thoracic disc herniation

胸椎间盘突出症
  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    合成代谢雄激素类固醇(AAS)是相对便宜和容易获得的药物,运动员和健美运动员通常用于提高性能和刺激肌肉生长。AAS的使用与肌肉骨骼损伤有关,如肌腱和韧带断裂,和许多其他有害的健康影响。尽管存在这些风险,个体继续以超生理剂量自我给药这些药物.这里,我们介绍了一例长期使用AAS的男性健美运动员,他患上了需要减压和融合的胸椎椎间盘突出症。我们使用这个案例来强调与慢性AAS滥用相关的严重潜在风险,并回顾当前关于生化,物理,和连接慢性AAS使用的生理机制,负重运动,以及椎间盘突出等肌肉骨骼损伤的风险。
    Anabolic androgenic steroids (AAS) are relatively cheap and accessible medications, commonly used by athletes and bodybuilders for performance enhancement and muscle growth stimulation. AAS usage has been associated with musculoskeletal injuries, such as tendon and ligament ruptures, and numerous other detrimental health effects. Despite these risks, individuals continue to self-administer these drugs in supraphysiologic doses. Here, we present a case of a male bodybuilder with chronic AAS use who developed a spinal thoracic intervertebral disc herniation requiring decompression and fusion. We use this case to highlight a severe potential risk associated with chronic AAS abuse and review the current literature on the biochemical, physical, and physiologic mechanisms linking chronic AAS use, weight-bearing exercise, and the risk of musculoskeletal injuries such as intervertebral disc herniations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    目的:电视胸腔镜手术后的术后疼痛通常使用胸段硬膜外镇痛药或胸椎旁镇痛药治疗。本文介绍了一种通过胸腔镜显微椎间盘切除术和术后胸段硬膜外镇痛药治疗胸椎间盘突出症的情况。患者出现布比卡因胸腔积液,在计算机断层扫描(CT)上模仿血胸。
    方法:使用高效液相色谱法确认胸腔积液中布比卡因的存在。
    结果:患者接受再次探查以缓解胸腔积液。患者的长期恢复与简单的胸腔镜显微椎间盘切除术的预期相似。
    结论:当在胸膜腔和硬膜外腔之间有走廊的患者中使用胸腔硬膜外镇痛药时,可能会发生胸腔积液。
    OBJECTIVE: Post-operative pain after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery is often treated using thoracic epidural analgesics or thoracic paravertebral analgesics. This article describes a case where a thoracic disc herniation is treated with a thoracoscopic microdiscectomy with post-operative thoracic epidural analgesics. The patient developed a bupivacaine pleural effusion which mimicked a hemothorax on computed tomography (CT).
    METHODS: The presence of bupivacaine in the pleural effusion was confirmed using a high performance liquid chromatography method.
    RESULTS: The patient underwent a re-exploration to relieve the pleural effusion. The patient showed a long-term recovery similar to what can be expected from an uncomplicated thoracoscopic microdiscectomy.
    CONCLUSIONS: A pleural effusion may occur when thoracic epidural analgesics are used in patents with a corridor between the pleural cavity and epidural space.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:微型开放外侧后胸膜(MO-LRP)入路是手术治疗胸椎间盘突出症的有效选择,但该方法引起了对气胸(PTX)的担忧.然而,胸管放置导致插入部位压痛,需要咨询服务,增加辐射暴露(需要多个射线照片),延迟护理的进展,并增加麻醉品需求。这项研究检查了MO-LRP方法后放射学和临床意义的PTX和血胸(HTX)的发生率,没有放置预防性胸管,用于胸椎间盘突出症.
