PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
BACKGROUND: With the mandate to review all available literature in the study\'s inclusion parameters, systematic review projects are likely to require full-text access to a significant number of articles that are not available in a library\'s collection, thereby necessitating ordering content via interlibrary loan (ILL). The aim of this study is to understand what effect a systematic review service has on the copyright royalty fees accompanying ILL requests at an academic health sciences library.
METHODS: The library created a custom report using ILLiad data to look specifically at 2018 ILL borrowing requests that were known to be part of systematic reviews. This subset of borrowing activity was then analyzed to determine its impact on the library\'s copyright royalty expenditures for the year. In 2018, copyright eligible borrowing requests that were known to be part of systematic reviews represented only approximately 5% of total filled requests that involved copyright eligible borrowing. However, these systematic review requests directly or indirectly caused approximately 10% of all the Spencer S. Eccles Library copyright royalty expenditures for 2018 requests.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on the sample data set, the library\'s copyright royalty expenditures did increase, but the overall financial impact was modest.
METHODS: The library created a custom report using ILLiad data to look specifically at 2018 ILL borrowing requests that were known to be part of systematic reviews. This subset of borrowing activity was then analyzed to determine its impact on the library\'s copyright royalty expenditures for the year. In 2018, copyright eligible borrowing requests that were known to be part of systematic reviews represented only approximately 5% of total filled requests that involved copyright eligible borrowing. However, these systematic review requests directly or indirectly caused approximately 10% of all the Spencer S. Eccles Library copyright royalty expenditures for 2018 requests.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on the sample data set, the library\'s copyright royalty expenditures did increase, but the overall financial impact was modest.
摘要：
背景：在审查研究纳入参数中所有可用文献的任务下，系统的审查项目可能需要全文访问大量的文章，这些文章在图书馆的收藏中没有，因此需要通过馆际互借(ILL)订购内容。这项研究的目的是了解在学术健康科学图书馆中，系统审查服务对ILL要求的版权使用费有什么影响。
方法：图书馆使用ILLiad数据创建了一个自定义报告，专门查看2018年ILL借用请求，这些请求被认为是系统审查的一部分。然后分析了这一借阅活动子集，以确定其对图书馆当年版权使用费支出的影响。2018年，已知属于系统审查的一部分的符合版权资格的借用请求仅占涉及符合版权资格的借用请求总数的约5％。然而,这些系统性审查请求直接或间接导致了2018年SpencerS.Eccles图书馆版权使用费支出的约10%.
结论：基于样本数据集，图书馆的版权使用费支出确实增加了，但总体财务影响不大。
方法：图书馆使用ILLiad数据创建了一个自定义报告，专门查看2018年ILL借用请求，这些请求被认为是系统审查的一部分。然后分析了这一借阅活动子集，以确定其对图书馆当年版权使用费支出的影响。2018年，已知属于系统审查的一部分的符合版权资格的借用请求仅占涉及符合版权资格的借用请求总数的约5％。然而,这些系统性审查请求直接或间接导致了2018年SpencerS.Eccles图书馆版权使用费支出的约10%.
结论：基于样本数据集，图书馆的版权使用费支出确实增加了，但总体财务影响不大。
