upper body

上身
  • DOI:
    文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在检查仰卧位医学掷球峰值力和力发展速率(RFD)测量的可靠性。次要目的是研究这些测量值与垂直跳跃高度之间的相关性。
    方法:20名年轻女性(21±3岁)在两种不同的场合进行了实验测试。在每个测试阶段进行仰卧位药物投掷评估,以评估峰值力。RFDmax,和RFD在特定百分比的峰值力(RFD30%和RFD40-80%)。在跳跃垫上进行垂直跳跃。跳跃垫基于飞行时间测量垂直跳跃高度。
    结果:在峰值力的会议之间观察到良好的组内相关系数(≥0.82)和变异系数(≤14.0%),RFDmax,和RFD40-80%,但不适用于RFD30%(0.55,27.2%)。跳高与峰值力之间存在显着相关性(r=0.483,P=0.031)。RFDmax(r=0.484,P=0.031),RFD40-80%(r=0.491,P=0.028)。跳高与RFD30%无显著相关性(r=0.359,P=0.120)。
    结论:我们的研究结果表明,仰卧位药物的掷球峰值力,RFDmax,RFD40-80%是评估年轻人上身爆炸强度的可靠指标。这些测量与垂直跳跃高度显着相关,因此,可能是一个人运动能力的有效预测因子。
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the reliability of supine medicine ball throw peak force and rate of force development (RFD) measurements. A secondary aim was to investigate the correlations between these measurements and vertical jump height.
    METHODS: Twenty young women (21±3 years) reported for experimental testing on two different occasions. Supine medicine ball throw assessments were performed during each testing session to assess peak force, RFDmax, and RFD at specific percentages of peak force (RFD30% and RFD40-80%). Vertical jumps were performed on a jump mat. The jump mat measured vertical jump height based on flight time.
    RESULTS: Good intraclass correlation coefficients (≥0.82) and coefficients of variation (≤14.0%) were observed between sessions for peak force, RFDmax, and RFD40-80%, but not for RFD30% (0.55, 27.2%). There were significant correlations between jump height and peak force (r=0.483, P=0.031), RFDmax (r=0.484, P=0.031), and RFD40-80% (r=0.491, P=0.028). There was no significant correlation between jump height and RFD30% (r=0.359, P=0.120).
    CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed that supine medicine ball throw peak force, RFDmax, and RFD40-80% were reliable measures for assessing upper-body explosive strength in young adults. These measurements were significantly associated with vertical jump height and therefore, may be effective predictors of one\'s athletic ability.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们已经研究了膝关节伸肌和屈肌的等速和等距强度的昼夜节律变化的幅度,以及使用MuscleLab力速度传感器的后蹲和卧推性能。十名抵抗训练的男性(平均±SD:年龄21.5±1.1岁;体重78.3±5.2kg;身高1.71±0.07m)进行了a)在每个测力计上进行了三到四次熟悉训练,b)在一天中的不同时间进行了四次训练(03:00、09:00、15:00和21:00h)。每个会话都以平衡的顺序进行,并包括一个感知情绪状态(POMS)发作的时期,然后直肠和肌肉温度(Trec,Tm)是在休息时测量的,之后,在自行车测功机上进行5分钟标准化的150W预热。一旦完成,等速运动(60和240°·s-1用于伸展和弯曲)和具有峰值扭矩(PT)的等速测力,测量峰值扭矩时间(tPT)和峰值力(PF)以及激活%。最后,在卧床(在30、50和70kg下)和后蹲(在40、60和80kg下)锻炼之前测量Trec和Tm。一个线性编码器连接到一个用于练习和平均力(AF)的奥林匹克酒吧,测量峰值速度(PV)和达到峰值速度的时间(tPV)(MuscleLab软件;MuscleLab技术,Langesund,挪威)在运动的同心阶段。在每组之间允许五分钟的恢复,完成三次重复。使用具有重复测量和余弦分析的一般线性模型来分析数据。休息时的Trec和Tm值在晚上比早晨值高(顶相Φ:16:35和17:03h,振幅A:0.30和0.23°C,MesorM:36.64和37.43°C,p<0.05)。充满活力,快乐和疲劳情绪状态反应分别为Φ16:11和16:03h和02:05h。昼夜节律对于所有变量都是明显的,无论在AF,PF和PT值在16:18和18:34小时之间达到峰值;PV,tPV和tPT在05:54和08:03h之间达到峰值(p<0.05)。总之,力输出的昼夜节律(力,扭矩,电源,和速度)显示为等速,等距测力计和复杂的多关节运动(使用线性编码器);与晚上相比,tPV和tPT发生在早上。昼夜节律的强度可以通过便携式设备来检测,低成本仪器,具有与已建立的测力计相似的余弦特性。因此,肌肉力量可以以更直接地转移到运动和运动表现世界的方式来测量。