    方法:本研究是对2017年至2022年连续病例的单机构回顾性评估。审查了电子病历,包括术后胸片,放射学和手术报告,和术后记录。在所有患者术后立即获得的胸片上确定PTX或HTX的存在。如果有任何一个存在,请提供间隔射线照片。根据美国胸科医师学会的指南,大小分为大(≥3cm)或小(<3cm)。如果需要干预,则认为PTX或HTX具有临床意义。
    结果:30例患者经MO-LRP入路行胸髓核切除术。包括所有患者。20名患者为男性(67%),10名(33%)是女性。患者的年龄范围为25至74岁。最常见的治疗水平是T11-12(n=11,37%)。术中侵犯顶叶胸膜5例(17%)。没有患者进行预防性胸管放置。15例患者(50%)在术后胸片上有PTX;2例患者有较大的PTX,13个有小PTX。两名患有大PTX的患者在重复X光片上均有扩张,并接受了胸管插入治疗。在13例患有小PTX的患者中,1个需要使用非呼吸面罩100%的氧气;其余的无症状。一个病人,术后胸部X光片没有异常发现,术后第6天出现了附带的HTX,并接受了胸管插入治疗。因此,3名患者(10%)需要胸管:2名用于扩张PTX,1名用于延迟HTX。
    结论:大多数通过MO-LRP方法进行胸髓核切除术的患者没有发生临床上显著的PTX或HTX。只有在有术后临床和影像学适应症的情况下,该患者人群中的PTX和HTX才应使用胸管治疗。
    OBJECTIVE: The mini-open lateral retropleural (MO-LRP) approach is an effective option for surgically treating thoracic disc herniations, but the approach raises concerns for pneumothorax (PTX). However, chest tube placement causes insertion site tenderness, necessitates consultation services, increases radiation exposure (requires multiple radiographs), delays the progression of care, and increases narcotic requirements. This study examined the incidence of radiographic and clinically significant PTX and hemothorax (HTX) after the MO-LRP approach, without the placement of a prophylactic chest tube, for thoracic disc herniation.
    METHODS: This study was a single-institution retrospective evaluation of consecutive cases from 2017 to 2022. Electronic medical records were reviewed, including postoperative chest radiographs, radiology and operative reports, and postoperative notes. The presence of PTX or HTX was determined on chest radiographs obtained in all patients immediately after surgery, with interval radiographs if either was present. The size was categorized as large (≥ 3 cm) or small (< 3 cm) based on guidelines of the American College of Chest Physicians. PTX or HTX was considered clinically significant if it required intervention.
    RESULTS: Thirty patients underwent thoracic discectomy via the MO-LRP approach. All patients were included. Twenty patients were men (67%), and 10 (33%) were women. The patients ranged in age from 25 to 74 years. The most commonly treated level was T11-12 (n = 11, 37%). Intraoperative violation of parietal pleura occurred in 5 patients (17%). No patient had prophylactic chest tube placement. Fifteen patients (50%) had PTX on postoperative chest radiographs; 2 patients had large PTXs, and 13 had small PTXs. Both patients with large PTXs had expansion on repeat radiographs and were treated with chest tube insertion. Of the 13 patients with a small PTX, 1 required 100% oxygen using a nonrebreather mask; the remainder were asymptomatic. One patient, who had no abnormal findings on the immediate postoperative chest radiograph, developed an incidental HTX on postoperative day 6 and was treated with chest tube insertion. Thus, 3 patients (10%) required a chest tube: 2 for expanding PTX and 1 for delayed HTX.
    CONCLUSIONS: Most patients who undergo thoracic discectomy via the MO-LRP approach do not develop clinically significant PTX or HTX. PTX and HTX in this patient population should be treated with a chest tube only when there are postoperative clinical and radiographic indications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:比较胸椎钙化性突出症(cTDH)的手术治疗方法(CTV)和经椎弓根(TP)的方法,在手术和临床结果方面。
    背景:cTDH的手术方法存在争议。建议前路入路,虽然后外侧入路是非钙化的首选方法,paramedian,和外侧疝.目前,关于更具侵入性的手术方法的优越性的证据有限,例如CTV或TP,在TF上,一种相对较少侵入性的方法,就神经结果而言,疼痛,和手术并发症,用于治疗cTDH。
    方法:回顾性研究,观察,单中心研究是对接受有症状的cTDH的后外侧胸部入路的患者进行的,2010年至2023年,在我们的研究所。起草了三个小组,根据所使用的手术方法:TF,TP,CTV所有手术均在术中CT扫描的辅助下进行,脊髓神经导航,术中神经监测。分析的因素包括手术时间,骨去除量,术中失血,脑脊液渗漏,医源性不稳定需要仪器,椎间盘突出的程度,脊髓病恢复。之后,进行了统计分析,以研究椎体上后缘的骨切除。主要结果是部分或完全去除疝。
    结果:本研究连续纳入65例接受cTDH后外侧胸外科手术的患者。TF方法最少,CTV时间最长(p<0.01)。在上述三种方法之间没有观察到统计学差异,术中失血,硬膜渗漏,切除后器械,完全去除疝,或者脊髓病的恢复.一个额外的体骨切除是成功实现全疝清除(P<0.01),骨切除程度与疝切除程度成正比(p<0.01)。
    结论:TP,TF,和CTV关于cTDH去除的程度,术后并发症,和神经系统的改善。所描述的躯体骨切除术实现了显着的全疝切除,并且与手术前相对于前后直径差异成正比。
    OBJECTIVE: To compare the costotransversectomy (CTV) and transpedicular (TP) approaches versus the transfacet (TF) approach for the surgical treatment of calcific thoracic spine herniations (cTDH), in terms of surgical and clinical outcomes.
