• 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究旨在报告在2021年7月至12月恢复有限的面对面课程和临床轮换的第一所菲律宾私立医学院的医学生中突破性感染的发生率和特征。
    这是一项描述性研究,使用来自多源记录的二级工作表审查了2021年7月至12月医学生的突破性感染。
    在837名接种疫苗的医学生中,23人(2.7%)经历了COVID-19突破性感染。其中,9人为男性,14人为女性。4人无症状,19人有症状。在19个症状中,18人轻度,1人严重。轻度感染表现为上呼吸道症状。症状持续时间为4至27天,平均10天。第2剂COVID-19疫苗后,突破性感染的时间为35至212天,平均为86天。23例病例中有14例报告与确诊病例接触,13人来自家庭成员,在SLICE和CLARO计划中都没有。
    我们的研究表明,即使在三角洲激增期间,低的突破性感染率,大多数是轻度症状病例,并且在SLICE和CLARO计划中没有病例传播。定期健康监测,严格遵守最低卫生规程。
    UNASSIGNED: This study aims to report the incidence and characteristics of breakthrough infections among medical students in the first Philippine private medical school that resumed limited face-to-face classes and clinical rotations from July to December 2021.
    UNASSIGNED: This is a descriptive study using secondary worksheet from multiple-source records review of breakthrough infections among medical students from July to December 2021.
    UNASSIGNED: Among the 837 vaccinated medical students, 23 (2.7%) experienced COVID-19 breakthrough infections. Of these, 9 were male and 14 were female. Four were asymptomatic and 19 were symptomatic. Of the 19 symptomatic, 18 had mild and 1 had severe disease. Mild infections presented with upper respiratory tract symptoms. Duration of symptoms ranged from 4 to 27 days with an average of 10 days. Timing of breakthrough infections ranged from 35 to 212 days after the second dose of COVID-19 vaccine with a mean of 86 days. Contact with confirmed cases was reported in 14 of 23 cases, 13 were from household members and none within the SLICE and CLARO programs.
    UNASSIGNED: Our study showed that even in the midst of the Delta surge, low breakthrough infection rate with mostly mildly symptomatic cases and no case transmissions within the SLICE and CLARO programs are possible with vaccination, regular health surveillance, and strict adherence to minimum health protocols.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本文旨在更好地理解不同的参与,成本,以及在COVID-19大流行期间在菲律宾开发和实施mHealth解决方案时的资源考虑。
    首先,六名参与者填写了一份表格,记录了开发具有缓解大流行功能的伪移动应用程序的估计成本。第二,十个关键线人访谈确定了主持人,障碍,以及开发mHealth工具的资源需求。
    开发和推出具有公共卫生和流行病学功能的移动应用程序的平均成本估算为4,018,907卢比(78,650美元)。对访谈的分析导致在三个领域组织了12个主题:1)开发和维持mHealth解决方案的促进者和障碍;2)维持mHealth技术的成本;3)影响mHealth技术开发和维护成本的因素。
    虽然成本估算存在明显差异,它提供了一个大概的数字和不同的因素,实施者需要维持和维持一个mHealth解决方案。本文希望为参与技术解决方案合作伙伴和扩展mHealth技术的政策和实践提供信息。
    UNASSIGNED: This paper aims to provide a better understanding of the different engagement, cost, and resource considerations in developing and implementing mHealth solutions in the Philippines during the COVID-19 pandemic.
    UNASSIGNED: First, six participants completed a form to document the estimated costs of developing a pseudo mobile application with features to mitigate the pandemic. Second, ten key informant interviews determined the facilitators, barriers, and resource requirements in developing mHealth tools.
    UNASSIGNED: The average cost estimate to develop and roll out a mobile application with public health and epidemiology features is Php 4,018,907 (US $78,650). The analysis of the interviews resulted in 12 themes organized in three domains: 1) facilitators and barriers in developing and sustaining mHealth solutions; 2) costs of sustaining mHealth technologies; and 3) factors affecting the costs of development and maintenance of mHealth technologies.
