• 文章类型: Journal Article
    伐尼克兰是戒烟最有效的唯一药物疗法。如果与尼古丁替代疗法(NRT)联合使用,戒烟率可能会进一步提高,但联合用药的疗效和安全性尚需评估.
    研究与单纯使用伐尼克林治疗的住院吸烟者相比,使用伐尼克林和NRT锭剂治疗的住院吸烟者是否获得了更高的长期戒烟率。
    双盲,安慰剂对照随机对照临床试验是在5家澳大利亚公立医院的成人内科或外科住院患者中进行的,这些患者有每天吸烟10支或更多的历史,有兴趣退出,并可在2019年5月1日至2021年5月1日期间进行12个月的随访(2022年5月的最终12个月数据收集)。数据分析于2023年6月1日至8月30日进行。
    所有参与者在住院期间以标准剂量开始了为期12周的伐尼克兰方案。如果有吸烟的冲动,参与者被随机分配使用NRT(2mg)或安慰剂锭剂。向所有参与者提供行为支持(Quitline)。
    主要结果是在6个月时经过生化验证的持续禁欲。次要结果包括自我报告的长时间禁欲,7天点患病率禁欲(3、6和12个月),和药物相关的不良事件。
    总共320名参与者(平均[SD]年龄,52.5[12.1]岁;183[57.2%]男性)被随机分组。生化验证的进行受到COVID-19限制的影响;因此,干预措施与对照组的生化验证禁欲(18[11.4%]对16[10.1%];比值比[OR],1.14;95%CI,0.56-2.33)不支持联合治疗。干预措施与对照组的次要结局为6个月时7天点的禁欲(54[34.2%]vs37[23.4%];或,1.71;95%CI,1.04-2.80),12个月时长期禁欲(47[29.9%]对30[19.1%];或,1.77;95%CI,1.05-3.00),和12个月时的7天点患病率禁欲(48[30.6%]vs31[19.7%];或,1.79;95%CI,1.07-2.99)在联合治疗下显着改善。自我报告的6个月延长禁欲(61[38.6%]对47[29.7%];或,1.49;95%CI,0.93-2.39)支持联合治疗,但无统计学意义。两组药物相关不良事件相似(干预组102例[74.5%],对照组86例[68.3%])。
    在这项针对住院成年每日吸烟者的伐尼克林和NRT锭剂组合的随机临床试验中,与单用伐尼克兰相比,联合治疗改善了自我报告的禁欲,在不损害安全的情况下,但它并没有改善生物化学验证的禁欲。
    anzctr.org.AU标识符:ACTRN12618001792213。
    UNASSIGNED: Varenicline is the most effective sole pharmacotherapy for smoking cessation. If used in combination with nicotine replacement therapy (NRT), cessation rates may be further improved, but the efficacy and safety of the combination need to be evaluated.
    UNASSIGNED: To examine whether hospitalized smokers treated with varenicline and NRT lozenges achieve higher prolonged smoking abstinence rates compared with those treated with varenicline alone.
    UNASSIGNED: A double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial was conducted in adult medical or surgical inpatients of 5 Australian public hospitals with a history of smoking 10 cigarettes or more per day, interested in quitting, and available for 12-month follow-up between May 1, 2019, and May 1, 2021 (final 12-month data collection in May 2022). Data analysis was performed from June 1 to August 30, 2023.
    UNASSIGNED: A 12-week varenicline regimen was initiated during hospitalization at standard doses in all participants. Participants were randomized to additionally use NRT (2 mg) or placebo lozenges if there was an urge to smoke. Behavioral support (Quitline) was offered to all participants.
    UNASSIGNED: The primary outcome was biochemically verified sustained abstinence at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included self-reported prolonged abstinence, 7-day point prevalence abstinence (3, 6, and 12 months), and medicine-related adverse events.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 320 participants (mean [SD] age, 52.5 [12.1] years; 183 [57.2%] male) were randomized. The conduct of biochemical verification was affected by COVID-19 restrictions; consequently, the biochemically verified abstinence in the intervention vs control arms (18 [11.4%] vs 16 [10.1%]; odds ratio [OR], 1.14; 95% CI, 0.56-2.33) did not support the combination therapy. The secondary outcomes in the intervention vs control arms of 7-day point prevalence abstinence at 6 months (54 [34.2%] vs 37 [23.4%]; OR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.04-2.80), prolonged abstinence at 12 months (47 [29.9%] vs 30 [19.1%]; OR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.05-3.00), and 7-day point prevalence abstinence at 12-months (48 [30.6%] vs 31 [19.7%]; OR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.07-2.99) significantly improved with the combination therapy. The self-reported 6-month prolonged abstinence (61 [38.6%] vs 47 [29.7%]; OR, 1.49; 95% CI, 0.93-2.39) favored the combination therapy but was not statistically significant. Medicine-related adverse events were similar in the 2 groups (102 [74.5%] in the intervention group vs 86 [68.3%] in the control group).
