secondary

次要
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    认知障碍是精神分裂症的核心特征之一,涉及神经认知和社会认知领域,并对现实世界的运作产生重大负面影响。本综述为精神分裂症中“原发性”和“继发性”认知障碍的概念化和表征提供了框架。在这个概念中,原发性认知障碍可以定义为神经生物学改变的结果,该神经生物学改变是该疾病的精神病理学表现的基础,而继发性认知障碍可以定义为对认知表现有负面影响的来源问题的结果。继发性认知障碍的来源在精神分裂症患者中很常见,包括几个不同的因素,如阳性和阴性症状,抑郁症状,自闭症症状,药物治疗,药物滥用,代谢综合征,社会剥夺,和睡眠障碍。可以假设继发性认知障碍可以通过有效解决来源问题来改善。而原发性认知障碍可能受益于专门治疗。需要进一步的研究来证实这一假设,为了在临床和神经生物学角度更好地描述原发性和继发性认知障碍之间的区别,并评估系统评估和治疗继发性认知障碍的影响。
    Cognitive impairment represents one of the core features of schizophrenia, involves both neurocognition and social cognition domains, and has a significant negative impact on real-world functioning. The present review provides a framework for the conceptualization and characterization of \"primary\" and \"secondary\" cognitive impairment in schizophrenia. In this conceptualization, primary cognitive impairment can be defined as a consequence of the neurobiological alterations that underlie psychopathological manifestations of the disorder, while secondary cognitive impairment can be defined as the results of a source issue that has a negative impact on cognitive performance. Sources of secondary cognitive impairment are frequent in people with schizophrenia and include several different factors, such as positive and negative symptoms, depressive symptoms, autistic symptoms, pharmacotherapy, substance abuse, metabolic syndrome, social deprivation, and sleep disorders. It can be hypothesized that secondary cognitive impairment may be improved by effectively resolving the source issue, while primary cognitive impairment may benefit from dedicated treatment. Further research is required to confirm this hypothesis, to better characterize the distinction between primary and secondary cognitive impairment in a clinical and in a neurobiological perspective, and to evaluate the impact of systematically assessing and treating secondary cognitive impairment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在比较无缝线和多缝线闭合方法对术后疼痛的影响,肿胀,和刺耳,和相关的并发症。
    方法:这种前瞻性,随机临床试验在口腔颌面外科进行,果阿牙科学院和医院。纳入标准包括年龄在17至55岁之间的受试者,归类为美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)I,无症状受累的第三磨牙落在中等困难的撞击范围内(佩德森的困难指数:5-7)。研究排除了被归类为ASAII的个体,III,或者IV,那些已知或怀疑对麻醉溶液过敏的人,免疫力低下的患者,以及服用可能影响愈合的药物的个体。孕妇或哺乳期女性以及有出血性疾病史的女性也被排除在外。比较伤口闭合方法:A组用真丝缝线进行初次闭合,B组无缝线闭合。使用简单的随机化方法将受试者分配到特定组。Thisinvolvedusingalottery-basedrandomsequencetoassigneachparticipantstoeitherGroupAorGroupB.面部肿胀,和关卡是关键的结果。次要结果包括舌神经感觉和术后并发症。人口统计因素,手术细节,影像学和围手术期数据,并考虑生理参数。采用非参数检验和参数检验(重复测量ANOVA)。P<0.05时具有统计学意义。
    结果:在101名参与者中,两种闭合技术在疼痛方面表现出相似的结果,肿胀,和舌神经功能。然而,无缝合闭合可显著减少三端肌,减少伤口延迟愈合的病例.
    结论:与多根缝线相比,手术切除第三磨牙后的无缝线方法可以减少三端肌。虽然痛苦,肿胀,和舌神经功能管理具有可比性。
    OBJECTIVE: This study aims to compare the outcomes of suture-less and multiple suture closure methods on postoperative pain, swelling, and trismus, and associated complications.
    METHODS: This prospective, randomized clinical trial was conducted at the Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Goa Dental College & Hospital. Inclusion criteria encompassed subjects aged between 17 and 55 years, classified as American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) I, with asymptomatic impacted third molars falling within the moderately difficult impaction range (Pederson\'s difficulty index: 5-7). Study excluded individuals classified as ASA II, III, or IV, those with known or suspected allergies to the anaesthetic solution, immunocompromised patients, and individuals taking medications that could affect healing. Pregnant or lactating females and those with a history of bleeding disorders were also excluded. Wound closure methods were compared: Group A underwent primary closure with silk sutures, while Group B had suture-less closure. Subjects were allocated to the specific groups using a simple randomization method. This involved using a lottery-based random sequence to assign each participant to either Group A or Group B. Pain intensity, facial swelling, and trismus were key outcomes. Secondary outcomes included lingual nerve sensation and postoperative complications. Demographics factors, surgical details, radiographic and perioperative data, and physiological parameters were considered. Non-parametric tests and parametric test (repeated measure ANOVA) were employed. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.
