totally extraperitoneal repair

完全腹膜外修复
  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    我们介绍了一例复发性腹股沟膀胱疝的病例,该病例先前三次手术均未成功,并使用完全腹膜外修复(TEP)进行了修复。一名79岁的男子出现右腹股沟肿胀,在同一侧用前路手术治疗了三次。计算机断层扫描证实腹股沟膀胱疝复发。在术前确定膀胱疝后进行TEP,与以前的手术使用的是通过前路插入和修补技术。腹膜外方法允许膀胱减少而不受伤,并使用3DMax®LightMesh安全修复疝气。术后恢复顺利,1年后无复发。TEP有助于膀胱疝的诊断和修复,强调术前诊断的重要性和内镜下膀胱疝修补术的疗效,即使在复发病例中。
    We present a case of a recurrent inguinal bladder hernia that was previously unsuccessfully operated on three times and was repaired using totally extraperitoneal repair (TEP). A 79-year-old man presented with a right inguinal swelling that had been treated three times on the same side with anterior approaches. Computed tomography confirmed a recurrent inguinal bladder hernia. TEP was performed after identifying the bladder hernia preoperatively, with previous surgeries that used a plug-and-patch technique through an anterior approach. The extraperitoneal approach allowed the bladder to be reduced without injury and the hernia to be safely repaired using a 3D Max® Light Mesh. The postoperative recovery was uneventful, with no recurrence after 1 year. TEP facilitates the diagnosis and repair of bladder hernias, emphasizing the importance of preoperative diagnosis and the efficacy of endoscopic procedures in bladder hernia repair, even in recurrent cases.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    疝可以定义为通过解剖学上设计为包含该内脏的层的内脏突出。大多数腹部疝发生在描述良好的潜在虚弱部位。腹股沟疝修补术是普外科最常见的手术之一。目的:比较全腹膜外(TEP)和经腹腹膜前(TAPP)修补原发性腹股沟疝的围手术期并发症发生率。
    这是一项随机比较研究,在普外科进行。共纳入50例患者,分为两组,每组25例。A组代表腹腔镜TEP修复,B组代表腹腔镜TAPP修复。包括18岁以上的原发性单侧腹股沟疝患者。排除患有复杂腹股沟疝和既往腹部手术史的患者。
    我们观察到,疝气的发生在31-50岁年龄段更为常见,右侧疝气更为常见。TEP和TAPP组的阴囊水肿和转换为开放手术的机会相似。与TAPP相比,TEP的手术持续时间明显更长。根据视觉模拟量表,与TAPP相比,接受TEP的患者疼痛较少。在TEP的情况下,术后住院时间和恢复常规活动的时间明显减少。
    TEP优于TAPP用于腹腔镜疝修补术,因为它保留了腹膜的完整性,术后疼痛较小。在接受TEP治疗的患者中,可以看到早期恢复并恢复到常规工作,并且比TAPP修复组显示出更好的视觉模拟评分。
    UNASSIGNED: Hernia may be defined as a protrusion of viscus through layers anatomically designed to contain that viscus. Most abdominal hernias occur at well-described sites of potential weakness. Repair of inguinal hernia is one of the most common operations in general surgery. Objectives: To compare the perioperative complication rates of total extraperitoneal (TEP) and transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repairs of primary inguinal hernias.
    UNASSIGNED: It is a randomised comparative study, conducted at the department of general surgery. A total of 50 patients were included and divided into two groups with 25 in each. Group A represents the laparoscopic TEP repair and group B represents the laparoscopic TAPP repair. Patients above 18 years with primary unilateral inguinal hernia were included. Patients having complicated inguinal hernia and history of previous abdominal surgery were excluded.
    UNASSIGNED: We observed that hernia occurrence is more common in the 31-50 years of age group and right-sided hernia is more common. Scrotal oedema and conversion to open surgery chances are similar in both TEP and TAPP groups. The duration of surgery in TEP is significantly higher as compared to TAPP. Patients who underwent TEP experienced less pain as compared to TAPP as per visual analogue scale. Postoperative hospital stay and time taken to resume the routine activity were significantly less in case of TEP.
