图书馆搜索了Cochrane中央对照试验注册中心(CENTRAL);OvidMEDLINE(R)Epub在打印前,过程中和其他非索引引文,OvidMEDLINE(R)日报,和OvidMEDLINE(R);和OvidEmbase,已发表的随机对照试验。为了确定正在进行的研究,我们检索了ClinicalTrials.gov和WHO国际临床试验注册平台(ICTRP).
    方法:所有前瞻性随机,准随机化,将腹腔镜TAPP技术与腹腔镜TEP技术在成人腹股沟疝修补术中进行比较的成群随机试验也符合纳入标准.如果我们可以提取腹股沟疝的数据,我们包括涉及不同类型腹股沟疝的混合研究。研究还可能包括一组通过开放手术接受疝气修复的参与者,但这些组不包括在我们的审查中。
    方法:两位综述作者独立评估了试验资格,从纳入的研究中提取数据,并评估纳入研究的偏倚风险。审查的主要结果是严重不良事件,慢性疼痛(手术后至少持续六个月),和疝气复发。我们还评估了围手术期的各种次要结局,术后早期,和术后晚期时间点。我们使用随机效应模型进行了统计分析,并将结果表示为二分结果的比值比(OR)和连续结果的平均差(MD),与他们各自的95%置信区间(CI)。我们使用等级来评估关键结果的证据的确定性,中度,低或非常低。
    结果:我们在本综述更新中纳入了23项研究,将1156人随机分配给TAPP,将1110人随机分配给TEP,都需要腹股沟疝的修复.研究样本量从40到316不等。绝大多数研究参与者是男性。我们认为大多数研究存在“高”或“不清楚”的偏倚风险。对于我们评估的所有结果,我们对证据确定性的判断都很低或很低。TAPP和TEP腹腔镜技术在严重不良事件方面可能几乎没有差异(0.4%对0.7%;OR0.58,95%CI0.15至2.32,P=0.45,I2=0%;19项研究,1735名参与者;证据确定性低);和疝气复发(1.2%对1.1%;OR1.14,95%CI0.49至2.62,P=0.97,I2=0%;17项研究,1712名参与者;证据确定性低)。关于TAPP与TEP技术对慢性疼痛的影响的证据非常不确定(OR0.62,95%CI0.20至1.97,P=0.68,I2=0%;6项研究,860名参与者;证据确定性非常低)。就次要结果而言,TAPP与TEP技术治疗围手术期内脏和血管损伤的证据非常不确定(15项研究,1523名参与者;证据的确定性非常低),以及术后早期(≤30天)的血肿或血清肿(OR0.86,95%CI0.54至1.37,P=0.3861,I2=0%;15项研究,1423名参与者;证据的确定性非常低)。与TAPP相比,TEP技术转换为另一种疝修补术(TAPP技术或开放手术)的风险更高(2.5%对0.7%;OR0.28,95%CI0.09至0.84,P=0.02,I2=0%;13项研究,1178名参与者;证据确定性低)。只有两项研究(474名参与者)报告了术后晚期(>30天)的生活质量;总体而言,从术前到术后评估,生活质量有所改善,但证据表明技术之间几乎没有差异(证据的确定性低)。
    结论:本综述更新发现,TAPP和TEP技术在严重不良事件方面可能几乎没有差异,疝气复发,或慢性疼痛(低到非常低的确定性证据)。关于使用哪种方法的决定将最有可能反映外科医生和患者的偏好,直到获得高确定性证据。与需要从TAPP转换为开放手术的风险相比,需要从TEP转换为TAPP或开放手术的风险可能更高(低确定性证据)。如果外科医生选择TEP作为他们的标准腹腔镜方法,他们可以考虑有一个策略来处理潜在的转换需求。这可能包括对TAPP方法的熟练程度或已告知患者转换为开放手术的风险。对于外科医生或外科部门来说,腹腔镜技术的选择应涉及患者及其家属或护理人员的共同决策.未来的研究可能集中在患者报告的结果上,比如生活质量。
    BACKGROUND: An inguinal hernia occurs when part of the intestine protrudes through the abdominal muscles. In adults, this common condition is much more likely in men than in women. Inguinal hernia can be monitored by \'watchful waiting\', but if symptoms persist or worsen, surgery is usually required, which can be open or laparoscopic. Laparoscopic (keyhole) repair of inguinal hernias in adults is generally performed using either the transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) or the totally extraperitoneal (TEP) method. Both methods include the use of mesh placed in front of the peritoneal lining of the abdominal wall, but for the TAPP technique, the abdominal cavity needs to be entered to place the mesh, and for the TEP technique, the whole procedure is done on the outside of the peritoneal lining of the abdominall wall. Whether one method is superior to the other has not been established, and there is debate about their relative benefits and harms. An advantage of TEP is its avoidance of the abdominal cavity; the downside is that it requires a steeper learning curve for clinicians. TAPP is considered simpler and makes it possible to inspect the contralateral side, but TAPP may have a higher risk of visceral injury compared to TEP. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2005.
