triarchic model

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:据报道,患有反社会人格障碍(ASPD)和边缘性人格障碍(BPD)的人具有高度精神病性,对治疗工作构成严峻挑战。在这些人的样本中,两种治疗的效果,基于心理的治疗(MBT)和统一协议(UP),对三个结果进行了调查:(I)精神病特质领域,三位一体精神病模型(TPM)提出的大胆和抑制;(ii)反社会和临界症状严重程度;(iii)其共同特征的严重程度,包括冲动,愤怒的表达和自我伤害。
    方法:对163名BPD+ASPD患者进行筛选,55例随机接受MBT治疗,53例随机接受UP治疗。以6个月至36个月的间隔评估治疗结果。
    结果:两种治疗方法的精神病特征均出现短期减少,反社会和边缘性人格症状的严重程度,愤怒失调,冲动和自我伤害,但两个治疗组在36个月随访时症状几乎完全复发.UP比MBT具有更持久的效果。
    结论:尽管治疗时间相当短,UP至少与MBT一样有效,并且在某些方面更优越。从长远来看,任何一种治疗都无法缓解症状。与之相关的精神病和边缘/反社会合并症在某种程度上可以通过心理治疗来补救,但只是在短期内。
    结论:冲动性和去抑制性高的患者在心理治疗后可能复发,治疗后应密切监测。
    BACKGROUND: Those with cooccurring antisocial personality disorder (ASPD) and borderline personality disorder (BPD) are reported to be highly psychopathic and to represent a severe challenge to treatment efforts. In a sample of such individuals, the effects of two treatments, mentalization-based therapy (MBT) and the unified protocol (UP), were investigated on three outcomes: (i) the psychopathy trait domains of meanness, boldness and disinhibition proposed by the triarchic psychopathy model (TPM); (ii) antisocial and borderline symptom severity; and (iii) the severity of their common features including impulsivity, anger expression and self-harm.
    METHODS: Of 163 individuals with BPD + ASPD screened for eligibility, 55 were randomized to MBT treatment and 53 to UP treatment. Outcomes of treatment were assessed at 6-month intervals to 36 months.
    RESULTS: Short-term reductions were seen following both treatments in traits of psychopathy, antisocial and borderline personality symptom severity, anger dysregulation, impulsivity and self-harm, but both treatment groups showed almost complete relapse of symptoms at the 36-month follow-up. UP had more durable effects than MBT.
    CONCLUSIONS: Despite being a considerably shorter treatment, UP was at least as effective as MBT and in some respects superior. Remission of symptoms was not achieved by either treatment in the long term. Psychopathy and borderline/antisocial comorbidity with which it is associated are to some extent remediable through psychotherapy, but only in the short term.
    CONCLUSIONS: Patients with high levels of impulsivity and disinhibition are likely to relapse following psychotherapy and should be closely monitored after treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本文从Fowles(1980)的角度出发,重点研究了JeffreyGray的焦虑理论,他的作品在唤醒理论中的应用,心理生理学,以及精神病的病因.虽然影响很大,一般唤醒的概念在采用多种生理测量的个体间评估方面未能得到支持.格雷构建了一个调节焦虑的行为抑制系统(BIS),激励行为以接近奖励的行为方法或激活系统(BAS),和一个非特定的唤醒系统,激励行为捕捉唤醒的各个方面。Fowles(1980)提出BIS引发皮肤电活动以应对威胁,BAS增加心率以响应奖励激励线索,精神病与BIS弱有关。本文回顾了格雷对这些主题未来研究的影响,包括与国家精神卫生研究所研究领域标准相关的早期建议。最后,本文总结了自1980年以来精神病病因学理论的演变,并指出了格雷理论在精神病研究中仍然存在的方面。帕特里克的三方模型已经成为精神病的主要理论。Beauchaine的注意缺陷多动障碍的特质冲动理论也是相关的。
    This paper focuses on Jeffrey Gray\'s theory of anxiety from the perspective of Fowles\' (1980) application of his work to theories of arousal, psychophysiology, and the etiology of psychopathy. Although highly influential, the concept of general arousal failed to find support in terms of between-individuals assessment with multiple physiological measures. Gray\'s constructs of a behavioral inhibition system (BIS) that mediates anxiety, a behavioral approach or activation system (BAS) that energizes behavior to approach rewards, and a nonspecific arousal system that energizes behavior captured aspects of arousal. Fowles (1980) proposed that the BIS elicits electrodermal activity in response to threats, the BAS increases heart rate in response to reward incentive cues, and psychopathy is associated with a weak BIS. The paper reviews Gray\'s impact on future research on these topics, including early proposals relevant to the National Institute of Mental Health\'s Research Domain Criteria. Finally, the paper summarizes the evolution of theories of the etiology of psychopathy since 1980, noting ways in which aspects of Gray\'s theory are still seen in psychopathy research. Patrick\'s triarchic model has emerged as a major theory of psychopathy. Beauchaine\'s trait impulsivity theory of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder also is relevant.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    注意缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)症状与无数不良结局相关,包括人际关系困难,但是,随着时间的推移,调节ADHD的发展过程和功能影响的因素还没有很好的理解。本研究评估了三元神经行为特征的发育贡献(大胆,卑鄙,和抑制)从青春期到成年的ADHD症状及其子维度。参与者是14、17和19岁的双胞胎和三胞胎(最初的N=1,185,51.2%的女性)。使用负二项回归的路径分析显示,14岁时的大胆与更多的ADHD症状(尤其是多动/冲动)相关。但在前瞻性分析中,19岁时的症状较少(尤其是注意力不集中)。值得注意的是,将14岁和17岁时的人际关系问题作为协变量,将后者的影响降低至不显著.解除抑制同时和前瞻性地预测了更高水平的ADHD症状,包括两个子维度,预期效应部分由17岁时更大的社会损害介导。预见性(但不是同时)预测多动/冲动症状的更高水平。性别调节了某些卑鄙和抑制与ADHD症状的关联。这些发现强调了基本的神经行为特征如何在ADHD的发展过程中塑造精神病理学和适应性结果。
    Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms are associated with myriad adverse outcomes, including interpersonal difficulties, but factors that moderate the developmental course and functional impact of ADHD over time are not well understood. The present study evaluated developmental contributions of the triarchic neurobehavioral traits (boldness, meanness, and disinhibition) to ADHD symptomatology and its subdimensions from adolescence to young adulthood. Participants were twins and triplets assessed at ages 14, 17, and 19 (initial N = 1,185, 51.2% female). Path analyses using negative binomial regression revealed that boldness at age 14 was associated with more ADHD symptoms cross-sectionally (especially hyperactivity/impulsivity), but fewer symptoms (especially inattention) at age 19 in the prospective analysis. Notably, inclusion of interpersonal problems at ages 14 and 17 as covariates reduced the latter effect to nonsignificant. Disinhibition concurrently and prospectively predicted higher levels of ADHD symptoms, including both subdimensions, and the prospective effects were partially mediated by greater social impairment at age 17. Meanness prospectively (but not concurrently) predicted higher levels of hyperactivity/impulsivity symptoms. Sex moderated certain associations of meanness and disinhibition with ADHD symptoms. These findings highlight how fundamental neurobehavioral traits shape both psychopathology and adaptive outcomes in the developmental course of ADHD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    精神病与情感过程的缺陷有关,可能反映在无法提取刺激的情感内容上。在两个实验中,我们测量了与处理同步目标刺激无关的情绪图像的干扰效应,并检查了这种干扰是否受到心理测量定义的精神病特征的缓解。在实验1中,我们显示了这种情绪分散效应作为与冷心相关的精神病特征的功能而降低,并且在正价和负价图像中均发生。实验2试图通过短暂呈现情绪刺激来测试效果的自动性,以便难以报告情绪。再一次,高可见度的图像产生了强烈的效果,这些效果受到精神病患者的冷热/卑鄙特征的调节,但是低能见度的图像并没有引起情感干扰效应。我们的结果强烈支持以下观点:与冷酷/卑鄙有关的精神病特征与无法自动处理图像的情感内容有关。
    Psychopathy is associated with a deficit in affective processes and might be reflected in the inability to extract the emotional content of a stimulus. Across two experiments, we measured the interference effect from emotional images that were irrelevant to the processing of simultaneous target stimuli and examined if this interference was moderated by psychometrically defined traits of psychopathy. In Experiment 1, we showed this emotional distraction effect was reduced as a function of psychopathic traits related to cold-heartedness and occurred for both positively- and negatively-valenced images. Experiment 2 attempted to test the automaticity of the effects by presenting the emotional stimuli briefly so that the emotion was difficult to report. Again, high visibility images produced strong effects that were moderated by the cold-heatedness/meanness traits of psychopathy, but the low-visibility images did not evoke the emotional distractor effect. Our results strongly support the notion that psychopathic traits related to cold-heartedness/meanness are associated with an inability to automatically process the emotional content of images.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    近年来,在临床心理科学更广泛领域取得重要进展的背景下,关于精神病的研究取得了长足的进步。我在这次审查中的主要目的是鼓励在性格上整合调查工作,生物行为学,以及精神病的发展方面与一般精神病理学的对应工作。使用三位一体的精神病模型作为参照系,我提供有关精神病概念化和评估的长期辩论的观点,讨论精神病的性格方面如何与内化和外化精神病理学的子维度相关,并总结了当代生物行为学和精神病发展研究的发现。最后,我描述了一种系统的策略,用于协调有关精神病的生物行为发育研究,使其能够被告知,并帮助告知,正在进行更广泛的心理健康问题研究。