    UNASSIGNED: In this randomized clinical trial of the combination of varenicline and NRT lozenges in hospitalized adult daily smokers, the combination treatment improved self-reported abstinence compared with varenicline alone, without compromising safety, but it did not improve biochemically validated abstinence.
    UNASSIGNED: anzctr.org.au Identifier: ACTRN12618001792213.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    结论:高血压,通常被称为高血压,是心血管疾病的主要危险因素,这是一个重大的全球健康问题。生活方式干预已成为控制高血压的有效非药物方法。生活方式干预在高血压中的作用,包括饮食调整,身体活动,体重管理,应力降低,和戒烟,是巨大的,在减少包括高血压在内的非传染性疾病负担方面至关重要。
    CONCLUSIONS: Hypertension, commonly known as high blood pressure, is a leading risk factor for cardiovascular disease, which is a major global health concern. Lifestyle interventions have emerged as effective nonpharmacological approaches for managing hypertension. The role of lifestyle interventions in hypertension, including dietary modifications, physical activity, weight management, stress reduction, and alcohol and tobacco cessation, is enormous and is pivotal in the reduction of the burden of noncommunicable diseases including hypertension.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    注射甲基苯丙胺会带来重大的健康风险,但对甲基苯丙胺注射器如何过滤其注射制剂和经历相关健康问题知之甚少。
    招募了注射甲基苯丙胺的土著人(n=30)的连锁转诊样本,并进行了半结构化访谈,以收集有关过滤方法和健康问题的信息。
    注射制剂的过滤由53%的注射器描述。对肾脏疾病的关注程度升高,在过滤制剂的患者中观察到癌症和心脏病(50%至56.3%)。对肝脏疾病的关注是那些过滤其制剂(62.5%)的人中最常见的关注,并且与不使用过滤器的人(7.1%)相比有所上升。分组逻辑回归显示,注射制剂的过滤与注射器表达的整体健康问题之间存在正相关。在调整性别和年龄后。注射制剂过滤的调整后比值比的边缘后验分布具有后验中位数=35.7,和95%HPD间隔=(5.1,512.4)。
    结果表明,注射甲基苯丙胺的土著人民对注射制剂的过滤与健康问题之间存在正相关关系。这可能反映了使用过滤来减少伤害,需要进一步研究以了解可能与甲基苯丙胺注射制剂过滤有关的全部预防范围。
    UNASSIGNED: Injecting methamphetamine poses significant health risks, but little is known about how methamphetamine injectors filter their injection preparations and experience related health concerns.
    UNASSIGNED: A chain-referral sample of Indigenous people who inject methamphetamine (n = 30) was recruited and semistructured interviews were conducted to collect information on filtration practices and health concerns.
    UNASSIGNED: Filtration of the injection preparation was described by 53% of injectors. Elevated levels of concern for kidney disease, cancer and heart disease were observed among those who filtered their preparations (ranging from 50 to 56.3%). Concern about liver disease was the most frequent concern among those who filtered their preparations (62.5%) and was elevated in comparison to those who did not use filters (7.1%). Grouped logistic regression revealed a positive association between filtration of the injection preparation and overall health concerns expressed by injectors, after adjusting for gender and age. The marginal posterior distribution of the adjusted odds ratio for filtration of the injection preparation had a posterior median = 35.7, and 95% HPD interval = (5.1, 512.4).