    OBJECTIVE: To compare the benefits and harms of laparoscopic TAPP technique versus laparoscopic TEP technique for inguinal hernia repair in adults.
    METHODS: On 25 October 2022, the authors searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in the Cochrane Library; Ovid MEDLINE(R) Epub Ahead of Print, In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid MEDLINE(R) Daily, and Ovid MEDLINE(R); and Ovid Embase, for published randomised controlled trials. To identify studies in progress, we searched ClinicalTrials.gov and the WHO International Clinical Trial Registry Platform (ICTRP).
    METHODS: All prospective randomised, quasi-randomised, and cluster-randomised trials that compared the laparoscopic TAPP technique with the laparoscopic TEP technique for inguinal hernia repair in adults were eligible for inclusion. We included studies that involved a mix of different types of groin hernia if we could extract data for the inguinal hernias. Studies may have also included a group of participants receiving hernia repair by open surgery, but these groups were not included in our review.
    METHODS: Both review authors independently evaluated trial eligibility, extracted data from included studies, and assessed the risk of bias in the included studies. The review\'s primary outcomes were serious adverse events, chronic pain (persisting for at least six months after surgery), and hernia recurrence. We also assessed a variety of secondary outcomes at perioperative, early postoperative, and late postoperative time points. We performed statistical analyses using the random-effects model, and expressed the results as odds ratios (ORs) for dichotomous outcomes and mean differences (MDs) for continuous outcomes, with their respective 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence for key outcomes as high, moderate, low or very low.
    RESULTS: We included 23 studies in this review update, which randomised 1156 people to TAPP and 1110 people to TEP, all requiring repair of inguinal hernias. Study sample sizes varied from 40 to 316 participants. The vast majority of study participants were male. We judged most studies to be at \'high\' or \'unclear\' risk of bias. Our judgements of the certainty of the evidence were low or very low for all outcomes we assessed. There may be little to no difference between TAPP and TEP laparoscopic techniques for serious adverse events (0.4% versus 0.7%; OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.15 to 2.32, P = 0.45, I2 = 0%; 19 studies, 1735 participants; low certainty of evidence); and hernia recurrence (1.2% versus 1.1%; OR 1.14, 95% CI 0.49 to 2.62, P = 0.97, I2 = 0%; 17 studies, 1712 participants; low certainty of evidence). The evidence is very uncertain about the effects of TAPP versus TEP techniques on chronic pain (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.20 to 1.97, P = 0.68, I2 = 0%; 6 studies, 860 participants; very low certainty of evidence). In terms of secondary outcomes, the evidence is very uncertain for TAPP versus TEP techniques for perioperative visceral and vascular injury (15 studies, 1523 participants; very low certainty of evidence), and for haematoma or seroma during the early (≤ 30 days) postoperative phase (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.37, P = 0.3861, I2 = 0%; 15 studies, 1423 participants; very low certainty of evidence). TEP technique may carry a higher risk of conversion to another hernia repair method (either TAPP technique or open surgery) when compared to TAPP (2.5% versus 0.7%; OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.84, P = 0.02, I2 = 0%; 13 studies, 1178 participants; low certainty of evidence). Only two studies (474 participants) reported quality of life in the late (> 30 days) postoperative phase; overall, there was an improvement in quality of life from the pre- to post-operative assessment, but the evidence suggests little to no difference between the techniques (low certainty of evidence).
