totally extraperitoneal repair

完全腹膜外修复
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究的目的是比较两孔(单切口加一孔)腹腔镜完全腹膜外修补术(TEP)与单孔TEP治疗腹股沟疝的可行性和疗效。我们从前瞻性维护的数据库中进行了回顾性比较研究。纳入了229例接受TEP的腹股沟疝患者。在这些病人中,124例接受了双端口TEP,105例接受了单端口TEP。比较手术结果的差异。与单端口TEP组相比,双端口TEP组的平均手术时间较短(55.3±13.1vs.65.1±16.6min,P<0.001)。在包括术后疼痛在内的其他手术结果方面,两组之间没有显着差异。术后住院时间,恢复日常活动的时间,化妆品满意度和并发症。与单端口TEP相比,双端口TEP的手术时间更短。而本研究中评估的其他结果似乎具有可比性。
    The aim of this study is to compare the feasibility and efficacy of two-port (single incision plus one port) laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal repair (TEP) with single-port TEP for the treatment of inguinal hernia. We performed a retrospective comparative study from a prospectively maintained database. A cohort of 229 patients with inguinal hernia who underwent TEP were included. Of these patients, 124 underwent two-port TEP and 105 underwent single-port TEP. Differences in surgical outcomes were compared. The mean operative time was shorter in the two-port TEP group compared to the single-port TEP group (55.3 ± 13.1 vs. 65.1 ± 16.6 min, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of other surgical outcomes including postoperative pain, postoperative hospital stay, time to resume daily activities, cosmetic satisfaction and complications. Two-port TEP is associated with a shorter operative time compared to single-port TEP, while the other outcomes evaluated in this study appear to be comparable.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在描述使用完全腹膜外(TEP)修复方法对肝移植患者进行腹股沟疝修复的可行性和术后结果。
    方法:从2022年5月至2023年3月,有腹股沟疝的肝移植患者接受了TEP腹股沟疝修补术,由单一的普通高级实验外科医生。背景资料,术中发现,术后并发症,术后疼痛,健康,幸福被登记了。
    结果:对10例患者进行了13次TEP入路腹股沟疝手术,在所有情况下完成手术,无需转换为开放或经腹腹膜前入路。70%的手术探查显示多发性疝缺损:所有患者都有外侧疝,62%的内侧缺损,股骨缺损占30.8%。中位住院时间为1天[范围(0.3)],30%作为门诊病人。手术后并发症发生在30%的病例中:1个血肿和2个血清瘤。术后疼痛和身体功能评分为100分(IQR44)和90分(IQR15),分别。
    结论:TEP腹股沟疝修补术对肝移植患者是安全可行的,并发症发生率低,住院时间短,和相当比例的门诊病人。后入路可以全面修复肌外阴骨缺损,至关重要的是,由于相关的先天缺陷。
    OBJECTIVE: The present study aims to describe the feasibility and the postoperative results of groin hernia repair in liver transplant patients using a totally extra-peritoneal (TEP) repair approach.
    METHODS: From May 2022 to March 2023, liver transplant patients with groin hernia underwent TEP groin hernia repair, by the single common senior experimented surgeon. Background information, intraoperative findings, postoperative complications, postoperative pain, health, and well-being were registered.
    RESULTS: Thirteen TEP approach groin hernioplasties were performed in 10 patients, completing the procedure in all cases without the need for conversion either to open or transabdominal preperitoneal approaches. 70% of surgical explorations revealed multiple hernia defects: lateral hernias in all patients, medial defects in 62%, and femoral defects in 30.8%. Median hospital stay was 1 day [range (0.3)], with 30% treated as outpatients. Post-surgical complications occurred in 30% of cases: 1 hematoma and 2 seromas. Postoperative pain and physical functioning scored 100 (IQR 44) and 90 (IQR 15), respectively.