    UNASSIGNED: TEP is preferred over TAPP for laparoscopic hernia repair because it preserves the peritoneal integrity and has lesser postoperative pain. The early recovery and return to the routine work were seen with the patient treated with the TEP and also showed better visual analogue score than the TAPP repair group.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究的目的是比较两孔(单切口加一孔)腹腔镜完全腹膜外修补术(TEP)与单孔TEP治疗腹股沟疝的可行性和疗效。我们从前瞻性维护的数据库中进行了回顾性比较研究。纳入了229例接受TEP的腹股沟疝患者。在这些病人中,124例接受了双端口TEP,105例接受了单端口TEP。比较手术结果的差异。与单端口TEP组相比,双端口TEP组的平均手术时间较短(55.3±13.1vs.65.1±16.6min,P<0.001)。在包括术后疼痛在内的其他手术结果方面,两组之间没有显着差异。术后住院时间,恢复日常活动的时间,化妆品满意度和并发症。与单端口TEP相比,双端口TEP的手术时间更短。而本研究中评估的其他结果似乎具有可比性。
    The aim of this study is to compare the feasibility and efficacy of two-port (single incision plus one port) laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal repair (TEP) with single-port TEP for the treatment of inguinal hernia. We performed a retrospective comparative study from a prospectively maintained database. A cohort of 229 patients with inguinal hernia who underwent TEP were included. Of these patients, 124 underwent two-port TEP and 105 underwent single-port TEP. Differences in surgical outcomes were compared. The mean operative time was shorter in the two-port TEP group compared to the single-port TEP group (55.3 ± 13.1 vs. 65.1 ± 16.6 min, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of other surgical outcomes including postoperative pain, postoperative hospital stay, time to resume daily activities, cosmetic satisfaction and complications. Two-port TEP is associated with a shorter operative time compared to single-port TEP, while the other outcomes evaluated in this study appear to be comparable.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在描述使用完全腹膜外(TEP)修复方法对肝移植患者进行腹股沟疝修复的可行性和术后结果。
    方法:从2022年5月至2023年3月,有腹股沟疝的肝移植患者接受了TEP腹股沟疝修补术,由单一的普通高级实验外科医生。背景资料,术中发现,术后并发症,术后疼痛,健康,幸福被登记了。
    结果:对10例患者进行了13次TEP入路腹股沟疝手术,在所有情况下完成手术,无需转换为开放或经腹腹膜前入路。70%的手术探查显示多发性疝缺损:所有患者都有外侧疝,62%的内侧缺损,股骨缺损占30.8%。中位住院时间为1天[范围(0.3)],30%作为门诊病人。手术后并发症发生在30%的病例中:1个血肿和2个血清瘤。术后疼痛和身体功能评分为100分(IQR44)和90分(IQR15),分别。
    结论:TEP腹股沟疝修补术对肝移植患者是安全可行的,并发症发生率低,住院时间短,和相当比例的门诊病人。后入路可以全面修复肌外阴骨缺损,至关重要的是,由于相关的先天缺陷。
    OBJECTIVE: The present study aims to describe the feasibility and the postoperative results of groin hernia repair in liver transplant patients using a totally extra-peritoneal (TEP) repair approach.
    METHODS: From May 2022 to March 2023, liver transplant patients with groin hernia underwent TEP groin hernia repair, by the single common senior experimented surgeon. Background information, intraoperative findings, postoperative complications, postoperative pain, health, and well-being were registered.
    RESULTS: Thirteen TEP approach groin hernioplasties were performed in 10 patients, completing the procedure in all cases without the need for conversion either to open or transabdominal preperitoneal approaches. 70% of surgical explorations revealed multiple hernia defects: lateral hernias in all patients, medial defects in 62%, and femoral defects in 30.8%. Median hospital stay was 1 day [range (0.3)], with 30% treated as outpatients. Post-surgical complications occurred in 30% of cases: 1 hematoma and 2 seromas. Postoperative pain and physical functioning scored 100 (IQR 44) and 90 (IQR 15), respectively.