    BACKGROUND: Surgical approaches for cTDH are debated. Anterior approaches are recommended, while posterolateral approaches are preferred for non-calcific, paramedian, and lateral hernias. Currently, there is limited evidence about the superiority of a more invasive surgical approach, such as CTV or TP, over TF, a relatively less invasive approach, in terms of neurological outcome, pain, and surgical complications, for the treatment of cTDH.
    METHODS: A retrospective, observational, monocentric study was conducted on patients who underwent posterolateral thoracic approaches for symptomatic cTDH, between 2010 and 2023, at our institute. Three groups were drafted, based on the surgical approach used: TF, TP, and CTV. All procedures were assisted by intraoperative CT scan, spinal neuronavigation, and intraoperative neuromonitoring. Analyzed factors include duration of surgery, amount of bone removal, intraoperative blood loss, CSF leak, need of instrumentation for iatrogenic instability, degree of disc herniation removal, myelopathy recovery. Afterwards, a statistical analysis was performed to investigate the bony resection of the superior posterior edge of the vertebral soma. The primary outcome was the partial or total herniation removal.
    RESULTS: This study consecutively enrolled 65 patients who underwent posterolateral thoracic surgery for cTDH. The TF approach taking the least, and the CTV the longest time (p < 0.01). No statistical difference was observed between the three mentioned approaches, in terms of intraoperative blood loss, dural leakage, post-resection instrumentation, total herniation removal, or myelopathy recovery. An additional somatic bony resection was successful in achieving total herniation removal (p < 0.01), and the extent of bony resection was directly proportional to the extent of hernia removal (p < 0.01).
    CONCLUSIONS: No statistically significant differences were highlighted between the TP, TF, and CTV regarding the extent of cTDH removal, the postoperative complications, and the neurological improvement. The described somatic bone resection achieved significant total herniation removal and was directly proportional to the preop against postop anteroposterior diameter difference.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    症状性胸椎间盘突出症(TDH)是一种罕见的病理,可以通过相对具有挑战性的手术方法解决。其选择和技术执行在文献中已经有很好的描述。有趣的是,长期结果,包括手术部位疼痛相关的残疾,对仪器的需要,和常见的并发症,如脑脊液(CSF)-胸膜瘘尚未得到广泛解决。这里,我们讨论了TDH不同手术入路的并发症和长期结局.
    我们对2000年至2010年间接受TDH手术的21例连续患者进行了回顾性研究。我们评估了术后并发症,如脑脊液胸膜瘘,以及使用弗兰克尔评分的长期结果,EQ-5D-3L,和视觉模拟比例。我们还研究了术后对仪器的需求。
    21名连续患者(13名女性,8名男性),平均年龄为55.3岁(标准偏差8.1),接受了有症状的TDH的胸髓切除术。手术入路包括后外侧开胸手术(52%,n=11),肋骨切除(43%,n=9),和经椎弓根(5%,n=1)。疝被归类为软(38%,n=8),钙化(38%,n=8),或钙化-硬膜(24%,n=5)。术后,所有接受后外侧开胸手术的钙化硬膜疝患者(100%,n=5)发达的脑脊液胸膜瘘,无需手术重新探查即可自发解决。89%(n=16)的患者显示Frankel评分持续改善。50%(n=7)的患者报告了持续的伤口部位疼痛。
    尽管神经系统预后良好,有症状的TDHs患者可能会经历长期的手术部位疼痛,因此,在这种情况下,应考虑向微创暴露迈进。术后并发症如CSF-胸膜瘘不太可能需要手术干预,因此可以保守治疗。
    UNASSIGNED: Symptomatic thoracic disc herniation (TDH) is a rare pathology that is addressed with relatively challenging surgical approaches, the choice and technical execution of which have been well described in the literature. Interestingly, long-term outcomes, including surgical site pain-related disability, the need for instrumentation, and commonly occurring complications such as cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-pleural fistula have not been widely addressed. Here, we address the complication profiles and long-term outcomes of different surgical approaches for TDH.