    UNASSIGNED: While differences in the cost estimates are evident, it provides a ballpark figure and the different factors that implementers need to sustain and maintain an mHealth solution. This paper hopes to inform policies and practices in engaging technology solution partners and in scaling up mHealth technologies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    疫苗的推出标志着对抗COVID-19的游戏规则改变。在撒哈拉以南非洲,研究记录了接种疫苗的意图和COVID-19疫苗的摄取。然而,关于性别差异如何影响COVID-19疫苗接种的文献很少。我们进行了一项多国横断面研究,以评估在刚果民主共和国(DRC)的COVID-19疫苗摄取和疫苗接种意向的性别差异,尼日利亚,塞内加尔,乌干达。这项研究涉及对2022年3月至6月间在每个国家的全国成人样本中进行的移动调查数据的分析。运行双变量和多变量逻辑回归模型。自我报告的COVID-19疫苗摄入量在男性和女性之间没有显着差异(p=0.47),而男性接种疫苗的意愿明显更高(p=0.008)。在男性中,从卫生工作者那里获得COVID-19信息,对COVID-19的检测以及对卫生部的高度信任与较高的疫苗接种率相关。在女性中,对政府的高度信任与更高的疫苗接种率有关。打算接种疫苗,居住在半城市地区的男性和居住在农村地区的女性的疫苗接种意愿明显高于城市地区的女性.与男性疫苗接种意向呈正相关的其他因素是对世界卫生组织的信任和机构的真实性。而社会经济指数较高的家庭和以前拒绝接种疫苗的男性接种意愿较低。总的来说,在男性和女性中区分疫苗摄取和接种意愿的因素主要与对政府机构的信任有关,机构的感知真实性,和被告的住所。这些因素是指导在撒哈拉以南非洲和类似情况下调整干预措施以增加COVID-19疫苗吸收的关键。
    The introduction of vaccines marked a game changer in the fight against COVID-19. In sub-Saharan Africa, studies have documented the intention to vaccinate and the uptake of COVID-19 vaccines. However, little is documented about how sex differences could have impacted COVID-19 vaccination. We conducted a multi-country cross-sectional study to assess the sex differences in COVID-19 vaccine uptake and intention to vaccinate in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), Nigeria, Senegal, and Uganda. This study involved analysis of data from mobile surveys conducted between March and June 2022 among nationally constituted samples of adults in each country. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression models were run. The self-reported uptake of COVID-19 vaccines was not significantly different between males and females (p = 0.47), while the intention to vaccinate was significantly higher among males (p = 0.008). Among males, obtaining COVID-19 information from health workers, testing for COVID-19, and having high trust in the Ministry of Health were associated with higher vaccination uptake. Among females, having high trust in the government was associated with higher vaccination uptake. For intention to vaccinate, males who resided in semi-urban areas and females who resided in rural areas had significantly higher vaccination intention compared to their counterparts in urban areas. Other factors positively associated with vaccination intention among males were trust in the World Health Organization and perceived truthfulness of institutions, while males from households with a higher socio-economic index and those who had declined a vaccine before had a lower vaccine intention. Overall, the factors differentiating vaccine uptake and intention to vaccinate among males and females were mostly related to trust in government institutions, perceived truthfulness of institutions, and respondent\'s residence. These factors are key in guiding the tailoring of interventions to increase COVID-19 vaccine uptake in sub-Saharan Africa and similar contexts.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    疫苗接种是预防冠状病毒病(COVID-19)等传染病的最有效的预防性公共卫生干预措施之一。考虑到对新的COVID-19疫苗的持续需求,修改我们的方法并纳入更保守的严重急性呼吸道综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)区域,以有效解决新出现的病毒变异,这一点至关重要.核衣壳蛋白是SARS-CoV-2的结构蛋白,参与复制和免疫反应。此外,该蛋白具有显著的优势,因为随着时间的推移突变的积累最小,并且包含对SARS-CoV-2免疫至关重要的关键T细胞表位.一种可能适用于新一代COVID-19疫苗的新策略是使用抗原组合,包括刺突和核衣壳蛋白,引发强大的体液和有效的细胞免疫反应,以及持久的免疫力。多种抗原的战略使用旨在增强疫苗效力并扩大对病毒的保护。包括他们的变体。针对来自其他冠状病毒的核衣壳蛋白的免疫反应是持久的,它可以在感染后持续长达11年。因此,将核衣壳(N)纳入疫苗设计为疫苗接种工作增加了一个重要维度,并有望增强有效对抗COVID-19的能力。在这次审查中,我们总结了评估核衣壳蛋白作为抗原的临床前研究。本研究讨论了核衣壳的单独使用及其与SARS-CoV-2的刺突蛋白或其他蛋白的组合。