    CONCLUSIONS: TEP groin hernioplasty is safe and feasible for liver transplant patients, with low complication rates, short hospital stays, and a significant proportion treated as outpatients. The posterior approach allows comprehensive repair of myopectineal defects, crucial due to associated hernial defects.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:ILAM(个体化腹腔镜解剖网格)研究的目的是基于CT扫描创建和植入完全个体化的网格,考虑到已发表的关于腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术植入物的材料和力学行为的知识体系。
    背景:创建和实施这项研究的团队由外科医生和工程师组成。制定了一个具体项目,分为4个阶段。
    方法:发育和植入的过程分为4个里程碑:基于预定义亚组的CT扫描和建模,网格制造,认证和临床评估。
    结果:该研究的结果是第一个单独设计的疝网片被植入人类受试者体内。经过12个月的随访,未报告复发或其他并发症.
    结论:新的网格为患者腹股沟区的几何形状提供了更好的解剖配合。植入物和组织之间的多个接触点确保了机械稳定性,产生摩擦力。连同形状设计的可能性(适当的重叠),作者认为不需要网片固定。如果是,这种设计网格的使用可以改变将来腹腔镜疝修补术的指南。
    OBJECTIVE: The aim of the ILAM (Individualized Laparoscopic Anatomical Mesh) study was to create and implant a fully individualized mesh based on CT scans, taking into account the published body of knowledge about the material and mechanical behavior of the implant for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.
    BACKGROUND: The team creating and conducting this study consisted of surgeons and engineers. A specific project was made and divided into 4 phases.
    METHODS: The process of development and implantation was divided into 4 milestones: CT scans and modeling based on predefined subgroups, mesh manufacture, certification and clinical evaluation.
    RESULTS: The result of the study was the first individually designed hernia mesh to have been implanted in a human subject. After 12 months of follow-up, no recurrences or other complications were reported.
    CONCLUSIONS: The new mesh provides a better anatomic fit to the patients\' inguinal region geometry. Mechanical stability is ensured by the multiple contact points between the implant and the tissues, which generate friction forces. Together with the possibility of shape design (proper overlap), the authors believe that there is no need for mesh fixation. If so, the use of such design meshes can change the guidelines in laparoendoscopic hernia repair in the future.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:腹壁疝修补术是一般外科实践中的基本手术之一。在微创修复技术出现之后,一直在努力寻找最可靠的技术,具有易于重复的结果,可以由世界各地的外科医生实践。从分析的角度来看,本研究旨在强调两种技术的优缺点。
    方法:将60名参与者分为两组,每组30例:完全腹膜外(TEP)和扩展TEP(eTEP)疝修补术组。使用卡方检验和Mann-WhitneyU检验分析协变量和结果。这项研究是在马哈拉施特拉邦西部地区的一所三级研究生教学医院进行的,浦那,印度,一个外科医生。两组的手术程序均符合标准手术惯例。进行该研究是为了了解在早期植入阶段观察到的困难类型以及这些程序的学习曲线。
    结果:TEP组10%的手术和eTEP组6.7%的手术需要使用Verress针来处理意外气腹(P=0.64)。eTEP组的平均手术时间明显短于TEP组(P=0.031)。
    结论:与TEP方法相比,eTEP修复与较短的手术时间相关,由于学习曲线较短,更宽的视角,更广泛的运动范围,用于仪器操作,和符合人体工程学的优越操作经验。
    BACKGROUND: Abdominal wall hernia repair is among the fundamental procedures in general surgical practice. Subsequent to the advent of minimally invasive repair, there have been efforts to find the most reliable technique, with easily reproducible results that can be practiced by surgeons worldwide. From an analytical point of view, this study aimed to highlight the advantages and disadvantages of two techniques.
    METHODS: A total of 60 participants were divided into two groups of 30 patients: the totally extraperitoneal (TEP) and the extended TEP (eTEP) hernia repair groups. Covariates and outcomes were analyzed using the chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests. The study was carried out at a tertiary postgraduate teaching hospital in the western zone of Maharashtra, Pune, India, by a single surgeon. The operative procedures were as per standard surgical practice for both groups. The study was conducted to understand types of difficulties observed in the early implantation stages and the learning curve of these procedures.
