resources

资源
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:有癌症史的人越来越多地从在线资源中寻求健康信息,包括NCI指定的癌症中心网站。中心获得NCI指定,因为它们提供出色的护理并从事尖端研究。然而,这些网页上提供的信息及其可访问性未知。需要对NCI指定的癌症中心以生存为重点的网页进行评估,以评估生存信息和这些网页的可访问性。
    方法:我们对来自64个NCI指定的癌症中心的以生存为重点的网页进行了评估。我们评估了以生存为中心的网页的存放位置,如果有生存诊所或项目,网页的目标受众,如何定义癌症幸存者,接触方法,和可用的资源。可访问性结果包括可读性,字体类型,字体大小,配色方案,和替代文本(alttext)描述符。进行了人工智能(AI)审核,以评估网页是否符合国家无障碍指南。
    结果:大多数癌症中心都有一个以生存为中心的网页,其中72%位于癌症中心的网站上,28%位于卫生系统的网站上。可用的生存信息差异很大,通常缺乏细节。尽管四分之三的网页仅针对患者,观察到癌症幸存者的变量定义.确定的可访问性问题包括alt文本描述符的使用不一致,字体大小小于15点,和配色方案没有足够的对比度。所提供信息的平均阅读水平高于12年级。只有9%的网页符合在线可访问性指南;72%的半适应性和21%的不合规。
    结论:在NCI指定的癌症中心以生存为重点的网页上提供的信息不一致,往往缺乏,和无法访问。NCI指定的癌症中心是美国癌症研究的榜样,并有义务提供生存信息。需要更改内容和网站设计,以便为寻求与癌症和护理有关的资源和健康信息的个人提供更好的信息。
    BACKGROUND: Individuals with a history of cancer increasingly seek health information from online resources, including NCI-designated Cancer Center websites. Centers receive NCI designation because they provide excellent care and engage in cutting-edge research. However, the information presented on these webpages and their accessibility is unknown. An evaluation of the survivorship-focused webpages from NCI-designated Cancer Centers is needed to assess survivorship information and accessibility of these webpages.
    METHODS: We conducted an evaluation of the survivorship-focused webpages from 64 NCI-designated Cancer Centers. We evaluated where survivorship-focused webpages were housed, if there was a survivorship clinic or program, target audience of the webpage, how cancer survivor was defined, contact methods, and available resources. Accessibility outcomes included readability, font type, font size, color scheme, and alternative text (alt text) descriptors. An artificial intelligence (AI) audit was conducted to assess if the webpage was compliant with national accessibility guidelines.
    RESULTS: Most cancer centers had a survivorship-focused webpage, with 72% located on the cancer center\'s website and 28% on a health system website. Survivorship information available varied considerably and was often lacking in detail. Although three-quarters of webpages targeted patients only, variable definitions of cancer survivor were observed. Accessibility issues identified included inconsistent use of alt text descriptors, font size smaller than 15 points, and color schemes without adequate contrast. The average reading-level of information presented was above 12th grade. Only 9% of webpages were compliant with online accessibility guidelines; 72% semicompliant and 21% were noncompliant.