    We have investigated the magnitude of circadian variation in Isokinetic and Isometric strength of the knee extensors and flexors, as well as back squat and bench press performance using the MuscleLab force velocity transducer. Ten resistance-trained males (mean±SD: age 21.5 ± 1.1 years; body mass 78.3 ± 5.2 kg; height 1.71 ± 0.07 m) underwent a) three to four familiarization sessions on each dynamometer and b) four sessions at different times of day (03:00, 09:00, 15:00 and 21:00 h). Each session was administered in a counterbalanced order and included a period when Perceived onset of mood states (POMS), then rectal and muscle temperature (Trec, Tm) was measured at rest, after which a 5-min standardized 150 W warm-up was performed on a cycle ergometer. Once completed, Isokinetic (60 and 240°·s-1 for extension and flexion) and Isometric dynamometry with peak torque (PT), time-to-peak-torque (tPT) and peak force (PF) and % activation was measured. Lastly, Trec and Tm were measured before the bench press (at 30, 50 and 70 kg) and back squat (at 40, 60 and 80 kg) exercises. A linear encoder was attached to an Olympic bar used for the exercises and average force (AF), peak velocity (PV) and time-to-peak-velocity (tPV) were measured (MuscleLab software; MuscleLab Technology, Langesund, Norway) during the concentric phase of the movements. Five-min recovery was allowed between each set with three repetitions being completed. General linear models with repeated measures and cosinor analysis were used to analyse the data. Values for Trec and Tm at rest were higher in the evening compared to morning values (Acrophase Φ: 16:35 and 17:03 h, Amplitude A: 0.30 and 0.23°C, Mesor M: 36.64 and 37.43°C, p < 0.05). Vigor, happy and fatigue mood states responses showed Φ 16:11 and 16:03 h and 02:05 h respectively. Circadian rhythms were apparent for all variables irrespective of equipment used where AF, PF and PT values peaked between 16:18 and 18:34 h; PV, tPV and tPT peaked between 05:54 and 08:03 h (p < 0.05). In summary, circadian rhythms in force output (force, torque, power, and velocity) were shown for isokinetic, isometric dynamometers and complex multi-joint movements (using a linear encoder); where tPV and tPT occur in the morning compared to the evening. Circadian rhythms in strength can be detected using a portable, low-cost instrument that shows similar cosinor characteristics as established dynamometers. Hence, muscle-strength can be measured in a manner that is more directly transferable to the world of athletic and sports performance.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:AppleWatch(AW)系列1为轮椅使用者提供了能量消耗(EE),但被发现不准确,误差约为30%,FitbitCharge2提供的心率(HR)的相应误差约为10%至20%。使用这些智能手表(SWs)的较新版本,预计会提高估计的EE和HR的准确性。
    目的:本研究旨在评估AW系列4(轮椅专用设置)和FitbitVersa(跑步机运行模式)在不同强度轮椅推进过程中估算EE和HR的准确性。
    方法:数据来自20名手动轮椅使用者(男性:n=11,女性:n=9;体重:平均75,SD19kg)和20名非残疾人士(男性:n=11,女性:n=9;体重:平均75,SD11kg)。在3个单独的测试日(0.5%,2.5%,或5%倾斜),而EE和HR是通过标准设备和AW或Fitbit收集的。平均绝对百分比误差(MAPE)用于指示EE和HR的标准设备与SWs之间的绝对一致性。此外,线性混合模型分析评估了运动强度的影响,性别,和组的SW错误。类别间相关系数用于评估标准设备和SWs之间的相对一致性。