    RESULTS: Among 101 participants, both closure techniques exhibited similar outcomes in pain, swelling, and lingual nerve function. However, suture-less closure resulted in significantly less trismus and fewer cases of delayed wound healing.
    CONCLUSIONS: Suture-less method after surgical removal of third molar may reduce trismus compared to multiple sutures. While pain, swelling, and lingual nerve function management were comparable.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    继发性噬血细胞性淋巴组织细胞增生症(sHLH)历来被定义为细胞因子风暴综合征(CSS),发生在导致强烈和失调的免疫激活的触发条件下,没有已知的遗传偏好。然而,最近的研究表明,现有的潜在遗传因素可能与特定的疾病和/或环境触发因素(包括感染,自身免疫性/自身炎症性疾病,某些生物疗法,或恶性转化),导致SHLH。随着基因检测技术的进步,更多的患者检查原发性HLH(pHLH)相关基因的遗传变异,包括全外显子组和全基因组测序。这种不断扩大的遗传和基因组证据表明,HLH是一种更复杂的现象,由于具有易感遗传背景的患者的特定免疫挑战。而不是一个简单的,pHLH和sHLH的二进制定义,HLH代表一系列疾病,从常见感染的严重并发症(EBV,流感)只能通过移植治愈的早发性家族性疾病。
    Secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (sHLH) has historically been defined as a cytokine storm syndrome (CSS) occurring in the setting of triggers leading to strong and dysregulated immunological activation, without known genetic predilection. However, recent studies have suggested that existing underlying genetic factors may synergize with particular diseases and/or environmental triggers (including infection, autoimmune/autoinflammatory disorder, certain biologic therapies, or malignant transformation), leading to sHLH. With the recent advances in genetic testing technology, more patients are examined for genetic variations in primary HLH (pHLH)-associated genes, including through whole exome and whole genome sequencing. This expanding genetic and genomic evidence has revealed HLH as a more complex phenomenon, resulting from specific immune challenges in patients with a susceptible genetic background. Rather than a simple, binary definition of pHLH and sHLH, HLH represents a spectrum of diseases, from a severe complication of common infections (EBV, influenza) to early onset familial diseases that can only be cured by transplantation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在最好的情况下,在河口实现或维持最佳生态条件具有挑战性。河口数据中持续的信息空白使得难以将自然变异性与潜在的政权转移区分开来。长期监测对于跟踪生态随时间的变化至关重要。在美国(US),许多资源管理计划正在以最大的能力工作,以解决现有的州和联邦水质要求(例如,污染物负荷限值,缓解气候影响,和渔业管理),并且几乎没有空间扩大常规采样工作以进行定期生态基线评估,特别是在州和地方范围内。替代设计,监测,当现有监测数据稀疏或空间有限时,需要采用评估方法来帮助抵消解决额外数据需求的负担,以增加对河口系统弹性的理解。这里提出的研究提供了一种伪概率方法,允许使用发现的或次要的数据,例如手头上的数据和其他获得的数据,生成河口生态条件的统计特征。我们的方法使用广义伪概率框架来综合来自不同贡献者的数据,以告知类似概率的基线评估。该方法依赖于简单的地理空间技术和为美国环境保护局开发的现有工具(R包功能),以支持生态监测和评估计划,例如国家沿海条件评估。使用在佛罗里达州西北部(美国)河口收集的次生河口水质数据,演示表明,伪概率方法产生的河口状况评估结果具有合理的统计置信度,提高空间代表性,和增值信息。虽然伪概率框架不能替代完全演进的监控,它提供了一个可扩展的替代方案,以弥合资源管理能力的限制和随着时间的推移跟踪河口生态基线的最佳监测策略之间的差距。
    Under the best circumstances, achieving or sustaining optimum ecological conditions in estuaries is challenging. Persistent information gaps in estuarine data make it difficult to differentiate natural variability from potential regime shifts. Long-term monitoring is critical for tracking ecological change over time. In the United States (US), many resource management programs are working at maximum capacity to address existing state and federal water quality mandates (e.g., pollutant load limits, climate impact mitigation, and fisheries management) and have little room to expand routine sampling efforts to conduct periodic ecological baseline assessments, especially at state and local scales. Alternative design, monitoring, and assessment approaches are needed to help offset the burden of addressing additional data needs to increase understanding about estuarine system resilience when existing monitoring data are sparse or spatially limited. Research presented here offers a pseudo-probabilistic approach that allows for the use of found or