Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) enumeration and molecular profiling hold promise in revolutionizing the management of solid tumors. Their understanding has evolved significantly over the past two decades, encompassing pivotal biological discoveries and clinical studies across various malignancies. While for some tumor types, such as breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer, CTCs are ready to enter clinical practice, for others, additional research is required. CTCs serve as versatile biomarkers, offering insights into tumor biology, metastatic progression, and treatment response. This review summarizes the latest advancements in CTC research and highlights future directions of investigation. Special attention is given to concurrent evaluations of CTCs and other circulating biomarkers, particularly circulating tumor DNA. Multi-analyte assessment holds the potential to unlock the full clinical capabilities of liquid biopsy. In conclusion, CTCs represent a transformative biomarker in precision oncology, offering extraordinary opportunities to translate scientific discoveries into tangible improvements in patient care.

As cutting-edge technologies applied for the study of body fluid molecular biomarkers are continuously evolving, clinical applications of these biomarkers improve. Diverse forms of circulating molecular biomarkers have been described, including cell-free DNA (cfDNA), circulating tumor cells (CTCs), and cell-free microRNAs (cfmiRs), although unresolved issues remain in their applicability, specificity, sensitivity, and reproducibility. Translational studies demonstrating the clinical utility and importance of cfmiRs in multiple cancers have significantly increased. This review aims to summarize the last 5 years of translational cancer research in the field of cfmiRs and their potential clinical applications to diagnosis, prognosis, and monitoring disease recurrence or treatment responses with a focus on solid tumors. PubMed was utilized for the literature search, following rigorous exclusion criteria for studies based on tumor types, patient sample size, and clinical applications. A total of 136 studies on cfmiRs in different solid tumors were identified and divided based on tumor types, organ sites, number of cfmiRs found, methodology, and types of biofluids analyzed. This comprehensive review emphasizes clinical applications of cfmiRs and summarizes underserved areas where more research and validations are needed.

Cyclin-dependent kinase 9 (CDK9) regulates mRNA transcription by promoting RNA Pol II elongation. CDK9 is now emerging as a potential therapeutic target for cancer, since its overexpression has been found to correlate with cancer development and worse clinical outcomes. While much work on CDK9 inhibition has focused on hematologic malignancies, the role of this cancer driver in solid tumors is starting to come into focus. Many solid cancers also overexpress CDK9 and depend on its activity to promote downstream oncogenic signaling pathways. In this review, we summarize the latest knowledge of CDK9 biology in solid tumors and the studies of small molecule CDK9 inhibitors. We discuss the results of the latest clinical trials of CDK9 inhibitors in solid tumors, with a focus on key issues to consider for improving the therapeutic impact of this drug class.

Curcumin (Cur) is a heavily used complementary derived drug from cancer patients. Spheroid samples derived from 82 patients were prepared and treated after 48 h with two Cur formulations (CurA, CurB) in mono- and combination therapy. After 72 h, cell viability and morphology were assessed. The Cur formulations had significant inhibitory effects of -8.47% (p < 0.001), CurA of -10.01% (-50.14-23.11%, p = 0.001) and CurB of -6.30% (-33.50-19.30%, p = 0.006), compared to their solvent controls Polyethylene-glycol, β-Cyclodextrin (CurA) and Kolliphor-ELP, Citrate (CurB). Cur formulations were more effective in prostate cancer (-19.54%) and less effective in gynecological non-breast cancers (0.30%). CurA showed better responses in samples of patients <40 (-13.81%) and >70 years of age (-17.74%). CurB had stronger effects in metastasized and heavily pretreated tumors. Combinations of Cur formulations and standard therapies were superior in 20/47 samples (42.55%) and inferior in 7/47 (14.89%). CurB stimulated chemo-doublets more strongly than monotherapies (-0.53% vs. -6.51%, p = 0.022) and more effectively than CurA (-6.51% vs. 3.33%, p = 0.005). Combinations of Cur formulations with Artesunate, Resveratrol and vitamin C were superior in 35/70 (50.00%) and inferior in 16/70 (22.86%) of samples. Cur formulations were significantly enhanced by combination with Artesunate (p = 0.020). Cur formulations showed a high variance in their anti-cancer effects, suggesting a need for individual testing before administration.