    CONCLUSIONS: Information presented on NCI-designated Cancer Center survivorship-focused webpages was inconsistent, often lacking, and inaccessible. NCI-designated Cancer Centers are role models for cancer research in the United States and have an obligation to provide survivorship information. Changes to content and website design are needed to provide better information for individuals seeking resources and health information relative to their cancer and care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:护士越来越需要以更少的资源达到黄金护理标准。因此,有效地应对日常工作生活中遇到的压力至关重要。这项研究基于需求资源和个人效果(DRIVE)护士模型,并采用了以人为中心的方法,其目标有两个:1。确定护士为应对压力而采用的应对策略模式(以问题为中心;寻求建议;自责;一意孤行;逃避/回避);2.探索感知需求(努力)的潜在差异,资源(奖励,作业控制,社会支持),和精神病理学症状(焦虑,恐惧-焦虑,强迫症,躯体化,抑郁症,人际关系敏感,敌意,精神病,偏执的想法)根据出现的模式。
    方法:本横断面研究采用STROBE检查表进行报告。总的来说,265名护理专业人员完成了自我报告措施。采用非分层k均值聚类分析来得出应对模式。MANOVA被用来测试需求的差异,资源,和精神病理症状根据出现的模式。
    结果:确定了三种稳定且有意义的应对方式,并将其标记为主动/面向解决方案,失调/情绪集中,和被动/脱离。与属于主动/面向解决方案组的护士相比,属于失调/以情绪为中心组的护士出现了更高的风险(更高的努力/精神病理学痛苦;更低的资源)-其次是被动/脱离组。
    结论:培养护士对其潜在应对方式的认识,并支持积极的方法/情绪调节策略进行压力管理,应成为定义干预措施促进护士在医疗环境内/外健康的关键目标。
    BACKGROUND: Nurses are increasingly demanded to achieve gold-standards of care with fewer resources. Dealing effectively with stress experienced in their daily-work-life is thus crucial. This study is based on the Demands-Resources-and-Individual-Effects (DRIVE) Nurses Model and applied the person-centred approach with a twofold objective: 1. to identify patterns of coping strategies (Problem-Focused; Seek-Advice; Self-Blame; Wishful-Thinking; Escape/Avoidance) adopted by nurses to deal with perceived stress; 2. to explore potential differences in perceived Demands (Effort), Resources (Rewards, Job-Control, Social-Support), and Psychopathological Symptoms (Anxiety, Phobic-Anxiety, Obsessive-Compulsive, Somatization, Depression, Interpersonal-Sensitivity, Hostility, Psychoticism, Paranoid-Ideation) according to the emerged patterns.
    METHODS: This cross-sectional study was reported by using the STROBE Checklist. Overall, 265 nursing professionals completed self-report measures. Non-hierarchical k-means-cluster-analysis was employed to derive patterns of coping. MANOVAs were used to test differences in Demands, Resources, and Psychopathological Symptoms according to the emerged patterns.
    RESULTS: Three stable and meaningful patterns of coping were identified and labelled as Active/Solution-Oriented, Dysregulated/Emotion-focused, and Passive/Disengaged. Nurses belonging to Dysregulated/Emotion-focused group emerged to be at higher risk (higher effort/psychopathological suffering; lower resources) - followed by Passive/Disengaged group - in comparison with nurses belonging to Active/Solution-Oriented group.
    CONCLUSIONS: Fostering nurses\' awareness of their latent coping patterns and supporting active approaches/emotional regulation strategies for stress management should represent a key goal when defining interventions promoting nurses\' health within/beyond the healthcare settings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:加强工作场所的沟通和支持流程,使残疾人能够维持就业和重返工作岗位是工人的优先事项,雇主,和社区利益相关者。这项研究的目的是评估一种解决支持挑战的新资源,工作需求和住宿计划工具(JDAPT),并评估其用途,相关性,以及9个月随访期间的结果。
    方法:使用有目的的抽样方法招募具有身体和心理健康/认知状况导致工作受限的工人。在线调查是在基线时进行的(在使用JDAPT之前),以及基线后三个月和九个月。收集了有关人口统计的信息(例如,年龄,性别)和工作特征(例如,就业部门,组织规模)。结果包括评估JDAPT的使用和相关性,和自我效能感的变化,工作效率困难,就业问题,工作需求的困难,和旷工。
    结果:基线参与者为269名工人(66%为女性;平均年龄41岁),其中188名(69.9%)完成了所有三波数据收集。许多工人报告在工作内外使用JDAPT策略,并对工具的可用性持有积极的看法,相关性,和乐于助人。自我效能感(时间1-2;时间1-3)显着改善,感知的工作效率,和缺勤,在自我效能感和生产力方面具有中等到较大的效应大小(0.46至0.78)。不同性别的调查结果是一致的,年龄,健康状况,和工作上下文变量。
    结论:JDAPT可以增强支持提供,并为工作场所残疾实践提供更大的透明度和一致性,这对于创造更具包容性和更容易获得的就业机会至关重要。
    OBJECTIVE: Enhancing workplace communication and support processes to enable individuals living with disabilities to sustain employment and return to work is a priority for workers, employers, and community stakeholders. The objective of this study was to evaluate a new resource that addresses support challenges, the Job Demands and Accommodation Planning Tool (JDAPT), and assess its use, relevance, and outcomes over a nine-month follow-up period.