    Vaccination is one of the most effective prophylactic public health interventions for the prevention of infectious diseases such as coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Considering the ongoing need for new COVID-19 vaccines, it is crucial to modify our approach and incorporate more conserved regions of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) to effectively address emerging viral variants. The nucleocapsid protein is a structural protein of SARS-CoV-2 that is involved in replication and immune responses. Furthermore, this protein offers significant advantages owing to the minimal accumulation of mutations over time and the inclusion of key T-cell epitopes critical for SARS-CoV-2 immunity. A novel strategy that may be suitable for the new generation of vaccines against COVID-19 is to use a combination of antigens, including the spike and nucleocapsid proteins, to elicit robust humoral and potent cellular immune responses, along with long-lasting immunity. The strategic use of multiple antigens aims to enhance vaccine efficacy and broaden protection against viruses, including their variants. The immune response against the nucleocapsid protein from other coronavirus is long-lasting, and it can persist up to 11 years post-infection. Thus, the incorporation of nucleocapsids (N) into vaccine design adds an important dimension to vaccination efforts and holds promise for bolstering the ability to combat COVID-19 effectively. In this review, we summarize the preclinical studies that evaluated the use of the nucleocapsid protein as antigen. This study discusses the use of nucleocapsid alone and its combination with spike protein or other proteins of SARS-CoV-2.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在COVID-19大流行期间,公共卫生小组尝试了几种方法来传播准确的健康信息,并与社区成员接触,以了解他们对公共卫生服务的需求。两种方法是社区拥护者和社区参与行动研究(CPAR)。这项研究评估了两个冠军计划和一个CPAR计划,为谁,在什么情况下,包括与实施相关的资金和资源。
    在2022年6月至2023年6月之间,对三个不同案例研究的现实主义评估(COVID-19冠军,疫苗冠军,和CPAR计划)在英格兰南安普敦市进行了三个阶段:开发初始计划理论和收集其他上下文信息,包括与交付每个计划相关的资金和资源;初始计划理论测试;最终计划理论的综合。数据主要通过半结构化访谈(n=29)收集,涉及计划和培训线索,志愿服务,社区组织,志愿者,和当地社区成员,和一个由当地社区成员组成的焦点小组(n=8)。
    市议会使用了来自两个资助奖项的64.2万英镑来提供这些计划:COVID-19冠军41万英镑;疫苗冠军485万英镑;CPAR计划115万英镑。产生了28个初始计划理论,经过“测试”以支持,精炼,或反驳上下文-机制-结果关系,最终在这三个方案中产生了22个方案理论。产生了六个半正则,每个都有多个节目理论,并提供有关这些程序如何以及为什么可以工作的数据,在这种情况下:(1)通过社区联系建立信任;(2)促进关系和合作;(3)提供培训和资源;(4)当地社区知识和专门知识;(5)社区代表性和领导力;(6)适当的沟通和信息共享。
    本研究提供了对公共卫生紧急情况下影响社区冠军和CPAR方法实施的因素的新知识和理解。这些结果表明,社区成员的代表性和参与,建立和建立信任,充足的培训和资源,来自可信赖的社区成员和组织的清晰沟通是与社区有意义参与的催化剂。评估注册:研究注册中心标识符:researchregistry8094。
    UNASSIGNED: During the COVID-19 pandemic, public health teams tried several approaches to circulate accurate health information and engage with community members to understand what they need from public health services. Two such approaches were community champions and community participatory action research (CPAR). This study evaluates two champion programmes and a CPAR programme in terms of what worked, for whom, and in what contexts, including the funding and resourcing associated with implementation.
    UNASSIGNED: Between June 2022 and June 2023, a realist evaluation of three distinct case studies (COVID-19 champions, Vaccine Champions, and CPAR programmes) in the city of Southampton in England was conducted in three stages: development of initial programme theories and collection of additional contextual information, including funding and resources associated with delivering each programme; initial programme theory testing; synthesis of final programme theories. Data was collected primarily through semi-structured interviews (n = 29) across programme and training leads, voluntary services, community organisations, volunteers, and local community members, and one focus group with local community members (n = 8).
    UNASSIGNED: The City Council used £642 k from two funding awards to deliver the programmes: COVID-19 Champions £41 k; Vaccine Champions £485 k; and CPAR programmes £115 k. Twenty-eight initial programme theories were generated, which were \"tested\" to support, refine, or refute context-mechanism-outcome relationships, resulting finally in a set of 22 programme theories across the three programmes. Six demi-regularities were generated, each featuring in multiple programme theories, and providing data on how and why these programmes can work, and in which contexts: (1) building trust through community connections; (2) fostering relationships and collaboration; (3) provision of training and resources; (4) local community knowledge and expertise; (5) community representation and leadership; (6) appropriate communication and information sharing.
