背景:这项研究提出了诊断,管理,在没有龋齿或牙周炎病史的年轻患者中,对急性牙周病和深口袋影响上颌中切牙的组织反应。
方法:临床和影像学检查有助于将病理诊断为具有根部损伤的终末期病变(EPL),表现出超侵入性牙根吸收。采用直行牙髓治疗对牙髓空间进行净化和密封。吸收部位通过牙髓通路治疗,清创,并密封。未进行牙周治疗(手术或非手术)。在袋装的根表面内没有进行机械仪器。
结果:在牙髓治疗后6个月和1年的随访中,牙周组织表现出生理健康状况,没有脓液或炎症,表现出2毫米的圆周探测深度,牙齿没有活动性.这些有利的结果在整个4年的随访期间持续存在。
结论:在EPL的牙髓治疗和外部侵入性牙根吸收治疗后,没有机械根器械的情况下,发生了口袋和脓肿的自发愈合。
结论:准确诊断和识别相关病因对于有效管理牙髓-牙周病变至关重要。一旦诊断成立,治疗的重点是消除主要病因,随后是愈合后的诊断阶段。对牙髓-牙周病变的诊断和病因的明确认识往往在回顾中变得清晰。根据治疗的结果。当探测急性牙周病时,深度探查可能会发生,而不会永久丧失牙周附着。如果急性病变不是由牙周原因引起的,并且没有继发牙周病因,解决髓内病变的主要原因可导致囊袋的自发解决。这导致牙周组织的自发愈合,而不需要有意的牙周治疗。在牙周病理学的急性炎症阶段考虑牙周治疗时会出现临床困境。建议不要使用机械牙根器械,特别是如果牙周原因不明显,防止牙周纤维的医源性损伤和牙龈衰退的潜在风险。然而,这并不意味着对所有病例都要完全避免牙周治疗。相反,建议推迟对根管器械的决定,直到牙髓病因学愈合后进行新的诊断阶段.
BACKGROUND: This study presents the diagnois, management, and tissue response to an acute periodontal lesion with deep pocketing affecting a maxillary central incisor in a young patient devoid of caries or a history of periodontitis.
METHODS: Clinical and radiographic examinations facilitated the diagnosis of the pathology as an endoperiodontal lesion (EPL) with root damage, exhibiting supracrestal invasive root resorption. Orthograde endodontic therapy was employed to decontaminate and seal the endodontic space. The resorptive site was treated through the endodontic access, debrided, and sealed. No periodontal therapy (surgical or nonsurgical) was performed. No mechanical instrumentation was performed within the pocketed root surface.
RESULTS: At 6-month and 1-year follow-ups after endodontic therapy the periodontium displayed a physiologically healthy condition without pus or inflammation, exhibiting a circumferential probing depth of 2 mm, and absence of tooth mobility. These favorable outcomes persisted throughout a 4-year follow-up period.
CONCLUSIONS: The spontaneous healing of pocketing and abscess occurred without mechanical root instrumentation following endodontic therapy and treatment of external invasive root resorption in an EPL.
CONCLUSIONS: Accurate diagnosis and identification of relevant etiologic factors are pivotal for effectively managing endodontic-periodontal lesions. Once a diagnosis is established, the therapy focuses on eliminating the primary cause, followed by a subsequent diagnostic phase after healing. The definitive understanding of the diagnosis and etiology of endodontic-periodontal lesions often becomes clear in retrospect, based on the outcomes of the therapy. When probing acute periodontal lesions, deep probing depths may occur without permanent loss of periodontal attachment. If the acute lesion was not induced by a periodontal cause and if no periodontal etiology arises secondarily, resolving the primary cause of the endoperiodontal lesion can lead to the spontaneous resolution of the pocketing. This results in spontaneous healing of periodontium without the need for intentional periodontal therapy. A clinical dilemma arises when considering periodontal treatment during the acute inflammatory phase of endo-periodontal pathology. It is advisable to refrain from mechanical root instrumentation particularly if a clear periodontal cause is not apparent, to prevent from iatrogenic damage to periodontal fibers and the potential risk of gingival recessions. However, this does not imply avoiding periodontal therapy entirely for every case. Rather, it is recommended to delay the decision on root instrumentation until a new diagnostic phase is conducted following the healing of the endodontic etiology.