variant interpretation

变体解释
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:研究如果在没有异常的胎儿中检测到有多少新的致病性(P)和可能致病性(LP)的非蛋白截短或非规范剪接变异将被归类为未知意义的变异(VUS)。
    方法:该研究包括156例通过出生后外显子组测序诊断的神经发育障碍患者。在没有特定产前表现的病例中,对导致P/LP非蛋白截短和非规范剪接变异进行回顾性重新分类。忽视产后症状。
    结果:在156名患者中,72具有非截短或非规范剪接变体。六名患者因具有一个以上可能的致病变异而被排除。十二名患者的产前畸形已知与诊断的疾病相关;因此,变体解释保持不变。在剩下的54个案件中,有33个,该变异体以前被报道为P/LP.对其他21种LP/P变体的重新分类显示,如果在产前检测到,有16种将被分类为VUS。
    结论:在我们的队列中,如果在怀孕期间进行测序,则有24%(16/66)的非蛋白质截短/非规范剪接变体将被分类为VUS。假阴性结果的可能性,源于产前可用的表型信息的局限性,应该与未来的父母讨论。在产前设置中分类和报告变体的标准可能需要调整。
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate how many novel pathogenic (P) and likely pathogenic (LP) nonprotein-truncating or noncanonical splicing variants would be classified as variants of unknown significance (VUS) if they were detected in fetuses without abnormalities.
    METHODS: The study included 156 patients with neurodevelopmental disorders diagnosed through postnatal exome sequencing. Causative P/LP nonprotein-truncating and noncanonical splicing variants were retrospectively reclassified in cases without specific prenatal manifestations, disregarding postnatal symptoms.
    RESULTS: Of the 156 patients, 72 had a nontruncating or noncanonical splicing variant. Six patients were excluded for having more than one possible causative variant. Twelve patients had prenatal malformations known to be associated with the diagnosed disorder; therefore, variant interpretation remained unchanged. In 33 of the 54 remaining cases, the variant had been previously reported as P/LP. Reclassification of the other 21 LP/P variants revealed that 16 would have been classified as VUS if detected prenatally.
    CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort, ∼24% (16/66) of causative nonprotein-truncating/noncanonical splicing variants would have been classified as VUS if sequencing had been conducted during pregnancy. The potential for false-negative results, stemming from limitations in the phenotypic information available prenatally, should be discussed with prospective parents. The criteria for classifying and reporting variants in the prenatal setting may require adjustment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    改变基因剪接的变异估计占所有致病变异的三分之一,然而,仅仅从DNA测序数据很难预测它们。为了克服这一点,许多小组都在进行基于RNA的分析,资源密集型,特别是诊断实验室。有成千上万的功能验证的变体诱导错误剪接;然而,这些信息没有合并,他们在ClinVar的代表性不足,这对变体解释构成了障碍,并可能导致验证工作的重复。为了解决这个问题,我们开发了SpliceVarDB,一个整合了50,000多个变体的在线数据库,分析了它们对8,000多个人类基因剪接的影响。我们评估了500多个已发布的数据源,并建立了一个可剪接性量表以标准化,协调,并合并一系列实验方案产生的变体验证数据。根据他们的有力支持证据,变异体被归类为“改变剪接”(~25%),“不改变拼接”(~25%),和“低频拼接-改变”(~50%),对应于微弱或不确定的剪接性证据。重要的是,SpliceVarDB中55%的剪接改变变体在规范剪接位点之外(5.6%为深内含子)。这些变体可以支持变体管理诊断途径,并且可以用于提供开发更准确的计算机剪接预测因子所需的高质量数据。这些变体可以通过在线平台访问,SpliceVarDB,具有可视化的附加功能,变异信息,在硅预测中,和验证指标。SpliceVarDB是一个非常大的拼接更改变体集合,可在https://splicevardb.org上获得。