    Research on psychopathy has progressed considerably in recent years against the backdrop of important advances in the broader field of clinical psychological science. My major aim in this review is to encourage integration of investigative work on dispositional, biobehavioral, and developmental aspects of psychopathy with counterpart work on general psychopathology. Using the triarchic model of psychopathy as a frame of reference, I offer perspective on long-standing debates pertaining to the conceptualization and assessment of psychopathy, discuss how dispositional facets of psychopathy relate to subdimensions of internalizing and externalizing psychopathology, and summarize findings from contemporary biobehavioral and developmental research on psychopathy. I conclude by describing a systematic strategy for coordinating biobehavioral-developmental research on psychopathy that can enable it to be informed by, and help inform, ongoing research on mental health problems more broadly.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    The validity of self-report psychopathy assessment has been questioned, especially in forensic settings where clinical evaluations influence critical decision-making (e.g., institutional placement, parole eligibility). Informant-based assessment offers a potentially valuable supplement to self-report but is challenging to acquire in under-resourced forensic contexts. The current study evaluated, within an incarcerated sample (n = 322), the extent to which brief prototype-based informant ratings of psychopathic traits as described by the triarchic model (boldness, meanness, disinhibition; Patrick et al., 2009) converge with self-report trait scores and show incremental validity in predicting criterion measures. Self/informant convergence was robust for traits of boldness and disinhibition, but weaker for meanness. Informant-rated traits showed incremental predictive validity over self-report traits, both within and across assessment domains. These findings indicate that simple prototype-based informant ratings of the triarchic traits can provide a useful supplement to self-report in assessing psychopathy within forensic-clinical settings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    精神病在职业环境中有好处吗?应用精神病的三元模型,我们认为大胆的维度,去抑制,和卑鄙与工作场所的结果有不同的关系。注重大胆,符合社会分析人格理论,我们认为政治技能可以调节胆识与工作绩效之间的关系。使用477对目标同事的样本,我们发现胆量和政治技巧对情境和任务表现的相互作用影响,以及对适得其反的工作行为的缓冲。此外,政治技巧缓和了大胆与适应性表现之间的关系。抑制和卑鄙与适得其反的工作行为呈正相关,从而反映了精神病的黑暗核心。总之,大胆是一个与职业成功有关的特质,在没有其他特质的情况下,构成整个精神病。此外,我们鼓励在职业环境中使用三元模式作为总体框架。
    Does psychopathy have an upside in vocational contexts? Applying the triarchic model of psychopathy, we propose that the dimensions of boldness, disinhibition, and meanness have different relations to workplace outcomes. Focusing on boldness and in line with socioanalytic personality theory, we propose that political skill moderates the relation between boldness and job performance. Using a sample of 477 target-coworker pairings, we found interaction effects of boldness and political skill on contextual and task performance, and the buffering of counterproductive work behavior. Furthermore, political skill moderated the relation between boldness and adaptive performance. Disinhibition and meanness were positively correlated with counterproductive work behaviors, thereby reflecting the dark core of psychopathy. In sum, boldness is a trait linked to career success in the absence of the other traits that make up psychopathy as a whole. Furthermore, we encourage the use of the triarchic model as an overarching framework in vocational contexts.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    人格特质的结构模型,特别是五因素模型(FFM),继续告知正在进行的辩论,关于什么人格属性和特质领域是精神病的核心。越来越多的文献将三位一体的精神病模型(大胆,卑鄙,去抑制)对FFM。最近,研究人员使用NEO人格量表-修订版-FFM的流行衡量标准,开发了基于项目和回归的三位一体精神病模型的衡量标准。当前的研究使用来自合作纵向人格障碍研究的数据,研究了这两种FFM衍生的三权制模型操作的相关性。这两种方法具有很强的收敛有效性系数和与标准相关的有效性系数的相似模式。与以剥削他人和不良依恋为特征的更大人格病理有关的卑鄙,而去抑制与负面影响较大和行为约束较差的指标相关。大胆与减少的负面影响和更大的自恋性格特征有关。尽管基于项目和回归的方法显示出与标准变量相似的关联模式,考虑到回归方法的均值和抑制得分之间的强相关性,基于项目的方法比基于回归的方法具有一些实践和心理上的优势。