    CONCLUSIONS: This review update found that there may be little to no difference between the TAPP and TEP techniques for serious adverse events, hernia recurrence, or chronic pain (low- to very-low-certainty evidence). Decisions about which method to use will most likely reflect surgeon and patient preference until high-certainty evidence becomes available. There may be a higher risk of needing to convert from TEP to TAPP or open surgery when compared to the risk of needing to convert from TAPP to open surgery (low-certainty evidence). If surgeons opt for TEP as their standard laparoscopic method, they could consider having a strategy for how to handle the potential need for conversion. This might include proficiency in the TAPP approach or having informed the patient about the risk of conversion to open surgery. For surgeons or surgical departments, the choice of a laparoscopic technique should involve shared decision-making with patients and their families or carers. Future research could focus on patient-reported outcomes, such as quality of life.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    我们介绍了一例复发性腹股沟膀胱疝的病例,该病例先前三次手术均未成功,并使用完全腹膜外修复(TEP)进行了修复。一名79岁的男子出现右腹股沟肿胀,在同一侧用前路手术治疗了三次。计算机断层扫描证实腹股沟膀胱疝复发。在术前确定膀胱疝后进行TEP,与以前的手术使用的是通过前路插入和修补技术。腹膜外方法允许膀胱减少而不受伤,并使用3DMax®LightMesh安全修复疝气。术后恢复顺利,1年后无复发。TEP有助于膀胱疝的诊断和修复,强调术前诊断的重要性和内镜下膀胱疝修补术的疗效,即使在复发病例中。
    We present a case of a recurrent inguinal bladder hernia that was previously unsuccessfully operated on three times and was repaired using totally extraperitoneal repair (TEP). A 79-year-old man presented with a right inguinal swelling that had been treated three times on the same side with anterior approaches. Computed tomography confirmed a recurrent inguinal bladder hernia. TEP was performed after identifying the bladder hernia preoperatively, with previous surgeries that used a plug-and-patch technique through an anterior approach. The extraperitoneal approach allowed the bladder to be reduced without injury and the hernia to be safely repaired using a 3D Max® Light Mesh. The postoperative recovery was uneventful, with no recurrence after 1 year. TEP facilitates the diagnosis and repair of bladder hernias, emphasizing the importance of preoperative diagnosis and the efficacy of endoscopic procedures in bladder hernia repair, even in recurrent cases.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:关于列支敦士登修复优势的证据,指南推荐的技术,对于术后慢性腹股沟疼痛(CPIP)很少。这项研究的主要目的是比较接受Lichtenstein治疗的患者与其他技术的CPIP。
    方法:前瞻性多中心队列研究,包括连续在葡萄牙医院接受择期腹股沟疝修补术的成年人(2019年10月至12月)。腹腔镜和无网片疝修补术被排除在外。主要结果是术后3个月疼痛,定义为欧洲疝学会生活质量评分疼痛领域评分≥3/10。次要结果是术后30天并发症。
    结果:纳入33家医院的八百六十九名患者。大多数是男性(90.4%)和单侧疝(88.6%)。总的来说,53.6%(466/869)接受了列支敦士登的修复,46.4%(403/869)接受其他技术治疗,其中83.9%(338/403)为插头和贴片。CPIP的总发生率为16.6%,12.2%的患者有手术并发症。Lichtenstein和其他技术之间的CPIP(OR0.76,p=0.166,CI0.51-1.12)和术后并发症(OR1.06,p=0.801,CI0.69-1.60)的未调整风险相似。调整后,CPIP(OR0.83,p=0.455,CI0.51-1.34)和术后并发症(OR1.14,p=0.584,CI0.71-1.84)的风险也相似.
    结论:Lichtenstein技术与较低的CPIP无关,并显示出相当的手术并发症。为了充分评估Lichtenstein技术对CPIP的益处,有必要对长期结果进行进一步调查。
    BACKGROUND: Evidence about the advantage of Lichtenstein\'s repair, the guidelines\' recommended technique, is scarce regarding postoperative chronic inguinal pain (CPIP). The primary aim of this study was to compare CPIP in patients undergoing Lichtenstein versus other techniques.
    METHODS: Prospective multicentric cohort study including consecutive adults undergoing elective inguinal hernia repair in Portuguese hospitals (October - December 2019). Laparoscopic and mesh-free hernia repairs were excluded. The primary outcome was postoperative pain at three months, defined as a score of ≥ 3/10 in the European Hernia Society Quality of Life score pain domain. The secondary outcome was 30-day postoperative complications.