    Variants that alter gene splicing are estimated to comprise up to a third of all disease-causing variants, yet they are hard to predict from DNA sequencing data alone. To overcome this, many groups are incorporating RNA-based analyses, which are resource intensive, particularly for diagnostic laboratories. There are thousands of functionally validated variants that induce mis-splicing; however, this information is not consolidated, and they are under-represented in ClinVar, which presents a barrier to variant interpretation and can result in duplication of validation efforts. To address this issue, we developed SpliceVarDB, an online database consolidating over 50,000 variants assayed for their effects on splicing in over 8,000 human genes. We evaluated over 500 published data sources and established a spliceogenicity scale to standardize, harmonize, and consolidate variant validation data generated by a range of experimental protocols. According to the strength of their supporting evidence, variants were classified as \"splice-altering\" (∼25%), \"not splice-altering\" (∼25%), and \"low-frequency splice-altering\" (∼50%), which correspond to weak or indeterminate evidence of spliceogenicity. Importantly, 55% of the splice-altering variants in SpliceVarDB are outside the canonical splice sites (5.6% are deep intronic). These variants can support the variant curation diagnostic pathway and can be used to provide the high-quality data necessary to develop more accurate in silico splicing predictors. The variants are accessible through an online platform, SpliceVarDB, with additional features for visualization, variant information, in silico predictions, and validation metrics. SpliceVarDB is a very large collection of splice-altering variants and is available at https://splicevardb.org.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    从下一代测序(NGS)数据中识别遗传性疾病的遗传原因仍然是一个复杂的过程,特别是由于在解释大量生成的数据和所识别的数百个候选变体方面的挑战。变体分类的不一致,遗传中心对相同的变异进行不同的分类,会阻碍对罕见疾病的准确诊断。收集有关人类遗传变异及其与疾病关联的数据的公开数据库为发现全球变异解释中的冲突提供了充足的机会。在这项研究中,我们使用ClinVar的数据探索了变异分类差异的模式,不同解释的公共档案。我们发现5.7%的变体有相互矛盾的解释(COIs)报告,绝大多数解释冲突是由于不确定意义(VUS)的变体而产生的。多达78%的临床相关基因带有COI变异,高COI率的基因往往有更多的外显子和更长的转录本,与几种不同条件相关的基因比例更高。富集COI基因的富集分析显示,这些基因的产物与心脏疾病有关,肌肉发育,和功能。为了改善诊断,我们认为可以为这些基因开发特定的变异解释规则。此外,我们的研究结果强调了发表变异体致病性证据的必要性,以及除非另有证明,否则将每个变异体视为VUS的重要性.
    The identification of the genetic causes of inherited disorders from next-generation sequencing (NGS) data remains a complicated process, in particular due to challenges in interpretation of the vast amount of generated data and hundreds of candidate variants identified. Inconsistencies in variant classification, where genetic centers classify the same variant differently, can hinder accurate diagnoses for rare diseases. Publicly available databases that collect data on human genetic variations and their association with diseases provide ample opportunities to discover conflicts in variant interpretation worldwide. In this study, we explored patterns of variant classification discrepancies using data from ClinVar, a public archive of variant interpretations. We found that 5.7% of variants have conflicting interpretations (COIs) reported, and the vast majority of interpretation conflicts arise for variants of uncertain significance (VUS). As many as 78% of clinically relevant genes harbor variants with COIs, and genes with high COI rates tended to have more exons and longer transcripts, with a greater proportion of genes linked to several distinct conditions. The enrichment analysis of COI-enriched genes revealed that the products of these genes are involved in cardiac disorders, muscle development, and function. To improve diagnoses, we believe that specific variant interpretation rules could be developed for such genes. Additionally, our findings underscore the need for the publication of variant pathogenicity evidence and the importance of considering every variant as VUS unless proven otherwise.