    METHODS: Workers with physical and mental health/cognitive conditions causing limitations at work were recruited using purposive sampling. Online surveys were administered at baseline (prior to using the JDAPT), and at three and nine months post-baseline. Information was collected on demographics (e.g., age, gender) and work characteristics (e.g., job sector, organization size). Outcomes included assessing JDAPT use and relevance, and changes in self-efficacy, work productivity difficulties, employment concerns, difficulties with job demands, and absenteeism.
    RESULTS: Baseline participants were 269 workers (66% women; mean age 41 years) of whom 188 (69.9%) completed all three waves of data collection. Many workers reported using JDAPT strategies at and outside of work, and held positive perceptions of the tool\'s usability, relevance, and helpfulness. There were significant improvements (Time 1-2; Time 1-3) in self-efficacy, perceived work productivity, and absenteeism with moderate to large effect sizes in self-efficacy and productivity (0.46 to 0.78). Findings were consistent across gender, age, health condition, and work context variables.
    CONCLUSIONS: The JDAPT can enhance support provision and provide greater transparency and consistency to workplace disability practices, which is critical to creating more inclusive and accessible employment opportunities.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究确定了与可用资源相关的农村社区经验和偏好及其对龙卷风和洪水后压力的影响。
    农村自然灾害压力和恢复调查于2021年12月至2022年2月在农村受灾社区进行了分发。在代表农业和非农业职业的自我选择参与者的分析样本(N=159)中,125对资源使用和效果调查部分做出了回应,该部分评估了22种资源对灾后压力的影响。其他定性问题提供了进一步的数据。
    发现灾难后最常用的资源正在谈论该事件(98.3%),朋友和邻居(97.6%)和家庭(97.6%)。使用派生的每次使用影响得分,来自邻近社区的团体和个人信仰活动最常减少压力。增加压力的资源被确定为FEMA或其他政府组织;修复,替换,或重建财产;并关注新闻或社交媒体。参与者报告说,来自社区的帮助(35.8%)或他们为自己做的事情(31.2%)最有效地减轻了灾难压力。家庭,朋友,信仰,邻居,和社区是在未来灾难中减轻压力的首选。
    农村居民确定了减轻灾害压力的可用资源,但是发现一些常见的灾后活动会增加压力。农村应急管理应调整应对和恢复计划和活动,以利用随时可以接触的人,groups,以及减轻负面心理和情绪健康影响的活动。
    UNASSIGNED: This study identified rural community experiences and preferences related to available resources and their effects on stress following tornadoes and floods.
    UNASSIGNED: The Rural Natural Disaster Stress and Recovery survey was distributed from December 2021 to February 2022 in rural disaster-affected communities. Within the analysis sample (N = 159) of self-selected participants representing both agricultural and non-agricultural occupations, 125 responded to the Resource Use and Effect survey component that evaluated the effects of 22 resources on post-disaster stress. Additional qualitative questions provided further data.
    UNASSIGNED: The most frequently used resources post-disaster were found to be talking about the event (98.3%), friends and neighbors (97.6%) and family (97.6%). Using a derived Impact per Use score, groups from the neighboring community and personal faith activities most often reduced stress. Resources that increased stress were identified as FEMA or other government organizations; repairing, replacing, or rebuilding property; and following news or social media. Participants reported help from their community (35.8%) or things they did for themselves (31.2%) most effectively decreased disaster stress. Family, friends, faith, neighbors, and community were top choices to decrease stress in a future disaster.
