Background: Although Total Ankle Arthroplasty (TAA) is primarily performed for post-traumatic ankle arthritis with joint disruption, anatomical landmarks for Joint Line (JL) level are typically preserved. However, severe Post-Traumatic Bone Loss (PTBL) or TAA revision may render some landmarks unidentifiable, challenging JL restoration. Methods: Patients undergoing customized TAA for severe PTBL or revision were enrolled. Custom-made implants, based on 3D CT scans, were designed to address bone defects and provide adequate bone support. Evaluated parameters, measured on bilateral ankle weight-bearing radiographs taken preoperatively and 6-8 months postoperatively, included JL Height Ratio (JLHR) and the distances from JL to the Lateral Malleolus apex (LM-JL), the posterior colliculus of the Medial Malleolus (MM-JL), and the Gissane Calcaneal Sulcus (CS-JL). Reproducibility and variability were assessed, and comparisons were made between radiological parameters measured at TAA and those at the contralateral ankle. Results: Thirteen patients were included. Intra- and interobserver reliability demonstrated excellent values. The least variability was observed in the LM-JL distance. Statistically significant correlations were found between CS-JL and MM-JL distances in the operated limb and between the CS-JL of the operated limb and the contralateral ankle. While TAA parameters did not show statistically significant differences compared with the contralateral ankle, a trend toward proximalization of the JL was noted. Conclusions: This study demonstrated good reproducibility of the analyzed parameters for evaluating JL in TAA among patients with severe PTBL or undergoing revision surgery. However, these parameters cannot be deemed fully reliable. Given their potential weaknesses, it is crucial to identify more reproducible values, preferably ratios.

UNASSIGNED: The treatment of failed ankle replacements is debated, and little is published about the medium- and long-term results of revision implants. We wanted to examine prosthesis survival and physical function at least 5 years after insertion of the Salto XT revision prosthesis.
UNASSIGNED: All consecutive patients operated with a Salto XT revision prosthesis underwent clinical and radiologic examinations preoperatively and after 3, 12, 24, and 60 months. Complications and reoperations are described, and changes in patient-reported outcome measures and clinical scores are reported.
UNASSIGNED: Thirty patients were operated with a Salto XT revision prosthesis between March 2014 and March 2017. Three of these were revised (1 to a fusion and 2 to a new prosthesis), and 3 patients were reoperated with screw removal. A concurrent subtalar fusion was performed on 13 patients, and there was 1 case of likely nonunion after these procedures, but no reoperations. The mean AOFAS score increased from 39.2 (95% CI 30.8-47.5) preoperatively to 75.1 (95% CI 67.3-82.9) after 5 years, and the mean improvement was 34.2 points (95% CI 23.8-44.6). Mean EQ-5D increased from 0.36 (95% CI 0.30-0.42) preoperatively to 0.74 (95% CI 0.64-0.85) after 5 years, an improvement of 0.34 (95% CI 0.19-0.49). Radiolucent lines were present in all but 3 patients. Five-year prosthesis survival was 93% (83.6-100).
UNASSIGNED: This is the first study to present medium-term results of this implant. We found good improvement in outcome scores and good implant survival, but also a high prevalence of radiolucent lines.

BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) poses a significant challenge in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), with recurrence rates as high as 14-28%, leading to substantial morbidity and treatment costs. When conventional treatments fail, knee fusion and above-the-knee amputation (AKA) emerge as alternative options. Existing literature offers conflicting views on the efficacy and impact of knee fusion versus AKA with varied outcomes and limitations.
METHODS: This retrospective national study spanning 2010-2022 investigates Knee Fusion and AKA as options for addressing Knee PJI. Utilizing PearlDiver Patient Records Database, procedural, and reimbursement data on over 100 million individuals from all the US was evaluated. Readmission rates, costs, and complications of the mentioned procedures were assessed using ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes within a 90-day period and one-year post-operation. Statistical analyses, including chi-square tests and regression models, were conducted using integrated R software.
RESULTS: The study reveals a substantial escalation (p < 0.0001) in the proportion of patients opting for AKA compared to arthrodesis. While age as a demographic factor showed no significant difference, arthrodesis patients exhibited lower comorbidity scores (3.6 ± 2.9 vs. 4.6 ± 3.4, p < 0.001). Arthrodesis correlated with higher 90-day thromboembolism rates (9.2% vs. 7.3%, p < 0.001), blood transfusion requirements (23.2% vs. 14.4%, p < 0.001), and acute renal failure incidence (p = 0.008) but demonstrated lower rates of urinary tract infections (p = 0.047) and cerebrovascular accidents (p < 0.001). At 1 year, arthrodesis was associated with higher infection rates (38.7% vs. 36.4%, p < 0.001). Arthrodesis patients had significant increased 90-day and 1-year readmission rates and hospitalization costs ($12,732 vs. $18,826, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: We found higher rates of 1-year thromboembolism, infection, acute renal failure, and readmission in the arthrodesis group. AKA patients had more sepsis and cerebrovascular accidents. A patient-centered conversation is best for persistent infections and failed revision TKA. Considering the patient\'s quality of life, goals, and health status, this discussion should cover each procedure\'s risks and complications.

BACKGROUND: There is only sparse knowledge on the psychological burden of patients who have periprosthetic joint infections. The aim of our study was to assess the need for psychological support following total joint arthroplasty of the hip and knee. A special focus was set on patients who had aseptic and septic complications.
METHODS: A total of 13,976 patients who underwent total hip (n = 6,926) or total knee arthroplasty (n = 7,050) between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2019 at a single institution were retrospectively evaluated for the postoperative need for a psychological consultation. Data were collected on age, sex, type of surgery, and indications for revision procedures. The need for a psychological consultation was assessed during the daily postoperative visits, which were further coordinated by 2 institutional psychologists.
RESULTS: The average age was 68 years (range, 12 to 100), and there were 63.5% women. The overall rate of psychological consultations was 1.7%. Patients who had a septic indication for revision surgery had an 18.7-fold higher rate of postoperative psychological consultations compared to patients following primary surgery and a 5.4-fold higher rate compared to patients who had an aseptic indication. In detail, this rate was 1.0% in the primary subgroup, compared to 7.7% following revision arthroplasty (P < .001). In the revision subgroup, the rate was 17.9% for septic and 3.3% for aseptic revision arthroplasty cases (P < .001). Postoperative psychological consultations were twice as frequent in women (2.1%) compared to men (1.0%), P < .001.
CONCLUSIONS: The present study raises awareness of the markedly high psychological burden in revision arthroplasty cases, in the view of the high estimated number of unknown cases. There is a significant correlation between periprosthetic joint infectionsand the postoperative need for a psychological consultation, with women being at an even higher risk. Health care providers should aim at offering psychological support for patients who have a septic complication, with affected patients being at risk for psychological stress.
METHODS: IV.

UNASSIGNED: Revision total knee (TKR) and hip (THR) arthroplasty surgeries are disincentivized due to unfavorable reimbursement rates, surgical times, and complication rates. Our study investigates secondary benefits of performing these surgeries by generating subsequent cases for surgeons and practices.
UNASSIGNED: Patients undergoing TKR and THR between April 1, 2011, and January 1, 2019, at our tertiary academic institution were analyzed. Patients were identified with Current Procedural Terminology codes for TKR and THR. We calculated a subsequent surgery rate on the same or different joint by the initial surgeon or another surgeon within the practice to determine the procedure yield after initial revision arthroplasty.
UNASSIGNED: One thousand six hundred twenty-five patients met inclusion criteria. Six hundred forty-nine (39.9%) patients received at least one subsequent procedure on any joint by any orthopaedic surgeon in the practice. Four hundred five patients (24.9%) underwent another procedure on any joint by the same surgeon. Two hundred sixty patients (16.0%) underwent another procedure on the same joint by the same surgeon, with 109 cases (41.9%) being a planned second stage of a 2-stage revision for infection. Two hundred eighty-five patients (17.5%) underwent another procedure on a different joint by the same surgeon, with 122 of these patients (42.8%) undergoing at least one primary total hip or knee arthroplasty.
UNASSIGNED: TKRs and THRs can increase surgeon and practice volumes through the generation of future cases, which are primarily the second stage of a 2-stage revision or primary joint arthroplasties on other joints.