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:变体解释对于在基因组中检测到的数百万患者中识别患者的致病遗传变异至关重要。数以百计的变化影响预测器(VIP),也称为变异效应预测因子(VEP),已经为此目的开发了,有各种各样的方法和目标。为了方便探索可用的VIP选项,我们已经创建了变量影响预测数据库(VIPdb)。
    结果:VariantImpactPredictor数据库(VIPdb)版本2展示了过去三十年开发的VIP集合,总结他们的特点,ClinGen校准分数,CAGI评估结果,出版物详细信息,访问信息,和引文模式。我们先前在2019年总结了217个VIP及其在VIPDB中的功能。在这个基础上,我们确定并分类了另外190名贵宾,在Vipdb版本2中总共有407个VIP。大多数VIP都有能力预测单核苷酸变体和非同义变体的影响。自2010年代以来,已经开发了更多的VIP来预测插入和删除的影响。相比之下,相对较少的VIP专门用于预测拼接,结构,同义词,和监管变体。对贵宾的引用率不断提高,反映了贵宾使用的持续增长,引文的演变趋势揭示了该领域和个体方法的发展。
    结论:VIPdb版本2总结了407个贵宾及其功能,可能促进各种变体解释应用的VIP探索。VIPDB可在https://genomepinterpretation.org/vipdb获得。
    BACKGROUND: Variant interpretation is essential for identifying patients\' disease-causing genetic variants amongst the millions detected in their genomes. Hundreds of Variant Impact Predictors (VIPs), also known as Variant Effect Predictors (VEPs), have been developed for this purpose, with a variety of methodologies and goals. To facilitate the exploration of available VIP options, we have created the Variant Impact Predictor database (VIPdb).
    RESULTS: The Variant Impact Predictor database (VIPdb) version 2 presents a collection of VIPs developed over the past three decades, summarizing their characteristics, ClinGen calibrated scores, CAGI assessment results, publication details, access information, and citation patterns. We previously summarized 217 VIPs and their features in VIPdb in 2019. Building upon this foundation, we identified and categorized an additional 190 VIPs, resulting in a total of 407 VIPs in VIPdb version 2. The majority of the VIPs have the capacity to predict the impacts of single nucleotide variants and nonsynonymous variants. More VIPs tailored to predict the impacts of insertions and deletions have been developed since the 2010s. In contrast, relatively few VIPs are dedicated to the prediction of splicing, structural, synonymous, and regulatory variants. The increasing rate of citations to VIPs reflects the ongoing growth in their use, and the evolving trends in citations reveal development in the field and individual methods.
    CONCLUSIONS: VIPdb version 2 summarizes 407 VIPs and their features, potentially facilitating VIP exploration for various variant interpretation applications. VIPdb is available at  https://genomeinterpretation.org/vipdb.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    几乎所有错义变体的计算机模拟变体效应预测都是可用的,但在临床变体分类中起着最小的作用,因为它们被认为仅提供支持证据。最近,ClinGen序列变异解释(SVI)工作组更新了变异效应预测使用的建议.通过分析所有基因的对照致病性和良性变异,他们能够计算预测分数区间的证据强度,有些区间产生中等,坚强,甚至是非常有力的证据。然而,这种全基因组方法可能掩盖不同基因的异质性预测结果.我们量化了两个顶级预测因子的逐个基因表现,REVEL和BayesDel,通过分析3,668个疾病相关基因中每个预测因子评分区间的对照变异。大约10%的间隔有足够的对照变异用于分析,和70%的这些间隔超过了SVI建议所暗示的错误预测的最大数量。这些趋势不一致的间隔是由于预测的基因特异性分布与全基因组分布的差异而产生的,这表明在许多情况下需要基因特异性校准。我们分析的基因(REVEL=100,629,BayesDel=71,928)中大约22%的ClinVar错义变体具有趋势不一致的区间的预测。因此,全基因组校准可能导致许多变体接受不适当的证据强度.为了便于审查SVI的校准,我们开发了一个Web应用程序,能够可视化基因特异性预测和趋势一致和不一致区间.