    UNASSIGNED: Rural residents identified available resources for reducing disaster stress, but some common post-disaster activities were found to increase stress. Rural emergency management should adapt response and recovery plans and activities to leverage readily accessible people, groups, and activities to mitigate negative mental and emotional health effects.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    从个人资源到行政员工承诺的激励过程仍然很少研究。本文使用工作需求-资源模型来研究公共雇员中个人资源的倍增效应和以目标为导向的氛围如何影响他们的工作满意度和参与度。具体来说,它提出了一个模型,其中心理资本对敬业度的影响由工作满意度介导,并由目标导向氛围调节。
    西班牙公共行政部门的行政人员共有326名员工回答了自我报告的调查。采用偏最小二乘-结构方程模型(PLS-SEM)方法评价数据的有效性和可靠性,还有,来检验所提出的假设。
    SEM结果显示心理资本对员工敬业度的积极影响,以及工作满意度在这种关系中的中介作用。此外,以目标为导向的氛围的存在对心理资本与工作满意度之间的关系产生了负面影响,降低调解效果。
    这些发现为未来在必要调整人力资源政策以改善公共管理背景下的激励过程方面的研究打开了新的大门。
    UNASSIGNED: The motivation process from personal resources to commitment of administrative employees is still little studied. This article uses the Job Demands-Resources model to investigate how the multiplicative effect of personal resources and a goal-oriented climate among public employees influences their satisfaction and engagement at work. Specifically, it proposes a model where the influence of psychological capital on engagement is mediated by job satisfaction and moderated by the goal orientation climate.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 326 employees of the administrative staff of a Spanish Public Administration answered a self-reported survey. Partial Least Square-Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) approach was used to evaluate the validity and reliability of the data, as well as, to test the hypotheses formulated.
    UNASSIGNED: The SEM results show the positive impact of psychological capital on employee engagement, and the mediating role of job satisfaction in this relationship. Furthermore, the existence of a goal-oriented climate negatively moderated the relationship between Psychological Capital and Job Satisfaction, reducing the mediation effect.
    UNASSIGNED: These findings open new doors for future research in the necessary adaptation of human resource policies to improve the motivation process in the public administration context.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:该研究的目的是评估州动物卫生官员(SAHOs)在管理马疾病暴发时面临的挑战。
    方法:进行了一项调查,以评估SAHOs与马主和执业兽医的合作,以提供生物安全和感染疾病控制。它被发送到马病传播中心网站数据库中列出的180个电子邮件地址。每个问题的每个类别的答复都以百分比列出并报告。
    结果:有来自45个州的72个调查答复。答复的州数量表明,结果代表了SAHO的当前观点。50%的受访者认为缺乏马健康管理和马可报告疾病预防和控制的资源和培训。在管理疾病暴发方面缺乏所有者的合规性,和寄宿马厩,马表演,和赛车设施需要最多资源进行爆发管理。调查显示,现场沟通是管理疫情最有效的方法,马病传播中心将成为警报和疾病信息的宝贵资源。
    结论:在州一级,缺乏有效管理马传染病暴发所需的人员和资源。此外,兽医和主人未能遵守报告和管理马传染病会导致疾病传播。
    结论:缺乏足够的资源来管理可报告的疾病可能会导致疾病的传播,并对马的健康和马业产生负面影响。
    OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to assess the challenges faced by state animal health officials (SAHOs) when managing equine disease outbreaks.
    METHODS: A survey was conducted to assess SAHOs\' collaboration with horse owners and practicing veterinarians to provide biosecurity and infection disease control. It was sent to 180 email addresses listed in the Equine Disease Communication Center website database. The responses in each category for each question were tabulated and reported as a percentage.
    RESULTS: There were 72 survey responses from 45 states. The number of states responding suggested that the results represent SAHOs\' current opinions. Fifty percent of responders identified the lack of resources and training for equine health management and equine reportable disease prevention and control. There is a lack of owner compliance in managing disease outbreaks, and boarding stables, horse shows, and racing facilities require the most resources for outbreak management. The survey indicated on-site communication as the most effective for managing an outbreak, and the Equine Disease Communication Center is to be a valued resource for alerts and disease information.
    CONCLUSIONS: At the state level, there is a lack of needed personnel and resources to effectively manage an equine infectious disease outbreak. Furthermore, failure of veterinary and owner compliance in reporting and managing equine infectious diseases allows disease spread.