secondary data, such as data on hand and other acquired data, to generate statistically robust characterizations of ecological conditions in estuaries. Our approach uses a generalized pseudo-probabilistic framework to synthesize data from different contributors to inform probabilistic-like baseline assessments. The methodology relies on simple geospatial techniques and existing tools (R package functions) developed for the US Environmental Protection Agency to support ecological monitoring and assessment programs like the National Coastal Condition Assessment. Using secondary estuarine water quality data collected in the Northwest Florida (US) estuaries, demonstrations suggest that the pseudo-probabilistic approach produces estuarine condition assessment results with reasonable statistical confidence, improved spatial representativeness, and value-added information. While the pseudo-probabilistic framework is not a substitute for fully evolved monitoring, it offers a scalable alternative to bridge the gap between limitations in resource management capability and optimal monitoring strategies to track ecological baselines in estuaries over time.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    场癌变是经典描述头颈部多个原发性恶性肿瘤发生的现象,同步或异时。遇到同步初选是不寻常的,一次也是三个。这是一位患者,向我们展示了涉及口腔底部的三原发鳞状细胞癌,舌根,和声门同时……
    Field cancerization is the phenomenon that classically describes the occurrence of multiple primary malignancies in the head and neck subsites, either synchronous or metachronous. It\'s unusual to come across synchronous primaries, that too three at a time. Here is a patient who presented to us with triple primary squamous cell carcinomas involving the floor of the mouth, base of the tongue, and glottis at the same time…….
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    关于2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)后持续性头痛的频率和影响以及慢性每日头痛(CDH)的发生率知之甚少。这项前瞻性队列研究的目的是评估发病率,危险因素,特点,以及CDH对COVID-19患者的影响。
    在第一阶段,在COVID-19急性期后,对288例患者进行了电话采访。随后,199名出现头痛的患者在COVID-19后至少一年接受了重新采访。持续超过COVID-19急性期三个月或三个月以上且在前三个月内出现频率≥45天的头痛被认为是CDH。
    纳入了123名患者,56%为女性;中位年龄:50岁(第25和第75百分位数:41;58)。52%的人头痛持续超过COVID-19的急性期,20.3%患有CDH(95%置信区间:13.6-28.2)。以前有头痛和在急性期有更大强度头痛的个体发生CDH的风险更高。患有CDH的人群包括更多的女性,头痛的影响更大,与其他持续头痛的个体相比,在COVID-19的第120天之后,头痛的持续时间更多,而抽搐性头痛更少。
    患有COVID-19的患者CDH的发病率很高。以前的头痛和更大的头痛强度与更高的CDH风险相关。
    UNASSIGNED: Little is known about the frequency and impact of the persistent headache and about the incidence of chronic daily headache (CDH) after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The aim of this prospective cohort study was to assess the incidence, risk factors, characteristics, and impact of CDH in patients with COVID-19.
    UNASSIGNED: In the first stage, 288 patients were interviewed by telephone after the acute phase of COVID-19. Subsequently, 199 patients who presented headache were reinterviewed at least one year after COVID-19. Headaches that persisted beyond the acute phase of COVID-19 for three or more months and presented frequency ≥ 45 days over the first three months were considered to be CDH.
    UNASSIGNED: One hundred and twenty-three patients were included, 56% were females; median age: 50 years (25th and 75th percentile: 41;58). The headache persisted beyond the acute phase of COVID-19 in 52%, and 20.3% had CDH (95% confidence interval: 13.6-28.2). Individuals who previously had headaches and who had headaches of greater intensity during the acute phase were at higher risk of developing CDH. The group with CDH included more females, greater impact of headache, more persistence of headache beyond the 120th day of COVID-19 and less throbbing headache than did the other individuals whose headache persisted.