    UNASSIGNED: This study provides new knowledge and understanding of the factors affecting the implementation of community champion and CPAR approaches during public health emergencies. These findings suggest that representation and involvement of community members, establishing and building on trust, adequate training and resources, and clear communication from trusted community members and organisations are catalysts for meaningful engagement with communities.Evaluation registration: Research Registry identifier: researchregistry8094.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    疫苗的采用是克服COVID-19大流行的关键因素。然而,农村和城市地区的疫苗接种率差异很大。在本文中,我们的目标是了解与哥伦比亚偏远农村地区疫苗接种相关的个人和机构因素.
    我们在2022年2月进行了疫苗接种时,采访了安蒂奥基亚(哥伦比亚)偏远农村地区的800户家庭(1,592人)的随机样本。然后,我们使用线性概率模型来解释COVID-19疫苗的摄取。
    结果表明,至少第一剂COVID-19疫苗的概率与获取信息呈正相关,对警察和军队的信任,以及感染COVID-19的感知风险。对教会的信任与疫苗接种呈负相关。
    机构可以在流行病的管理中发挥关键作用。及时了解与该疾病相关的风险和感知的风险是动员人群服用COVID-19疫苗的关键因素。
    UNASSIGNED: The adoption of vaccines was a crucial factor in overcoming the COVID-19 pandemic. However, vaccination rates between rural and urban areas varied greatly. In this paper, our objective is to understand the individual and institutional factors associated with the uptake of vaccines in remote rural areas in Colombia.
    UNASSIGNED: We interviewed a random sample of 800 households (1,592 individuals) in remote rural areas of Antioquia (Colombia) during February 2022 when vaccinations were available. Then, we use a linear probability model to explain the uptake of the COVID-19 vaccine.
    UNASSIGNED: The results indicate that the probability of having at least the first dose of the COVID-19 vaccine is positively associated with access to information, trust in police and army, and the perceived risk of contracting COVID-19. Trust in the church is negatively related to vaccination.
    UNASSIGNED: Institutions can play a critical role in the management of pandemics. Timely information on the risks associated with the disease and perceived riskiness are key factors that mobilize the population to take the COVID-19 vaccine.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    已知COVID-19与急性心肌梗死(MI)有关。
    本研究的目的是评估COVID-19住院幸存者中心肌梗死再入院30天的结果。
    我们使用美国全国再入院数据库识别2020年4月1日至2020年11月30日的COVID-19入院,使用国际疾病分类-第10修订版-临床修改(ICD-10-CM)索赔。主要结果是MI的30天再入院发生率。共纳入521251例COVID-19病例,其中11.6%在出院后30天内再次入院。MI的30天再入院发生率为0.6%。30天全因再入院死亡率为1.3%。再次入院的MI患者更常见的是男性(61.6%vs38.4%),并且Charlson合并症负担评分更高(7vs4)。30天MI再入院中最常见的诊断是2型MI(51.1%),随后诊断为1型非ST段抬高MI(41.7%)。ST段抬高MI病例占所有MI再入院的7.6%,而0.6%的患者患有不稳定型心绞痛。复发诊断为COVID-19的30天MI再入院死亡率和并发症发生率较高。相反,对于复发COVID-19的MI,进行血运重建手术的几率较低.此外,与非COVID-19心肌梗死再入院相比,复发性COVID-19心肌梗死再入院的住院时间(7天比5天)和住院费用(18,398美元比16,191美元)更高。
    在COVID-19住院的幸存者中,5.2%的全因30天再入院和12%的全因再入院死亡率归因于MI。与MI相关的再入院是死亡的重要来源,发病率,和资源利用。
    UNASSIGNED: COVID-19 is known to be associated with acute myocardial infarction (MI).
    UNASSIGNED: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of 30-day readmissions for MI among survivors of COVID-19 hospitalization.