    CONCLUSIONS: Lack of sufficient resources for management of reportable diseases will potentially result in disease spread with a negative impact on horse health and the equine industry.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肝细胞癌是常见的消化道恶性肿瘤之一。由于其发病率高,严重威胁患者的生命,强大的入侵,转移,和预后。目前,预防和治疗HCC的主要方法包括药物治疗,手术,干预,但患者经常遇到特定的不良反应或副作用。许多中药可以改善肝功能,多靶点的作用方式,降低肝癌复发,在肝癌的治疗中具有独特的优势,多途径,多组分,多层次。倍半萜,一类广泛存在于自然界中并具有良好抗肿瘤活性的天然产物,其中许多具有很好的治疗肝癌的潜力。本文综述了其抗肿瘤活性,自然资源,天然倍半萜类化合物抗肝癌的药理机制,为HCC的预防和治疗提供理论依据,并全面了解其开发新的临床药物的潜力。
    Hepatocellular carcinoma is one of the common malignant tumors of digestive tract, which seriously threatens the life of patients due to its high incidence rate, strong invasion, metastasis, and prognosis. At present, the main methods for preventing and treating HCC include medication, surgery, and intervention, but patients frequently encounter with specific adverse reactions or side effects. Many Traditional Chinese medicine can improve liver function, reduce liver cancer recurrence and have unique advantages in the treatment of HCC because of their acting mode of multi-target, multi-pathway, multi-component, and multi-level. Sesquiterpenoids, a class of natural products which are widely present in nature and exhibit good anti-tumor activity, and many of them possess good potential for the treatment of HCC. This article reviewed the anti-tumor activities, natural resources, pharmacological mechanism of natural sesquiterpenoids against HCC, providing the theoretical basis for the prevention and treatment of HCC and a comprehensive understanding of their potential for development of new clinical drugs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    先前的大流行研究集中在提供直接患者护理的医生和护士上。关于非护士/医师临床医生和非临床医疗保健专业人员的经验的文献很少。
    观测,在三个时间点进行了横断面研究,以检查COVID-19对临床和非临床医疗保健专业人员的影响(n=464).
    在不同的调查波中,遇险没有显著差异,除了愤怒(p=.046)。工作类型之间的困扰评分没有显着差异。多元线性回归结果各不相同。威胁和中断计划得分都是困扰的重要预测因素。在所有三波浪潮中,医疗保健提供者(HCP)可用的资源均未得到充分利用。
    医疗保健专业人员的痛苦随着暴露而增加。整合员工的自我护理资源可以减轻影响并保持健康的工作环境。
    职业卫生提供者在发展机会以满足工作场所卫生保健专业人员的需求时,应将这些发现纳入其中。
    UNASSIGNED: Prior pandemic research has focused on physicians and nurses who provide direct patient care. Literature on the experiences of nonnurse/physician clinicians and nonclinical health care professionals is sparse.
    UNASSIGNED: An observational, cross-sectional study was conducted over threetime points to examine the impact of COVID-19 on clinical and nonclinical healthcare professionals (n = 464).
    UNASSIGNED: There were no significant differences in distress across survey waves, except for anger (p = .046). No significant differences in distress scores were found between job types. Multiple linear regression results varied. Both the threat and interrupted plans scores were significant predictors of distress. Resources available to healthcare providers (HCPs) were underutilized in all three waves.
    UNASSIGNED: Healthcare professionals\' distress increases with exposure. Integrating self-care resources for staff may mitigate the impact and maintain a healthy work environment.
