residency programs

居住计划
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:牙科居民在他们苛刻的项目中经历了很高的压力,基于性别的骚扰/歧视会导致他们的压力。目标是比较压力,满意,经历过性骚扰和观察到歧视妇女的牙科研究生课程与高,中等,和低比例的女性,并探索这些感兴趣的结构之间的关系。
    方法:请注意,112儿科牙科(PD),44个口腔修复,56名口腔颌面外科(OMS)居民对一项调查做出了回应。
    结果:PD居民的个人生活相关压力最低(4分量表,4=非常压力:PD=2.99/P=3.67/OMS=3.56;p<0.001),与教师相关的压力(2.68/3.66/3.03;p<0.001),缺乏信心相关的压力(2.79/3.31/2.96;p<0.01)和学业压力(2.65/3.24/3.02;p<0.001),而口腔修复居民的压力水平最高。OMS居民经历性骚扰的平均频率最高,PD居民最低(5分制,1=从不:1.15/2.62/2.74;p<0.001)。PD居民观察到最少,OMS居民观察到的女性居民由于性别而受到其他居民的积极对待(1.59/2.57/3.00;p<0.001)。口腔修复科居民的工作满意度得分最低(5分量表,1=最低满意度:4.12/3.14/4.20;p<0.001)。男性和女性居民遭受性骚扰的频率越高,他们的个人生活压力越高,与教师相关的压力,缺乏信心相关的压力,和学术压力,他们的职业满意度越低,专业内容满意度,和压力相关的满意度。妇女观察到的基于性别的歧视的频率与较高的压力和较低的满意度有关。虽然男性的这些观察频率与压力无关,但与满意度增加有关。
    结论:牙科居民的压力,职业满意度,经历过性骚扰,和观察到的歧视女性居民取决于牙科专业计划。男性和女性居民都报告说,他们经历性骚扰越多,压力越大,满意度越低。女性对女性的歧视越多,压力越大,他们越不满意。对于男人来说,这些观察的频率与压力无关,但与满意度增加呈正相关。
    OBJECTIVE: Dental residents experience high stress in their demanding programs and gender-based harassment/discrimination can contribute to their stress. The objectives were to compare stress, satisfaction, experienced sexual harassment and observed discrimination of women in dental graduate programs with high, medium, and low percentages of women and to explore relationships between these constructs of interest.
    METHODS: Note that, 112 pediatric dentistry (PD), 44 prosthodontics, and 56 oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMS) residents responded to a survey.
    RESULTS: PD residents had the lowest personal life-related stress (4-point scale with 4 = very stressful: PD = 2.99/P = 3.67/OMS = 3.56; p < 0.001), faculty-related stress (2.68/3.66/3.03; p < 0.001), lack of confidence-related stress (2.79/3.31/2.96; p < 0.01) and academic stress (2.65/3.24/3.02; p < 0.001), while prosthodontics residents had the highest stress levels. The average frequency of experiencing sexual harassment was highest for OMS residents and lowest for PD residents (5-point scale with 1 = never: 1.15/2.62/2.74; p < 0.001). PD residents observed least and OMS residents most frequently that female residents were treated less positively by other residents because of their gender (1.59/2.57/3.00; p < 0.001). Prosthodontics residents had the lowest job satisfaction score (5-point scale with 1 = lowest satisfaction: 4.12/3.14/4.20; p < 0.001). The more frequently male and female residents experienced sexual harassment, the higher their personal life-related stress, faculty-related stress, lack of confidence-related stress, and academic stress, and the lower their career satisfaction, specialty content satisfaction, and stress-related satisfaction. Women\'s frequencies of observed gender-based discrimination were associated with higher stress and lower satisfaction, while men\'s frequencies of these observations were not associated with stress, but associated with increased satisfaction.