    UNASSIGNED: We conducted a retrospective review of 21 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for TDH between 2000 and 2010. We assessed post-operative complications such as CSF-pleural fistulas, as well as long-term outcomes using Frankel grades, the EQ-5D-3L, and the Visual Analog Scale. We also looked at the need for instrumentation postoperatively.
    UNASSIGNED: 21 consecutive patients (13 females, 8 males) with a mean age of 55.3 years (Standard deviation 8.1) underwent thoracic discectomy for symptomatic TDH. Surgical approaches included posterolateral thoracotomy (52%, n = 11), costotransversectomy (43%, n = 9), and transpedicular (5%, n = 1). Herniations were classified as soft (38%, n = 8), calcified (38%, n = 8), or calcified-transdural (24%, n = 5). Postoperatively, all patients with calcifiedtransdural herniations undergoing posterolateral thoracotomy (100%, n = 5) developed CSF-pleural fistulas, which resolved spontaneously without the need for surgical re-exploration. 89% (n = 16) of patients exhibited sustained improvement in Frankel scores. Persistent wound site pain was reported by 50% (n = 7) of patients.
    UNASSIGNED: Despite favorable neurological outcomes, patients with symptomatic TDHs can experience long-term surgical site pain, and therefore, a move toward minimally invasive exposure in such cases should be considered. Postoperative complications such as CSF-pleural fistulas are unlikely to require surgical intervention and thus can be managed conservatively.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:巨大胸椎间盘突出症的经胸前入路或侧入路是一项复杂的手术,需要最佳的暴露和最大的可视化。传统的金属刚性牵开器可能会造成严重的皮肤创伤,尤其是长时间的手术使用,并限制了内窥镜器械在深度的工作角度。我们首次在经胸胸腔镜辅助椎间盘切除术中率先使用Alexis牵开器。
    方法:作者描述并演示了Alexis牵开器在手术病例中的技术应用。病人定位,阐明了临床原理和手术细微差别,以供读者了解经胸椎间盘突出症的经胸方法。
    结果:亚历克西斯牵开器的优点包括微创圆周柔性牵开,促进双手器械的使用,手术部位感染的风险降低,肋骨回缩减少,从而减少术后疼痛。
    结论:使用灵活且直观的Alexis牵开器可以最大限度地增加手术暴露,并且在进行复杂的经胸方法治疗胸椎间盘突出症时是一种有效的辅助手段。
    OBJECTIVE: A transthoracic anterior or lateral approach for giant thoracic disc herniations is a complex operation which requires optimal exposure and maximal visualisation. Traditional metal rigid retractors may inflict significant skin trauma especially with prolonged operative use and limit the working angles of endoscopic instrumentation at depth. We pioneer the use of the Alexis retractor in transthoracic thoracoscopically assisted discectomy for the first time.
    METHODS: The authors describe and demonstrate the technical use of the Alexis retractor during operative cases. Patient positioning, clinical rationale and operative nuances are elucidated for readers to gain an appreciation of the transthoracic approach to thoracic disc herniations.
    RESULTS: The advantages of the Alexis retractor include minimally invasive circumferential flexible retraction, facilitation of bimanual instrument use, diminished risk of surgical site infections and reduced rib retraction leading to less postoperative pain.