    RESULTS: Ten percent of the procedures in the TEP group and 6.7% of procedures in the eTEP group required Veress needle use to manage accidental pneumoperitoneum (P=0.64). The mean operative time in the eTEP group was significantly shorter than that of the TEP group (P=0.031).
    CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the TEP approach, eTEP repair is associated with shorter operative times, owing to a shorter learning curve, a wider-angle view, a wider range of motion for instrument manipulation, and an ergonomically superior operative experience.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在评估同期腹腔镜完全腹膜外(TEP)腹股沟疝修补术和经尿道前列腺电切术(TURP)的结果。
    方法:这项回顾性研究在我院进行,从2011年6月到2020年6月。超过9年,17例并存的单纯性单侧或双侧腹股沟疝(原发性/复发性)和明显的良性前列腺肥大的患者在同一坐位中进行了手术。比较以下结果:手术持续时间,转为开放性疝气手术,术中和术后并发症,住院时间,复发,恢复正常活动所需的时间和治疗费用。
    结果:本研究包括17名患者,平均年龄65岁(50-87岁)。手术的平均时间为115分钟,没有转换为开放式疝修补术。术后平均住院时间为3.7天。有4名患者(23.5%)在第10天确定了血清肿,只有2名在第6周时仍然存在,而在第12周时没有。术中或术后均无明显出血。无浅层或深部伤口感染(包括网状物感染)。腹股沟疝无复发。2例患者(11.7%)发生TURP术后尿道狭窄并接受膀胱镜狭窄成形术,初始程序后3和2.5个月。恢复正常活动所需的时间为7(±1)天。与两个手术分开进行时的成本总和相比,医院成本降低了25%。
    结论:并发TEP腹股沟疝修补术和TURP是一种实用的,安全和具有成本效益的程序。
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate concurrent laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) with determination of outcomes.
    METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted at our hospital, from June 2011 to June 2020. Over 9 years, 17 patients with co-existing uncomplicated unilateral or bilateral inguinal hernia (primary/recurrent) and significant benign prostatic hypertrophy were operated in the same sitting. The following outcomes were compared: duration of the surgery, conversion to open hernia surgery, intraoperative and post-operative complications, duration of hospital stay, recurrence, time taken to resume normal activity and cost of the treatment.
    RESULTS: This study included 17 patients with a mean age of 65 years (range of 50-87 years). The average time taken for the surgery was 115 min with no conversion to open hernia repair. The mean post-operative stay was 3.7 days. There were four patients (23.5%) with seromas identified at day 10, only two remained at 6 weeks and none at 12 weeks. None had significant bleeding intraoperatively or postoperatively. There was no superficial or deep wound infection (including mesh infection). There was no recurrence of inguinal hernia. Two patients (11.7%) developed post-TURP urethral stricture and underwent cystoscopic stricturoplasty, 3 and 2.5 months after the initial procedure. The time taken to resume normal activity was 7 (±1) days. The hospital cost is reduced by 25% as compared to the sum of costs when both the operations are done separately.
    CONCLUSIONS: Concurrent TEP inguinal hernia repair and TURP is a practical, safe and cost-effective procedure.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究旨在评估同期腹腔镜完全腹膜外(TEP)腹股沟疝修补术和经尿道前列腺电切术(TURP)的结果。
    这项回顾性研究是在我们医院进行的,从2011年6月到2020年6月。超过9年,17例并存的单纯性单侧或双侧腹股沟疝(原发性/复发性)和明显的良性前列腺肥大的患者在同一坐位中进行了手术。比较以下结果:手术持续时间,转为开放性疝气手术,术中和术后并发症,住院时间,复发,恢复正常活动所需的时间和治疗费用。
    这项研究包括17名患者,平均年龄为65岁(范围为50-87岁)。手术的平均时间为115分钟,没有转换为开放式疝修补术。术后平均住院时间为3.7天。有4名患者(23.5%)在第10天确定了血清肿,只有2名在第6周时仍然存在,而在第12周时没有。术中或术后均无明显出血。无浅层或深部伤口感染(包括网状物感染)。腹股沟疝无复发。2例患者(11.7%)发生TURP术后尿道狭窄并接受膀胱镜狭窄成形术,初始程序后3和2.5个月。恢复正常活动所需的时间为7(±1)天。与两个手术分开进行时的成本总和相比,医院成本降低了25%。
    并发TEP腹股沟疝修补术和TURP是一种实用的,安全和具有成本效益的程序。
    UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to evaluate concurrent laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) with determination of outcomes.