    RESULTS: Eight hundred and sixty-nine patients from 33 hospitals were included. Most were men (90.4%) and had unilateral hernias (88.6%). Overall, 53.6% (466/869) underwent Lichtenstein\'s repair, and 46.4% (403/869) were treated with other techniques, of which 83.9% (338/403) were plug and patch. The overall rate of CPIP was 16.6% and 12.2% of patients had surgical complications. The unadjusted risk was similar for CPIP (OR 0.76, p = 0.166, CI 0.51 - 1.12) and postoperative complications (OR 1.06, p = 0.801, CI 0.69 - 1.60) between Lichtenstein and other techniques. After adjustment, the risk was also similar for CPIP (OR 0.83, p = 0.455, CI 0.51 - 1.34) and postoperative complications (OR 1.14, p = 0.584, CI 0.71 - 1.84).
    CONCLUSIONS: The Lichtenstein technique was not associated with lower CPIP and showed comparable surgical complications. Further investigation as- sessing long term outcomes is necessary to fully assess the benefits of the Lichtenstein technique regarding CPIP.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:我们研究了菠萝蛋白酶(200mg)和BoswelliaserrataCasperome®(200mg)的营养组合对网片疝修补术术后结果的潜在益处。
    方法:一百八十位患者(27位女性,153名男性)被招募使用Progrim®进行开放式无张力疝修补术。患者被随机分配为空腹接受一片Siben®(研究组)或安慰剂(对照组)。术后11天,每12小时一次。所有患者都填写了针对术后疼痛的医学问卷,基于视觉模拟量表(VAS)量表和简短表格36(SF-36)问卷,在时间T0(手术日)和T28(手术后第28天)。
    结果:一年的结果显示研究组的主要术后转归有显著改善。与对照组相比,Siben®组的疼痛感知显著降低,术后第7天(p<0.05)和第21天(p<0.05)。包括在Siben®组中的患者也比对照更早地恢复日常活动并恢复工作。此外,SF-36的结果表明,研究组的生活质量(QoL)评分优于安慰剂组.
    结论:我们的分析有效地表明,在开放式腹股沟疝网片修补术中使用Siben®可以改善短期和长期手术结果,有助于更好的QoL。
    OBJECTIVE: We investigated the potential benefits of administering a nutraceutical combination of Bromelain (200 mg) and Boswellia serrata Casperome® (200 mg) on post-operative outcomes of hernioplasty with mesh.
    METHODS: One hundred eighty patients (27 females, 153 males) were enrolled to undergo open tension-free hernioplasty with the use of Progrip®. Patients were randomized to receive either one tablet of Siben® (study group) or placebo (control group) on an empty stomach, every twelve hours for eleven postoperative days. All patients filled out a medical questionnaire focused on postoperative pain, based on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scale and the Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaire, at time T0 (day of surgery) and T28 (28th day after surgery).
    RESULTS: One-year results showed a significant improvement in the primary postoperative outcome in the study group. Perception of pain was significantly reduced in the Siben® group compared with controls, both on the seventh (p < 0.05) and the twenty-first (p < 0.05) postoperative day. Patients included in the Siben® group also resumed daily activities and returned to work earlier than the controls. Moreover, results of the SF-36 indicated better Quality of Life (QoL) scores in the study group compared to the placebo group.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis effectively demonstrates that the use of Siben® in open inguinal hernia mesh repair may improve short- and long-term surgical outcomes, contributing to a better QoL.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:前列腺癌根治术后复发疝的发生率较高,因此本文探讨前列腺癌根治术后腹股沟疝的发生率及危险因素。
    方法:回顾性分析湖州市第一人民医院2019年3月至2021年5月251例前列腺癌根治术患者的临床资料。根据腹股沟疝的发生,将受试者分为研究组和对照组,并对各组临床资料进行统计学分析,采用多因素Logistic分析寻找预测腹股沟疝发生的独立影响因素。根据腹股沟疝的发生和时间绘制Kaplan-Meier生存曲线。
    结果:前列腺癌手术后腹股沟疝的总发病率为14.7%(37/251),平均时间为8.58±4.12个月。淋巴结清扫术患者腹股沟疝的平均时间为7.61±4.05(月),未进行淋巴结清扫的患者为9.16±4.15(月),两者比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。腹股沟疝的发病率随年龄的变化无统计学意义,BMI,高血压,糖尿病,PSA,既往腹部手术及手术入路(P>0.05),手术方式和盆腔淋巴结清扫方式差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。腹股沟疝组盆腔淋巴结清扫的发生率为24.3%(14/57),显著高于对照组11.8%(23/194)。Logistic回归分析显示盆腔淋巴结清扫是前列腺癌术后腹股沟疝的危险因素(OR=0.413,95%Cl:0.196~0.869,P=0.02)。Kaplan-Meier生存曲线显示,盆腔淋巴结清扫组腹股沟疝发生率明显高于对照组(P<0.05)。
    结论:盆腔淋巴结清扫是前列腺癌根治术后腹股沟疝的危险因素。
    OBJECTIVE: The incidence of recurrent hernia after radical resection of prostate cancer is high, so this article discusses the incidence and risk factors of inguinal hernia after radical resection of prostate cancer.
