Open fractures are highly incident injuries closely related to the modern life, in which accidents caused by motor vehicles or other machines impart high energy to bone tissue. Individual morbidity is represented by the functional impairment resultant of infection, nonunion, or vicious healing. In terms of public health, there are huge costs involved with the treatment of these fractures, particularly with their complications. One of the critical issues in managing open fractures is the use of antibiotics (ATB), including decisions about which specific agents to administer, duration of use, and ideal timing of the first prophylactic dose. Although recent guidelines have recommended starting antibiotic prophylaxis as soon as possible, such a recommendation appears to stem from insufficient evidence. In light of this, we conducted a systematic review, including studies that addressed the impact of the time to first antibiotic and the risk of infectious outcomes. Fourteen studies were selected, of which only four found that the early initiation of treatment with antibiotics is able to prevent infection. All studies had important risks of bias. The results indicate that this question remains open, and further prospective and methodologically sound studies are necessary in order to guide practices and health policies related to this matter. Level of Evidence II; Therapeutic Studies Investigating the Results Level of Treatment.
As fraturas expostas são lesões altamente incidentes, intimamente relacionadas à vida moderna, na qual os acidentes causados por veículos automotores ou outros aparatos transmitem alta energia ao tecido ósseo. A morbidade individual é representada pelo comprometimento funcional resultante de infecção, não-união ou cicatrização viciosa. Há enormes custos envolvidos no tratamento dessas fraturas em termos de saúde pública, principalmente quanto as complicações. Uma das questões críticas no tratamento de fraturas expostas é o uso de antibióticos, incluindo as decisões sobre quais agentes específicos devem ser administrados, a duração e o momento ideal para a primeira dose profilática. Embora as diretrizes recentes tenham recomendado o início da profilaxia antibiótica o mais rápido possível, essa recomendação parece se basear em evidências insuficientes. Em vista disso, realizamos uma revisão sistemática, incluindo estudos que abordaram o impacto do tempo até o primeiro antibiótico e o risco de resultados infecciosos. Foram selecionados 14 estudos, dos quais apenas quatro concluíram que o início precoce do tratamento com antibióticos é capaz de prevenir infecções. Todos os estudos tinham riscos importantes de viés. Os resultados indicam que essa questão permanece em aberto, sendo necessários mais estudos prospectivos e metodologicamente sólidos para orientar as práticas e políticas de saúde relacionadas a esse assunto. Nível de Evidência II; Estudos Terapêuticos que Investigam o Nível de Resultados do Tratamento.

UNASSIGNED: Posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) tears in young children are rare and optimal treatment is poorly described. Diagnosis may prove challenging as young children may not be able to verbalize a complete history of injury, may be difficult to examine, and plane film radiographs often appear within normal limits. Surgical treatment carries a risk of physeal arrest, but non-operative treatment may lead to recurrent instability and pain.
UNASSIGNED: We present a case report of a fouryear- old child with a PCL avulsion off the femoral insertion who received an open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with combined arthroscopic synovial debridement. We performed a literature review which compared the mechanism, location, concomitant injuries, work up and management of PCL injuries in children under the age of ten compared to adolescents and adults.
UNASSIGNED: Nineteen months following surgery, physical examination revealed full knee range of motion and return to baseline function. Imaging studies confirmed there was no evidence of physeal arrest.
UNASSIGNED: ORIF with arthroscopy can be an effective method to treat PCL avulsions in children under the age of 10 years. This is similar to other case reports which reported positive outcomes with ORIF in this population. Large studies are needed to best understand optimal treatment modalities for PCL injuries in very young children. Level of Evidence: IV.

Bone regeneration is a complex pathophysiological process determined by molecular, cellular, and biomechanical factors, including immune cells and growth factors. Fracture healing usually takes several weeks to months, during which patients are frequently immobilized and unable to work. As immobilization is associated with negative health and socioeconomic effects, it would be desirable if fracture healing could be accelerated and the healing time shortened. However, interventions for this purpose are not yet part of current clinical treatment guidelines, and there has never been a comprehensive review specifically on this topic. Therefore, this narrative review provides an overview of the available clinical evidence on methods that accelerate fracture healing, with a focus on clinical applicability in healthy patients without bone disease. The most promising methods identified are the application of axial micromovement, electromagnetic stimulation with electromagnetic fields and direct electric currents, as well as the administration of growth factors and parathyroid hormone. Some interventions have been shown to reduce the healing time by up to 20 to 30%, potentially equivalent to several weeks. As a combination of methods could decrease the healing time even further than one method alone, especially if their mechanisms of action differ, clinical studies in human patients are needed to assess the individual and combined effects on healing progress. Studies are also necessary to determine the ideal settings for the interventions, i.e., optimal frequencies, intensities, and exposure times throughout the separate healing phases. More clinical research is also desirable to create an evidence base for clinical guidelines. To make it easier to conduct these investigations, the development of new methods that allow better quantification of fracture-healing progress and speed in human patients is needed.