Lck, a member of the Src kinase family, is a non-receptor tyrosine kinase involved in immune cell activation, antigen recognition, tumor growth, and cytotoxic response. The enzyme has usually been linked to T lymphocyte activation upon antigen recognition. Lck activation is central to CD4, CD8, and NK activation. However, recently, it has become clearer that activating the enzyme in CD8 cells can be independent of antigen presentation and enhance the cytotoxic response. The role of Lck in NK cytotoxic function has been controversial in a similar fashion as the role of the enzyme in CAR T cells. Inhibiting tyrosine kinases has been a highly successful approach to treating hematologic malignancies. The inhibitors may be useful in treating other tumor types, and they may be useful to prevent cell exhaustion. New, more selective inhibitors have been documented, and they have shown interesting activities not only in tumor growth but in the treatment of autoimmune diseases, asthma, and graft vs. host disease. Drug repurposing and bioinformatics can aid in solving several unsolved issues about the role of Lck in cancer. In summary, the role of Lck in immune response and tumor growth is not a simple event and requires more research.

BACKGROUND: JNJ-78306358 is a bispecific antibody that redirects T cells to kill human leukocyte antigen-G (HLA-G)-expressing tumor cells. This dose escalation study evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and preliminary antitumor activity of JNJ-78306358 in patients with advanced solid tumors.
METHODS: Adult patients with metastatic/unresectable solid tumors with high prevalence of HLA-G expression were enrolled. Dose escalation was initiated with once-weekly subcutaneous administration with step-up dosing to mitigate cytokine release syndrome (CRS).
RESULTS: Overall, 39 heavily pretreated patients (colorectal cancer: n = 23, ovarian cancer: n = 10, and renal cell carcinoma: n = 6) were dosed in 7 cohorts. Most patients (94.9%) experienced ≥ 1 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs); 87.2% had ≥ 1 related TEAEs. About half of the patients (48.7%) experienced CRS, which were grade 1/2. Nine patients (23.1%) received tocilizumab for CRS. No grade 3 CRS was observed. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of increased transaminases, pneumonitis and recurrent CRS requiring a dose reduction were reported in 4 patients, coinciding with CRS. No treatment-related deaths reported. No objective responses were noted, but 2 patients had stable disease > 40 weeks. JNJ-78306358 stimulated peripheral T cell activation and cytokine release. Anti-drug antibodies were observed in 45% of evaluable patients with impact on exposure. Approximately half of archival tumor samples (48%) had expression of HLA-G by immunohistochemistry.
CONCLUSIONS: JNJ-78306358 showed pharmacodynamic effects with induction of cytokines and T cell activation. JNJ-78306358 was associated with CRS-related toxicities including increased transaminases and pneumonitis which limited its dose escalation to potentially efficacious levels. Trial registration number ClinicalTrials.gov (No. NCT04991740).

Previous studies have suggested a negative impact of steroids on the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), but how this effect is modulated by the dosage and time of administration is yet to be clarified. We have performed a retrospective analysis of 475 patients with advanced solid tumors treated with ICI as monotherapy from 2015 to 2022. Data regarding immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and clinical outcomes were collected. For each patient, the daily steroid dose (in mg/kg of prednisone) was registered until disease progression or death. The impact of cumulative doses on response rates and survival outcomes was analyzed within different periods. The objective response rate (ORR) was significantly lower among patients exposed to steroids within 30 days before the first cycle of ICI (C1) (20.3% vs. 36.7%, p < 0.01) and within the first 90 days of treatment (25.7% vs. 37.7%, p = 0.01). This negative association was confirmed by multivariable analysis. Higher mean steroid doses were observed among non-responders, and cumulative doses were inversely correlated with the disease control rate (DCR) around ICI initiation. Remarkably, poorer outcomes were observed even in patients belonging to the lowest dose quartile compared to the steroid-naïve population. The exposure to steroids after 6 months of ICI was not associated with worse survival outcomes. Our results suggest that the potential impact of steroids on ICI efficacy may be time-dependent, prevailing around ICI initiation, and dose-dependent, with modulation of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a possible underlying mechanism.

Sarcomas comprise between 10-15% of all pediatric malignancies. Osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma are the two most common pediatric bone tumors diagnosed in children and young adults. These tumors are commonly treated with surgery and/or radiation therapy and combination chemotherapy. However, there is a strong need for the development and utilization of targeted therapeutic methods to improve patient outcomes. Towards accomplishing this goal, pre-clinical models for these unique malignancies are of particular importance to design and test experimental therapeutic strategies prior to being introduced to patients due to their origination site and propensity to metastasize. Pre-clinical models offer several advantages for the study of pediatric sarcomas with unique benefits and shortcomings dependent on the type of model. This review addresses the types of pre-clinical models available for the study of pediatric solid tumors, with special attention to the bone sarcomas osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma.