    UNASSIGNED: Occupational health providers should incorporate these findings when developing opportunities to address the needs of health care professionals in the workplace.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:炎性风湿性疾病(IRD)的诊断通常由于非特异性症状和风湿病学家的短缺而延迟。数字诊断决策支持系统(DDSS)有可能加快诊断,并帮助患者更有效地导航医疗保健系统。
    目的:本研究的目的是评估基于移动人工智能(AI)的症状检查程序(Ada)和基于网络的自我转诊工具(Rheport)对IRD的诊断准确性。
    方法:前瞻性,多中心,开放标签,我们对新到3个风湿病中心就诊的患者进行了交叉随机对照试验.参与者被随机分配使用Ada或Rheport完成症状评估。主要结果是DDSS对IRD的正确识别,定义为Ada建议的诊断列表中存在任何IRD或Rheport达到预定阈值评分。金标准是风湿病学家做出的诊断。
    结果:共纳入600例患者,其中214人(35.7%)被诊断为IRD。最常见的IRD是类风湿性关节炎,有69例(11.5%)患者。Rheport的疾病建议和Ada的前1(D1)和前5(D5)疾病建议显示,总体诊断准确率为52%,63%,58%,分别,用于IRDs。Rheport对IRD的敏感性为62%,特异性为47%。Ada的D1和D5疾病建议的敏感性分别为52%和66%,分别,特异性为68%和54%,分别,关于IRD。Ada关于个体诊断的诊断准确性是异质性的,与其他诊断相比,Ada在识别类风湿性关节炎方面的表现明显更好(D1:42%;D5:64%)。Rheport对任何风湿性疾病诊断与AdaD1的一致性的Cohenκ统计为0.15(95%CI0.08-0.18),与AdaD5为0.08(95%CI0.00-0.16),表明2个DDSS之间存在任何风湿性疾病的一致性较差。
    结论:据我们所知,这是与患者实际使用DDSS的最大比较性DDSS试验.在这种高患病率患者人群中,两种DDSS对IRD的诊断准确性都没有希望。DDSS可能导致滥用稀缺的医疗保健资源。我们的结果强调了需要严格的监管和重大改进,以确保DDSS的安全性和有效性。
    背景:德国临床试验注册DRKS00017642;https://drks。de/search/en/trial/DRKS00017642.
    BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRDs) is often delayed due to unspecific symptoms and a shortage of rheumatologists. Digital diagnostic decision support systems (DDSSs) have the potential to expedite diagnosis and help patients navigate the health care system more efficiently.
    OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of a mobile artificial intelligence (AI)-based symptom checker (Ada) and a web-based self-referral tool (Rheport) regarding IRDs.
    METHODS: A prospective, multicenter, open-label, crossover randomized controlled trial was conducted with patients newly presenting to 3 rheumatology centers. Participants were randomly assigned to complete a symptom assessment using either Ada or Rheport. The primary outcome was the correct identification of IRDs by the DDSSs, defined as the presence of any IRD in the list of suggested diagnoses by Ada or achieving a prespecified threshold score with Rheport. The gold standard was the diagnosis made by rheumatologists.
    RESULTS: A total of 600 patients were included, among whom 214 (35.7%) were diagnosed with an IRD. Most frequent IRD was rheumatoid arthritis with 69 (11.5%) patients. Rheport\'s disease suggestion and Ada\'s top 1 (D1) and top 5 (D5) disease suggestions demonstrated overall diagnostic accuracies of 52%, 63%, and 58%, respectively, for IRDs. Rheport showed a sensitivity of 62% and a specificity of 47% for IRDs. Ada\'s D1 and D5 disease suggestions showed a sensitivity of 52% and 66%, respectively, and a specificity of 68% and 54%, respectively, concerning IRDs. Ada\'s diagnostic accuracy regarding individual diagnoses was heterogenous, and Ada performed considerably better in identifying rheumatoid arthritis in comparison to other diagnoses (D1: 42%; D5: 64%). The Cohen κ statistic of Rheport for agreement on any rheumatic disease diagnosis with Ada D1 was 0.15 (95% CI 0.08-0.18) and with Ada D5 was 0.08 (95% CI 0.00-0.16), indicating poor agreement for the presence of any rheumatic disease between the 2 DDSSs.
    CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the largest comparative DDSS trial with actual use of DDSSs by patients. The diagnostic accuracies of both DDSSs for IRDs were not promising in this high-prevalence patient population. DDSSs may lead to a misuse of scarce health care resources. Our results underscore the need for stringent regulation and drastic improvements to ensure the safety and efficacy of DDSSs.