    CONCLUSIONS: Use of the flexible and intuitive Alexis retractor maximises operative exposure and is an effective adjunct when performing complex transthoracic approaches for thoracic disc herniations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在钙化型中线胸椎间盘突出症(CMTDH)患者的治疗中,采用后路视频辅助经椎弓根手术(VATPS)技术。用于治疗CMTDH的前和后两种手术入路都具有手术并发症和潜在发病率的显著风险。本技术说明介绍了一种避免与这些方法相关的缺点的外科手术。
    方法:VATPS技术提出了治疗胸椎间盘突出症的综合方法,结合显微和内镜阶段。微观阶段需要一个小的胸腔镜切口,肌肉释放,半椎板切开术,小关节切除术,和椎骨切除,最终形成了一个用于内窥镜进入的全身切除术腔。硬膜和韧带之间的粘连的小心分离标志着这一阶段。过渡到内窥镜阶段,将内窥镜插入空腔中,允许精确的可视化和分离残余的粘连,使用专门的仪器去除钙化的椎间盘碎片,并确保椎间盘完全切除。
    结果:14例患者接受VATPS治疗。在手术过程中,1例患者的诱发反应降低.然而,未观察到术后神经功能缺损.我们还注意到,在比较术前和术后评估时,Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)和视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分显着改善。
    结论:VATPS,一种微创技术,与前外侧入路相比,提供了出色的前视野,同时避免了与开胸手术相关的不良反应以及后外侧入路中常见的脊髓侵犯引起的并发症。此外,它是一个更安全的替代传统的内窥镜后胸手术。在椎体内形成的空腔为内窥镜的使用提供了充足的工作空间。
    BACKGROUND: In the treatment of patients with calcified midline thoracic disc herniation (CMTDH), the posterior video-assisted transpedicular surgery (VATPS) technique is employed. Both anterior and posterior surgical approaches for treating CMTDH carry a significant risk of surgical complications and potential morbidity. This technical note introduces a surgical procedure that avoids the drawbacks associated with these approaches.
    METHODS: The VATPS technique presents a comprehensive approach for treating thoracic disc herniation, combining both microscopic and endoscopic stages. The microscopic phase entails a small thoracoscopic incision, muscle release, hemilaminotomy, facet joint resection, and vertebra removal, culminating in creating a corpectomy cavity for endoscope access. Careful separation of adhesions between the dura and ligaments marks this stage. Transitioning to the endoscopic phase, an endoscope is inserted into the cavity, allowing for precise visualization and separation of residual adhesions, removal of calcified disc fragments using specialized instruments, and ensuring complete discectomy.
    RESULTS: Fourteen patients underwent VATPS for CMTDH. During the procedure, evoked responses were reduced in one patient. However, no postoperative neurological deficits were observed. We also noted significant improvements in the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores when comparing the preoperative and postoperative assessments.
    CONCLUSIONS: VATPS, a minimally invasive technique, offers excellent anterior visibility comparable to that of the anterolateral approach, all while avoiding the adverse effects associated with thoracotomies and the complications resulting from spinal cord encroachment often seen in the posterolateral approach. Moreover, it is a safer alternative to conventional endoscopic posterior thoracic surgery. The cavity formed within the vertebral corpus provides ample working space for the use of an endoscope.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    与颈和腰椎间盘突出症相比,胸椎间盘突出症(TDH)并不常见。由于解剖学限制和由于接近胸脊髓而导致的高发病风险,TDH的手术治疗可能是具有挑战性的。此外,选择合适的手术方式取决于各种因素,如椎管内椎间盘突出的大小和位置,脊柱水平,有无钙化,脊髓压迫程度,并熟悉治疗外科医生的各种方法。虽然后外侧入路可用于治疗后外侧和中央性软椎间盘突出症已经达成共识,对于中央钙化和巨大钙化TDH的最佳手术入路缺乏共识,前路被认为是最佳选择.有越来越多的证据支持后外侧入路的安全性和有效性,即使是中央钙化和巨大钙化TDH。这篇综述根据过去和当前的文献以及作者在其机构的经验,重点介绍了TDH手术管理的演变。
    Thoracic disc herniations (TDH) are uncommon compared to cervical and lumbar disc herniations. Surgical treatment of TDH can be challenging due to the anatomical constraints and the high risk of morbidity due to proximity to the thoracic spinal cord. Moreover, the selection of appropriate surgical approach depends on various factors such as the size and location of disc herniation within the spinal canal, spinal level, presence or absence of calcification, degree of spinal cord compression, and familiarity with various approaches by the treating surgeon. While there is agreement that posterolateral approaches can be used to treat posterolateral and central soft disc herniation, there is a lack of consensus on the best surgical approach for central calcified and giant calcified TDH where an anterior approach is perceived as the best option. There is increasing evidence that support the safety and efficacy of posterolateral approaches even for central calcified and giant calcified TDH. This review highlights the evolution of surgical management for TDH based on the past and current literature and the author\'s experience at his institution.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号