    In silico variant effect predictions are available for nearly all missense variants but played a minimal role in clinical variant classification because they were deemed to provide only supporting evidence. Recently, the ClinGen Sequence Variant Interpretation (SVI) Working Group updated recommendations for variant effect prediction use. By analyzing control pathogenic and benign variants across all genes, they were able to compute evidence strength for predictor score intervals with some intervals generating moderate, strong, or even very strong evidence. However, this genome-wide approach could obscure heterogeneous predictor performance in different genes. We quantified the gene-by-gene performance of two top predictors, REVEL and BayesDel, by analyzing control variants in each predictor score interval in 3,668 disease-relevant genes. Approximately 10% of intervals had sufficient control variants for analysis, and ∼70% of these intervals exceeded the maximum number of incorrect predictions implied by the SVI recommendations. These trending discordant intervals arose owing to the divergence of the gene-specific distribution of predictions from the genome-wide distribution, suggesting that gene-specific calibration is needed in many cases. Approximately 22% of ClinVar missense variants of uncertain significance in genes we analyzed (REVEL = 100,629, BayesDel = 71,928) had predictions in trending discordant intervals. Thus, genome-wide calibrations could result in many variants receiving inappropriate evidence strength. To facilitate a review of the SVI\'s calibrations, we developed a web application enabling visualization of gene-specific predictions and trending concordant and discordant intervals.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在本文中,我们描述了一个松散选择的队列,包括有早发性乳腺癌和/或家族性癌症病史的患者.这项研究的目的是深入了解巴西南部微观地区人群中乳腺癌相关基因变异的存在,特别是库里蒂巴的都会区。这个地区表现出高度遗传混合的人口,反映了巴西人民的一般特征。
    方法:对来自该地区的12名患者进行了全面的下一代测序(NGS)多基因小组测试,利用三种不同的文库制备方法。
    结果:确定了两种致病性变体和一种候选致病性变体:BRCA2c.8878C>T,p.Gln2960Ter;CHEK2c.1100del,p.Thr367Metfs15和BRCA2c.3482dup,p.Asp1161Glufs3.
    结论:BRCA2c.3482dup,一种新的候选致病变异,以前未出版,据报道。在这个小群体中致病变异的患病率与文献中描述的相似。所有不同的文库制备方法在能够检测这些变体方面同样熟练。
    BACKGROUND: In this article, we delineate a loosely selected cohort comprising patients with a history of early-onset breast cancer and/or a familial occurrence of cancer. The aim of this study was to gain insights into the presence of breast cancer-related gene variants in a population from a micro-region in southern Brazil, specifically the Metropolitan Region of Curitiba. This area exhibits a highly genetically mixed population, mirroring the general characteristics of the Brazilian people.
    METHODS: Comprehensive next-generation sequencing (NGS) multigene panel testing was conducted on 12 patients from the region, utilizing three different library preparation methods.
    RESULTS: Two pathogenic variants and one candidate pathogenic variant were identified: BRCA2 c.8878C>T, p.Gln2960Ter; CHEK2 c.1100del, p.Thr367Metfs15, and BRCA2 c.3482dup, p.Asp1161Glufs3.
