Nosocomial pneumonia is defined as pneumonia occurring ≥ 48 h after hospital admission in a patient without severe immunosuppression. It can occur in spontaneously breathing patients or with noninvasive ventilation (NIV) and mechanically ventilated patients. In patients with suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) (semi)quantitative cultures of tracheobronchial aspirates or bronchoalveolar lavage fluid should be perfomed. The initial empirical antimicrobial treatment is determined by the risk for multidrug-resistant pathogens (MDRP). The advantage of combination treatment increases with the prevalence of MDRPs. The antibiotic treatment should be adapted when the microbiological results are available. After 72 h a standardized re-evaluation including the response to treatment and also checking of the suspected diagnosis of pneumonia in a structured form is mandatory. Treatment failure can occur as a primary or secondary failure and in the case of primary progression necessitates another comprehensive diagnostic work-up before any further antibiotic treatment.
UNASSIGNED: Die nosokomiale Pneumonie ist definiert als eine Pneumonie, die ≥ 48 h nach Krankenhausaufnahme bei einem Patienten ohne schwere Immunsuppression auftritt. Sie kann spontan atmende bzw. nichtinvasiv sowie beatmete Patienten betreffen. Bei Verdacht auf eine VAP (ventilatorassoziierte Pneumonie) sollen (semi)quantitative Kulturen eines Tracheobronchialsekrets oder einer bronchoalveolären Lavageflüssigkeit gewonnen werden. Die initiale kalkulierte antimikrobielle Therapie richtet sich nach dem Risiko für multiresistente Erreger (MRE). Der Vorteil der Kombinationstherapie steigt mit der MRE-Prävalenz. Die initiale kalkulierte antimikrobielle Therapie sollte nach Vorliegen der mikrobiologischen Ergebnisse angepasst werden. Nach 72 h ist eine Reevaluation erforderlich, die sowohl das Therapieansprechen als auch die Überprüfung der Verdachtsdiagnose Pneumonie in strukturierter Form einschließt. Ein Therapieversagen kann primär oder sekundär auftreten und erfordert bei primärer Progression eine erneute umfassende Diagnostik vor jeglicher Antibiotikatherapie.

We compared clinical outcomes of patients who received monotherapy and combination therapy for treatment of MDR A. baumannii VAP. 170 patients were included. Vasopressor use and mortality rate were higher for combination therapy (69.3% versus 28.6%, p=0.024; 67.5% versus 14.3%, p=0.007; respectively). Majority received polymyxin B-based combination therapy, with higher mortality than those without polymyxin B (80.2% versus 19.8%, p=0.043). After adjusting for vasopressor use, monotherapy, dual combination, and triple combination therapy were not associated with mortality (aHR 0.24, 95% CI 0.03 to 1.79, p=0.169; aHR 1.26, 95% CI 0.79 to 2.00, p=0.367; aHR 0.93, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.49, p=0.744; respectively). There was no difference in adverse effects and length of stay between the two groups. Mortality from MDR A. baumannii VAP was high and not associated with monotherapy or combination therapy after adjustment for vasopressor use. Antibiotic regimens other than those containing polymyxin are urgently needed for the treatment of these infections.