    结果:AW低估了EE,轮椅使用者的MAPE为29.2%(SD22%),无残疾人士的MAPE为30%(SD12%)。Fitbit高估了EE,轮椅使用者的MAPE为73.9%(SD7%),无残疾人士的MAPE为44.7%(SD38%)。两个SWs都低估了HR。EE和HR的设备误差随两种SWs的强度而增加(所有比较:P<.001),两组之间唯一的显着差异是AW中的HR(轮椅使用者-5.27次/分钟;P=.02)。性别对EE的估计误差有显著影响,女性参与者的AW精度较差(-0.69kcal/min;P<.001),Fitbit精度较好(-2.08kcal/min;P<.001)。对于HR,仅在AW人群中发现性别差异,女性参与者的误差较小(5.23次/分钟;P=.02)。除2个阶段倾斜组合外,两个SWs的类别间相关系数均显示较差至中等的相对一致性(EE的AW:0.12-0.57,HR的AW:0.11-0.86;Fitbit:EE的0.06-0.85,HR的0.03-0.29)。
    结论:AW和Fitbit均不足以估计轮椅推进期间的EE或HR。AW低估了EE,Fitbit高估了EE,两个SWs都低估了HR。因此,当使用SWs作为训练轮椅使用者的强度调节和能量平衡或不平衡的工具时,需要谨慎。
    BACKGROUND: The Apple Watch (AW) Series 1 provides energy expenditure (EE) for wheelchair users but was found to be inaccurate with an error of approximately 30%, and the corresponding error for heart rate (HR) provided by the Fitbit Charge 2 was approximately 10% to 20%. Improved accuracy of estimated EE and HR is expected with newer editions of these smart watches (SWs).
    OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess the accuracy of the AW Series 4 (wheelchair-specific setting) and the Fitbit Versa (treadmill running mode) for estimating EE and HR during wheelchair propulsion at different intensities.
    METHODS: Data from 20 manual wheelchair users (male: n=11, female: n=9; body mass: mean 75, SD 19 kg) and 20 people without a disability (male: n=11, female: n=9; body mass: mean 75, SD 11 kg) were included. Three 4-minute wheelchair propulsion stages at increasing speed were performed on 3 separate test days (0.5%, 2.5%, or 5% incline), while EE and HR were collected by criterion devices and the AW or Fitbit. The mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) was used to indicate the absolute agreement between the criterion device and SWs for EE and HR. Additionally, linear mixed model analyses assessed the effect of exercise intensity, sex, and group on the SW error. Interclass correlation coefficients were used to assess relative agreement between criterion devices and SWs.
    RESULTS: The AW underestimated EE with MAPEs of 29.2% (SD 22%) in wheelchair users and 30% (SD 12%) in people without a disability. The Fitbit overestimated EE with MAPEs of 73.9% (SD 7%) in wheelchair users and 44.7% (SD 38%) in people without a disability. Both SWs underestimated HR. The device error for EE and HR increased with intensity for both SWs (all comparisons: P<.001), and the only significant difference between groups was found for HR in the AW (-5.27 beats/min for wheelchair users; P=.02). There was a significant effect of sex on the estimation error in EE, with worse accuracy for the AW (-0.69 kcal/min; P<.001) and better accuracy for the Fitbit (-2.08 kcal/min; P<.001) in female participants. For HR, sex differences were found only for the AW, with a smaller error in female participants (5.23 beats/min; P=.02). Interclass correlation coefficients showed poor to moderate relative agreement for both SWs apart from 2 stage-incline combinations (AW: 0.12-0.57 for EE and 0.11-0.86 for HR; Fitbit: 0.06-0.85 for EE and 0.03-0.29 for HR).