    CONCLUSIONS: Dental residents\' stress, career satisfaction, experienced sexual harassment, and observed discrimination of women residents differ depending on the dental specialty program. Both male and female residents report more stress and less satisfaction the more they experience sexual harassment. The more women observe discrimination of women, the more stressed and the less satisfied they are. For men, the frequencies of these observations are not associated with stress, but positively associated with increased satisfaction.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:越来越多的居留申请给申请人和居留计划带来了挑战,以评估他们在居留申请和匹配过程中是否适合。申请人在评估计划时面临有限或冲突的信息,导致过度使用。对居留申请进行全面审查被认为是项目的黄金标准,但是当前的数量和相关的时间限制使程序依赖于数字过滤器,这并不能预测成功的居住权。申请人可以从居留申请过程中提高透明度中受益。
    目的:本研究旨在确定申请人在决定申请地点时从居留计划中发现的最有益的信息,按医学院教育背景的类型划分。
    方法:Match2023申请者通过Twitter和Instagram社交媒体平台自愿完成了一项匿名调查。我们要求受访者从多项选择列表中选择3个主要因素,以确定他们希望从居住计划中获得哪些信息,以帮助确定其应用程序的特征是否与计划价值相符。我们使用ANOVA检查了由医学院背景选择的有用因素的差异。
    结果:有4649名受访者。当通过美国同种疗法(US-MD)分析反应时,骨病医学博士(DO),和国际医学研究生(IMG)的教育背景,受访者选择了不同的因素作为最有帮助的因素:最低美国医学执照考试(USMLE)或综合整骨疗法医学执照考试(COMLEX)第2步得分(565/3042,18.57%美国医学博士;485/3042,15.9%DO;1992/3042,65.48%IMG;P<.001),居民家乡地区(281/1132,24.82%美国-MD;189/1132,16.7%DO;和662/1132,58.48%IMG;P=.02),住院医师医学院地区(476/2179,22%美国医学博士;250/2179,11.5%DO;1453/2179,66.7%IMG;P=0.002),以及在医学中代表性不足的居民或就诊百分比(417/1815,22.98%美国医学博士;158/1815,8.71%DO;和1240/1815,68.32%IMG;P<.001)。
    结论:申请居留计划时,这项研究发现,受访者认为最有帮助的因素,从程序中决定在哪里应用不同的教育背景。在所有教育团体中,受访者希望标准化考试成绩透明,地理,以及居民和出席者的种族或族裔背景。
    BACKGROUND: Increasing numbers of residency applications create challenges for applicants and residency programs to assess if they are a good fit during the residency application and match process. Applicants face limited or conflicting information as they assess programs, leading to overapplying. A holistic review of residency applications is considered a gold standard for programs, but the current volumes and associated time constraints leave programs relying on numerical filters, which do not predict success in residency. Applicants could benefit from increased transparency in the residency application process.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aims to determine the information applicants find most beneficial from residency programs when deciding where to apply, by type of medical school education background.
    METHODS: Match 2023 applicants voluntarily completed an anonymous survey through the Twitter and Instagram social media platforms. We asked the respondents to select 3 top factors from a multiple-choice list of what information they would like from residency programs to help determine if the characteristics of their application align with program values. We examined differences in helpful factors selected by medical school backgrounds using ANOVA.
    RESULTS: There were 4649 survey respondents. When responses were analyzed by United States-allopathic (US-MD), doctor of osteopathic medicine (DO), and international medical graduate (IMG) educational backgrounds, respondents chose different factors as most helpful: minimum United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) or Comprehensive Osteopathic Medical Licensing Examination (COMLEX) Step 2 scores (565/3042, 18.57% US-MD; 485/3042, 15.9% DO; and 1992/3042, 65.48% IMG; P<.001), resident hometown region (281/1132, 24.82% US-MD; 189/1132, 16.7% DO; and 662/1132, 58.48% IMG; P=.02), resident medical school region (476/2179, 22% US-MD; 250/2179, 11.5% DO; and 1453/2179, 66.7% IMG; P=.002), and percent of residents or attendings underrepresented in medicine (417/1815, 22.98% US-MD; 158/1815, 8.71% DO; and 1240/1815, 68.32% IMG; P<.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: When applying to residency programs, this study found that the factors that respondents consider most helpful from programs in deciding where to apply differ by educational background. Across all educational groups, respondents want transparency around standardized exam scores, geography, and the racial or ethnic backgrounds of residents and attendings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:GPT-4的可靠性,GPT-4是专门研究临床推理和医学知识的最先进的扩展语言模型,在非英语语言中仍未得到验证。
    目的:本研究旨在通过使用普通医学培训考试(GM-ITE)比较日本居民和GPT-4之间的基本临床能力。
    方法:我们使用OpenAI提供的GPT-4模型和2020年,2021年和2022年的GM-ITE考试试题进行了比较分析。这项分析的重点是评估与GPT-4相比,即将结束居住第二年的个人的表现。鉴于GPT-4目前的能力,我们的研究只包括单项选择题,不包括那些涉及音频的,视频,或图像数据。评估包括4个类别:一般理论(专业和医学面试),症状学和临床推理,体检和临床程序,具体的疾病。此外,我们将问题分为7个专业领域和3个难度级别,这是根据居民的正确反应率确定的。
    结果:在检查了137个日语GM-ITE问题后,GPT-4得分显著高于居民平均得分(居民:55.8%,GPT-4:70.1%;P<.001)。就具体学科而言,GPT-4在“特定疾病”中得分高23.5分,“妇产科高出30.9分,“和26.1点在内科。“相比之下,GPT-4在“医学面试和专业性”方面的得分,\"\"一般做法,“和”精神病学“低于居民,尽管这种差异没有统计学意义.在根据问题难度分析分数后,GPT-4分数对于容易的问题(P=.007)低17.2分,但对于正常和困难的问题高25.4分和24.4分,分别(P<.001)。在同比比较中,在2020年(P=0.01)和2022年(P=0.003)考试中,GPT-4得分分别高出21.7和21.5分,分别,但在2021年的考试中仅高出3.5分(没有显着差异)。
    结论:在日语中,GPT-4在GM-ITE测试中的表现也优于普通医疗居民,最初是为他们设计的。具体来说,GPT-4在居民正确应答率低的难题和要求对疾病有更全面了解的难题上表现出得分较高的趋势。然而,GPT-4在居民可以轻易回答的问题上得分相对较低,比如测试对病人的态度和专业精神,以及那些需要理解上下文和沟通的人。这些发现凸显了人工智能在医学教育和实践中的优势和局限性。
    BACKGROUND: The reliability of GPT-4, a state-of-the-art expansive language model specializing in clinical reasoning and medical knowledge, remains largely unverified across non-English languages.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aims to compare fundamental clinical competencies between Japanese residents and GPT-4 by using the General Medicine In-Training Examination (GM-ITE).