OBJECTIVE: This executive summary of a German national guideline aims to provide the most relevant evidence-based recommendations on the diagnosis and treatment of nosocomial pneumonia.
METHODS: The guideline made use of a systematic assessment and decision process using evidence to decision framework (GRADE). Recommendations were consented by an interdisciplinary panel. Evidence analysis and interpretation was supported by the German innovation fund providing extensive literature searches and (meta-) analyses by an independent methodologist. For this executive summary, selected key recommendations are presented including the quality of evidence and rationale for the level of recommendation.
RESULTS: The original guideline contains 26 recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of adults with nosocomial pneumonia, thirteen of which are based on systematic review and/or meta-analysis, while the other 13 represent consensus expert opinion. For this key summary, we present 11 most relevant for everyday clinical practice key recommendations with evidence overview and rationale, of which two are expert consensus and 9 evidence-based (4 strong, 5 weak and 2 open recommendations). For the management of nosocomial pneumonia patients should be divided in those with and without risk factors for multidrug-resistant pathogens and/or Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Bacterial multiplex-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) should not be used routinely. Bronchoscopic diagnosis is not considered superior to´non-bronchoscopic sampling in terms of main outcomes. Only patients with septic shock and the presence of an additional risk factor for multidrug-resistant pathogens (MDRP) should receive empiric combination therapy. In clinically stabilized patients, antibiotic therapy should be de-escalated and focused. In critically ill patients, prolonged application of suitable beta-lactam antibiotics should be preferred. Therapy duration is suggested for 7-8 days. Procalcitonin (PCT) based algorithm might be used to shorten the duration of antibiotic treatment. Patients on the intensive care unit (ICU) are at risk for invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA). Diagnostics for Aspergillus should be performed with an antigen test from bronchial lavage fluid.
CONCLUSIONS: The current guideline focuses on German epidemiology and standards of care. It should be a guide for the current treatment and management of nosocomial pneumonia in Germany.

UNASSIGNED: To compare the effects of midazolam, propofol, and dexmedetomidine monotherapy and combination therapy on the prognosis of intensive care unit (ICU) patients receiving continuous mechanical ventilation (MV).
UNASSIGNED: 11,491 participants from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV database 2008-2019 was included in this retrospective cohort study. The primary outcome was defined as incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), in-hospital mortality, and duration of MV. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were utilized to evaluate the association between sedation and the incidence of VAP. Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses were performed to investigate the correlation between sedative therapy and in-hospital mortality. Additionally, univariate and multivariate linear analyses were conducted to explore the relationship between sedation and duration of MV.
UNASSIGNED: Compared to patients not receiving these medications, propofol alone, dexmedetomidine alone, combination of midazolam and dexmedetomidine, combination of propofol and dexmedetomidine, combination of midazolam, propofol and dexmedetomidine were all association with an increased risk of VAP; dexmedetomidine alone, combination of midazolam and dexmedetomidine, combination of propofol and dexmedetomidine, combination of midazolam, propofol and dexmedetomidine may be protective factor for in-hospital mortality, while propofol alone was risk factor. There was a positive correlation between all types of tranquilizers and the duration of MV. Taking dexmedetomidine alone as the reference, all other drug groups were found to be associated with an increased risk of in-hospital mortality. The administration of propofol alone, in combination with midazolam and dexmedetomidine, in combination with propofol and dexmedetomidine, in combination with midazolam, propofol and dexmedetomidine were associated with an increased risk of VAP compared to the use of dexmedetomidine alone.
UNASSIGNED: Dexmedetomidine alone may present as a favorable prognostic option for ICU patients with mechanical ventilation MV.

BACKGROUND: Severe COVID-19 carries a high morbidity and mortality. Previous studies have shown an association between COVID-19 severity and SARS-CoV-2 viral load (VL). We sought to measure VL in multiple compartments (urine, plasma, lower respiratory tract) in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with severe COVID-19 pneumonia and correlate with clinical outcomes.
METHODS: Plasma, urine, and endotracheal aspirate (ETA) samples were obtained on days 1, 3, 7, 14, and 21 from subjects admitted to the ICU with severe COVID-19. VL was measured via reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. Clinical data was collected from the electronic health record. Grouped comparisons were performed using Student\'s t-test or 1-way ANOVA. Linear regression was used to correlate VL from different compartments collected at the same time. Logistic regression was performed to model ventilator-freedom at 28 days as a function of peak plasma VL.
RESULTS: We enrolled 57 subjects with severe COVID-19 and measured VL in plasma (n = 57), urine (n = 25), and ETA (n = 34). Ventilator-associated pneumonia developed in 63% of subjects. 49% of subjects were viremic on study day 1. VL in plasma and ETA both significantly decreased by day 14 (P < 0.05), and the two were weakly correlated on study day 1 (P = 0.0037, r2 = 0.2343) and on all study days (P < 0.001, r2 = 0.2211). VL were not detected in urine. While no associations were observed with peak ETA VL, subjects with higher peak plasma VL experienced a greater number of respiratory complications, including ventilator-associated pneumonia and fewer ventilator-free and hospital-free days. There was no association between VL in either plasma or ETA and mortality. In viremic patients, plasma VL was significantly lower in subjects that were ICU-free and ventilator-free (P < 0.05), with trends noted for hospital-freedom, ventilator-associated pneumonia, and survival to discharge (P < 0.1). By logistic regression, plasma VL was inversely associated with ventilator-freedom at 28 days (odds ratio 0.14, 95% confidence interval 0.02-0.50).
CONCLUSIONS: Elevated SARS-CoV-2 VL in the plasma but not in the lower respiratory tract is a novel biomarker in severe COVID-19 for respiratory complications.