    METHODS: This case control study was conducted in The First People\'s Hospital of Huzhou clinical data of 251 cases underwent radical resection of prostate cancer in this hospital from March 2019 to May 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the occurrence of inguinal hernia, the subjects were divided into study group and control group, and the clinical data of each group were statistically analyzed, Multivariate Logistic analysis was performed to find independent influencing factors for predicting the occurrence of inguinal hernia. The Kaplan-Meier survival curve was drawn according to the occurrence and time of inguinal hernia.
    RESULTS: The overall incidence of inguinal hernia after prostate cancer surgery was 14.7% (37/251), and the mean time was 8.58 ± 4.12 months. The average time of inguinal hernia in patients who received lymph node dissection was 7.61 ± 4.05 (month), and that in patients who did not receive lymph node dissection was 9.16 ± 4.15 (month), and there was no significant difference between them (P > 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of inguinal hernia with age, BMI, hypertension, diabetes, PSA, previous abdominal operations and operative approach (P > 0.05), but there were statistically significant differences with surgical method and pelvic lymph node dissection (P < 0.05). The incidence of pelvic lymph node dissection in the inguinal hernia group was 24.3% (14/57), which was significantly higher than that in the control group 11.8% (23/194). Logistic regression analysis showed that pelvic lymph node dissection was a risk factor for inguinal hernia after prostate cancer surgery (OR = 0.413, 95%Cl: 0.196-0.869, P = 0.02). Kaplan-Meier survival curve showed that the rate of inguinal hernia in the group receiving pelvic lymph node dissection was significantly higher than that in the control group (P < 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: Pelvic lymph node dissection is a risk factor for inguinal hernia after radical resection of prostate cancer.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:腹股沟疝手术后生活质量的结果,比如美学,术后疼痛,缺席活动期间,和复发是一个相关的话题,因为腹股沟疝影响到27%的男性和3%的女性,并应指导卫生政策更有效地分配资源。
    目的:评估腹股沟疝修补术后后期复发的生活质量,疼痛,美学,限制活动,比较微创技术-经腹腹膜前(TAPP)和常规Lichtenstein。
    方法:采用EuraHS-QoL问卷进行横断面观察性临床研究,适用于术后平均65个月的患者。对45名患者进行了评估,28人接受列支敦士登治疗,17人接受TAPP治疗。所有患者均为男性,年龄在18至87岁之间,患有原发性单侧腹股沟疝。复发性或双侧疝,其他伴随的腹壁疝,选择不参加或未找到的患者,女性患者被排除在研究之外.
    结果:关于领域疼痛,限制,和美学,两组在检查生活质量时没有差异.两组均未在研究期间出现复发。
    结论:TAPP和Lichtenstein技术在长期比较时,在生活质量方面的结果相似。
    BACKGROUND: Results on quality of life after inguinal hernia surgery, such as esthetics, postoperative pain, period of absence from activities, and recurrence are a relevant topic since inguinal hernia affects 27% of men and 3% of women at some point in their lives, and should guide health policies to allocate resources more efficiently.
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the quality of life in the late postoperative period of inguinal herniorrhaphy regarding recurrence, pain, esthetics, and restriction in activities, comparing the minimally invasive techniques - the transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) and the conventional Lichtenstein.