    METHODS: We used the GPT-4 model provided by OpenAI and the GM-ITE examination questions for the years 2020, 2021, and 2022 to conduct a comparative analysis. This analysis focused on evaluating the performance of individuals who were concluding their second year of residency in comparison to that of GPT-4. Given the current abilities of GPT-4, our study included only single-choice exam questions, excluding those involving audio, video, or image data. The assessment included 4 categories: general theory (professionalism and medical interviewing), symptomatology and clinical reasoning, physical examinations and clinical procedures, and specific diseases. Additionally, we categorized the questions into 7 specialty fields and 3 levels of difficulty, which were determined based on residents\' correct response rates.
    RESULTS: Upon examination of 137 GM-ITE questions in Japanese, GPT-4 scores were significantly higher than the mean scores of residents (residents: 55.8%, GPT-4: 70.1%; P<.001). In terms of specific disciplines, GPT-4 scored 23.5 points higher in the \"specific diseases,\" 30.9 points higher in \"obstetrics and gynecology,\" and 26.1 points higher in \"internal medicine.\" In contrast, GPT-4 scores in \"medical interviewing and professionalism,\" \"general practice,\" and \"psychiatry\" were lower than those of the residents, although this discrepancy was not statistically significant. Upon analyzing scores based on question difficulty, GPT-4 scores were 17.2 points lower for easy problems (P=.007) but were 25.4 and 24.4 points higher for normal and difficult problems, respectively (P<.001). In year-on-year comparisons, GPT-4 scores were 21.7 and 21.5 points higher in the 2020 (P=.01) and 2022 (P=.003) examinations, respectively, but only 3.5 points higher in the 2021 examinations (no significant difference).
    CONCLUSIONS: In the Japanese language, GPT-4 also outperformed the average medical residents in the GM-ITE test, originally designed for them. Specifically, GPT-4 demonstrated a tendency to score higher on difficult questions with low resident correct response rates and those demanding a more comprehensive understanding of diseases. However, GPT-4 scored comparatively lower on questions that residents could readily answer, such as those testing attitudes toward patients and professionalism, as well as those necessitating an understanding of context and communication. These findings highlight the strengths and limitations of artificial intelligence applications in medical education and practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    美国的核医学(NM)正在经历人力短缺,而且这种情况正在稳步恶化。这在很大程度上源于训练有素的NM医生的生产不足。在世界其他地方是不同的,其中NM是独立的专业,培训更加严格。提出了三个建议来帮助扭转这种情况:(1)停止培训不足的放射科医生练习NM;(2)加强NM培训计划;(3)告知医学生在NM的职业机会。如果我们什么都不做,世界其他地区将继续前进,把我们留在后面.
    Nuclear medicine (NM) in the United States is experiencing a manpower shortage that is steadily getting worse. It largely derives from inadequate production of well-trained NM physicians. It is different in the rest of the world, where NM is an independent specialty and training is more rigorous. Three suggestions are offered to help reverse the situation: (1) stop radiologists with inadequate training from practicing NM; (2) strengthen NM training programs; and (3) inform medical students of career opportunities in NM. If we do nothing, the rest of the world will move forward, leaving us behind.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:导师制在外科学员和教职员工的职业发展中起着至关重要的作用。随着外科劳动力的不断多样化,指导不同的学员)种族,种族,原产国,社会经济地位,教育背景,宗教,性别,性取向或能力)可能对导师和受训者的体验构成挑战。
    目的:本手稿的目的是向外科教育者介绍受训者面临的系统性障碍以及有效指导的模型。
    方法:在2022年APDS会议上,召集了一个小组,以强调当前在针对外科教育工作者的差异和有效模式进行指导方面的挑战。本文突出并扩展了本小组的总结。
    结果:描述了新型指导模型的示例。
    结论:承认障碍,实施深思熟虑的指导策略,与国家外科组织和外科部门和教师的合作可能有助于减少医生的流失。
    Mentorship plays a critical role in the career development of surgical trainees and faculty. As the surgical workforce continues to diversify, mentoring trainees who differ) race, ethnicity, country of origin, socioeconomic status, educational background, religion, gender, sexual orientation or ability) can pose challenges to the experience for both mentor and mentee.