    CONCLUSIONS: BRCA2 c.3482dup, a novel candidate pathogenic variant, previously unpublished, is reported. The prevalence of pathogenic variants in this small cohort is similar to that described in the literature. All different library preparation methods were equally proficient in enabling the detection of these variants.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    考虑到在遗传性视网膜营养不良(IRD)中观察到的显着遗传异质性,因此准确解释遗传性视网膜营养不良(IRD)中的序列变异至关重要。为了实现一致和准确的诊断,建立变体解释的标准化指南至关重要。美国医学遗传学和基因组学学院/分子病理学协会(ACMG/AMP)的变异解释指南是全球“跨疾病”标准,用于对孟德尔遗传性疾病的变异进行分类。这些指南提出了一种系统的方法,用于根据各种类型的证据将变体分为5类,比如人口数据,计算数据,功能数据,隔离数据。然而,用于临床遗传诊断并确保标准化的诊断和治疗标准,基于与每种疾病相关的特征的附加规格是必要的。在这种情况下,我们提出了一个全面的框架,概述了新指定的ACMG/AMP规则,该规则代表罕见和难治疗疾病研究小组在日本人口中明确针对IRD(卫生部,日本的劳动和福利)。这些指南考虑了疾病的频率,等位基因频率,以及日本人群IRD特有的表型和基因型特征。已纳入调整和修改,以反映人口的具体要求。通过整合这些IRD特定因素并完善现有的ACMG/AMP指南,我们旨在提高IRD病例变异解释的准确性和一致性,特别是在日本人口中。这些指南为参与IRD诊断和治疗的眼科医生和临床遗传学家提供了宝贵的资源。为他们提供一个标准化的框架来评估和分类遗传变异。
    Accurate interpretation of sequence variants in inherited retinal dystrophy (IRD) is vital given the significant genetic heterogeneity observed in this disorder. To achieve consistent and accurate diagnoses, establishment of standardized guidelines for variant interpretation is essential. The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics/Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG/AMP) guidelines for variant interpretation serve as the global \"cross-disease\" standard for classifying variants in Mendelian hereditary disorders. These guidelines propose a systematic approach for categorizing variants into 5 classes based on various types of evidence, such as population data, computational data, functional data, and segregation data. However, for clinical genetic diagnosis and to ensure standardized diagnosis and treatment criteria, additional specifications based on features associated with each disorder are necessary. In this context, we present a comprehensive framework outlining the newly specified ACMG/AMP rules tailored explicitly to IRD in the Japanese population on behalf of the Research Group on Rare and Intractable Diseases (Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan). These guidelines consider disease frequencies, allele frequencies, and both the phenotypic and the genotypic characteristics unique to IRD in the Japanese population. Adjustments and modifications have been incorporated to reflect the specific requirements of the population. By incorporating these IRD-specific factors and refining the existing ACMG/AMP guidelines, we aim to enhance the accuracy and consistency of variant interpretation in IRD cases, particularly in the Japanese population. These guidelines serve as a valuable resource for ophthalmologists and clinical geneticists involved in the diagnosis and treatment of IRD, providing them with a standardized framework to assess and classify genetic variants.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:通过ACMG/AMPPP3/BP4证据强度研究人类基因组序列中观察到的罕见错义变异的数量,遵循校准的PP3/BP4计算建议。
    方法:使用能够达到PP3_Strong和BP4_中等证据强度的计算预测工具,分析了来自稀有基因组计划的300个先证者的基因组序列中的错觉变体,MutPred2,REVEL,和VEST4)。在每个证据强度下的变异数量在疾病相关基因和全基因组范围内进行分析。
    结果:根据每个先证者的疾病相关基因中75.5个罕见(≤1%等位基因频率)错义变异的中位数,中位数达到PP3_Strong,3-5PP3_中等,和3-5PP3_支持。大多数被分配BP4证据(每个先证者中位数41-49)或不确定(每个先证者中位数17.5-19)。将分析扩展到全基因组的所有蛋白质编码基因,与疾病相关基因相比,PP3_Strong变异体的数量增加了约2.6倍,每个先证者的中位数为1-3PP3_Strong,8-16PP3_中度,和10-17PP3_支持。
    结论:在3,424个疾病相关基因中,每个先证者的少量变体达到PP3_Strong和PP3_中度,虽然不是建议的预期用途,也是全基因组的。在临床诊断实验室中使用校准的计算预测工具推荐的PP3/BP4证据不太可能不适当地导致ACMG/AMP规则将过多的变体分类为致病性或可能致病性。
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the number of rare missense variants observed in human genome sequences by ACMG/AMP PP3/BP4 evidence strength, following the calibrated PP3/BP4 computational recommendations.
    METHODS: Missense variants from the genome sequences of 300 probands from the Rare Genomes Project with suspected rare disease were analyzed using computational prediction tools able to reach PP3_Strong and BP4_Moderate evidence strengths (BayesDel, MutPred2, REVEL, and VEST4). The numbers of variants at each evidence strength were analyzed across disease-associated genes and genome-wide.