    UNASSIGNED: Results illustrate a positive relationship between filtration of the injection preparation and health concerns among Indigenous people who inject methamphetamine. This likely reflects the use of filtration to reduce harms, and further research is needed to understand the full scope of prevention that may be associated with filtration of methamphetamine injection preparations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    麻醉药成瘾的个体的治疗依从性降低,复发率降低,可以通过止痛药的持续药物释放制剂来提高。到目前为止,据报道,不同的药物配方具有28天和35天的持续药物释放期。为了进一步增加这个持续时间,通过将低分子量(LMW)和高分子量(HMW)壳聚糖(CS)与瓜尔胶(GG)结合并通过磷酸氢二钠交联它们,开发了可注射水凝胶(IHs)的不同配方。结构,形态学,LMW-CSIH的理化性质,使用傅里叶变换红外光谱(FT-IR)对HMW-CSIH进行了评价,热重分析(TGA),扫描电子显微镜(SEM),和流变学,肿胀,和生物降解分析。HMW-CSIH显示高交联,增加热稳定性,机械强度高,肿胀升高,和低生物降解。将抗肿瘤药物纳曲酮(NTX)和双硫仑(DSF)分别加载到HMW-CSIH和LMW-CSIH中。在磷酸盐缓冲盐水(PBS)和乙醇(0.3%,0.4%,和0.5%)使用UV分光光度计在56天的时间内。药物释放数据进行了零级测试,一阶,和Korsemeyer-Peppas数学模型.在PBS中,所有制备的制剂都遵循非Fickian药物释放,在乙醇中,在所有三种不同浓度的乙醇中,只有NTXHMW-CSIH跟随非Fickian释放。
    The treatment adherence of narcotics-addicted individuals with reduced incidences of relapse can be enhanced by a sustained drug release formulation of antinarcotics. So far, different drug formulations have been reported with sustained drug release periods of 28 and 35 days. To further enhance this duration, different formulations of injectable hydrogels (IHs) have been developed by combining low molecular weight (LMW) and high molecular weight (HMW) chitosan (CS) with guar gum (GG) and crosslinking them by sodium bi phosphate dibasic. The structural, morphological, and physicochemical properties of LMW-CS IH, and HMW-CS IH were evaluated using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), thermo-gravimetric analysis (TGA), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and rheological, swelling, and biodegradation analysis. The HMW-CS IH showed high crosslinking, increased thermal stability, high mechanical strength, elevated swelling, and low biodegradation. The antinarcotic drugs naltrexone (NTX) and disulfiram (DSF) were loaded separately into the HMW-CS IH and LMW-CS IH. The release of NTX and DSF was investigated in phosphate buffer saline (PBS) and ethanol (0.3%, 0.4%, and 0.5%) over a 56-day period using an UV spectrophotometer. The drug release data were tested in zero-order, first-order, and Korsemeyer-Peppas mathematical models. In PBS, all prepared formulations followed non-Fickian drug release, while in ethanol, only NTX HMW-CS IH followed non-Fickian release in all three different concentrations of ethanol.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    甲基苯丙胺(METH)暴露会增加运动敏化。然而,没有研究探讨心血管致敏的发生。本研究,在老鼠身上进行,分析如下:(i)METH致敏延伸至收缩压(SBP);(ii)动态和心血管致敏之间的潜在相关性;(iii)纹状体内的形态学改变,内消旋边缘和脑桥儿茶酚胺系统,包括c-fos表达。运动活动,在C57Bl/6J小鼠中评估SBP和儿茶酚胺能神经元的形态学改变的发生,每天腹膜内注射盐水或METH(1、2或5mg/kg)连续5天和停药6天后。重申暴露于较低剂量的METH(1mg/kg和2mg/kg)在不改变SBP的情况下在小鼠运动致敏中产生。相比之下,在没有运动致敏的情况下,用最高剂量的METH(5mg/kg)重复治疗会产生SBP的致敏作用。未检测到蓝斑和伏隔核神经元内的形态改变,但c-fos表达增加。目前的数据表明,METH产生的塑性变化超出了运动系统,从而改变了自主神经调节。这种心血管致敏独立于运动致敏而发生。持续的血压升高可能是产生高血压的特定机制的基础。
    Methamphetamine (METH) exposure increases locomotor sensitization. However, no study has explored the occurrence of cardiovascular sensitization. The present study, carried out in mice, analyzed the following: (i) METH sensitization extending to systolic blood pressure (SBP); (ii) a potential correlation between ambulatory and cardiovascular sensitization; and (iii) morphological alterations within meso-striatal, meso-limbic and pontine catecholamine systems including c-fos expression. Locomotor activity, SBP and occurrence of morphological alterations of catecholaminergic neurons were assessed in C57Bl/6J mice following daily i.p. injections of either saline or METH (1, 2 or 5 mg/kg) for 5 consecutive days and following 6 days of withdrawal. Reiterated exposure to the lower doses of METH (1 mg/kg and 2 