RESULTS: We introduce two models for expressing taxonomic information in the form of species checklists. First, we show how species checklists are presented in a relational database system using LSIDs. Then, in order to gain a more detailed representation of taxonomic information, we introduce meta-ontology TaxMeOn to model the same content as Semantic Web ontologies where taxa are identified using HTTP URIs. We also explore how changes in scientific names can be managed over time.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of HTTP URIs is preferable for presenting the taxonomic information of species checklists. An HTTP URI identifies a taxon and operates as a web address from which additional information about the taxon can be located, unlike LSID. This enables the integration of biological data from different sources on the web using Linked Data principles and prevents the formation of information silos. The Linked Data approach allows a user to assemble information and evaluate the complexity of taxonomical data based on conflicting views of taxonomic classifications. Using HTTP URIs and Semantic Web technologies also facilitate the representation of the semantics of biological data, and in this way, the creation of more \"intelligent\" biological applications and services.
结果:我们介绍了两种以物种清单形式表达分类学信息的模型。首先,我们展示了如何使用LSID在关系数据库系统中显示物种清单。然后,为了获得更详细的分类信息,我们引入了元本体TaxMeOn来对与语义Web本体相同的内容进行建模,其中使用HTTPURI识别分类单元。我们还探讨了如何随着时间的推移管理科学名称的变化。
结论:对于提供物种清单的分类学信息,使用HTTPURI更为可取。HTTPURI标识一个分类单元,并作为一个网址操作,可以从中找到有关该分类单元的其他信息,不像LSID。这使得能够使用关联数据原理在网络上集成来自不同来源的生物数据,并防止信息孤岛的形成。链接数据方法允许用户基于分类分类的冲突观点来组装信息并评估分类数据的复杂性。使用HTTPURI和语义Web技术还可以促进生物数据的语义表示,以这种方式,创造更多的“智能”生物应用和服务。