    BACKGROUND: German Register of Clinical Trials DRKS00017642; https://drks.de/search/en/trial/DRKS00017642.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:2020年,安大略省卫生部(MoH),加拿大,引入了虚拟紧急护理(VUC)试点计划,以提供其他紧急护理服务,并减少对低视力健康问题患者进行急诊(ED)就诊的需求。
    目的:本研究旨在从MoH的角度比较与VUC和现场ED接触相关的30天费用。
    方法:使用安大略省(加拿大人口最多的省份)的行政数据,以人口为基础,对2020年12月至2021年9月使用VUC服务的安大略省人进行了配对队列研究.正如预期的那样,VUC和现场ED用户会有所不同,定义了两组VUC使用者:(1)由VUC提供者立即转诊至ED,随后在72小时内就诊的患者(这些患者与有任何出院处置的现场ED使用者相匹配)和(2)由VUC提供者看到的患者,没有转诊至现场ED(这些患者与亲自就诊并由ED医师出院的患者相匹配).使用Bootstrap技术从MoH的角度比较了VUC的30天平均成本(建立VUC计划的运营成本加上医疗保健支出)与现场ED护理(医疗保健支出)。所有费用均以加拿大元表示(适用1加元=0.76美元的货币汇率)。
    结果:我们匹配了2129名在VUC转诊后72小时内出现ED的患者和14,179名VUC提供者未转诊ED的患者。我们的匹配人群代表99%(2129/2150)的合格VUC患者由其VUC提供者转诊至ED,而98%(14,179/14,498)的合格VUC患者未由其VUC提供者转诊至ED。与匹配的人ED患者相比,在VUC转诊后72小时内出现ED的VUC患者队列中,每位患者的30天费用明显较高(2805美元vs2299美元;差异为506美元,95%CI$139-885),而在VUC队列中,不需要ED转诊的患者中,每位患者的30天费用明显较低(907美元vs1270美元;差异为362美元,95%CI284-446美元)。总的来说,与2个VUC队列相关的30天绝对费用为1890万美元(即,600万美元+1290万美元),而2个面对面的ED队列为2290万美元(490万美元+1800万美元)。
    结论:此成本评估支持VUC的使用,因为大多数投诉在未转诊ED的情况下得到解决。未来的研究应该评估VUC的目标应用(例如,由执业护士或医师助理领导的VUC模型,并得到ED医师的支持),以告知未来的资源分配和政策决定。
    BACKGROUND: In 2020, the Ministry of Health (MoH) in Ontario, Canada, introduced a virtual urgent care (VUC) pilot program to provide alternative access to urgent care services and reduce the need for in-person emergency department (ED) visits for patients with low acuity health concerns.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aims to compare the 30-day costs associated with VUC and in-person ED encounters from an MoH perspective.
    METHODS: Using administrative data from Ontario (the most populous province of Canada), a population-based, matched cohort study of Ontarians who used VUC services from December 2020 to September 2021 was conducted. As it was expected that VUC and in-person ED users would be different, two cohorts of VUC users were defined: (1) those who were promptly referred to an ED by a VUC provider and subsequently presented to an ED within 72 hours (these patients were matched to in-person ED users with any discharge disposition) and (2) those seen by a VUC provider with no referral to an in-person ED (these patients were matched to patients who presented in-person to the ED and were discharged home by the ED physician). Bootstrap techniques were used to compare the 30-day mean costs of VUC (operational costs to set up the VUC program plus health care expenditures) versus in-person ED care (health care expenditures) from an MoH perspective. All costs are expressed in Canadian dollars (a currency exchange rate of CAD $1=US $0.76 is applicable).
    RESULTS: We matched 2129 patients who presented to an ED within 72 hours of VUC referral and 14,179 patients seen by a VUC provider without a referral to an ED. Our matched populations represented 99% (2129/2150) of eligible VUC patients referred to the ED by their VUC provider and 98% (14,179/14,498) of eligible VUC patients not referred to the ED by their VUC provider. Compared to matched in-person ED patients, 30-day costs per patient were significantly higher for the cohort of VUC patients who presented to an ED within 72 hours of VUC referral ($2805 vs $2299; difference of $506, 95% CI $139-$885) and significantly lower for the VUC cohort of patients who did not require ED referral ($907 vs $1270; difference of $362, 95% CI 284-$446). Overall, the absolute 30-day costs associated with the 2 VUC cohorts were $18.9 million (ie, $6.0 million + $12.9 million) versus $22.9 million ($4.9 million + $18.0 million) for the 2 in-person ED cohorts.
    CONCLUSIONS: This costing evaluation supports the use of VUC as most complaints were addressed without referral to ED. Future research should evaluate targeted applications of VUC (eg, VUC models led by nurse practitioners or physician assistants with support from ED physicians) to inform future resource allocation and policy decisions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号