BACKGROUND: Multiple hemiarthroplasty (HA) approaches exist for femoral neck fracture (FNF) treatment. However, there is no consensus on the superiority of one approach for postoperative outcomes. This study assessed outcomes among randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the posterior approach (PA), direct lateral approach (DLA), anterolateral approach (ALA), and the direct anterior approach (DAA) in HA for FNF.
METHODS: PubMed, Ovid/MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were queried in February 2024. A frequentist model network meta-analysis of eligible prospective RCTs compared outcomes among approaches using P-scores.
RESULTS: Of 1,481 retrieved studies, 11 RCTs totaling 1,513 FNF patients who underwent HA through a PA (n = 446; 29.5%), DLA (n = 481; 31.8%), ALA (n = 296; 19.6%), or DAA (n = 290; 19.2%) with median (interquartile range) follow-up of 6 (4.5-12.0) months were included for meta-analysis. DAA was associated with statistically increased operative duration (mean difference [MD], 1.89 minutes; 95% CI, 0.08 to 3.69 minutes; p < 0.001) compared with a PA, whereas an ALA was associated with statistically greater blood loss compared with a PA (MD, 5.81 mL; 95% CI, 4.11 to 7.50 mL; p < 0.001). There were no differences in the incidence of fracture, dislocation, infection, complications, revision, nor 1-year mortality among approaches. There were also no differences in hip nor pain score improvement at latest follow-up, although with high heterogeneity (I2 = 85.7% and 94.2%, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: This study found no clinical difference in improvement in pain, function, nor in revision outcomes and operative characteristics among HA approaches for FNF, and each approach had a similar adverse event profile. Despite limited randomized evidence, these findings suggest comparable short-term efficacy and safety of all approaches.
METHODS: Therapeutic, Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

This review evaluates the current landscape and future directions of regenerative medicine for knee cartilage repair, with a particular focus on tissue engineering strategies. In this context, scaffold-based approaches have emerged as promising solutions for cartilage regeneration. Synthetic scaffolds, while offering superior mechanical properties, often lack the biological cues necessary for effective tissue integration. Natural scaffolds, though biocompatible and biodegradable, frequently suffer from inadequate mechanical strength. Hybrid scaffolds, combining elements of both synthetic and natural materials, present a balanced approach, enhancing both mechanical support and biological functionality. Advances in decellularized extracellular matrix scaffolds have shown potential in promoting cell infiltration and integration with native tissues. Additionally, bioprinting technologies have enabled the creation of complex, bioactive scaffolds that closely mimic the zonal organization of native cartilage, providing an optimal environment for cell growth and differentiation. The review also explores the potential of gene therapy and gene editing techniques, including CRISPR-Cas9, to enhance cartilage repair by targeting specific genetic pathways involved in tissue regeneration. The integration of these advanced therapies with tissue engineering approaches holds promise for developing personalized and durable treatments for knee cartilage injuries and osteoarthritis. In conclusion, this review underscores the importance of continued multidisciplinary collaboration to advance these innovative therapies from bench to bedside and improve outcomes for patients with knee cartilage damage.

BACKGROUND: The use of antidepressants, especially selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), has been linked to adverse effects on bone health, but findings are conflicting. This study aimed to quantify the associations between newer antidepressants and bone mineral density (BMD) and fracture risk through a comprehensive meta-analysis.
METHODS: Observational studies on the association between the use of novel antidepressants and BMD and hip fracture were systematically searched in PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and Scopus. Random effects meta-analyses were conducted to pool results across the eligible studies. The heterogeneity, publication bias, and influence were assessed extensively.
RESULTS: 14 eligible studies with 1,417,134 participants were identified. Antidepressant use was associated with significantly lower BMD compared to non-use at all skeletal sites examined, with pooled standardized mean differences (SMD) ranging from -0.02 (total hip) to -0.04 (femoral neck). Importantly, antidepressant use was associated with a 2.5-fold increased risk of hip fracture (pooled odds ratio (OR) 2.50, 95% CI 2.26-2.76). While heterogeneity was detected, the overall findings were robust in sensitivity analyses.
CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis provided strong evidence that novel antidepressants, especially widely used SSRIs, have detrimental impacts on bone health. The observed associations with decreased BMD and doubled hip fracture risk have important clinical implications.

Weber Type B fractures often arise from external rotation with the foot supinated or pronated. Altered tibiofibular joint kinematics in Weber B fractures are responsible for syndesmotic damage seen in Weber B fractures. Weber B fractures are managed using open reduction and internal fixation if displaced. The syndesmosis is injured in up to 40% of cases resulting in an unstable injury with a syndesmotic diastasis. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the current literature on syndesmotic fixation in Weber B fractures, assess the outcomes and complications of syndesmotic fixation and assess the necessity of syndesmotic fixation in Weber B fractures. A search was carried out on the EMBASE, PubMed and CINAHL databases and eight studies assessing the outcomes of syndesmotic fixations versus no syndesmotic fixation with 292 Weber B ankle fractures were included in this systematic review. Results showed significant heterogeneity so a narrative review was conducted. Results of these studies showed that functional, radiological, and quality-of-life outcomes and incidences of post-traumatic osteoarthritis in patients with syndesmotic screws were similar to those of patients not managed with syndesmotic screws. Only one favoured syndesmotic fixation in all cases of diastasis. As such, syndesmotic fixation with screws may not be necessary in the management of Weber B fractures. Screws are also associated with breakage, loosening, local irritation and infections. Suture button devices and antiglide fixation techniques appear to be valid alternatives to syndesmotic screws. It was found that there was no need for routine hardware removal unless the hardware was causing significant side effects for the patient.

