BACKGROUND: Messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines emerged as a powerful tool in the fight against infections. Unlike traditional vaccines, this unique type of vaccine elicits robust and persistent innate and humoral immune response with a unique host cell-mediated pathogen gene expression and antigen presentation.
METHODS: This offers a novel approach to combat poxviridae infections. From the genome of vaccinia and Mpox viruses, three key genes (E8L, E7R, and H3L) responsible for virus attachment and virulence were selected and employed for designing the candidate mRNA vaccine against vaccinia and Mpox viral infection. Various bioinformatics tools were employed to generate (B cell, CTL, and HTL) epitopes, of which 28 antigenic and immunogenic epitopes were selected and are linked to form the mRNA vaccine construct. Additional components, including a 5\' cap, 5\' UTR, adjuvant, 3\' UTR, and poly(A) tail, were incorporated to enhance stability and effectiveness. Safety measures such as testing for human homology and in silico immune simulations were implemented to avoid autoimmunity and to mimics the immune response of human host to the designed mRNA vaccine, respectively. The mRNA vaccine\'s binding affinity was evaluated by docking it with TLR-2, TLR-3, TLR-4, and TLR-9 receptors which are subsequently followed by molecular dynamics simulations for the highest binding one to predict the stability of the binding complex.
RESULTS: With a 73% population coverage, the mRNA vaccine looks promising, boasting a molecular weight of 198 kDa and a molecular formula of C8901H13609N2431O2611S48 and it is said to be antigenic, nontoxic and nonallergic, making it safe and effective in preventing infections with Mpox and vaccinia viruses, in comparison with other insilico-designed vaccine for vaccinia and Mpox viruses.
CONCLUSIONS: However, further validation through in vivo and in vitro techniques is underway to fully assess its potential.

Immune imprinting is a phenomenon that stems from the fundamentals of immunological memory. Upon recurrent exposures to an evolving pathogen, the immune system must weigh the benefits of rapidly recalling established antibody repertoires with greater affinity to the initial variant or invest additional time and energy in producing de novo responses specific to the emerging variant. In this review, we delve into the mechanistic complexities of immune imprinting and its role in shaping subsequent immune responses, both de novo and recall, against rapidly evolving respiratory viruses such as influenza and coronaviruses. By exploring the duality of immune imprinting, we examine its potential to both enhance or hinder immune protection against disease, while emphasizing the role of host and viral factors. Finally, we explore how different vaccine platforms may affect immune imprinting and comment on vaccine strategies that can favor de novo variant-specific antibody responses.

The different technology platforms used to make poultry vaccines are reviewed. Vaccines based on classical technologies are either live attenuated or inactivated vaccines. Genetic engineering is applied to design by deletion, mutation, insertion, or chimerization, genetically modified target microorganisms that are used either as live or inactivated vaccines. Other vaccine platforms are based on one or a few genes of the target pathogen agent coding for proteins that can induce a protective immune response (\"protective genes\"). These genes can be expressed in vitro to produce subunit vaccines. Alternatively, vectors carrying these genes in their genome or nucleic acid-based vaccines will induce protection by in vivo expression of these genes in the vaccinated host. Properties of these different types of vaccines, including advantages and limitations, are reviewed, focusing mainly on vaccines targeting viral diseases and on technologies that succeeded in market authorization.
Plataformas tecnológicas de vacunas avícolas En este artículo se revisan las diferentes plataformas tecnológicas utilizadas para elaborar vacunas avícolas. Las vacunas basadas en tecnologías clásicas son vacunas vivas atenuadas o inactivadas. La ingeniería genética se aplica al diseño mediante eliminación, mutación, inserción o quimerización de microorganismos diana genéticamente modificados que se utilizan como vacunas vivas o inactivadas. Otras plataformas de vacunas se basan en uno o varios genes del agente patógeno objetivo que codifican proteínas que pueden inducir una respuesta inmunitaria protectora (“genes protectores”). Estos genes pueden expresarse in vitro para producir vacunas de subunidades. Alternativamente, los vectores que llevan estos genes en su genoma o las vacunas basadas en ácidos nucleicos inducirán protección mediante la expresión in vivo de estos genes en el huésped vacunado. Se revisan las propiedades de estos diferentes tipos de vacunas, incluidas sus ventajas y limitaciones, centrándose principalmente en las vacunas dirigidas a enfermedades virales y en las tecnologías que lograron la autorización de comercialización.