    UNASSIGNED: We used the U.S. Nationwide Readmission Database to identify COVID-19 admissions from April 1, 2020, to November 30, 2020, using International Classification of Diseases-10th Revision-Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) claims. The primary outcome was 30-day readmission incidence for MI. A total of 521,251 cases of COVID-19 were included, of which 11.6% were readmitted within 30 days of discharge. The 30-day readmission incidence for MI was 0.6%. The 30-day all-cause readmission mortality incidence was 1.3%. Patients readmitted for MI were more frequently males (61.6% vs 38.4%) and had a higher Charlson comorbidity burden score (7 vs 4). The most common diagnosis among 30-day MI readmission was type 2 MI (51.1%), followed by a diagnosis of a type 1 non-ST-segment elevation MI (41.7%). ST-segment elevation MI cases constituted 7.6% of all MI-readmission whereas 0.6% of patients had unstable angina. 30-day MI readmissions with a recurrent diagnosis of COVID-19 had higher readmission mortality and incidence of complications. Conversely, the odds of performing revascularization procedures were lower for MI with recurrent COVID-19. Furthermore, MI readmissions with recurrent COVID-19 had a higher length of stay (7 vs 5 days) and cost of hospitalization ($18,398 vs $16,191) when compared with non-COVID-19 MI readmissions.
    UNASSIGNED: Among survivors of COVID-19 hospitalization, 5.2% of all-cause 30-day readmissions and 12% of all-cause readmission mortality were attributed to MI. MI-related readmissions were a significant source of mortality, morbidity, and resource utilization.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    COVID-19心血管后遗症的先前研究包括在4周内进行的诊断,但世界卫生组织对“急性期”的定义是>3个月。
    这项研究的目的是确定COVID-19急性期哪些心血管诊断与SARS-CoV-2感染有关。
    对艾伯塔省所有在2020年3月1日至2021年6月30日之间SARS-CoV-2逆转录聚合酶链反应测试阳性的成年人进行的回顾性队列研究,匹配(按年龄,性别,Charlson合并症评分,和测试日期)与逆转录聚合酶链反应测试阴性的对照。
    177892例实验室确认SARS-CoV-2感染的患者(平均年龄42.7岁,49.7%的女性)更有可能去急诊室(5.7%对3.3%),住院(3.4%vs2.1%),或在1个月内死亡(1.3%vs0.4%)比匹配的测试阴性对照。三个月后,病例比对照组更有可能因糖尿病进行急诊就诊或住院(1.5%vs0.7%),高血压(0.6%vs0.4%),心力衰竭(0.2%vs0.1%),或肾损伤(0.3%对0.2%)。在6,030例因COVID-19住院后存活的患者中,急性期糖尿病的风险明显更高(9.5%vs3.0%,调整后的赔率比[AOR]:3.16[95%CI:2.43-4.12]),高血压(3.5%vs1.4%,OR:2.89[95%CI:1.97-4.23]),心力衰竭(2.1%vs0.7%,OR:3.16[95%CI:1.88-5.29]),肾损伤(3.1%对0.8%,OR:2.70[95%CI:1.71-4.28]),出血(1.5%vs0.5%,OR:3.40[95%CI:1.83-6.32]),和静脉血栓栓塞(0.8%vs0.3%,OR:3.60[95%CI:1.59-8.13])。
    临床医生应该对COVID-19幸存者进行糖尿病筛查,高血压,心力衰竭,和急性期的肾功能障碍。
    UNASSIGNED: Prior studies of COVID-19 cardiovascular sequelae include diagnoses made within 4 weeks, but the World Health Organization definition for \"postacute phase\" is >3 months.
    UNASSIGNED: The purpose of this study was to determine which cardiovascular diagnoses in the postacute phase of COVID-19 are associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection.
    UNASSIGNED: Retrospective cohort study of all adults in Alberta who had a positive SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction test between March 1, 2020 and June 30, 2021, matched (by age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity score, and test date) with controls who had a negative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction test.
    UNASSIGNED: The 177,892 patients with laboratory confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection (mean age 42.7 years, 49.7% female) were more likely to visit an emergency department (5.7% vs 3.3%), be hospitalized (3.4% vs 2.1%), or die (1.3% vs 0.4%) within 1 month than matched test-negative controls. After 3 months, cases were significantly more likely than controls to have an emergency department visit or hospitalization for diabetes mellitus (1.5% vs 0.7%), hypertension (0.6% vs 0.4%), heart failure (0.2% vs 0.1%), or kidney injury (0.3% vs 0.2%). In the 6,030 patients who had survived a hospitalization for COVID-19, postacute phase risks were substantially greater for diabetes mellitus (9.5% vs 3.0%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 3.16 [95% CI: 2.43-4.12]), hypertension (3.5% vs 1.4%, aOR: 2.89 [95% CI: 1.97-4.23]), heart failure (2.1% vs 0.7%, aOR: 3.16 [95% CI: 1.88-5.29]), kidney injury (3.1% vs 0.8%, aOR: 2.70 [95% CI: 1.71-4.28]), bleeding (1.5% vs 0.5%, aOR: 3.40 [95% CI: 1.83-6.32]), and venous thromboembolism (0.8% vs 0.3%, aOR: 3.60 [95% CI: 1.59-8.13]).