BACKGROUND: Long-term complications following total joint arthroplasty are not well established for patients who have Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS), a group of connective tissue disorders. This study compared 10-year incidence of revision surgery after total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in patients who have and do not have EDS.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted using a national all-payer claims database from 2010 to 2021 to identify patients who underwent primary TKA or THA. Patients who had and did not have EDS were propensity score-matched by age, sex, and a comorbidity index. Kaplan-Meier analyses and Cox proportional hazard models were used to determine the cumulative incidence and risks of revision experienced by patients who have and do not have EDS.
RESULTS: The EDS patients who underwent TKA had a higher risk of all-cause revision (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.50, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.09 to 2.07, P < .014) and risk of revision due to instability (HR = 2.49, 95% CI: 1.37 to 4.52, P < .003). The EDS patients who underwent THA had a higher risk of all-cause revision (HR = 2.32, 95% CI: 1.47 to 3.65, P < .001), revision due to instability (HR = 4.26, 95% CI: 2.17 to 8.36, P < .001), and mechanical loosening (HR = 3.63, 95% CI: 2.05 to 6.44, P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients who had EDS were found to have a higher incidence of revision within 10 years of undergoing TKA and THA compared to matched controls, especially for instability. Patients who have EDS should be counseled accordingly. Surgical technique and implant selection should include consideration for increased constraint in TKA and larger femoral heads or dual mobility articulations for THA.

BACKGROUND: Improving local antibiotic delivery is a promising approach to improve infection control and potentially shorten systemic treatment in periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). This study investigates the use of an antibiotic-loaded, mouldable collagen-tricalciumphosphate composite in treatment of hip PJI.
METHODS: 124 application cases in 79 patients were included from a referral centre; systemic adverse infects, local complications, and infection control were analysed.
RESULTS: In most cases, either vancomycin or meropenem were used. Pathogens were previously known in 82 (66%) cases with polymicrobial infection in 20 (25%) patients. There were no cases of hypercalcaemia. Acute kidney injure was present in 14 (11%) cases. Chronic kidney failure persisted in two cases. During a mean follow-up of 12 (SD 9.3; range 3-35) months, implant survival was achieved in 73 (92%) patients; revision due to PJI was performed in 19 cases.
CONCLUSIONS: Mouldable collagen-tricalciumphosphate composite bone substitute as a local antibiotic carrier in revision hip arthroplasty appears to be a valid option for local antibiotic delivery without systemic complications. Implant survival of 92% supports the hypothesis that local antibiotic therapy is an important component in the treatment of PJI.

Arthritis of the first carpometacarpal (CMC) joint is a common pathology hand surgeons encounter. Treatment begins with conservative measures, but when they fail, surgery is a viable option for providing relief to patients. The most widely used surgical technique is CMC arthroplasty with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (LRTI). However, more novel techniques such as trapeziectomy with suspensionplasty are gaining popularity. When surgical measures fail, it is important to identify the mechanism of failure and proper treatment options. There are multiple options for revision surgery at the surgeon\'s disposal, with no consensus on a superior technique. This case illustrates a patient with painful subsidence secondary to a traumatic collapse of the first CMC joint eight months status post suspensionplasty with trapeziectomy. After conservative measures failed to provide relief, it was decided that a surgical revision was appropriate. The surgeon chose to move forward with suture button suspensionplasty, as it has multiple advantages over LRTI. In the short-term follow-up after revision, the patient experienced improvements in pain and range of motion, along with radiographic evidence of proper alignment of the first metacarpal without subsidence. Regarding the treatment of a case such as this, the authors believe this case should serve as a reference that may be used by future physicians when deciding which surgical technique to employ for the revision of a traumatically collapsed first CMC joint after trapeziectomy with CMC joint suspensionplasty.

BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic infection (PJI) with concomitant extensor mechanism disruption (EMD) and soft-tissue defect-hereinafter termed the \"Terrible Triad\"-is a devastating complication following total knee arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to define the surgical and clinical outcomes following management of a cohort of patients who have the Terrible Triad.
METHODS: From 2000 to 2022, 127 patients underwent operative management for PJI alone, 25 for PJI with soft-tissue defects (defined as defects requiring flap reconstruction or being a factor contributing to the decision of performing above-knee amputation or arthrodesis), 14 for PJI with EMD, and 22 for the Terrible Triad. A composite outcome of infection status, range of motion, extensor lag, and ambulatory status at final follow-up was used to compare the proportion of patients in each group with a favorable overall knee outcome. Differences between groups were determined using one-way analyses of variance with post hoc Tukey\'s tests and Pearson\'s Chi-square tests or Fisher\'s exact tests with post hoc Bonferroni adjustments, where applicable. Odds ratios (OR) were calculated for comparison of the overall knee outcome between groups. A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis for patient mortality was performed.
RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 8.4 years and similar between groups (P = .064). Patients who had the Terrible Triad had a 45.5% incidence of above-knee amputation, or arthrodesis, and an 86.4% incidence of an unfavorable outcome. Compared to patients in the PJI group, patients in the PJI who had a soft-tissue defect (OR = 5.8, 95% CI [confidence interval] 2.2 to 15.7), PJI with EMD (OR = 3.7, 95%CI 1.0 to 12.9), and Terrible Triad groups (OR = 11.6, 95% CI 3.3 to 41.5) showed higher odds of an unfavorable knee outcome.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that the total knee arthroplasty Terrible Triad is a dreaded diagnosis with poor outcomes. Clinicians and patients might consider early treatment with amputation or arthrodesis.
METHODS: III.

BACKGROUND: Although risk calculators are used to prognosticate postoperative outcomes following revision total hip and knee arthroplasty (total joint arthroplasty [TJA]), machine learning (ML) based predictive tools have emerged as a promising alternative for improved risk stratification. This study aimed to compare the predictive ability of ML models for 30-day mortality following revision TJA to that of traditional risk-assessment indices such as the CARDE-B score (congestive heart failure, albumin (< 3.5 mg/dL), renal failure on dialysis, dependence for daily living, elderly (> 65 years of age), and body mass index (BMI) of < 25 kg/m2), 5-item modified frailty index (5MFI), and 6MFI.
METHODS: Adult patients undergoing revision TJA between 2013 and 2020 were selected from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database and randomly split 80:20 to compose the training and validation cohorts. There were 3 ML models - extreme gradient boosting, random forest, and elastic-net penalized logistic regression (NEPLR) - that were developed and evaluated using discrimination, calibration metrics, and accuracy. The discrimination of CARDE-B, 5MFI, and 6MFI scores was assessed individually and compared to that of ML models.
RESULTS: All models were equally accurate (Brier score = 0.005) and demonstrated outstanding discrimination with similar areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs, extreme gradient boosting = 0.94, random forest = NEPLR = 0.93). The NEPLR was the best-calibrated model overall (slope = 0.54, intercept = -0.004). The CARDE-B had the highest discrimination among the scores (AUC = 0.89), followed by 6MFI (AUC = 0.80), and 5MFI (AUC = 0.68). Albumin < 3.5 mg/dL and BMI (< 30.15) were the most important predictors of 30-day mortality following revision TJA.
CONCLUSIONS: The ML models outperform traditional risk-assessment indices in predicting postoperative 30-day mortality after revision TJA. Our findings highlight the utility of ML for risk stratification in a clinical setting. The identification of hypoalbuminemia and BMI as prognostic markers may allow patient-specific perioperative optimization strategies to improve outcomes following revision TJA.