    CONCLUSIONS: TEP groin hernioplasty is safe and feasible for liver transplant patients, with low complication rates, short hospital stays, and a significant proportion treated as outpatients. The posterior approach allows comprehensive repair of myopectineal defects, crucial due to associated hernial defects.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:ILAM(个体化腹腔镜解剖网格)研究的目的是基于CT扫描创建和植入完全个体化的网格,考虑到已发表的关于腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术植入物的材料和力学行为的知识体系。
    背景:创建和实施这项研究的团队由外科医生和工程师组成。制定了一个具体项目,分为4个阶段。
    方法:发育和植入的过程分为4个里程碑:基于预定义亚组的CT扫描和建模,网格制造,认证和临床评估。
    结果:该研究的结果是第一个单独设计的疝网片被植入人类受试者体内。经过12个月的随访,未报告复发或其他并发症.
    结论:新的网格为患者腹股沟区的几何形状提供了更好的解剖配合。植入物和组织之间的多个接触点确保了机械稳定性,产生摩擦力。连同形状设计的可能性(适当的重叠),作者认为不需要网片固定。如果是,这种设计网格的使用可以改变将来腹腔镜疝修补术的指南。
    OBJECTIVE: The aim of the ILAM (Individualized Laparoscopic Anatomical Mesh) study was to create and implant a fully individualized mesh based on CT scans, taking into account the published body of knowledge about the material and mechanical behavior of the implant for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.
    BACKGROUND: The team creating and conducting this study consisted of surgeons and engineers. A specific project was made and divided into 4 phases.
    METHODS: The process of development and implantation was divided into 4 milestones: CT scans and modeling based on predefined subgroups, mesh manufacture, certification and clinical evaluation.
    RESULTS: The result of the study was the first individually designed hernia mesh to have been implanted in a human subject. After 12 months of follow-up, no recurrences or other complications were reported.
    CONCLUSIONS: The new mesh provides a better anatomic fit to the patients\' inguinal region geometry. Mechanical stability is ensured by the multiple contact points between the implant and the tissues, which generate friction forces. Together with the possibility of shape design (proper overlap), the authors believe that there is no need for mesh fixation. If so, the use of such design meshes can change the guidelines in laparoendoscopic hernia repair in the future.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:腹壁疝修补术是一般外科实践中的基本手术之一。在微创修复技术出现之后,一直在努力寻找最可靠的技术,具有易于重复的结果,可以由世界各地的外科医生实践。从分析的角度来看,本研究旨在强调两种技术的优缺点。
    方法:将60名参与者分为两组,每组30例:完全腹膜外(TEP)和扩展TEP(eTEP)疝修补术组。使用卡方检验和Mann-WhitneyU检验分析协变量和结果。这项研究是在马哈拉施特拉邦西部地区的一所三级研究生教学医院进行的,浦那,印度,一个外科医生。两组的手术程序均符合标准手术惯例。进行该研究是为了了解在早期植入阶段观察到的困难类型以及这些程序的学习曲线。
    结果:TEP组10%的手术和eTEP组6.7%的手术需要使用Verress针来处理意外气腹(P=0.64)。eTEP组的平均手术时间明显短于TEP组(P=0.031)。
    结论:与TEP方法相比,eTEP修复与较短的手术时间相关,由于学习曲线较短,更宽的视角,更广泛的运动范围,用于仪器操作,和符合人体工程学的优越操作经验。
    BACKGROUND: Abdominal wall hernia repair is among the fundamental procedures in general surgical practice. Subsequent to the advent of minimally invasive repair, there have been efforts to find the most reliable technique, with easily reproducible results that can be practiced by surgeons worldwide. From an analytical point of view, this study aimed to highlight the advantages and disadvantages of two techniques.
    METHODS: A total of 60 participants were divided into two groups of 30 patients: the totally extraperitoneal (TEP) and the extended TEP (eTEP) hernia repair groups. Covariates and outcomes were analyzed using the chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests. The study was carried out at a tertiary postgraduate teaching hospital in the western zone of Maharashtra, Pune, India, by a single surgeon. The operative procedures were as per standard surgical practice for both groups. The study was conducted to understand types of difficulties observed in the early implantation stages and the learning curve of these procedures.
    RESULTS: Ten percent of the procedures in the TEP group and 6.7% of procedures in the eTEP group required Veress needle use to manage accidental pneumoperitoneum (P=0.64). The mean operative time in the eTEP group was significantly shorter than that of the TEP group (P=0.031).
    CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the TEP approach, eTEP repair is associated with shorter operative times, owing to a shorter learning curve, a wider-angle view, a wider range of motion for instrument manipulation, and an ergonomically superior operative experience.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED:完全腹膜外(TEP)和经腹腹膜前(TAPP)修复是腹股沟疝手术的两种既定的最小入路技术。TEP提供避免侵犯腹膜腔的优点。
    UNASSIGNED:本研究旨在描述三级护理教学机构中TEP在腹股沟疝修补术中长达十年的经验,以及在困难情况下相同的可行性。
    UNASSIGNED:回顾性分析了2008年1月至2019年12月在三级教学医院接受TEP修补术治疗腹股沟疝的患者数据库。详细的术前临床细节,手术持续时间,术中和术后并发症,包括疼痛,分析术后住院时间和疝气复发数据。
    未经批准:超过12年,511例患者接受了内镜下TEP网片修复,疝修复总数为614例。大多数(97.45%)患者为男性。患者群体的平均年龄为51.3岁。490例患者出现原发性疝。单侧腹股沟疝修补术的平均手术时间为56.8±16分钟,双侧修补术的平均手术时间为80.9±25.2分钟。在17例(3.3%)患者中尝试了先前下腹部/耻骨上手术疤痕的TEP,只有一个需要转换。术中腹膜破裂是最常见的并发症(34.8%)。在9.4%的患者中发现了血清肿。17名患者需要转换(14名TAPP和3名开放)。4(0.7)例患者出现复发。
    UNASSIGNED:TEP修补术是腹股沟疝修补术的有效方法,可在大多数腹股沟疝患者中尝试,包括先前下腹部切口的患者。
    UNASSIGNED: Totally extra-peritoneal (TEP) and transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repair are two established minimal access techniques of groin hernia surgery. TEP offers the advantage of avoiding violation of the peritoneal cavity.
    UNASSIGNED: This study aims to describe the decade-long experience of TEP in groin hernia repair in a tertiary care teaching institute and the feasibility of the same in difficult scenarios.
    UNASSIGNED: Retrospective analysis of the database of patients undergoing TEP repair for inguinal hernia in a single surgical unit at a tertiary teaching hospital between January 2008 and December 2019 was performed. Detailed pre-operative clinical details, operative duration, intraoperative and post-operative complications, including pain, length of post-operative hospital stay and hernia recurrence data were analysed.
    UNASSIGNED: Over 12 years\' duration, 511 patients underwent endoscopic TEP mesh repair and the total number of hernias repaired was 614. Majority (97.45%) of patients were male. The mean age of the patient population was 51.3 years. Primary hernia was seen in 490 patients. The mean operating time for unilateral inguinal hernia repair was 56.8 ± 16 min and for bilateral repair 80.9 ± 25.2 min. TEP in previous lower abdominal/suprapubic surgical scars was attempted in 17 (3.3%) patients, with only one requiring conversion. The intraoperative peritoneal breach was the most common documented complication (34.8%). Seroma was seen in 9.4% of patients. Seventeen patients required conversion (14 TAPP and 3 open). Recurrence was seen in 4 (0.7) patients.
    UNASSIGNED: TEP repair is an effective method of groin hernia repair and can be attempted in the majority of patients groin hernia, including patients with previous lower abdominal incisions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    目的:建立腹膜前间隙的安全性在腹腔镜完全腹膜外(TEP)疝修补术中至关重要。在这篇系统综述和荟萃分析中,我们比较了接受TEP疝修补术的腹股沟疝或股疝患者的球囊剥离术和伸缩式剥离术的结局.
    方法:我们搜索了PubMed,Embase,WebofScience,和Cochrane数据库的随机对照试验(RCT)以及从开始到2022年7月发表的前瞻性和回顾性研究。采用随机效应模型进行Meta分析。使用手术时间测量治疗结果,术中出血的发生率,腹膜裂伤,转换为其他方法,手术部位感染(SSI),血肿,血清瘤形成,疝气复发,和术后疼痛。
    结果:五个RCT,一项前瞻性研究,和两项回顾性研究(总共,936名患者)被包括在内。两组间手术时间无显著差异,SSI,血肿,血清肿,复发率,术后第1天和第7天疼痛。球囊组的转换率明显低于伸缩组(比值比,0.34;95%置信区间,0.15-0.81)。
    结论:在腹腔镜TEP疝修补术中,球囊剥离术和伸缩式剥离术都是创造腹膜前间隙的可行技术,手术时间相似,并发症发生率,和术后疼痛。然而,接受球囊剥离术的患者的转换率低于接受伸缩式剥离术的患者。
    OBJECTIVE: Safety in creating a preperitoneal space is crucial in laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) hernia repairs. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we compared the outcomes of balloon dissection and telescopic dissection in patients with inguinal or femoral hernias who underwent TEP hernia repair.
    METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective and retrospective studies published from inception to July 2022. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model. The treatment outcome was measured using operation time, incidence of intraoperative hemorrhage, peritoneal laceration, conversion to other approaches, surgical site infection (SSI), hematoma, seroma formation, hernia recurrence, and postoperative pain.
    RESULTS: Five RCTs, one prospective study, and two retrospective studies (in total, 936 patients) were included. No significant between-group differences were noted in operation time, SSI, hematoma, seroma, recurrence rate, and postoperative pain on days 1 and 7. The conversion rate was significantly lower in the balloon group than in the telescopic group (odds ratio, 0.34; 95% confidence interval, 0.15-0.81).
    CONCLUSIONS: Both balloon dissection and telescopic dissection are viable techniques for creating preperitoneal space in laparoscopic TEP hernia repair and have similar operation time, complication rate, and postoperative pain. Nevertheless, the conversion rate was lower in patients undergoing balloon dissection than in those undergoing telescopic dissection.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在评估同期腹腔镜完全腹膜外(TEP)腹股沟疝修补术和经尿道前列腺电切术(TURP)的结果。
    方法:这项回顾性研究在我院进行,从2011年6月到2020年6月。超过9年,17例并存的单纯性单侧或双侧腹股沟疝(原发性/复发性)和明显的良性前列腺肥大的患者在同一坐位中进行了手术。比较以下结果:手术持续时间,转为开放性疝气手术,术中和术后并发症,住院时间,复发,恢复正常活动所需的时间和治疗费用。
    结果:本研究包括17名患者,平均年龄65岁(50-87岁)。手术的平均时间为115分钟,没有转换为开放式疝修补术。术后平均住院时间为3.7天。有4名患者(23.5%)在第10天确定了血清肿,只有2名在第6周时仍然存在,而在第12周时没有。术中或术后均无明显出血。无浅层或深部伤口感染(包括网状物感染)。腹股沟疝无复发。2例患者(11.7%)发生TURP术后尿道狭窄并接受膀胱镜狭窄成形术,初始程序后3和2.5个月。恢复正常活动所需的时间为7(±1)天。与两个手术分开进行时的成本总和相比,医院成本降低了25%。
    结论:并发TEP腹股沟疝修补术和TURP是一种实用的,安全和具有成本效益的程序。
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate concurrent laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) with determination of outcomes.
    METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted at our hospital, from June 2011 to June 2020. Over 9 years, 17 patients with co-existing uncomplicated unilateral or bilateral inguinal hernia (primary/recurrent) and significant benign prostatic hypertrophy were operated in the same sitting. The following outcomes were compared: duration of the surgery, conversion to open hernia surgery, intraoperative and post-operative complications, duration of hospital stay, recurrence, time taken to resume normal activity and cost of the treatment.
    RESULTS: This study included 17 patients with a mean age of 65 years (range of 50-87 years). The average time taken for the surgery was 115 min with no conversion to open hernia repair. The mean post-operative stay was 3.7 days. There were four patients (23.5%) with seromas identified at day 10, only two remained at 6 weeks and none at 12 weeks. None had significant bleeding intraoperatively or postoperatively. There was no superficial or deep wound infection (including mesh infection). There was no recurrence of inguinal hernia. Two patients (11.7%) developed post-TURP urethral stricture and underwent cystoscopic stricturoplasty, 3 and 2.5 months after the initial procedure. The time taken to resume normal activity was 7 (±1) days. The hospital cost is reduced by 25% as compared to the sum of costs when both the operations are done separately.
    CONCLUSIONS: Concurrent TEP inguinal hernia repair and TURP is a practical, safe and cost-effective procedure.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号