    METHODS: A cross-sectional observational clinical study was conducted with the EuraHS-QoL questionnaire validated and translated into Portuguese, applied to patients after an average of 65 months postoperatively. Forty-five patients were assessed, 28 undergoing Lichtenstein and 17 undergoing TAPP. All were males aged between 18 and 87 years with a primary unilateral inguinal hernia. Recurrent or bilateral hernias, other concomitant abdominal wall hernias, patients who chose not to participate or who were not found, and female patients were excluded from the study.
    RESULTS: Regarding the domains pain, restriction, and esthetics, there was no difference between the two groups when examining quality of life. Neither group presented recurrence in the studied period.
    CONCLUSIONS: Both TAPP and Lichtenstein techniques presented similar results concerning quality of life when compared in the long-term.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:经直肌鞘腹膜外手术(TREPP)是一种开放式手术,其中网状物放置在腹膜前空间中,因此与较少的慢性术后腹股沟疼痛相关。TREPP主要在全身麻醉或脊髓麻醉下进行,然而,也可以在镇静和局部麻醉下进行,具有潜在的优势。这项回顾性可行性试点研究调查了与Lichtenstein相比,TREPP在门诊局部麻醉下的安全性和有效性。
    方法:在2019年至2022年之间,对所有在门诊手术室局部麻醉下接受择期腹股沟疝修补术的患者进行评估。包括TREPP组的34例患者和Lichtenstein组的213例患者。结果是并发症,操作时间,剧院时间,术后8周和6个月内腹股沟疝复发。
    结果:伤口感染等并发症无显著差异,血肿,血清肿,发现TREPP和Lichtenstein之间的尿潴留和早期复发。Lichtenstein术后8周的术后疼痛没有明显升高(8.8%vs.18.8%,P=0.22)。运行时间(21.0(IQR:16.0-27.3)分钟vs.39.0(IQR:31.5-45.0)分钟,P<0.001)和剧院时间(37.5(IQR:30.8-42.5)分钟vs.54.0(IQR:46.0-62.0)分钟,TREPP的P<0.001)显著较短。
    结论:这项初步研究表明,TREPP在局部麻醉下安全地进行似乎是可行的,其并发症发生率与Lichtenstein相当,手术时间明显短于Lichtenstein。这些结果证明了在更大的研究人群和更长的随访时间内进行进一步的研究,以提供确切的结论。
    BACKGROUND: The Trans Rectus Sheath Extra-Peritoneal Procedure (TREPP) is an open procedure in which the mesh is placed in the preperitoneal space and is therefore associated with less chronic post-operative inguinal pain. TREPP is primarily performed under general or spinal anesthesia, however, it is also possible to perform under sedation and local anesthesia with potentially advantages. This retrospective feasibility pilot study investigates the safety and efficiency of TREPP under local anesthesia in the outpatient clinic in comparison with Lichtenstein.
    METHODS: Between 2019 and 2022, all patients who underwent an elective inguinal hernia repair under local anesthesia in the outpatient clinic operation theatre were assessed. 34 patients in the TREPP group and 213 patients in the Lichtenstein group were included. Outcomes were complications, operating time, theatre time, and early inguinal hernia recurrence within 8 weeks and 6 months post-operatively.
    RESULTS: No significant differences in complications such as wound infection, hematoma, seroma, urine retention and early recurrence between TREPP and Lichtenstein were found. Post-operative pain at 8 weeks was not significantly higher after Lichtenstein (8.8% vs. 18.8%, P = 0.22). Operating time (21.0 (IQR: 16.0-27.3) minutes vs. 39.0 (IQR: 31.5-45.0) minutes, P < 0.001) and theatre time (37.5 (IQR: 30.8-42.5) minutes vs. 54.0 (IQR: 46.0-62.0) minutes, P < 0.001) was significantly shorter for TREPP.
    CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study showed that TREPP appears to be feasible to perform safely under local anesthesia with comparable complication rates and substantially shorter operation time than Lichtenstein. These results justify further research with a larger study population and a longer period of follow up in order to provide firm conclusions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    BACKGROUND: Inguinal hernia is defined as a projection of an organ through the inguinal canal. This can be incarcerated as a consequence of continuous inflammation of the hernial sac, which will prevent its return, causing damage to the venous and lymphatic return of the viscera. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is an easily accessible inflammatory biomarker obtained from blood cell counts. Therefore, the objective was to determine if the NLR is useful as a predictor of intestinal resection in incarcerated inguinal hernias.
