UNASSIGNED: Skin grafting is a routinely employed technique to cover the skin defect. Though the skin grafts are technically effortless, they are tiresome because of the prolonged duration of hospital stay, labor-intensive, demanding repeated dressings, and also create a second wound. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is one that has a higher concentration of platelets than the blood. Alpha granules of the platelets are rich in growth factors.
UNASSIGNED: To assess the effect of PRP on split-thickness skin graft uptake and donor site healing.
UNASSIGNED: In a single-center-based prospective study done from August 2018 to June 2020, 60 patients with acute and chronic wounds were divided into two equal groups. Autologous PRP was applied on the recipient wound bed and donor site in PRP group, and conventional methods like staples/sutures were used to anchor the skin grafts and standard of care of the donor site in a control group.
UNASSIGNED: Instantaneous graft adhesion was observed in all patients of PRP group. The first graft inspection was delayed. Seroma, hematoma, total number of dressings, and duration of stay in hospital were significantly reduced in the PRP group. Donor site pain in the postoperative period was notably reduced in PRP group. PRP also remarkably hastened the donor site healing.
UNASSIGNED: The application of PRP promotes graft take, minimizes complications, enhances donor site wound healing, mitigates donor site pain, and has immense economic benefits due to the reduced number of dressing changes and shorter hospital stay.

Fournier\'s gangrene is a rare and potentially fatal condition that affects the external genitalia and perineum as a necrotizing soft-tissue infection. It is equally prevalent in men and women and although there are many ways to manage the condition, it must be done so effectively because there is a chance that life-threatening complications could develop. This retrospective study set out to fill any knowledge gaps, compare reconstructive options to those described in the literature, and promote reflection on current management. Between January 2010 and January 2020, all perineal debridement operation notes were examined. The primary conclusions were that a large majority of defects could be repaired using split skin grafts to reduce surgical time and donor site morbidity. To avoid secondary contracture and the need for revision surgery, full-thickness skin grafts should be used whenever possible to treat penile defects.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze differences in re-epithelization, exudate absorbency, ease and pain on dressing removal between ALLEVYN™ Non-Adhesive and Betaplast™ N.
METHODS: Patients admitted to the general ward undergoing split skin grafting were recruited. Allevyn and Betaplast were applied on the donor site. Exudate absorption was assessed daily using an absorbency grading chart. Dressing change was done on post-operative day five. Ease of dressing removal and pain score using the Wong-Baker Pain Scale was assessed. The percentage of re-epithelization for each dressing was assessed.
RESULTS: 30 patients were recruited. There was a statistically significant difference in exudate absorption on post-operative day 3 (z = -2.006, p = 0.045, T = 236) and post-operative day 4 (z = -2.026, p = 0.0143, T = 188), pain score (z = -2.861, p = 0.004, T = 180), ease of removal (z = -2.668, p = 0.008, T = 126) and re-epithelization (z = -2.566, p = 0.009, T = 336) between Betaplast and Allevyn.
CONCLUSIONS: Betaplast may have faster re-epithelization, better exudate absorption, and is easier to remove while minimizing discomfort as compared to Allevyn.

BACKGROUND: Many healthcare workers have contracted SARS-CoV-2 during the pandemic, many cases of which have resulted in severe illness and death. No studies have assessed the potential for powered dermatomes to generate aerosol, an essential technique in burns and plastic surgery. The primary aim of the present study was to capture video footage to illustrate the potential for a powered dermatome to generate significant spray and hence aerosol.
METHODS: We utilised a simulated skin graft harvest experimental method. Fluorescein-stained saline was used with ultraviolet (UV) backlighting to demonstrate fluorescent spray from a popular brand of air-powered dermatome. Ultra-slow-motion (960 frames/s) video was used to demonstrate the oscillation of the dermatome blade and the origin within the machine of any spray generated, and the extent of spray generated.
RESULTS: The key finding from this study is the captured video footage linked with this paper. Droplets of various sizes are seen spraying out from the leading edge at the sides where the blade oscillates. UV backlighting provides a clear demonstration of the dermatome generating fine spray.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that powered dermatome usage is likely to generate aerosol from blood or blood-contaminated fluid, but does not demonstrate or quantify to what extent this may be clinically relevant in terms of viral transmission potential. We suggest ways to reduce the risk of spray from dermatomes including limiting donor-site bleeding and avoiding a wet donor area.
BACKGROUND: A dermatome is a device used by surgeons to harvest split skin grafts (SSGs). SSGs are an essential component of burns and reconstructive plastic surgery. Aerosol-generating procedures (AGPs) have implications for transmission of viruses including COVID-19. It has not previously been formally assessed whether use of a dermatome should be classified as an AGP. This study uses a fluorescent dye in the context of simulated surgery using a dermatome to see if any, and how much, fine spray is generated from the device and also utilises ultra-slow-motion videography to see how any spray may be generated. At the heart of this study is the included video footage that demonstrates considerable fine spray generation which suggests it is best to assume that dermatomes are likely to generate some degree of aerosol depending on the clinical scenario and how it is used. However, this information does not translate to providing any information about the risk of transmission of the virus from using a dermatome, especially in relation to COVID-19, and separate research would be required to answer this.