    CONCLUSIONS: Neither the AW nor Fitbit were sufficiently accurate for estimating EE or HR during wheelchair propulsion. The AW underestimated EE and the Fitbit overestimated EE, and both SWs underestimated HR. Caution is hence required when using SWs as a tool for training intensity regulation and energy balance or imbalance in wheelchair users.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Comparative Study
    背景:将血流限制(BFR)应用于低强度运动可能不仅能够增加受训肢体的力量,而且能够增加同源未受训肢体的力量。这种效果是否可重复,以及这种变化与高强度运动观察到的变化相比是未知的。
    目的:研究与没有BFR和最大努力的运动相比,使用BFR的低强度训练是否增强了力量的交叉教育。
    方法:共有179名参与者完成了为期6周的研究,135个人在18个课程中进行等距手握训练。参与者被随机分配到四组中的一组:1)低强度(30%MVC的4×2分钟;LI,n=47),2)低强度血流受限(LI+50%动脉闭塞压;LI-BFR,n=41),3)最大努力(100%MVC的4×5秒;MAX,n=47),和4)非运动控制(CON,n=44)。
    结果:LI-BFR是唯一观察到力量交叉教育的组(CON:0.64SD2.9kg,李:0.95标准差3.6公斤,BFR-LI:2.7SD3.3kg,最大值:0.80SD3.1kg)。在训练有素的手中,MAX观察到强度变化最大(4.8SD3.3kg),其次是LI-BFR(2.8SD4.0kg)。LI与CON没有什么不同。未经训练的手臂肌肉厚度没有变化,但LI-BFR组受训臂内尺骨肌厚度增加(0.06SD0.11cm)。
    结论:将BFR纳入低强度等距训练导致对力量的交叉教育效应大于所有其他组(包括高强度训练)。
    BACKGROUND: The application of blood flow restriction (BFR) to low-intensity exercise may be able to increase strength not only in the trained limb but also in the homologous untrained limb. Whether this effect is repeatable and how that change compares to that observed with higher intensity exercise is unknown.
    OBJECTIVE: Examine whether low-intensity training with BFR enhances the cross-education of strength compared to exercise without BFR and maximal efforts.
    METHODS: A total of 179 participants completed the 6-week study, with 135 individuals performing isometric handgrip training over 18 sessions. Participants were randomly assigned to one of four groups: 1) low-intensity (4 × 2 min of 30% MVC; LI, n = 47), 2) low-intensity with blood flow restriction (LI + 50% arterial occlusion pressure; LI-BFR, n = 41), 3) maximal effort (4 × 5 s of 100% MVC; MAX, n = 47), and 4) non-exercise control (CON, n = 44).
    RESULTS: LI-BFR was the only group that observed a cross-education in strength (CON: 0.64 SD 2.9 kg, LI: 0.95 SD 3.6 kg, BFR-LI: 2.7 SD 3.3 kg, MAX: 0.80 SD 3.1 kg). In the trained hand, MAX observed the greatest change in strength (4.8 SD 3.3 kg) followed by LI-BFR (2.8 SD 4.0 kg). LI was not different from CON. Muscle thickness did not change in the untrained arm, but ulna muscle thickness was increased within the trained arm of the LI-BFR group (0.06 SD 0.11 cm).
    CONCLUSIONS: Incorporating BFR into low-intensity isometric training led to a cross-education effect on strength that was greater than all other groups (including high-intensity training).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在许多研究中已经进行了日常生活活动期间的运动分析。然而,缺乏有关影响临床评估和治疗目标的年龄相关差异的信息.本研究旨在研究日常生活活动中年龄对运动学的影响。肩膀的三维运动,弯头,脖子,和12名年轻成年人的躯干(年龄,29.8±5.4岁;7名男性和5名女性)和10名老年人(年龄,69.5±4.9岁;6名男性和4名女性)在伸手拿桌子的过程中进行了测量,把杯子带到嘴里喝,擦臀部,系鞋带,洗头发,洗腋窝,伸向一个高架子,伸手去拿地板。通过使用离散分析和统计参数映射,比较了年龄组之间的运动范围和顺序关节角度,分别。老年人和年轻人的所有关节角度的运动范围在饮酒时相当,洗头发,洗腋窝,伸手去完成地面任务。统计参数映射表明,在饮酒(67-92%的周期时间)和系鞋带(64-95%的周期时间)任务中,老年人的颈部伸展明显比年轻人差。在日常生活活动中,健康的老年人大多保持运动学。然而,后来在一些任务中确认了减少的动作。结果表明,现有知识与当前发现相结合,考虑到年龄,可用于临床设置,以评估日常生活活动的运动学和设定治疗目标。