mg/kg) produced in mice locomotor sensitization without altering SBP. In contrast, repeated treatment with the highest dose of METH (5 mg/kg) produced sensitization of SBP in the absence of locomotor sensitization. No morphological alterations but increases in c-fos expression within neurons of locus coeruleus and nucleus accumbens were detected. The present data suggest that METH produces plastic changes that extend beyond the motor systems to alter autonomic regulation. This cardiovascular sensitization occurs independently of locomotor sensitization. The persistency of increased blood pressure may underlie specific mechanisms operating in producing hypertension.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景和目的:这项研究的目的是确定医生在全麻下择期手术患者戒烟的强化干预和教育中的作用。材料和方法:在家庭医生诊所进行了一项随机前瞻性研究,其中男女吸烟者,21-65岁,没有认知障碍,并且没有对精神活性物质上瘾的人自愿参加。术前四周,将120名吸烟者随机分为两个相等的组;干预组(IG)进行了戒烟干预,对照组(CG)不进行干预。生化测试是为了确定随机阶段参与者的吸烟状况,术前一周,以及术后40、120和180天和12个月。IG的考生与医生交谈了五次,收到了140条电话信息,小叶,和激励信件以及药物治疗,而CG的参与者很少或根本没有得到戒烟的建议。结果:与CG相比,这项研究的结果证实了干预和教育对IG中戒烟的显着影响(p<0.001)。在12个月的随访中,IG中的吸烟者的禁欲几率是CG中吸烟者的7.31倍(95%CI:2.32-23.04)。与CG中的吸烟者相比,IG中未停止吸烟的吸烟者的依赖性较低,并且吸烟较少(p<0.0001),以及短期和长期禁欲的多倍患病率。结论:强化干预和教育可以激励择期手术患者短期和长期戒烟。
    Background and Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the role of physicians in the intensive intervention and education regarding the smoking cessation of patients undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia. Materials and Methods: A randomised prospective study was conducted in family physicians\' clinics in which smokers of both sexes, aged 21-65 years, without cognitive impairments, and who were not addicted to psychoactive substances voluntarily participated. Four weeks preoperatively, 120 smokers were randomised into two equal groups; the intervention group (IG) underwent an intervention for the purpose of smoking cessation and the control group (CG) underwent no intervention. Biochemical tests were performed in order to determine the smoking status of the participants in the phase of randomisation, one week preoperatively, as well as 40, 120, and 180 days and 12 months postoperatively. The examinees of the IG talked to the physician five times and received 140 telephone messages, leaflets, and motivational letters along with the pharmacotherapy, while the participants in the CG received little or no advice on smoking cessation. Results: The results of this study confirmed a significant influence of the intervention and education on the smoking abstinence in the IG compared to the CG (p < 0.001). The smokers in the IG had 7.31 (95% CI: 2.32-23.04) times greater odds of abstinence upon the 12-month follow-up than the smokers in the CG. The smokers in the IG who did not stop smoking had a lower degree of dependence and smoked fewer cigarettes (p < 0.0001) compared to those in the CG, as well as a multiple times higher prevalence of short- and long-term abstinence. Conclusions: It can be concluded that the intensive intervention and education can motivate patients preparing for elective surgery to stop smoking in the short- and long term.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管有兴趣在年轻人(YAs)中戒烟,人们对寻求治疗的电子烟(EC)使用者的特征知之甚少。在这项研究中,居住在美国的18-24岁的YAs对戒毒治疗感兴趣,他们被招募来完成关于人口统计学和EC使用的在线调查。主要资格标准是每月至少20天使用EC(无其他烟草使用),并有兴趣在下个月辞职。我们报告了那些做和没有完成强制性教练电话的描述性统计数据(n=981)。在这个样本中,大多数欧共体使用者报告高度依赖尼古丁,尝试退出失败的历史记录(包括先前使用NRT的29.4%),随着压力,焦虑,和抑郁症。人口统计学上几乎没有什么有意义的差异,EC使用行为,或行为健康因素之间的电话教练电话(完全参加研究;n=508),和那些没有(n=473)。YAs表现出对戒烟支持的兴趣,但是对于一半没有完成教练电话的人来说,没有明确的特征。Vaping戒烟计划设计师应考虑针对该人群中自我报告的行为健康问题进行调整。