Two therapeutic options for deep dermal hand burns are autologous split-thickness skin graft (STSG) following tangential excision and the application of the temporary wound dressing Suprathel following removal of burn blisters. We compared elasticity and perfusion of burn scars after both types of therapy at least one year after completion of treatment. A case series of 80 patients of our department with deep dermal hand burns between 2013 and 2018 was examined in the year 2019 at least one year after completion of treatment (24 females and 56 males with a median age of 47.6 years). The clinical assessment of the scar was performed with the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) and Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) and the objective assessment with suction cutometry (MPA 580) and an O2C device on both hands. Our statistical analysis showed no statistically significant differences for the R2 and R5 elasticity values between the two types of therapy. The 95% confidence intervals for the ratios of elasticity, and microcirculatory perfusion parameters and scar scale scores of burn scars to respective healthy areas of skin after STSG and Suprathel-therapy mostly covered 1. Subgroup analysis of R2 viscoelasticity and analyses with adjustments for scar compression therapy, nicotine consumption, age, palmar or dorsal localization of the burn scar and interactions of age with smoking and localization gave similar results. The adjusted analysis of SO2 showed statistically significant lower SO2 values, 9% less, after STSG compared to Suprathel treatment. Split-thickness skin graft following tangential excision and the application of Suprathel following removal of burn blisters may be equivalent options for treatment of deep dermal hand burns. To detect possible small differences, further studies with larger samples are required.

BACKGROUND: Burn injuries in adults can be complicated due to various underlying factors. Of all the co-morbidities complicating wound healing and prognosis of the patient post burn injury, diabetes mellitus is the most common in India. We therefore aimed to explore the epidemiology, interventions, complications, and outcomes in diabetic patients with burn injury.
OBJECTIVE: To analyze demographic characteristics, clinical and microbiological profile and outcome of diabetic burns patients in comparison with nondiabetic burns patients.
METHODS: This study was a retrospective analysis of diabetic and nondiabetic burns patients admitted to Apollo speciality clinics, Vanagaram, a tertiary care facility in Chennai over a period of 3 years. Data such as age, gender, type and degree of burns, percentage of burns and length of stay, mortality rate, infection rate, type of infections, surgical procedures, and medical complications were analyzed in comparison with nondiabetic burns patients.
RESULTS: Among ninety-four burns patients admitted to our hospital over a period of 3 years, 18 patients (19%) were diabetics and 76 patients (81%) were nondiabetics. Mean age of diabetics was 58.2 years (SD-17.1) and nondiabetics was 36.3 years (SD-16.4). Surgical intervention with split skin graft was performed in 50% of diabetics and 48.7% of nondiabetics. Average length of stay of diabetics was 12.6 days and nondiabetics was 16.2 days (p value: 0.334). Diabetic patients with burns were noted to have higher rate of infection (67% vs 61.8%, p value: 0.803) and mortality (44% vs 35.5%, p value: 0.482).
CONCLUSIONS: The clinical course is different between diabetic and nondiabetic patients with burns injury. Although length of stay and surgical interventions were not significantly different, diabetes as a comorbidity appears to increase the risk of infections and mortality in patients with burns.
UNASSIGNED: Vadala R, Princess I, Ebenezer R, Ramakrishnan N, Krishnan G. Burns in Diabetes Mellitus Patients among Indian Population: Does it Differ from the Rest? Indian J Crit Care Med 2020;24(1):11-16.