    Motion analysis during activities of daily living has been conducted in numerous studies. However, information is lacking regarding age-related differences that affect clinical assessment and treatment goals. This study aimed to examine the effect of age on kinematics during activities of daily living. Three-dimensional motions of the shoulder, elbow, neck, and trunk of 12 younger adults (age, 29.8 ± 5.4 years; 7 men and 5 women) and 10 older adults (age, 69.5 ± 4.9 years; 6 men and 4 women) were measured during the acts of reaching for a table, bringing a glass to the mouth for drinking, wiping the buttocks, tying shoelaces, washing hair, washing the axilla, reaching for a high shelf, and reaching for the floor. The ranges of motion and sequential joint angles were compared between age groups by using discrete analysis and statistical parametric mapping, respectively. The ranges of motion of all joint angles in older and younger adults were comparable in the drinking, washing hair, washing the axilla, and reaching for the floor tasks. Statistical parametric mapping indicated that older adults had significantly poorer neck extension than did younger adults during the drinking (67-92% cycle time) and tying shoelaces (64-95% cycle time) tasks. Kinematics were mostly maintained in healthy older adults during activities of daily living. However, reduced motions were confirmed later during some tasks. The results indicated that existing knowledge combined with the current findings, which take age into account, could be used in clinical settings to assess the kinematics of activities of daily living and set treatment goals.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    Becker的痣也称为Becker的黑色素沉着症(BM)或色素沉着的毛状表皮痣是一种皮肤错构瘤,具有棕色色素沉着和多毛症。它通常发生在青春期,很少发生在出生时。它通常影响青春期后的年轻男性,患病率为0.5%。痣通常由被限制的,单边,不规则形状,色素沉着斑通常位于前上身周围,有或没有多毛和/或痤疮样病变。有时Becker的痣会出现发育异常,这就是所谓的贝克尔的痣综合征(BNS)。贝克尔的痣在两名患者的前臂和腿部表现不典型。因此,这些病例报告越来越重要。
    Becker\'s naevus also known as Becker\'s melanosis (BM) or pigmented hairy epidermal naevus is a cutaneous hamartoma with brown hyperpigmentation and hypertrichosis. It commonly occurs during adolescence and rarely at birth. It usually affects young post-pubertal males and has a prevalence of 0.5%. A naevus usually consists of a circumscribed, unilateral, irregularly shaped, hyperpigmented spot usually located around the anterior upper body, with or without hypertrichosis and/or acneiform lesions. Sometimes developmental abnormalities can occur with Becker\'s naevus, which is called Becker\'s naevus syndrome (BNS). Becker\'s naevus was of atypical presentation in two patients over the forearm and leg. Hence, these case reports gain importance.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:研究使用感知运动评分(RPE)处方和规范为期4周的手循环训练干预措施的有效性。
    方法:30名活跃的成年人,未经训练的上半身耐力运动,分为三组以完成为期4周的干预:(i)RPE指导训练(n=10;2名女性),(ii)功率输出(PO)指导(n=10;2名女性)训练,或(iii)非训练对照(n=10;4名女性)。训练组每周进行三次手提自行车训练。摄氧量([公式:见正文]),心率(HR),在培训期间收集感觉量表(FS)评级。在RPE13时进行RPE指导训练。PO指导培训与每节峰值PO的百分比相匹配,基于RPE指导培训小组取得的成就。
    结果:峰值百分比没有差异[公式:见正文](66±13%vs61±9%,p=0.22),峰值HR(75±8%vs71±6%,p=0.11)或RPE和PO指导培训之间的FS等级(1.2±1.9vs0.8±1.6,p=0.48),分别。在RPE指导训练期间,连续训练之间的峰值HR百分比的平均变异系数为2.8%,在PO指导培训期间为3.4%。
    结论:在长期训练干预中,使用RPE可以有效地规定中等强度的自行车运动。为从业者在各种康复环境中的应用提供建议。
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy of using Ratings of Perceived Exertion (RPE) to prescribe and regulate a 4-week handcycle training intervention.