This study systemically reviewed the effects of robot-assisted percutaneous kyphoplasty (R-PKP) on the clinical outcomes and complications of patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF). The articles published from the establishment of the database to 19 April 2024 were searched in PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Chinese biomedical literature service system (SinoMed). Meta-analysis was employed to evaluate the status of pain relief and complications between the control and R-PKP groups. Standardized mean difference (SMD) or mean difference (MD), risk ratios (RR), and 95% confidence interval (CI) were selected for analysis, and a common or random effect model was adopted to merge the data. Eight studies involving 773 patients with OCVFs were included. R-PKP could effectively Cobb\'s angles (MD = -1.00, 95% CI -1.68 to -0.33, P = 0.0034), and decrease the occurrence of cement leakage (RR = 0.36, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.60, P < 0.0001). However, there was no significant effect on the results of visual analog scale (MD = -0.09, 95% CI -0.20 to 0.02, P = 0.1145), fluoroscopic frequency (SMD = 5.31, 95% CI -7.24 to 17.86, P = 0.4072), and operation time (MD = -0.72, 95% CI -7.47 to 6.03, P = 0.8342). R-PKP could significantly correct vertebral angle and reduce cement leakage. Thus, R-PKP maybe an effective choice for correction vertebral Angle and reducing postoperative complications, while its impact on relieving pain, decreasing fluoroscopic frequency, and shortening operation time need further exploration.

BACKGROUND: The study aimed to predict the risk factors of deep vein thrombosis of lower extremity after traumatic fracture of lower extremity, so as to apply effective strategies to prevent deep vein thrombosis of lower extremity, improve survival rate, and reduce medical cost.
METHODS: The English and Chinese literatures published from January 2005 to November 2023 were extracted from PubMed, Embase, Willey Library, Scopus, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP databases. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata/SE 16.0 software.
RESULTS: A total of 13 articles were included in this paper, including 2699 venous thromboembolism (VTE) patients and 130,507 normal controls. According to the meta-results, 5 independent risk factors can be identified: history of VTE was the most significant risk factor for deep vein thrombosis after traumatic lower extremity fracture (risk ratio [RR] = 6.45, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.64-11.26); age (≥60) was the risk factor for deep vein thrombosis after traumatic lower extremity fracture (RR = 1.60, 95% CI: 1.02-2.18); long-term braking was a risk factor for deep vein thrombosis after traumatic lower extremity fracture (RR = 1.52, 95% CI: 1.11-1.93); heart failure was a risk factor for deep vein thrombosis after traumatic lower extremity fracture (RR = 1.92, 95% CI: 1.51-2.33); obesity was a risk factor for deep vein thrombosis after traumatic lower extremity fracture (RR = 1.59, 95% CI: 1.35-1.83).
CONCLUSIONS: The study confirmed that the history of deep vein thrombosis, age (60 + years), previous history of VTE, obesity, prolonged bed rest, and heart failure are all associated with an increased risk of VTE. By identifying these significant risk factors, we can more intensively treat patients at relatively high risk of VTE, thereby reducing the incidence of VTE. However, the limitation of the study is that the sample may not be diversified enough, and it fails to cover all potential risk factors, which may affect the universal applicability of the results. Future research should include a wider population and consider more variables in order to obtain a more comprehensive risk assessment.

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials investigating acetabular fractures are heterogeneous in their investigated outcomes and their corresponding measurements. Standardization may facilitate comparability and pooling of research results, which would lead to an increase in knowledge about the optimal treatment of acetabular fractures, resulting in long-term evidence-based treatment decisions and improvements in patient care. The aim of this systematic review is to identify the reported outcomes and their measurements from studies on treatments for acetabular fractures to develop a core outcome set which contains the most relevant outcome measures to be included in future studies.
METHODS: Studies published in English and German including patients aged 16 years and older, with a surgically treated acetabular fracture, will be included. Studies with nonsurgical treatment, pathologic fractures, polytraumatized patients, and patients younger than 16 years of age will be excluded because other outcomes may be of interest in these cases. Any prospective and retrospective study will be included. Systematic reviews will be excluded, but their included studies will be screened for eligibility. The literature will be searched on MEDLINE, CENTRAL, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, and WHO ICTRP. Risk of selective reporting of outcomes will be assessed using the Outcome Reporting Bias in Trials classification system. Heterogeneously defined outcomes that measure the same outcome will be grouped and subsequently categorized into outcome domains using the taxonomy of the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials Initiative.
CONCLUSIONS: It is expected that a high number of studies will be included, and many outcomes will be identified using different definitions and measurement instruments. A limitation of this systematic review is that only previously investigated outcomes will be detected, thus disregarding potentially relevant outcomes.
BACKGROUND: PROSPERO CRD42022357644.