目的:许多欧洲国家的医院已将增材制造(AM)技术应用于多种口腔颌面外科(OMFS)应用。尽管该技术得到了广泛的应用,对于医院是否采用外科手术技术,外科医生也起着至关重要的作用。该研究有两个目标:(1)调查医院类型(大学或非大学医院)如何影响外科医生对AM的看法,(2)探讨AM的先前经验(AM经验与否)如何影响外科医生对AM的看法。
方法:设计了一个在线调查问卷来捕捉外科医生的观点,由根据实施研究综合框架(CFIR)制定的11个李克特量表问题组成。问卷通过瑞典口腔颌面外科协会提供的渠道发送给OMF外科医生。使用Mann-WhitneyU检验对数据进行分析,以确定OMF外科医生在组织形式方面的显着差异(即,大学医院或非大学医院)和AM的经验(即,AM经验或无经验)。
结果:总计,31名OMF外科医生对调查做出了回应。来自大学和非大学的外科医生的观点,以及有经验和没有经验的外科医生之间,在五个CFIR域中捕获的11个问题中没有显示显着差异。然而,CFIR中的“个体特征”域,由三个问题组成,外科医生有AM经验和无经验有显著差异(P值:P=0.01,P=0.01和P=0.04).
结论:外科医生,无论是附属于大学医院还是非大学医院,无论他们以前的AM经验如何,通常对AM表现出良好的态度。然而,在个体特征方面,有AM经验的人和没有AM经验的人之间存在显著差异.
结论:本研究通过报告OMF外科医生对AM的看法,促进了AM在OMFS中的实施。
OBJECTIVE: Hospitals in many European countries have implemented Additive Manufacturing (AM) technology for multiple Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (OMFS) applications. Although the technology is widely implemented, surgeons also play a crucial role in whether a hospital will adopt the technology for surgical procedures. The study has two objectives: (1) to investigate how hospital type (university or non-university hospital) influences surgeons\' views on AM, and (2) to explore how previous experience with AM (AM experience or not) influences surgeons\' views on AM.
METHODS: An online questionnaire to capture surgeons\' views was designed, consisting of 11 Likert scale questions formulated according to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). The questionnaire was sent to OMF surgeons through the channel provided by the Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery in Sweden. Data were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test to identify significant differences among OMF surgeons in terms of organizational form (i.e., university hospital or non-university hospital) and experience of AM (i.e., AM experience or no-experience).
RESULTS: In total, 31 OMF surgeons responded to the survey. Views of surgeons from universities and non-universities, as well as between surgeons with experience and no-experience, did not show significant differences in the 11 questions captured across five CFIR domains. However, the \"individual characteristics\" domain in CFIR, consisting of three questions, did show significant differences between surgeons\' experience with AM and no-experience (P-values: P = 0.01, P = 0.01, and P = 0.04).
CONCLUSIONS: Surgeons, whether affiliated with university hospitals or non-university hospitals and regardless of their prior experience with AM, generally exhibit a favorable attitude towards AM. However, there were significant differences in terms of individual characteristics between those who had prior experience with AM and those who did not.
CONCLUSIONS: This investigation facilitates the implementation of AM in OMFS by reporting on the views of OMF surgeons on AM.