    METHODS: Thirty active adults, untrained in upper body endurance exercise, were divided into three groups to complete a 4-week intervention: (i) RPE-guided training (n = 10; 2 female), (ii) power output (PO)-guided (n = 10; 2 female) training, or (iii) non-training control (n = 10; 4 female). Training groups performed three sessions of handcycling each week. Oxygen uptake ([Formula: see text]), heart rate (HR), and Feeling Scale (FS) rating were collected during training sessions. RPE-guided training was performed at RPE 13. PO-guided training was matched for percentage of peak PO per session, based upon that achieved by the RPE-guided training group.
    RESULTS: There were no differences in percentage of peak [Formula: see text] (66 ± 13% vs 61 ± 9%, p = 0.22), peak HR (75 ± 8% vs 71 ± 6%, p = 0.11) or FS rating (1.2 ± 1.9 vs 0.8 ± 1.6, p = 0.48) between RPE- and PO-guided training, respectively. The average coefficient of variation in percentage of peak HR between consecutive training sessions was 2.8% during RPE-guided training, and 3.4% during PO-guided training.
    CONCLUSIONS: Moderate-vigorous intensity handcycling exercise can be prescribed effectively using RPE across a chronic training intervention, suggesting utility for practitioners in a variety of rehabilitation settings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    根据国际功能分类(ICF),研究惯性测量单元(IMU)在评估上肢运动功能(UL)中的有用性。
    PubMed;Scopus;Embase;从成立到2022年2月1日搜索了WoS和PEDro数据库。
    当前的系统审查遵循PRISMA的建议。包括IMU评估卒中个体UL的文章已被纳入并分为四个ICF类别(b710、b735、b760、d445)。我们使用相关性荟萃分析来汇集运动学和临床评估之间每个相关性的FisherZ评分。
    共35篇,涉及475名患者,符合纳入标准。在纳入的研究中,IMU已用于评估关节功能的移动性(n=6),肌张力功能(n=4),控制自愿运动功能(n=15),手和手臂的使用(n=15)。在基于10项研究的总体荟萃分析中发现了显著的相关性,涉及213名受试者:(r=0.69)(95%CI:0.69/0.98;p<0.001),如d445(r=0.71)和b760(r=0.64)ICF域,在整个研究中没有异质性。
    文献支持在卒中后UL的功能评估中整合IMU和常规临床评估。使用有限数量的可穿戴传感器可以在所有研究的ICF领域提供UL的额外运动学特征。特别是在ADL任务中,发现与临床评估有很强的相关性。
    To investigate the usefulness of inertial measurement units (IMUs) in the assessment of motor function of the upper limb (UL) in accordance with the international classification of functioning (ICF).
    PubMed; Scopus; Embase; WoS and PEDro databases were searched from inception to 1 February 2022.
    The current systematic review follows PRISMA recommendations. Articles including IMU assessment of UL in stroke individuals have been included and divided into four ICF categories (b710, b735, b760, d445). We used correlation meta-analysis to pool the Fisher Z-score of each correlation between kinematics and clinical assessment.
    A total of 35 articles, involving 475 patients, met the inclusion criteria. In the included studies, IMUs have been employed to assess the mobility of joint functions (n = 6), muscle tone functions (n = 4), control of voluntary movement functions (n = 15), and hand and arm use (n = 15). A significant correlation was found in overall meta-analysis based on 10 studies, involving 213 subjects: (r = 0.69) (95% CI: 0.69/0.98; p < 0.001) as in the d445 (r = 0.71) and b760 (r = 0.64) ICF domains, with no heterogeneity across the studies.
