背景:Covid-19大流行极大地改变了获取和提供癌症护理服务的方式,包括结直肠癌(CRC)。在英国,不鼓励患者在初级保健中就诊,许多磋商都是远程进行的,调查程序和筛查程序暂停,和较少的手术和治疗交付。人们不得不面对在大流行期间患癌症的实际后果,并导航从未见过的途径,经常独自一人。我们检查了在大流行期间被诊断和治疗CRC的经验,以及这对人们癌症之旅的影响。
方法:在Covid-19大流行期间(2020年1月至2021年5月),对被诊断为CRC的人进行了半结构化访谈,在英格兰东北部。在面试中使用了一个迭代的主题指南,远程发生(电话或缩放),录音,伪匿名和转录。最初的转录本由两名研究人员独立编码,以及为跨成绩单应用而开发的代码“bank”。研究团队合作开发了主题和总体分析结构。
结果:对19名参与者进行了访谈,分析并确定了四个关键主题:(1)新冠肺炎和癌症的相对威胁不可比拟,与Covid-19相比,癌症的风险要大得多;(2)远程咨询存在问题,影响患者与临床医生建立融洽和信任的能力,评估非语言交流,感觉能够披露,理解并保留信息;(3)Stoma缺乏随访护理,一些人经历了造口逆转的漫长等待时间;最后,(4)在协商中独处对一些人吸收信息的能力产生负面影响,在情感脆弱的时候让他们没有亲人的支持。然而,一些参与者更喜欢在他们路径的某些点上独处,包括接受诊断,最常见的是在接受住院治疗时。
结论:独处带来意想不到的好处,让人们免于承担情感为他人工作,而是专注于他们的康复,然而,远程咨询对患者体验产生负面影响。这项研究强调了大流行癌症之旅的复杂益处和负担,包括这些是如何在癌症通路的不同点转移的。
■洛林·安吉尔,癌症幸存者,从概念概念出发一直是这项研究的核心,有助于:研究重点和设计的发展;确保资金;制作面向患者的材料;制定面试主题指南;数据的分析和解释;以及关键发现和手稿的起草。
BACKGROUND: The Covid-19 pandemic dramatically altered the way cancer care services were accessed and delivered, including for colorectal cancer (CRC). In the United Kingdom, patients were discouraged from presenting in primary care, many consultations took place remotely, investigative procedures and screening programmes were temporarily suspended, and fewer operations and treatments were delivered. People had to face the practical consequences of having cancer during a pandemic and navigate never before seen pathways, often alone. We examined the experience of being diagnosed and treated for CRC during the pandemic, and the implications of this on people\'s cancer journeys.
METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were undertaken with people diagnosed with CRC during the Covid-19 pandemic (January 2020-May 2021), in the North East of England. An iterative topic guide was used during interviews, which took place remotely (telephone or Zoom), were audio recorded, pseudo-anonymised and transcribed. Initial transcripts were independently coded by two researchers, and a code \'bank\' developed for application across transcripts. Development of themes and overarching analytical constructs was undertaken collaboratively by the research team.
RESULTS: Interviews were conducted with 19 participants, analysed and four key themes identified: (1) The relative threats of Covid-19 and Cancer were not comparable, with cancer seen as posing a far greater risk than Covid-19; (2) Remote consultations were problematic, affecting patients\' abilities to build rapport and trust with clinicians, assess nonverbal communication, and feel able to disclose, comprehend and retain information; (3) Stoma follow-up care was seen to be lacking, with long wait times for stoma reversal experienced by some; Finally, (4) Being alone during consultations negatively impacted some peoples\' abilities to absorb information, and left them without the support of loved ones at an emotionally vulnerable time. However, some participants preferred being alone at certain points in their pathways, including receiving a diagnosis, and most frequently when receiving in-patient treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: Being alone brought unexpected benefits, absolving people from undertaking emotions work for others, and instead focus on their recovery, however, remote consultations negatively impacted patients\' experiences. This study highlights the complex benefits and burdens of pandemic-located cancer journeys, including how these shifted at different points across cancer pathways.
UNASSIGNED: Lorraine Angell, a cancer survivor, has been central to this study from idea conception, contributing to: development of study focus and design; securing funding; production of patient-facing materials; development of interview topic guides; analysis and interpretation of data; and drafting of key findings and manuscripts.