We previously demonstrated that a prime-boost regime with an infectious bronchitis virus (IBV) Massachusetts (Mass)-type vaccine and recombinant LaSota virus (rLS) coexpressing IBV Arkansas (Ark)-type trimeric spike ectodomain (Se) and granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor (GMCSF) enhances heterologous protection against virulent Ark challenge. This study evaluates protection against Ark-type challenge conferred by administering the rLS/ArkSe.GMCSF and the attenuated Mass viruses mixed in the same vial as a combined vaccine. Chickens were vaccinated at day of hatch and challenged at 21 days of age with virulent Ark. Protection conferred by vaccination was assessed by respiratory signs, tracheal virus isolation as well as IBV RNA quantitation, and tracheal histomorphometry. Protection conferred by the combined vaccine was compared to protection induced by a commercial attenuated ArkDPI (Delmarva Poultry Industry) vaccine as well as by the attenuated Mass vaccine alone. Vaccination with the combined vaccine (rLS/ArkSe.GMCSF + Mass) as well as Mass alone provided significantly less protection against Ark challenge compared to the control using attenuated live ArkDPI vaccine. Only ArkDPI-vaccinated chickens exhibited \"sterilizing immunity,\" i.e., no virus isolated from ≥10% of chickens after challenge. Chickens vaccinated with the combined vaccine rLS/ArkSe.GMCSF + Mass showed significantly less tracheal damage than birds vaccinated with the attenuated Mass vaccine alone. In addition, the combined vaccine also resulted in less virus isolation from the trachea. We concluded that the combined vaccine containing the recombinant virus and the attenuated Mass enhanced the cross-protective ability of the attenuated Mass vaccine against heterologous challenge.
Nota de investigación- Protección cruzada conferida por una vacuna combinada que contiene el virus atenuado de la bronquitis infecciosa serotipo Massachusetts y un virus de Newcastle LaSota recombinante que expresa la proteína de la espícula del serotipo Arkansas. Previamente se demostró que un esquema de refuerzo con una vacuna tipo Massachusetts (Mass) del virus de la bronquitis infecciosa (IBV) y con un virus de Newcastle LaSota recombinante (rLS) que co-expresa el ectodominio de pico trimérico del serotipo Arkansas (Ark) del virus de la bronquitis infecciosa (Se) y el factor de estimulación de colonias de granulocitos y macrófagos (GMCSF) (virus rLS/ArkSe.GMCSF) mejora la protección heteróloga contra el desafío con serotipo Arkansas virulento. Este estudio evaluó la protección contra el desafío con el serotipo Arkansas conferida por la administración del virus recombinante rLS/ArkSe.GMCSF y el virus Massachussets atenuado mezclados en el mismo vial como una vacuna combinada. Los pollos se vacunaron el día de la eclosión y se desafiaron a los 21 días de edad con el serotipo Arkansas virulento. La protección conferida por la vacunación se evaluó mediante signos respiratorios, el aislamiento del virus traqueal, cuantificación del ARN del virus de bronquitis y por histomorfometría traqueal. La protección conferida por la vacuna combinada se comparó con la protección inducida por una vacuna comercial atenuada ArkDPI (Delmarva Poultry Industry), y con la vacuna atenuada Massachussets por si sola. La vacunación con la vacuna combinada (rLS/ArkSe.GMCSF + Mass), así como con Massachussets sola, proporcionó una protección significativamente menor contra la exposición con Arkansas en comparación con el control que utilizó la vacuna ArkDPI viva atenuada. Solo los pollos vacunados con ArkDPI exhibieron “inmunidad esterilizante”, es decir, que no se aisló ningún virus en ≥10 % de los pollos después del desafío. Los pollos vacunados con la vacuna combinada rLS/ArkSe.GMCSF + Mass mostraron significativamente menos daño traqueal que las aves vacunadas con la vacuna Massachusetts atenuada sola. Además, la vacuna combinada también resultó en un menor aislamiento del virus de la tráquea. Se concluye que la vacuna combinada que contiene el virus recombinante y el serotipo Massachussets atenuado mejoró la capacidad de protección cruzada de la vacuna de Massachusetts atenuada contra el desafío heterólogo.

Marburg virus (MARV), a filovirus, was first identified in 1967 in Marburg, Germany, and Belgrade, former Yugoslavia. Since then, MARV has caused sporadic outbreaks of human disease with high case fatality rates in parts of Africa, with the largest outbreak occurring in 2004/05 in Angola. From 2021 to 2023, MARV outbreaks occurred in Guinea, Ghana, New Guinea, and Tanzania, emphasizing the expansion of its endemic area into new geographical regions. There are currently no approved vaccines or therapeutics targeting MARV, but several vaccine candidates have shown promise in preclinical studies. We compared three vaccine platforms simultaneously by vaccinating hamsters with either a single dose of an adenovirus-based (ChAdOx-1 MARV) vaccine, an alphavirus replicon-based RNA (LION-MARV) vaccine, or a recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus-based (VSV-MARV) vaccine, all expressing the MARV glycoprotein as the antigen. Lethal challenge with hamster-adapted MARV 4 weeks after vaccination resulted in uniform protection of the VSV-MARV and LION-MARV groups and 83% of the ChAdOx-1 MARV group. Assessment of the antigen-specific humoral response and its functionality revealed vaccine-platform-dependent differences, particularly in the Fc effector functions.