    UNASSIGNED: Clinicians should screen COVID-19 survivors for diabetes mellitus, hypertension, heart failure, and kidney dysfunction in the postacute phase.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    COVID-19患者的出院后即刻处于脆弱状态,这是由于在此期间可能出现的几种并发症。一些患者在出院后不久再次入院,而另一些患者报告症状持续存在,发展专业需求,或观察到其基线功能能力的下降。我们机构目前缺乏关于COVID出院后患者预后的信息。这项研究描述了COVID-19患者从菲律宾总医院服务区出院后的结果。
    这项研究是一项回顾性图表审查,涉及去年2021年8月至2021年10月从PGHCOVID服务区出院的所有成年患者的图表。他们在1周的随访咨询数据,1个月,和出院后3个月进行审查。基线特征和出院后结果,包括COVID后症状,特殊护理需求,死亡率,再住院,紧急咨询,依赖程度,评估了重返工作岗位的能力。
    共纳入171例患者图表。患者的平均年龄为53.7岁。大多数是男性(60.2%),失业者(59.7%),非吸烟者(55%),高血压(57.9%),糖尿病(50.2%),肥胖(50.2%)。其中大多数为需氧(80%),并在入院期间有严重至严重的COVID感染(72.5%)。出院后3个月,113(66%)稳定,能够完成随访,8人(4.6%)死亡,9人(5.2%)再次入院,41例(23.9%)失访。在3个月后能够随访的人中,84例(74%)无症状。在那些仍然有症状的人中,最常见的症状是呼吸困难,疲劳,还有咳嗽.三个月后,100人(88%)不需要特殊护理需求,100人(88%)完全独立,45例(39.8%)能够恢复基线工作.
    尽管大多数患者在入院期间有严重至危重的COVID感染,大多数人在出院后3个月内无症状。在那些出现持续症状的人中,呼吸困难,咳嗽,与COVID严重程度无关,疲劳是最常见的症状。大多数人不需要特殊护理需求。
    UNASSIGNED: The immediate post-discharge period of COVID-19 patients is a vulnerable state due to several complications that may arise during this time. Some patients get readmitted shortly after being discharged while others report persistence of symptoms, develop specialized needs, or observe a decline from their baseline functional capacity. Information on the outcomes of post-COVID discharge patients in our institution is currently lacking. This study described the outcomes of patients with COVID-19 after their discharge from the service areas of Philippine General Hospital.
    UNASSIGNED: This study is a retrospective chart review involving charts of all adult patients discharged from the PGH COVID service areas last August 2021 to October 2021. Data from their follow up consults at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months post-discharge were reviewed. Baseline characteristics and post-discharge outcomes including post-COVID symptoms, special care needs, mortality, rehospitalization, emergency consult, level of dependence, and ability to return to work were assessed.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 171 patient charts were included. The mean age of patients was 53.7 years. Most were male (60.2%), unemployed (59.7%), non-smoker (55%), hypertensive (57.9%), diabetic (50.2%), and obese (50.2%). Most of them were oxygen requiring (80%) and with severe to critical COVID infection (72.5%) during admission. At 3 months post-discharge, 113 (66%) were stable and able to complete the follow up, 8 (4.6%) died, 9 (5.2%) got readmitted, and 41 (23.9%) were lost to follow up. Among those who were able to follow up after 3 months, 84 (74%) were asymptomatic. Among those who remained symptomatic, the most common symptoms were dyspnea, fatigue, and cough. After 3 months, 100 (88%) did not require special care needs, 100 (88%) were fully independent, and 45 (39.8%) were able to return to baseline work.
    UNASSIGNED: Despite the majority of patients having severe to critical COVID infection during admission, most were asymptomatic within 3 months post-discharge. In those who developed persistent symptoms, dyspnea, cough, and fatigue were the most common symptoms identified regardless of COVID severity. Majority did not require special care needs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号