    METHODS: An observational, analytical, diagnostic test and retrospective study was carried out in a hospital in northern Peru from January 2013 to August 2019 in the Department of General Surgery and Emergency Surgery and Critical Care. Patients diagnosed with unilateral inguinal hernia with intestinal obstruction were included. For the relationship between the event and the exposure, it was analyzed using Chi square (χ2) and T-Student. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value of the NLR as well as the area under the ROC curve were found to determine the predictive accuracy.
    RESULTS: 161 patients with incarcerated inguinal hernia were studied: group I (20 patients with intestinal resection) and group II (141 patients without intestinal resection). The mean age in groups I and II were 69±16 and 60±17 years (p<0.05); the frequency in males was 70% in group I and 76% in group II (p>0.05). Intestinal obstruction and duration of incarceration >24 hours and the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio demonstrated significant differences. With respect to NLR taking a cut-off point ≥6.5, a sensitivity of 75%, a specificity of 93.62%, a positive predictive value of 62.5% and a negative predictive value of 96.35% were observed; In addition, when analyzing with the ROC curve, a value of 5.14 was obtained as a predictor of intestinal resection with a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 84.4% (p<0.001). Therefore, the NLR >5.14 predicts intestinal resection in patients with incarcerated inguinal hernias with an area under the curve of 0.92 at the Belen Hospital of Trujillo.
    CONCLUSIONS: The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio is useful for predicting intestinal resection with a diagnostic accuracy of 92%.
    UNASSIGNED: Определить прогностическое значение отношения нейтрофилов к лимфоцитам в отношении резекции кишки у больных с ущемленными паховыми грыжами.
    UNASSIGNED: Обсервационное ретроспективное исследование проведено с января 2013 г. по август 2019 г. В исследование включены пациенты с односторонней паховой грыжей и кишечной непроходимостью. Для оценки связи между переменными использовали критерий хи-квадрат и t-критерий Стьюдента. Прогностическое значение отношения нейтрофилов к лимфоцитам оценивали с использованием параметров чувствительности, специфичности, положительной и отрицательной прогностической значимости, а также площади под ROC-кривой.
    UNASSIGNED: В исследовании принял участие 161 пациент с ущемленной паховой грыжей: 1-я группа — 20 больных с резекцией кишки; 2-я группа — 141 больной без резекции кишки. Средний возраст больных составил соответственно 69±16 лет и 60±17 лет (p<0,05). Мужчины составили 70% больных в 1-й группе и 76% во 2-й группе (p>0,05). Частота кишечной непроходимости, продолжительность ущемления >24 ч и отношение тромбоциты/лимфоциты продемонстрировали существенные различия. Отношение нейтрофилов к лимфоцитам с пороговым значением ≥6,5 показало чувствительность 75%, специфичность 93,62%, положительную прогностическую ценность 62,5% и отрицательную прогностическую ценность 96,35%. В ROC-анализе значение 5,14 являлось предиктором резекции кишки с чувствительностью 90% и специфичностью 84,4% (p<0,001). Таким образом, отношение нейтрофилов к лимфоцитам >5,14 прогнозирует резекцию кишки у пациентов с ущемленными паховыми грыжами (площадь под ROC-кривой 0,92).
    UNASSIGNED: Отношение нейтрофилов к лимфоцитам эффективно для прогнозирования резекции кишки с диагностической точностью до 92%.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    疝囊中的宏观肿瘤植入物是非常罕见的情况。它们是由于在从腹股沟管到疝囊的恶性腹水中植入恶性细胞而发生的。在这个案例报告中,我们分享了一名65岁的男性患者在腹股沟管和阴囊水平的疝囊中宏观肿瘤植入物的临床和影像学发现,该患者有胃腺癌全胃切除术史,并在手术后6个月发展为恶性腹水。
    Macroscopic tumor implants in the hernia sac are a very rare condition. They occur as a result of the implantation of malignant cells in the malignant ascites from the inguinal canal to the hernia sac. In this case report, we share the clinical and radiological findings of the macroscopic tumoral implants in the hernia sac at the level of the inguinal canal and scrotum in a male patient aged 65 years with a history of total gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma and developing malignant ascites six months after the surgery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号