    Structural models of personality traits, particularly the five-factor model (FFM), continue to inform ongoing debates regarding what personality attributes and trait domains are central to psychopathy. A growing body of literature has linked the constructs of the triarchic model of psychopathy (boldness, meanness, disinhibition) to the FFM. Recently, researchers developed both item and regression-based measures of the triarchic model of psychopathy using the NEO Personality Inventory-Revised-a popular measure of the FFM. The current study examines the correlates of these two FFM-derived operationalizations of the triarchic model using data from the Collaborative Longitudinal Personality Disorders Study. The two approaches had strong convergent validity coefficients and similar patterns of criterion-related validity coefficients. Meanness related to greater personality pathology characterized by exploitation of others and poor attachment, whereas disinhibition related to indicators of greater negative affect and poor behavioral constraint. Boldness related to reduced negative affect and greater narcissistic personality traits. Although the item and regression-based approaches showed similar patterns of associations with criterion-variables, the item-based approach has some practical and psychometric advantages over the regression-based approach given strong correlations between the meanness and disinhibition scores from the regression approach.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    The triarchic model was advanced as an integrative, trait-based framework for investigating psychopathy using different assessment methods and across developmental periods. Recent research has shown that the triarchic traits of boldness, meanness, and disinhibition can be operationalized effectively in youth, but longitudinal research is needed to realize the model\'s potential to advance developmental understanding of psychopathy. We report on the creation and validation of scale measures of the triarchic traits using questionnaire items available in the University of Southern California Risk Factors for Antisocial Behavior (RFAB) project, a large-scale longitudinal study of the development of antisocial behavior that includes measures from multiple modalities (self-report, informant rating, clinical-diagnostic, task-behavioral, physiological). Using a construct-rating and psychometric refinement approach, we developed triarchic scales that showed acceptable reliability, expected intercorrelations, and good temporal stability. The scales showed theory-consistent relations with external criteria including measures of psychopathy, internalizing/externalizing psychopathology, antisocial behavior, and substance use. Findings demonstrate the viability of measuring triarchic traits in the RFAB sample, extend the known nomological network of these traits into the developmental realm, and provide a foundation for follow-up studies examining the etiology of psychopathic traits and their relations with multimodal measures of cognitive-affective function and proneness to clinical problems.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Can the components of the triarchic model of psychopathy (i.e., boldness, meanness, disinhibition) be operationalized using the item pool comprising the Comprehensive Assessment of Psychopathic Personality (CAPP) model? To address this question, the authors first derived CAPP-based triarchic scales using standard item-selection procedures and then examined the external correlates of these provisional scales in three archival data sets: (a) U.S. jail inmates administered the institutional rating scale version of the CAPP and (b and c) prototypicality ratings of the CAPP traits provided by Swedish forensic mental health professionals and U.S. probation officers. Although most research on triarchic constructs has relied exclusively on self-report inventories, the results suggest that the CAPP model can be reorganized to reflect boldness, meanness, and disinhibition and that its institutional rating scale items can effectively quantify these constructs using interview and file review data. Implications for future research on the measurement and assessment of psychopathic traits are discussed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号