    RESULTS: From a median of 75.5 rare (≤1% allele frequency) missense variants in disease-associated genes per proband, a median of one reached PP3_Strong, 3-5 PP3_Moderate, and 3-5 PP3_Supporting. Most were allocated BP4 evidence (median 41-49 per proband) or were indeterminate (median 17.5-19 per proband). Extending the analysis to all protein-coding genes genome-wide, the number of PP3_Strong variants increased approximately 2.6-fold compared to disease-associated genes, with a median per proband of 1-3 PP3_Strong, 8-16 PP3_Moderate, and 10-17 PP3_Supporting.
    CONCLUSIONS: A small number of variants per proband reached PP3_Strong and PP3_Moderate in 3,424 disease-associated genes, and though not the intended use of the recommendations, also genome-wide. Use of PP3/BP4 evidence as recommended from calibrated computational prediction tools in the clinical diagnostic laboratory is unlikely to inappropriately contribute to the classification of an excessive number of variants as Pathogenic or Likely Pathogenic by ACMG/AMP rules.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:变体解释对于在基因组中检测到的数百万患者中识别患者的致病遗传变异至关重要。数以百计的变化影响预测器(VIP),也称为变异效应预测因子(VEP),已经为此目的开发了,有各种各样的方法和目标。为了方便探索可用的VIP选项,我们已经创建了变量影响预测数据库(VIPdb)。
    结果:VariantImpactPredictor数据库(VIPdb)版本2展示了过去25年开发的VIP集合,总结他们的特点,ClinGen校准分数,CAGI评估结果,出版物详细信息,访问信息,和引文模式。我们先前在2019年总结了217个VIP及其在VIPDB中的功能。在这个基础上,我们确定并分类了另外186名贵宾,在Vipdb版本2中总共有403个VIP。大多数VIP都有能力预测单核苷酸变体和非同义变体的影响。自2010年代以来,已经开发了更多的VIP来预测插入和删除的影响。相比之下,相对较少的VIP专门用于预测拼接,结构,同义词,和监管变体。对贵宾的引用率不断提高,反映了贵宾使用的持续增长,引文的演变趋势揭示了该领域和个体方法的发展。
    结论:VIPdb版本2总结了403个贵宾及其功能,可能促进各种变体解释应用的VIP探索。
    背景:VIPDB版本2可在https://genomeinterpretation.org/vipdb/上获得。
    UNASSIGNED: Variant interpretation is essential for identifying patients\' disease-causing genetic variants amongst the millions detected in their genomes. Hundreds of Variant Impact Predictors (VIPs), also known as Variant Effect Predictors (VEPs), have been developed for this purpose, with a variety of methodologies and goals. To facilitate the exploration of available VIP options, we have created the Variant Impact Predictor database (VIPdb).
    UNASSIGNED: The Variant Impact Predictor database (VIPdb) version 2 presents a collection of VIPs developed over the past 25 years, summarizing their characteristics, ClinGen calibrated scores, CAGI assessment results, publication details, access information, and citation patterns. We previously summarized 217 VIPs and their features in VIPdb in 2019. Building upon this foundation, we identified and categorized an additional 186 VIPs, resulting in a total of 403 VIPs in VIPdb version 2. The majority of the VIPs have the capacity to predict the impacts of single nucleotide variants and nonsynonymous variants. More VIPs tailored to predict the impacts of insertions and deletions have been developed since the 2010s. In contrast, relatively few VIPs are dedicated to the prediction of splicing, structural, synonymous, and regulatory variants. The increasing rate of citations to VIPs reflects the ongoing growth in their use, and the evolving trends in citations reveal development in the field and individual methods.
    UNASSIGNED: VIPdb version 2 summarizes 403 VIPs and their features, potentially facilitating VIP exploration for various variant interpretation applications.
    UNASSIGNED: VIPdb version 2 is available at https://genomeinterpretation.org/vipdb.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号