UNASSIGNED: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) have been widely adopted in a number of early and advanced malignancies. Histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACis) and alkylating agents (AAs) have been suggested to potentiate the actions of CPIs on tumor cells. We conducted a comprehensive literature review to explore the potential synergistic activity between CPIs, AAs, and HDACis.
UNASSIGNED: Clinical and non-clinical studies describing outcomes in patients with cancer receiving CPIs and either concomitant or sequential (pre- or post-CPI) AAs or HDACis were identified in PubMed using pre-defined search strings. Manual searches of key oncology congresses were similarly performed. All relevant articles and abstracts were manually screened for relevance, classified according to the specific anticancer agents used (CPIs, AAs, or HDACis), tumor entity, and whether treatment was concomitant or sequential.
UNASSIGNED: Overall, 227 unique clinical studies across a range of tumor types, both solid tumors and hematological malignancies, were identified. One hundred and fifty-nine publications on Phase I and II clinical studies together with 41 publications on Phase III studies were examined. The most commonly investigated tumor types were melanoma, triple-negative breast cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, and Hodgkin lymphoma. The randomized clinical studies identified, all of which reported on the combination of a CPI with an AA, demonstrated superior outcomes in the combination arm compared with CPI or AA monotherapy. Similarly, combination therapy with CPIs and HDACis demonstrated promising activity.
UNASSIGNED: Sequential or concomitant administration of a CPI with an AA or an HDACi may improve outcomes for patients with a range of tumor types. There is a rationale to support further investigation into the potential for synergy between CPIs, alkylating agents and/or HDACis in both the non-clinical and clinical settings.
People being treated for cancer will often receive more than one drug at a time, and the concept of combining cancer drugs is frequently investigated as a potential opportunity to improve outcomes for patients. We reviewed the published literature for clinical trials and work undertaken in laboratories to explore whether combining targeted agents that stop cancer cells from multiplying (known as checkpoint inhibitors) with traditional chemotherapy that kills cancer cells could be a useful approach. We looked at evidence in publications where checkpoint inhibitors were used at the same time as chemotherapy, or given immediately before or after chemotherapy. The most important evidence came from clinical trials where outcomes for patients receiving combinations of treatment were directly compared with those from patients receiving a single treatment. These studies showed superior outcomes for patients who were treated with a combination of cancer drugs compared with patients receiving monotherapy. We also found evidence that adding another class of cancer drug, called histone deacetylase inhibitors, might sensitize tumors to checkpoint inhibitors. These findings provide a rationale for examining alkylating agents and/or histone deacetylase inhibitors combined with checkpoint inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: Bisphosphonates (P-C-Ps) also called diphosphonates are the structural analogs of naturally occurring pyrophosphates. Bisphosphonates are traditionally used and shown to provide long-term success in the treatment and prevention of osteoporosis and other bone loss pathologies. Furthermore, bisphosphonates are gaining popularity in the present era of cancer therapeutics and prevention. The usage of bisphosphonates as adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy, either as a single agent or combined with other chemotherapy, has been studied in different solid tumors. This review aims to present the various roles of bisphosphonates in solid tumors.
METHODS: Articles in MEDLINE/PubMed and the National Institutes of Health Clinical Trials Registry (http://www. Clinicaltrials.gov) between 1 January 2011 and 1 February 2022 were extracted using MeSH terms \"bisphosphonates/diphosphosphonates and mechanism,\" \"bisphosphonates and breast cancer,\" \"bisphosphonates and prostate cancer,\" \"bisphosphonates and lung cancer,\" \"bisphosphonates and cancer risk,\" and \"bisphosphonates and adverse events.\" Manual searches of some major oncology journals were also conducted.
CONCLUSIONS: This review article focuses on the antitumor activity of bisphosphonates, safety profile, and the role of bisphosphonates as preventive, neoadjuvant, and adjuvant chemotherapy. A significant improvement in overall survival and cancer-specific survival and recurrence-free survival with the usage of bisphosphonates is noted in breast cancer patients, particularly in post-menopausal women. Though great progress has been achieved in over 20 years, further research is needed to identify the subgroup of patients that are most likely to benefit from adjuvant bisphosphonate therapy and to determine regimens with greater efficacy and better safety profile.