    UNASSIGNED: This retrospective study was conducted at our hospital, from June 2011 to June 2020. Over 9 years, 17 patients with co-existing uncomplicated unilateral or bilateral inguinal hernia (primary/recurrent) and significant benign prostatic hypertrophy were operated in the same sitting. The following outcomes were compared: duration of the surgery, conversion to open hernia surgery, intraoperative and post-operative complications, duration of hospital stay, recurrence, time taken to resume normal activity and cost of the treatment.
    UNASSIGNED: This study included 17 patients with a mean age of 65 years (range of 50-87 years). The average time taken for the surgery was 115 min with no conversion to open hernia repair. The mean post-operative stay was 3.7 days. There were four patients (23.5%) with seromas identified at day 10, only two remained at 6 weeks and none at 12 weeks. None had significant bleeding intraoperatively or postoperatively. There was no superficial or deep wound infection (including mesh infection). There was no recurrence of inguinal hernia. Two patients (11.7%) developed post-TURP urethral stricture and underwent cystoscopic stricturoplasty, 3 and 2.5 months after the initial procedure. The time taken to resume normal activity was 7 (±1) days. The hospital cost is reduced by 25% as compared to the sum of costs when both the operations are done separately.
    UNASSIGNED: Concurrent TEP inguinal hernia repair and TURP is a practical, safe and cost-effective procedure.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    腹腔镜腹股沟疝(IH)修补术的两个主要问题是复发和慢性腹股沟疼痛(CGP)。该过程涉及用钉固定网眼,据信这会增加神经损伤引起的CGP发生率。因此,正在提议不固定网状物,但仍存在有关复发增加的担忧。在完全腹膜外修复(TEP)中改用非固定网片后,我们试图研究我们的结果。在4年的时间内,对122例患者(固定59例和非固定112例)进行了前瞻性维护的171例修复数据库的回顾性审查,并努力完成至少1年的临床随访。主要目标是评估复发率和CGP,次要目标是评估手术时间,术后即刻疼痛,尿潴留的发生率,住院时间,恢复活动所需的天数,和成本。固定组和非固定组单侧IH的平均手术时间分别为41.8±11.4和35.9±9.7分钟,分别(p=0.021),而双侧分别为66.2±15.6和55.3±14.2分钟,分别(p=0.018)。两组的平均疼痛评分分别为3.44±1.2和3.01±1.0;(p=0.037),分别。平均随访33.2±17.0和18.7±6.2个月,两组CGP的发生率分别为02(3.4%)和3(2.7%)(p=1.000),复发均为02(3.4%),分别(p=0.118)。TEP中网片的非固定不会导致复发增加,尽管它不会降低慢性腹股沟疼痛的发生率。附带优势将减少手术时间,术后疼痛较小,和降低成本。
    Two major issues with laparoscopic inguinal hernia (IH) repair are recurrences and chronic groin pain (CGP). The procedure involves fixing the mesh with the tackers which is believed to increase the rate of CGP due to nerve injuries. Thus, non-fixation of mesh is being proposed but concerns remain regarding increased recurrences. We sought to look at our outcomes after we switched over to non-fixation of mesh in totally extraperitoneal repair (TEP). Retrospective review of prospectively maintained database of 171 repairs was done on 122 patients (fixation 59 and non-fixation 112) during a period of 4 years with an endeavor to complete a minimum of 1 year of clinical follow-up. The primary objective was to assess the recurrence rates and CGP and the secondary objective was to assess operative times, immediate post-op pain, incidence of urinary retention, duration of hospital stay, days taken to return to activity, and cost. The mean operative times for unilateral IH for the fixation and non-fixation groups were 41.8 ± 11.4 and 35.9 ± 9.7 min, respectively (p = 0.021), whereas for bilateral were 66.2 ± 15.6 and 55.3 ± 14.2 min, respectively (p = 0.018). The mean pain score was 3.44 ± 1.2 versus 3.01 ± 1.0; (p = 0.037) in the two groups, respectively. At a mean follow-up of 33.2 ± 17.0 and 18.7 ± 6.2 months, the incidence of CGP was 02 (3.4%) and 3 (2.7%) (p = 1.000) and recurrences were 02 (3.4%) in the two groups, respectively (p = 0.118). Non-fixation of mesh in TEP