    The literature supports the integration of IMUs and conventional clinical assessment in functional evaluation of the UL after a stroke. The use of a limited number of wearable sensors can provide additional kinematic features of UL in all investigated ICF domains, especially in the ADL tasks when a strong correlation with clinical evaluation was found.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Observational Study
    背景:先前的工作表明,在老年人行走时,下肢的平均连续相对相位和协调变异性会发生变化。
    目标:这里,我们建议了解步态过程中上肢控制机制的存在程度。具体来说,我们试图了解衰老和步态速度限制是否会影响步行过程中上肢的关节间控制。
    方法:这项观察性研究评估了33名参与者,分为老年人(n=20,年龄66.4±4.3岁;质量:77.2±14.2kg;身高:165±9.20cm)和年轻人(n=13,年龄29.5±4.7岁;质量75.5±9.6kg;身高:172±6.24cm)被要求在0.28、0.83、1.38m行走。在水平跑步机上的s-1,同时使用3D运动捕获系统记录其分段运动。我们计算了肘-肩和肩-髋对的平均连续相对相位和协调变异性(连续相对相位变异性),并使用广义估计方程来检验年龄和速度的主要和交互作用。
    结果:老年人在肘肩整体站立时上肢的连续相对相减少(更多同相协调),在肩臀负荷反应时,与不同速度下的年轻人相比,肘肩和肩髋的中间姿势和末端姿势(p<0.05)。在0.28和1.38m处,老年人的上肢协调变异性更大(连续相对相位变异性更高)。s-1.
    结论:这些发现证实了上肢在步态老化过程中运动控制作用的改变,这表明较低的自选速度可能与步态中间阶段控制手臂运动的能力降低有关。
    Previous work has shown that the mean continuous relative phase and coordination variability of lower limbs are modified in older adults when walking.
    Here, we propose to understand the extent to which such control mechanisms for upper limbs are present during gait. Specifically, we seek to understand if aging and gait speed constraints influence the interjoint control of upper limbs during walking.
    This observational study evaluated thirty-three participants, divided into older (n = 20, age 66.4 ± 4.3 years; mass: 77.2 ± 14.2 kg; height: 165 ± 9.20 cm) and young adults (n = 13, age 29.5 ± 4.7 years; mass 75.5 ± 9.6 kg; height: 172 ± 6.24 cm) were asked to walk at 0.28, 0.83, 1.38 m.s-1 on a level treadmill while their segmental movements were simultaneously registered with 3D motion capture system. We calculated the mean continuous relative phase and coordination variability (continuous relative phase variability) in elbow-shoulder and shoulder-hip pairs, and a generalized estimating equation was used to test the main and interaction effects of age and speed.
    Older adults had a reduced continuous relative phase (more in-phase coordination) of upper limbs at whole stance for elbow-shoulder, at loading response for shoulder-hip, at mid-stance and terminal stance for elbow-shoulder and shoulder-hip in comparison to young adults at different speeds (p < 0.05). The coordination variability of upper limbs was greater (higher continuous relative phase variability) in older than young adults at 0.28 and 1.38 m.s-1.
    These findings substantiate the altered motor control role of upper limbs in gait aging, suggesting that lower self-selected speed may be related to the reduced ability to control arm movement during the intermediate phases of gait.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肌肉骨骼(MSK)模型是评估复杂生物力学问题的宝贵工具,估计运动过程中的关节扭矩,优化运动,设计外骨骼和假肢.这项研究提出了一个开源的上身MSK模型,支持人体运动的生物力学分析。上身的MSK模型由8个身体段(躯干,头部,左/右上臂,左/右前臂,和左/右手)。该模型具有20个自由度(DoF)和40个肌肉扭矩发生器(MTG),这是使用实验数据构建的。该模型可针对不同的人体测量和受试者身体特征进行调整:性别,年龄,体重,高度,占主导地位的一面,和身体活动。在提出的多DoFMTG模型中,使用实验测功机数据对接头极限进行建模。通过模拟关节运动范围(ROM)和扭矩来验证模型方程;所有模拟结果与先前发表的研究具有良好的一致性。
    A musculoskeletal (MSK) model is a valuable tool for assessing complex biomechanical problems, estimating joint torques during motion, optimizing motion in sports, and designing exoskeletons and prostheses. This study proposes an open-source upper body MSK model that supports biomechanical analysis of human motion. The MSK model of the upper body consists of 8 body segments (torso, head, left/right upper arm, left/right forearm, and left/right hand). The model has 20 degrees of freedom (DoFs) and 40 muscle torque generators (MTGs), which are constructed using experimental data. The model is adjustable for different anthropometric measurements and subject body characteristics: sex, age, body mass, height, dominant side, and physical activity. Joint limits are modeled using experimental dynamometer data within the proposed multi-DoF MTG model. The model equations are verified by simulating the joint range of motion (ROM) and torque; all simulation results have a good agreement with previously published research.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号