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) for ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) or ventilated hospital-acquired pneumonia (vHAP) in extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E) carriers is challenging. BioFire® FilmArray® Pneumonia plus Panel (mPCR) can detect bacteria and antibiotic resistance genes, including blaCTX-M, the most common ESBL-encoding gene.
METHODS: This monocentric, prospective study was conducted on a group of ESBL-E carriers from March 2020 to August 2022. The primary objective was to evaluate the concordance between the results of mPCR and conventional culture performed on respiratory samples of ESBL-E carriers to investigate suspected VAP/vHAP. The secondary objective was to appraise the impact of performing or not mPCR on initial antibiotic therapy adequacy in ESBL-E carriers with confirmed VAP/vHAP.
RESULTS: Over the study period, 294 patients with ESBL-E carriage were admitted to the ICU, of who 168 (57%) were mechanically ventilated. (i) Diagnostic performance of mPCR was evaluated in suspected 41 episodes of VAP/vHAP: blaCTX-M gene was detected in 15/41 (37%) episodes, where 9/15 (60%) were confirmed ESBL-E-induced pneumonia. The culture and blaCTX-M were concordant in 35/41 (85%) episodes, and in all episodes where blaCTX-M was negative (n = 26), the culture never detected ESBL-E. (ii) The impact of mPCR on initial antibiotic therapy adequacy was assessed in 95 episodes of confirmed VAP/vHAP (22 episodes were tested with mPCR and 73 without); 47 (49%) episodes were ESBL-E-induced, and 24 (25%) were carbapenem-resistant bacteria-induced. The use of mPCR was significantly associated with higher prescription of adequate empirical antibiotic therapy in the multivariable logistic regression (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) (95% CI) of 7.5 (2.1-35.9), p = 0.004), propensity-weighting (aOR of 5.9 (1.6-22.1), p = 0.008), and matching-cohort models (aOR of 5.8 (1.5-22.1), p = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: mPCR blaCTX-M showed an excellent diagnostic value to rule out the diagnosis of ESBL-E related pneumonia in ESBL-E carriers with suspected VAP/vHAP. In addition, in patients with confirmed VAP/vHAP, a mPCR-based antibiotic therapy was associated with an increased prescription of adequate empirical antibiotic therapy. Performing mPCR on respiratory samples seems to be a promising tool in ESBL-E carriers with suspected vHAP/VAP. However, if mPCR is used in very low pre-test clinical probability of pneumonia, due to the high sensitivity and the rate of overdiagnosed pneumonia, the risk of overconsumption of carbapenem may prevail. Further studies are warranted.

Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is one of the most common causes of nosocomial infections. The aim of this study was to evaluate the antimicrobial and anti-biofilm activity of an in-house low-cost tracheostomy tube impregnated with chlorhexidine and violet crystal. The impregnated tracheostomy tubes demonstrated antimicrobial activity, including for multidrug-resistant bacteria. Fourteen patients were evaluated. During ventilation, VAP occurred in one patient in the coated group and in three patients in the control group (p=0.28). A reduction of biofilm cells was observed. This study provides preliminary evidence to support that the antiseptic impregnation of a tracheostomy tube provides significant antimicrobial activity.