does not lead to increased recurrence though it does not decrease the incidence of chronic groin pain. Collateral advantage would be decreased operative times, lesser post-operative pain, and decreased costs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    BACKGROUND: Surgery for inguinal hernia continues to evolve. The most recent development in the field of surgery for inguinal hernia is the emergence of laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgery (LIHS) which is challenging the gold standard Lichtenstein\'s tension free mesh repair. Our centre has the largest series of LIHS from any Armed Forces hospital. The aim of this study was to analyze the short and long term outcomes at our center since its inception.
    METHODS: Retrospective review of prospectively maintained data base of 501 LIHS done in 434 patients by a single surgeon between April 2008 and October 2013. Preoperative, intraoperative, postoperative and follow-up data was analyzed with emphasis on the recurrence rates and the incidence of inguinodynia.
    RESULTS: 402 (92.6%) patients had primary hernias and 367 (84.6%) patients had unilateral hernias. Of the 501 repairs, 453 (90.4 %) were done totally extraperitoneal approach and 48 (9.6 %) were done by the transabdominal preperitoneal approach. The mean operative time for unilateral and bilateral repairs was 40.9 ± 11.2 and 76.2 ± 15.0 minutes, respectively. The conversion rate to open surgery was 0.6%. The intraoperative, and early and late postoperative complication rates were 1.7%, 6.2% and 3%, respectively. The incidence of chronic groin pain was 0.7% and the recurrence rate was 1.6%. The median hospital stay was 1 day (1-5 days).
    CONCLUSIONS: We, in this series of over 500 repairs have demonstrated that feasibility as well as safety of LIHS at our centre with good short and long term outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Journal Article
    Inguinal hernia (IH) repair can be obtained with both open and laparoscopic techniques, which are usually performed using a transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) or a totally extraperitoneal (TEP) approach. The aim of the study was to evaluate whether the results of laparoscopic TEP IH repair in the elderly (≥65 years old) are different with respect to results obtained in younger patients. One hundred and four consecutive patients (four women and 100 men, median age of 57 years, range=21-85 years) with unilateral (N=21, 20.2%) or bilateral (N=83, 79.8%) IH were prospectively enrolled in the study. Patients were divided into two groups according to their age: group A (N=68, 65.4%) aged <65 years and group B (N=36, 34.6%) aged ≥65 years. The mean operative time was not significantly different between groups (48±20 vs. 52±20 min, p=0.33). One case of increased PaCO2 was observed in each group (p=0.72) and two and one case of pneumoperitoneum (p=0.57) in groups A and B, respectively. Two (1.9%) patients (one in each group; p=0.55) required TEP conversion. Mild postoperative complications developed in four patients of each group (p=0.44). After one-year follow-up, three (2.9%) recurrences occurred (group 1=1, group 2=2, p=0.55), both in patients who had undergone direct IH repair. The overall postoperative relative risk of complications related to age was 1.08 (95% confidence interval=0.91-1.27, p=0.53). In conclusion, our results suggest that in patients with IH scheduled for TEP repair, age does not represent a contraindication to surgery in terms of complication rate and postoperative results.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号