    UNASSIGNED: Patients who had COVID-19 had a high incidence of CDH. Previous headache and greater intensity of headache were associated with higher risk of CDH.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    主动脉肠瘘(AEF)定义为主动脉与胃肠道之间的异常连通。AEF通常在腹主动脉瘤(AAA)恢复后分为原发性和继发性,是普通外科医生在其职业生涯中可能面临的罕见但相当危险的胃肠道出血原因。二级AEF于1953年首次被描述为AAA手术后3个月的44岁女性。这篇综述介绍了外科医生在继发性主动脉肠瘘治疗中的作用。AEF是一种罕见但致命的胃肠道出血原因,一般外科医生可能会被要求管理。诊断需要强烈的临床怀疑和AAA手术史的结合。虽然是血管外科手术,普通外科医生在选择恢复肠道的技术方面发挥作用,这似乎与随后的发病率和死亡率显着相关。
    Aortoenteric fistula (AEF) is defined as the abnormal communication between the aorta and the gastrointestinal tract. AEFs are divided into primary and secondary usually after abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) recovery and are a rare but quite dangerous cause of gastrointestinal bleeding that the general surgeon may face during his/her career. Secondary AEF was first described in 1953 to a 44-year-old woman 3 months after an AAA operation. This review presents the role of the surgeon in the management of secondary aortoenteric fistulas. AEFs are a rare but fatal gastrointestinal bleeding cause that the general surgeon may be asked to manage. Diagnosis requires the combination of strong clinical suspicion and the presence of a history of AAA surgery. Although a vascular surgery case, general surgeons play a role in choosing the technique of restoring the intestinal tract, which seems to be significantly related to subsequent morbidity and mortality.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:颈部食管重建术对提高癌症手术患者的生活质量至关重要。显微外科手术对于提供血管化组织进行缺损修复至关重要,特别是在继发病例中,由于以前的手术和放疗造成的较大缺陷和损伤而导致的失败风险较高。这项研究的目的是根据作者的经验和文献综述,描述一系列接受二次食管缺损修复的患者的临床特征,并为此类病例的管理和治疗提供实用信息。方法:我们回顾性回顾了的里雅斯特大学整形外科诊所的电子病历,以确定在肿瘤手术后接受二次食道显微外科重建的患者病例。患者人口统计学,食管缺损的病因,既往手术史,术前评估从病历中收集.用于重建的外科技术,如带蒂皮瓣或游离组织转移,与术中信息一起记录。术后结果,包括并发症,移植物活力,和功能结果,在随访期间进行了评估。结果:我们在2011年至2022年期间治疗了13例二次食管重建。最常见的是,应用股前外侧(ALT)皮瓣10例,而2例采用桡侧前臂皮瓣(RFF),1例采用嵌合的肩副皮瓣。在中位50个月的随访期间,没有发生皮瓣失败。一名ALT皮瓣患者经历了术后狭窄,但保持了吞咽能力。一名有放疗史和完整淋巴结清扫术的RFF患者发生了一次气管食管瘘。结论:颈部食管重建通过恢复口腔进食和发声显著影响患者的生活质量。当局部襟翼不足时,肠皮瓣的显微外科重建是有价值的,但有局限性。对于具有挑战性的次要案件,ALT或RFF皮瓣出现作为更安全的选择,由于其坚固的椎弓根,产生低并发症率和积极的功能结果。
    Background: Cervical esophageal reconstruction is vital to improve the quality of life in cancer surgery patients. Microsurgery is crucial in providing vascularized tissue for defect repair, particularly in secondary cases with a higher risk of failure due to larger defects and damage from previous surgery and radiotherapy. The purpose of this study was to describe the clinical characteristics of a series of patients who underwent secondary repair of esophageal defects and provide practical information for the management and treatment of such cases based on the authors\' experience and the literature review. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the electronic medical records of the Plastic Surgery Clinic at the University of Trieste to identify cases of patients who underwent secondary esophageal microsurgical reconstructions following oncological surgery. Patient demographics, the etiology of esophageal defects, previous surgical history, and preoperative assessments were collected from medical records. Surgical techniques utilized for reconstruction, such as pedicled flaps or free tissue transfers, were documented along with intraoperative information. Postoperative outcomes, including complications, graft viability, and functional outcomes, were evaluated during follow-up. Results: We treated 13 cases of secondary esophageal reconstructions between 2011 and 2022. Most commonly, Antero-Lateral Thigh (ALT) flaps were used in 10 cases, while 2 cases employed a radial forearm flap (RFF), and 1 case employed a chimeric parascapular flap. No flap failures occurred during a median 50-month follow-up. One ALT flap patient experienced postop stricture but maintained swallowing ability. A single tracheoesophageal fistula occurred in an RFF patient with a history of radiotherapy and complete lymph node dissection. Conclusions: Cervical esophageal reconstruction significantly impacts patients\' quality of life by restoring oral feeding and phonation. When local flaps fall short, microsurgical reconstruction with intestinal flaps is valuable but is burdened by limitations. For challenging secondary cases, ALT or RFF flaps emerge as safer options due to their robust pedicles, yielding low complication rates and positive functional outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    管理肿瘤患者的中心静脉导管具有挑战性,外周置入中心导管PORT(PICC-PORT)已成为一种有希望的安全性和有效性选择.然而,了解使用中心静脉导管的癌症患者导管相关性血栓形成(CRT)的临床进展仍然有限,尤其是在某些与静脉血栓形成风险较高相关的肿瘤类型中。