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is one of the main causes of healthcare-associated infection in Europe that increases patient morbidity and mortality. Multi-resistant pathogens are a major public health issue in burn centers. Mortality increases when the initial antibiotic treatment is inappropriate, especially if the patient is infected with P. aeruginosa strains that are resistant to many antibiotics. Phage therapy is an emerging option to treat severe P. aeruginosa infections. It involves using natural viruses called bacteriophages, which have the ability to infect, replicate, and, theoretically, destroy the P. aeruginosa population in an infected patient. We report here the case of a severely burned patient who experienced relapsing ventilator-associated pneumonia associated with skin graft infection and bacteremia due to extensively drug-resistant P. aeruginosa. The patient was successfully treated with personalized nebulized and intravenous phage therapy in combination with immunostimulation (interferon-γ) and last-resort antimicrobial therapy (imipenem-relebactam).

Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a critical hospital-acquired infection following non-cardiac surgeries, leading to poor outcomes. This study identifies VAP risk factors in non-cardiac surgical patients and determines the causative pathogens. A retrospective analysis with 1:4 propensity-score matching was conducted on patients in a surgical intensive care unit (ICU) from 2010 to 2020 at a private tertiary medical center. Among 99 VAP patients, the mortality rate was 64.7%. VAP risk factors included prolonged mechanical ventilation (odds ratio [OR] 6.435; p < 0.001), repeat intubation (OR 6.438; p < 0.001), lower oxygenation levels upon ICU admission (OR 0.950; p < 0.001), and undergoing gastrointestinal surgery (OR 2.257; p = 0.021). The 30-day mortality risk factors in the VAP group were late-onset VAP (OR 3.450; p = 0.022), inappropriate antibiotic treatment (OR 4.083; p = 0.041), and undergoing gastrointestinal surgeries (OR 4.776; p = 0.019). Nearly half of the Gram-negative infections were resistant strains, and a third were polymicrobial infections. Non-cardiac surgical patients with VAP face adverse hospital outcomes. Identifying high-risk patients and understanding VAP\'s resistant and microbial nature are crucial for appropriate treatment and improved health outcomes.

Background: The methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) accounts for 20% to 40% of all hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) cases with mortality rates up to 55%. Prompt and accurate diagnosis is essential, especially in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Nasal MRSA polymerase chain reaction (PCR) diagnostic utility evidence is conflicting in the literature for HAP due to a low number of HAP patients included in prior studies or due to the lack of high-yield gold standard cultures defined for comparisons. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted in a 65-bed medical ICU, and encompassing all adult patients admitted from January 2015 to March 2023 for HAP. Respiratory cultures included were those obtained by bronchoalveolar lavage or endotracheal suction within 7 days of nasal MRSA PCR testing. Results: The study included 412 patients; 56.8% were males and 65% were Whites. The mean age was 60.5 years. Most patients (82.5%) underwent MRSA-PCR before intubation, and the average time between MRSA-PCR and lower respiratory cultures was 2.15 days. The diagnostic performance of nasal MRSA PCR in diagnosing HAP in the ICU yielded a sensitivity (Sen) of 47.83%, specificity (Sp) of 92.29%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 26.83%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 96.77%. For nonventilator HAP (nv-HAP) cases sensitivity was at 50%, specificity 92.83%, PPV 28.57%, and NPV at 97.00%. In ventilator-acquired pneumonia (VAP-HAP), the corresponding values were 42.86%, 90.91%, 23.08%, and 96.15%, respectively. Conclusion: The nasal MRSA PCR shows a high NPV and low false negative rate, suggesting it is a reliable tool for ruling out MRSA HAP in ICU patients. Care should be taken into account for disease prevalence and clinical context, as these factors may influence test performance. Further validation through prospective large-sample studies utilizing high-yield lower respiratory tract cultures is necessary to confirm our findings.