    Despite interest in quitting vaping among young adults (YAs), little is known about characteristics of e-cigarette (EC) users seeking treatment. In this study, YAs aged 18-24 living in the United States interested in vaping cessation treatment were recruited to complete an online survey regarding demographics and EC use. Primary eligibility criteria were EC use on at least 20 days per month (no other tobacco use), and interest in quitting in the next month. We report descriptive statistics for those who did and did not complete a mandatory coaching call (n = 981). In this sample, most EC users reported high nicotine dependence, a history of unsuccessful quit attempts (including 29.4% with previous NRT use), along with stress, anxiety, and depression. There were few meaningful differences in demographics, EC use behaviors, or behavioral health factors between those who engaged with a phone coaching call (fully enrolled in study; n = 508), and those who did not (n = 473). YAs demonstrated interest in vaping cessation support, but there were no clear characteristics for the half who did not complete a coaching call. Vaping cessation program designers should consider tailoring for the self-reported behavioral health concerns present in this population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    全球范围内,大约有13亿香烟消费者,表明它是早期死亡和发病的第二高危险因素。同时,心理治疗提供基于其不同模式和技术的工具,这有助于戒烟。在这种情况下,这项研究收集了科学证据,以确定可用于减少香烟消费的心理治疗方法。对对照临床研究进行了系统评价,实施PRISMA方法。使用从MESH(医学主题词)和DECS(健康科学中的描述符)提取的术语进行搜索查询。随后,搜索在Medline/PubMed的科学数据库中进行了查询,科克伦,Scopus,科学直接,ProQuest,和PsycNet,随后使用乔安娜·布里格斯研究所的检查表验证方法学质量。选定的文件显示,认知行为疗法因其在七份出版物中的使用和有效性而盛行(25%)。正念疗法的认知方法见于4份出版物(14%),动机疗法的跨理论模型发表在4篇出版物中(14%),简短的心理治疗在3出版物(10%),其余10份文件(37%)与其他文件对应。干预研究认为认知行为疗法是减少香烟消费最常用的方法;在禁欲持续时间方面,科学证据显示短期减少的有益效果。
    Globally, there are around 1.3 billion cigarette consumers, indicating it to be the second highest risk factor for early death and morbidity. Meanwhile, psychological therapy offers tools based on its different models and techniques, which can contribute to smoking cessation. In this context, this study gathers scientific evidence to identify psychological therapies that can be used to reduce cigarette consumption. A systematic review of controlled clinical studies was conducted, implementing the PRISMA methodology. Search queries were performed with terms extracted from MESH (Medical Subject Headings) and DECS (Descriptors in Health Sciences). Subsequently, the search was queried in the scientific databases of Medline/PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus, Science Direct, ProQuest, and PsycNet, with subsequent verification of methodological quality using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklists. The selected documents revealed that cognitive behavioral therapy prevails due to its use and effectiveness in seven publications (25%). The cognitive approach with mindfulness therapy is found in 4 publications (14%), the transtheoretical model with motivational therapy in 4 publications (14%), brief psychological therapy in 3 publications (10%), and the remaining 10 documents (37%) correspond with others. Intervention studies refer to cognitive behavioral therapy as the most used in reducing cigarette consumption; in terms of the duration of abstinence, scientific evidence shows beneficial effects with short-term reduction.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在戒烟干预措施(SCI)后实现高随访率是一个普遍的挑战。这项研究的目的是确定患者和治疗师对改善随访率的偏好,并评估失去随访的患者在6个月时的吸烟状况。来自丹麦烟草和尼古丁STOPbase,它收集整个医疗保健领域的SCI数据,确定了20名通过常规程序失去随访的代表性患者以及11名治疗师。所有人都参加了个人半结构化电话面试,患者还包括6个月的吸烟状况。进行了演绎和归纳分析。分析中出现了四个主题,其中有几个子主题,所有关于接触。患者和治疗师都倾向于通过额外的尝试和使用语音信息来加强随访过程,电子邮件和/或短信,在一天中的指定时间呼叫,并避免来自未知号码的呼叫。此外,一些患者提到,他们在通话时很忙或没有携带移动设备作为障碍。一些治疗师提到,障碍可能包括复发的预期,但也是一种糟糕的精神状态,一天中的时间和病人对公共系统的恐惧。在最初失去随访的患者中,35%(95%CI16%-59%)连续戒烟6个月,全国总比率为22%(21.6-23.3%)。总之,患者和治疗师都倾向于强化随访.失去随访的患者的6个月吸烟状况似乎与常规随访的患者相似。这些发现将在更大的研究中进行实验检查。