    本研究旨在评估超声引导管理在检测和治疗患有PICC的癌症患者中无症状CRT的有效性。
    在这项对120例接受化疗的实体瘤患者进行的前瞻性队列研究中,我们调查了孤立性上肢浅静脉血栓的发生率,上肢深静脉血栓形成,插入导管后30天和90天,通过超声随访形成纤维蛋白鞘。我们分析了与CRT相关的危险因素,并比较了PICC-PORT和传统PICC的发生率。
    在队列中,69例患者(57.5%)有高危血栓栓塞性肿瘤,观察到31例(25.8%)的CRT,大多在30天内,只有7例(22.6%)出现症状。传统的PICC使用(赔率比,5.86;95%CI,1.14-30)和高危血栓栓塞性肿瘤(比值比,4.46;95%CI,1.26-15.81)被确定为CRT的独立危险因素。
    在实体瘤患者中,大多数CRT在静脉导管插入的前30天内无症状出现。超声随访对检测无症状CRT有价值。PICC-PORT的CRT风险低于PICC。此外,发现高危血栓栓塞性肿瘤患者接受CRT的风险较高.对于更大规模的研究来说,确认治疗无症状血栓形成和孤立的浅表血栓形成的效用是至关重要的。
    UNASSIGNED: Managing central venous catheters in patients with neoplasms is challenging, and peripherally inserted central catheter PORT (PICC-PORT) has emerged as a promising option for safety and efficacy. However, understanding the clinical progression of catheter-related thrombosis (CRT) in cancer patients with central venous catheters remains limited, especially in certain neoplasm types associated with a higher risk of venous thrombosis.
    UNASSIGNED: This study aims to assess the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided management in detecting and treating asymptomatic CRT in cancer patients with PICC.
    UNASSIGNED: In this prospective cohort study of 120 patients with solid neoplasms receiving chemotherapy, we investigated the incidence of isolated upper-extremity superficial vein thrombosis, upper-extremity deep vein thrombosis, and fibrin sheath formation through ultrasound follow-up at 30 and 90 days after catheter insertion. We analyzed risk factors associated with CRT and compared incidence rates between PICC-PORT and traditional PICC.
    UNASSIGNED: Among the cohort, 69 patients (57.5%) had high-risk thromboembolic neoplasm, and 31 cases (25.8%) of CRT were observed, mostly within 30 days, with only 7 cases (22.6%) showing symptoms. Traditional PICC use (odds ratio, 5.86; 95% CI, 1.14-30) and high-risk thromboembolic neoplasm (odds ratio, 4.46; 95% CI, 1.26-15.81) were identified as independent risk factors for CRT.
    UNASSIGNED: The majority of CRT present asymptomatically within the first 30 days of venous catheter insertion in patients with solid neoplasms. Ultrasound follow-up is valuable for detecting asymptomatic CRT. The risk of CRT was lower with PICC-PORT than with PICC. Additionally, the risk of CRT was found to be higher in patients with high-risk thromboembolic neoplasms. It is crucial for larger studies to confirm the utility of treating asymptomatic thromboses and isolated superficial thrombosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    头痛影响COVID-19急性期约一半的患者,通常发生在症状期开始时,有一个阴险的发作,是双边的,中等至重度强度。COVID-19还可能出现引起急性和持续性头痛的并发症,比如脑血管疾病,鼻窦炎,脑膜炎,颅内高压.在10%至20%的COVID-19患者中,头痛可能持续超过急性期。总的来说,头痛会随着时间的推移而改善。迄今为止,尚无临床试验评估COVID-19后持续性头痛的治疗方法.
    Headache affects around half of patients in the acute phase of COVID-19 and generally occurs at the beginning of the symptomatic phase, has an insidious onset, and is bilateral, and of moderate to severe intensity. COVID-19 may also present complications that cause acute and persistent headaches, such as cerebrovascular diseases, rhinosinusitis, meningitis, and intracranial hypertension. In 10% to 20% of patients with COVID-19, headache may persist beyond the acute phase. In general, the headache improves over time. To date, there are no clinical trials that have assessed the treatment of persistent post-COVID-19 headache.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号