UNASSIGNED: Spinopelvic motion, the cornerstone of the sagittal balance of the human body, is pivotal in patient-specific total hip arthroplasty.
UNASSIGNED: This study aims to develop a novel model using back propagation neural network (BPNN) to predict pelvic changes when one sits down, based on standing lateral spinopelvic radiographs.
UNASSIGNED: Young healthy volunteers were included in the study, 18 spinopelvic parameters were taken, such as pelvic incidence (PI) and so on. First, standing parameters correlated with sitting pelvic tilt (PT) and sacral slope (SS) were identified via Pearson correlation. Then, with these parameters as inputs and sitting PT and SS as outputs, the BPNN prediction network was established. Finally, the prediction results were evaluated by relative error (RE), prediction accuracy (PA), and normalized root mean squared error (NRMSE).
UNASSIGNED: The study included 145 volunteers of 23.1 ± 2.3 years old (M:F = 51:94). Pearson analysis revealed sitting PT was correlated with six standing measurements and sitting SS with five. The best BPNN model achieved 78.48% and 77.54% accuracy in predicting PT and SS, respectively; As for PI, a constant for pelvic morphology, it was 95.99%.
UNASSIGNED: In this study, the BPNN model yielded desirable accuracy in predicting sitting spinopelvic parameters, which provides new insights and tools for characterizing spinopelvic changes throughout the motion cycle.

Prior investigations have been primarily conducted in a laboratory to examine the effects of the smartphone use on the neck and head positions, whether these results are applicable to actual conditions is still unknown. This field survey thus analyzed the neck flexion (NF), head flexion (HF), gaze angle (GA), and viewing distance (VD) of smartphone users in public areas in Taipei, Taiwan. Six hundred smartphone users (300 men and 300 women) were photographed sagittally in standing, supported sitting, or unsupported sitting postures while using a smartphone. Results showed that women had significantly less NF and HF and shorter VDs than male users. Regardless of gender, higher NF was observed for standing than for sitting. Women had similar NF and HF while sitting supported and unsupported, but both were significantly lower than those while standing. By contrast, male users had higher NF and HF during unsupported sitting than during supported sitting. The NF (45°-50°) was much greater than the recommended maximum safe NF of 15°. Women may be at higher risk of visual strain because of shorter VD.