One major limitation of effective vaccine delivery is its dependency on a robust cold chain infrastructure. While Vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) has been demonstrated to be an effective viral vaccine vector for diseases including Ebola, its -70 °C storage requirement is a significant limitation for accessing disadvantaged locations and populations. Previous work has shown thermal stabilization of viral vaccines with a combination of pullulan and trehalose (PT) dried films. To improve the thermal stability of VSV, we optimized PT formulation concentrations and components, as well as drying methodology with enhanced vacuum drying. When formulated in PT films, VSV can be stored for 32 weeks at 4 °C with less than 2 log PFU loss, at 25 °C with 2.5 log PFU loss, and at 37 °C with 3.1 log PFU loss. These results demonstrate a significant advancement in VSV thermal stabilization, decreasing the cold chain requirements for VSV vectored vaccines.

暂无摘要。

The recent emergence and rapid response to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 was enabled by prototype pathogen and vaccine platform approaches, driven by the preemptive application of RNA vaccine technology to the related Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus. Recently, the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases identified nine virus families of concern, eight enveloped virus families and one nonenveloped virus family, for which vaccine generation is a priority. Although RNA vaccines have been described for a variety of enveloped viruses, a roadmap for their use against nonenveloped viruses is lacking. Enterovirus D68 was recently designated a prototype pathogen within the family Picornaviridae of nonenveloped viruses because of its rapid evolution and respiratory route of transmission, coupled with a lack of diverse anti-enterovirus vaccine approaches in development. Here, we describe a proof-of-concept approach using a clinical stage RNA vaccine platform that induced robust enterovirus D68-neutralizing antibody responses in mice and nonhuman primates and prevented upper and lower respiratory tract infections and neurological disease in mice. In addition, we used our platform to rapidly characterize the antigenic diversity within the six genotypes of enterovirus D68, providing the necessary data to inform multivalent vaccine compositions that can elicit optimal breadth of neutralizing responses. These results demonstrate that RNA vaccines can be used as tools in our pandemic-preparedness toolbox for nonenveloped viruses.

Infectious bursal disease (IBD) is a widespread problem in the poultry industry, and vaccination is the primary preventive method. However, moderately virulent vaccines may damage the bursa, necessitating the development of a safe and effective vaccine. The Newcastle disease virus (NDV) has been explored as a vector for vaccine development. In this study, reverse genetic technology was used to obtain three recombinant viruses, namely, rClone30-VP2L (P/M)-chGM-CSF (NP), rClone30-chGM-CSF (P/M)-VP2L (NP), and rClone30-VP2L-chGM-CSF (P/M). Animal experiments showed that the three biological adjuvant bivalent vaccines effectively increased anti-NDV and anti-infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) titres, enhancing both humoral and cellular immune responses in chickens without leading to any harm. Amongst the three biological adjuvant bivalent vaccines, the rClone30-chGM-CSF (P/M)-VP2L (NP) group had higher levels of anti-NDV antibodies at 14 days after the first immunization and stimulated a greater humoral immune response in 7-10 days. While, the rClone30-VP2L (P/M)-chGM-CSF (NP) group was the most effective in producing a higher level of IBDV antibody response. In conclusion, these three vaccines can induce immune responses more rapidly and effectively, streamline production processes, be cost-effective, and provide a new avenue for the development of Newcastle disease (ND) and IBD bivalent vaccines.

Enhancing livestock biosecurity is critical to safeguard the livelihoods of farmers, global and local economies, and food security. Vaccination is fundamental to the control and prevention of exotic and endemic high-priority infectious livestock diseases. Successful implementation of vaccination in a biosecurity plan is underpinned by a strong understanding of correlates of protection-those elements of the immune response that can reliably predict the level of protection from viral challenge. While correlates of protection have been successfully characterized for many human viral vaccines, for many high-priority livestock viral diseases, including African swine fever and foot and mouth disease, they remain largely uncharacterized. Current literature provides insights into potential correlates of protection that should be assessed during vaccine development for these high-priority mammalian livestock viral diseases. Establishment of correlates of protection for biosecurity purposes enables immune surveillance, rationale for vaccine development, and successful implementation of livestock vaccines as part of a biosecurity strategy.