Pharyngo cutaneous fistula occurs in 16-32% of cases after laryngectomy. Repair of a non healing fistula is a reconstructive challenge due to inherent problems like malnutrition, lung infection, infected and soiled neck wound, irradiated neck field and hypothyroid status. As the defect is composite involving the neck and the aero digestive tract, there is requirement for two epithelial surfaces. The selected flaps should be thin and rigid to maintain a patent food passage and an unobstructed tracheostoma. From January 2008 to December 2016 we operated 14 cases of post laryngectomy pharyngo cutaneous fistula. 12 cases had undergone radiotherapy before laryngectomy. Duration of the fistula was 2-9 months. There was history of previous reconstructive attempts in four cases. The size of the neck defects ranged from 2 cm × 4 cm to 4 cm × 8 cm. In four cases, primary pharyngeal repair, Pectoralis major myofascial flap reinforcement and split skin grafting was done. In 10 cases, pharyngeal repair by Pectoralis major myocutaneous flap and split skin graft was done. Follow up was for 3 months to 3 years. In 13 cases, the fistula and the neck wound healed well and there was no recurrence of the fistula. Patients were on normal oral diet. One patient succumbed to the disease due to tumour recurrence at the tracheostomy site. We propose PMMF/PMMC flap and SSG for the reconstruction of post laryngectomy pharyngocutaneous fistula as an undemanding and a reliable solution.

The surgical removal of split skin grafts (SSGs) leads to superficial wounds that can be covered with different wound dressings. Currently, international guidelines that recommend a standard treatment of the donor sites are not yet established. We developed a questionnaire to evaluate the treatment of SSG donor sites and sent it to all dermatological departments in Germany. Altogether 78 of the 115 contacted departments in Germany participated in our cross-sectional trial. Our analysis reveals that multiple wound dressings with different frequencies of replacement are used. On an average, complete reepithelialization of the donor site takes 14-21 days. Foams and coated gauzes are used in 73% of all surgical procedures for postsurgical treatment of SSG donor sites. Still, neither a significant faster reepithelialization nor a lower rate of wound healing disorders can be assigned to any of the wound dressings. The results of our study indicate that a large number of wound care products and treatment strategies are currently applied on SSG donor sites in dermatological departments in Germany. The selection of the wound dressing is not based on scientific data but rather on the experience of individual experts.

Split skin graft (SSG) is one of the most commonly performed operations on any Plastic Surgery service. Rate of donor site healing is affected by various factors including the type of dressing applied. The aim of this study was to survey the practice of plastic surgeons in the sub region with respect to management of SSG donor site and see how it conforms to international standards. Structured questionnaires on various aspects of the harvest and management of SSG donor sites were administered to plastic surgeons during the 53rd annual conference of the West African College of Surgeons (WACS) at Lome, Togo in March 2013. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. There were 47 respondents out of 55 plastic surgeons from four West African countries, which represented 85.4% of registered participants at the plastic surgery section of the conference. All the respondents performed SSG regularly, and the thigh was the most commonly used donor site. Different types of paraffin gauze remained the most commonly used primary donor site dressing. Only 17% of the respondents apply a topical local anaesthetic agent on the donor site. The choice of SSG donor site dressing in the sub region was driven mainly by availability. Concerted efforts must be made to access newer wound care products for optimum management of this commonly performed operation.
Les greffes de peau mince font partie des opérations les plus fréquemment réalisées dans tout service de chirurgie plastique. La qualité de cicatrisation du site donneur dépend de plusieurs facteurs, dont le type de pansement utilisé. Le but de cette étude est d’enquêter sur la pratique des chirurgiens plasticiens en Afrique de l’Ouest, vis-à-vis de la gestion du site donneur de peau mince et de vérifier si elle est en accord avec les standards internationaux. Des questionnaires structurés sur les différents aspects du prélèvement cutané de peau mince ont été remis aux chirurgiens plasticiens pendant la 53e Conférence annuelle des chirurgiens du Collège des Chirurgiens de l’Afrique de l’Ouest(WACS) à Lomé, Togo en Mars 2013. Les données ont été analysées à l’aide de statistiques descriptives. Ont été recueillies 47 réponses sur 55 chirurgiens plastiques de 4 régions de l’Afrique de l’Ouest, soit 85 8,4 % des participants inscrits à la section chirurgie plastique de la Conférence. Toutes les réponses émanaient de chirurgiens pratiquant des greffes de peau mince de façon régulière et la cuisse était la zone la plus communément utilisée. Différents types de pansements à la paraffine étaient le plus souvent utilisés en première intention. Seulement 17 % des réponses signalaient l’utilisation d’un topique anesthésiant local sur le site donneur. Le choix de pansement du site donneur dépendait principalement de sa disponibilité. Des efforts concertés doivent être faits pour avoir accès aux nouveaux produits cicatrisants, afin d’obtenir une meilleure prise en charge de ce type d’intervention couramment pratiquée.

暂无摘要。