sulbactam/durlobactam

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    据估计,抗生素耐药性(AMR)每年导致全球近500万人死亡,到2050年将达到1000万人。耐碳青霉烯类鲍曼不动杆菌(CRAB)感染是全球因抗菌素耐药性引起的第四大死亡原因。但是仍然缺乏标准化的治疗方法。在考虑的抗生素中,舒巴坦/durlobactam似乎是替代当前骨干药物的最佳候选药物。头孢地洛可在联合治疗方案中起关键作用。由于毒性和药代动力学/药效学(PK/PD)的限制,粘菌素(或多粘菌素B)应用作替代药物(当没有其他选择时)。替加环素(或米诺环素)和磷霉素可以代表两种NBL的合适伴侣。需要进行随机临床试验(RCT),以更好地评估NBLs在CRAB感染治疗中的作用,并比较替加环素和磷霉素作为伴侣抗生素的疗效。应测试NBLs与“旧”药物(利福平和甲氧苄啶/磺胺甲恶唑)之间的协同作用。应该做出巨大的努力,以加快对具有改善的肺活动的更安全的多粘菌素候选物的临床前和临床研究,以及IV利福布汀配方。在这篇叙述性评论中,鉴于新开发的β-内酰胺类药物(NBLs),我们重点关注CRAB感染的抗生素治疗.
    It is estimated that antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is responsible for nearly 5 million human deaths worldwide each year and will reach 10 million by 2050. Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) infections represent the fourth-leading cause of death attributable to antimicrobial resistance globally, but a standardized therapy is still lacking. Among the antibiotics under consideration, Sulbactam/durlobactam seems to be the best candidate to replace current back-bone agents. Cefiderocol could play a pivotal role within combination therapy regimens. Due to toxicity and the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) limitations, colistin (or polymyxin B) should be used as an alternative agent (when no other options are available). Tigecycline (or minocycline) and fosfomycin could represent suitable partners for both NBLs. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are needed to better evaluate the role of NBLs in CRAB infection treatment and to compare the efficacy of tigecycline and fosfomycin as partner antibiotics. Synergism should be tested between NBLs and \"old\" drugs (rifampicin and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole). Huge efforts should be made to accelerate pre-clinical and clinical studies on safer polymyxin candidates with improved lung activity, as well as on the iv rifabutin formulation. In this narrative review, we focused the antibiotic treatment of CRAB infections in view of newly developed β-lactam agents (NBLs).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    革兰氏阴性菌是微生物学领域研究最多的种类之一,特别是在过去几十年来全球对这些病原体的抗菌素耐药性水平令人担忧的背景下。大量的这些微生物被描述为多药耐药(MDR),甚至是扩展耐药(XDR)细菌,该领域的专家一直在努力跟上这种超级细菌引起的难以治疗感染的更高患病率。FDA批准的新型抗菌药物,如头孢地洛(FDC),头孢洛赞/他唑巴坦(C/T),头孢他啶/阿维巴坦(CZA),亚胺培南/莱巴坦(IMR),舒巴坦/杜洛巴坦(SUL-DUR)和氨曲南/阿维巴坦(ATM-AVI)的3期临床试验结果证明,虽然所有这些物质都提供了令人鼓舞的有效率,抗生素耐药性跟上药物开发的步伐。微生物已经发展了更广泛的抗性机制,以针对这些新型抗菌剂所构成的威胁,因此,使研究人员必须不断寻找其他潜在的候选药物和分子开发。然而,这些策略需要对细菌耐药机制有适当的了解,以获得对该问题的全面展望。本综述旨在强调这六种抗生素药物,在过去的十年里给临床医生带来了希望,讨论这些物质的一般性质,以及抵抗的机制和模式,同时还提供了有关该领域进一步方向的简短概述。
    https://www.crd.约克。AC.英国/普华永道/#searchadvanced,标识符CRD42024505832。
    Gram-negative bacteria have been one of the most studied classes in the field of microbiology, especially in the context of globally alarming antimicrobial resistance levels to these pathogens over the course of the past decades. With high numbers of these microorganisms being described as multidrug-resistant (MDR), or even extended-drug-resistant (XDR) bacteria, specialists in the field have been struggling to keep up with higher prevalence of difficult-to-treat infections caused by such superbugs. The FDA approval of novel antimicrobials, such as cefiderocol (FDC), ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T), ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA), imipenem/relebactam (IMR), sulbactam/durlobactam (SUL-DUR) and phase 3 clinical trials\' results of aztreonam/avibactam (ATM-AVI) has proven that, while all these substances provide encouraging efficacy rates, antibiotic resistance keeps up with the pace of drug development. Microorganisms have developed more extensive mechanisms of resistance in order to target the threat posed by these novel antimicrobials, thus equiring researchers to be on a constant lookout for other potential drug candidates and molecule development. However, these strategies require a proper understanding of bacterial resistance mechanisms to gain a comprehensive outlook on the issue. The present review aims to highlight these six antibiotic agents, which have brought hope to clinicians during the past decade, discussing general properties of these substances, as well as mechanisms and patterns of resistance, while also providing a short overview on further directions in the field.
    UNASSIGNED: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/#searchadvanced, Identifier CRD42024505832.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    耐碳青霉烯类鲍曼不动杆菌(CRAB)引起的感染的治疗选择有限。舒巴坦-杜洛巴坦是两种β内酰胺酶抑制剂的组合,在3期临床研究中具有抗CRAB的活性。我们对报告鲍曼不动杆菌对舒巴坦/杜洛巴坦的耐药性的体外研究进行了系统评价。我们认为“抗性”物种是MIC≥8mg/L的物种。该综述包括10项研究(9754个测试的分离株)。总的来说,2.3%的鲍曼不动杆菌对舒巴坦/杜洛巴坦耐药,在CRAB亚组中,这一百分比上升到3.4%,在粘菌素耐药菌株中上升到3.7%。产金属β-内酰胺酶菌株的抗性为100%。总的来说,在12.5%的案例中,舒巴坦/durlobactam抗性与NDM-1的产生有关,在31.7%的病例中,PBP3决定簇中存在取代,在其余病例中,耐药机制未知。总之,鲍曼不动杆菌对舒巴坦/杜洛巴坦的耐药性有限,除了生产MBL的菌株。
    Infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) have limited therapeutic options. Sulbactam-durlobactam is a combination of two βlactamase inhibitors with activity against CRAB under phase 3 clinical investigation. We performed a systematic review on in vitro studies reporting A. baumannii resistances against sulbactam/durlobactam. We considered \"resistant\" species to be those with MIC ≥ 8 mg/L. Ten studies were included in the review (9754 tested isolates). Overall, 2.3% of A. baumannii were resistant to sulbactam/durlobactam, and this percentage rose to 3.4% among CRAB subgroups and to 3.7% among colistin-resistant strains. Resistance was 100% among metallo β-lactamase-producing strains. Overall, in 12.5% of cases, sulbactam/durlobactam resistance was associated with the production of NDM-1, in 31.7% of cases with the substitutions in the PBP3 determinants, and in the remaining cases the resistance mechanism was unknown. In conclusion, A. baumannii resistance towards sulbactam/durlobactam is limited, except for MBL-producing strains.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号