背景:职业身份的构建和表现对于更广泛的社会文化理解“专业人士”是谁以及他们做什么具有重要意义。重要的是,它还牵涉到政策的制定和颁布,regulation,教育,和专业实践。职业身份与自尊有关,自我效能感,专业价值,信心和成功。这与助产实践有关的显著性是非常重要的;自主性方面,信心,能力,责任,和问责制都涉及提供安全有效的护理。
目的:探讨学生助产士在政策论述中的建构,敬业精神,和学习,为了提供新的视角,政策,教育,和实践。
方法:对英国(UK)护理和助产理事会2009年预注册助产教育标准的适应性批判性语篇分析,使用三步过程:在(1)话语实践(2)文本的语言特征层面探索话语,(3)社会实践。
■与助产教育和实践有关的话语出现在社会政治和历史背景下。身份的建构是通过一个有规则约束的框架来表达的,其中包括能力,信心和“身体健康,性格良好”。需要助产士负责任,负责任,自治,专业,主管,和自信。监管权力通过医学法律话语得到加强,助产的地位在话语上表现为不如医学。
结论:根据标准,助产士一定有很多东西在起作用和作用。标准话语是权威的,立法和控制,创造一种关于职业地位和机构的意识形态,构建一种“想象中的自主性”;成为助产士更加自动(具有控制感),比agentic。所有这些都对助产的社会实践具有重要意义。
结论:“助产士是如何形成的?学生助产士的话语建构”职业身份:语篇分析。
BACKGROUND: The construction and performance of professional identity is significant to broader socio-cultural understandings of who \'professionals\' are and what they do. Importantly, it is also implicated in the development and enactment of policy, regulation, education, and professional practice. Professional identity is linked to self-esteem, self-efficacy, professional value, confidence and success. The salience of this in relation to midwifery practice is highly significant; aspects of autonomy, confidence, competence, responsibility, and accountability are all implicated in the provision of safe and effective care.
OBJECTIVE: To explore how student midwives are constructed in the discourses of policy, professionalism, and learning, to provide new perspectives to inform, policy, education, and practice.
METHODS: An adapted critical discourse analysis of the United Kingdom (UK) Nursing and Midwifery Council\'s 2009 Standards for pre-registration midwifery education, using a three-step process: exploring discourse at the level of (1) discursive practice (2) linguistic features of the text, and (3) social practice.
UNASSIGNED: The discourses that relate to midwifery education and practice emerge within socio-political and historical contexts. Constructions of identity are articulated through a rule-bound framework which includes competence, confidence and \'good health and good character\'. There is a requirement for midwives to \'be\' responsible, accountable, autonomous, professional, competent, and confident. Regulatory power is reinforced through medico-legal discourses, with the status of midwifery discursively presented as inferior to medicine.
CONCLUSIONS: According to the Standards, midwives must be a lot of things in their role and function. The Standards\' discourses are authoritative, legislative and controlling, creating an ideology about professional status and agency which constructs an \'imaginary autonomy\'; becoming a midwife is more automatic (with the perception of control), than agentic. All of which has significance for the social practice of midwifery.
CONCLUSIONS: \'How are midwives made? Discursive constructions of student midwives\' professional identities: a discourse analysis.