    Achieving high follow-up rates after smoking cessation interventions (SCIs) is a general challenge. The aim of this study was to identify preferences among patients and therapists for improving follow-up rates and to assess smoking status at 6 months among patients lost to follow-up. From the Danish STOPbase for Tobacco and Nicotine, which collects data on SCI across health care, 20 representative patients lost to follow-up by routine procedures were identified together with 11 therapists. All participated in individual semi-structured phone interviews, which for patients also included 6-month smoking status. Deductive and inductive analyses were performed. Four themes emerged from the analyses with several subthemes, all regarding contacts. Both patients and therapists preferred to intensify the follow-up process by boosting it with additional attempts and using voice messages, e-mail and/or SMS, calling at specified times of the day and avoiding calls from unknown numbers. In addition, some patients mentioned that they were busy or were not carrying their mobile devices at the time of a call as a barrier. Some therapists mentioned that barriers could include an expectation of relapse, but also a poor mental state, the time of day and patient fear of public systems. Among the patients originally lost to follow-up, 35% (95% CI 16%-59%) experienced continuous smoking cessation for 6 months, and the overall national rate was 22% (21.6-23.3%). In conclusion, both patients and therapists preferred intensified follow-up. The 6-month smoking status for patients lost to follow-up seemed to be similar to that of the routinely followed-up patients. These findings will be examined experimentally in a larger study.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究旨在评估尼古丁替代疗法(NRT)与伐尼克林,未经治疗的吸烟有发展为眼部疾病的风险。我们采用了新用户设计,以调查NRT使用与台湾国民健康保险计划的眼疾发病率之间的关联。这项研究包括8416名接受NRT的吸烟者和8416名没有接受NRT的吸烟者(对照组),使用2007年至2018年的倾向评分进行匹配。经相关因素调整后,多变量Cox回归分析显示,与未经治疗的吸烟者相比,使用NRT与黄斑变性的风险显着降低相关(风险比[HR]:0.34;95%置信区间[CI]:0.13-0.87,P=0.024)。当按剂量分层时,与未治疗相比,短期使用NRT(8~28个确定的日剂量)与青光眼风险显著降低(HR:0.35;95%CI:0.16~0.80,P=0.012)和白内障风险降低趋势相关(HR:0.60;95%CI:0.36~1.01,P=0.053).然而,这些关联在长期使用NRT时未观察到.这项真实世界观测研究的结果表明,NRT使用,特别是短期使用,与没有戒烟治疗相比,某些眼部疾病的风险较低。长期使用NRT并未显示出相同的益处。因此,短期NRT可能是降低试图戒烟的吸烟者眼部疾病风险的有益治疗策略.然而,需要进一步的证据来验证这些发现并确定NRT使用的最佳持续时间.
    This study aims to assess the association between nicotine replacement therapy (NRT), varenicline, and untreated smoking with the risk of developing eye disorders. We employed a new-user design to investigate the association between NRT use and the incidence of eye disorders by the Taiwan National Health Insurance program. This study included 8416 smokers who received NRT and 8416 smokers who did not receive NRT (control group) matched using propensity scores between 2007 and 2018. After adjustment for relevant factors, a multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed that compared with untreated smokers, NRT use was associated with a significantly reduced risk of macular degeneration (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.34; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.13-0.87, P = 0.024). When stratified by dose, short-term NRT use (8-28 defined daily doses) was associated with significantly lower risk of glaucoma (HR: 0.35; 95% CI: 0.16-0.80, P = 0.012) and a trend toward reduced risk of cataract (HR: 0.60; 95% CI: 0.36-1.01, P = 0.053) compared to no treatment. However, these associations were not observed with long-term NRT use. The results of this real-world observational study indicate that NRT use, particularly short-term use, was associated with a lower risk of certain eye disorders compared to no treatment for smoking cessation. Long-term NRT use did not demonstrate the same benefits. Thus, short-term NRT may be a beneficial treatment strategy for reducing the risk of eye disorders in smokers attempting to quit. However, further evidence is required to verify these findings and determine the optimal duration of NRT use.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号