    The aim of this manuscript is to introduce surgical educators to the systemic barriers faced by trainees and to models of effective mentorship.
    At the 2022 APDS Meeting, a panel convened to highlight the current challenges of mentoring across differences and effective models for surgical educators. This paper highlights and expands the summary of this panel.
    Examples of novel mentoring models are described.
    Acknowledgment of barriers, Implementation of deliberate mentoring strategies, and collaboration with national surgical organizations and surgery departments and faculty may help to reduce physician attrition.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    有证据的数据可以帮助学生匹配到有竞争力的居住计划指导课外活动,课外活动,和居住职业选择。我们旨在研究申请竞争性手术住院医师的学生的特征,并确定匹配成功的预测因素。我们确定了2020年国家居民匹配计划报告中列出的外科亚专业的五个最低匹配率,以将外科住院医师定义为具有竞争力。我们分析了来自115所美国医学院的关于2017年至2020年申请数据的数据库。使用多水平逻辑回归来确定匹配的预测因子。统计学显著性设定为p<0.05。共有1,448名医学生提交了25,549份申请。五个最具竞争力的专业包括整形外科(N=172),耳鼻喉科(N=342),神经外科手术(N=163),血管手术(N=52),骨科手术(N=679),和胸外科手术(N=40)。我们发现有地理联系的医学生(调整后的OR,1.65[95%CI,1.41至1.93]),和在申请课程中进行客场轮换的学生(调整后的OR,3.22[95%CI,2.75至3.78])在统计学上显着增加了匹配进入竞争性外科专业的几率。此外,我们发现,美国医师资格考试(USMLE)第1步得分低于230,第2步临床知识(CK)得分低于240的学生,如果在所申请的课程中完成了轮换,则匹配的几率会增加.在面试后,完成与机构的轮换和地理联系可能比学术标准更有助于选择具有竞争力的外科住院医师。这一发现可能是由于这些高绩效医学生之间的学术标准差异较小。由于轮换的经济负担,资源有限的学生申请有竞争力的外科专业可能处于不利地位。
    Evidence-informed data may help students matching into competitive residency programs guide curricular activities, extracurricular activities, and residency career choices. We aimed to examine the characteristics of students applying to competitive surgical residencies and identify predictors of matching success. We identified the five lowest match rates for the surgical subspecialities listed in the 2020 National Resident Matching Program report to define a surgical residency as competitive. We analyzed a database from 115 United States medical schools regarding application data from 2017 to 2020. Multilevel logistic regression was used to determine predictors of matching. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.A total of 1,448 medical students submitted 25,549 applications. The five most competitive specialties included were plastic surgery (N = 172), otolaryngology (N = 342), neurological surgery (N = 163), vascular surgery (N = 52), orthopedic surgery (N = 679), and thoracic surgery (N = 40). We found that medical students with a geographical connection (adjusted OR, 1.65 [95% CI, 1.41 to 1.93]), and students who did an away rotation at the applied program (adjusted OR, 3.22 [95% CI, 2.75 to 3.78]) had statistically significantly increased odds of matching into a competitive surgical specialty. Furthermore, we found that students with a United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 score below 230 and Step 2 Clinical Knowledge (CK) score below 240 had increased odds of matching if they completed an away rotation at the applied program. Completing an away rotation and geographical connection to the institution may contribute more than academic criteria for selection into a competitive surgical residency after an interview. This finding may be due to less variation in academic criteria among this pool of high-performing medical students. Students with limited resources who apply to a competitive surgical specialty may be at a disadvantage given the financial burden of an away rotation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:本研究旨在评估学生对法医学概念的了解以及他们对意大利大学医学和外科学位课程中教授的课程的看法。因此,该研究旨在评估该课程对学生选择住院医师的知识和态度的影响。
    方法:一项横断面研究是通过一项匿名的基于网络的调查对CattolicadelSacroCuore大学的医学生进行的。进行描述性和单变量分析。
    结果:1166名学生完成了调查。法医学课程在提供法医学基本概念的培训方面似乎极为重要,尤其是职业责任,防御医学,和法医病理学。在课程中,进行尸检很重要,他们的数量应该超过十个。此外,单因素分析表明,学生对法医学主题的认识,比如法医的功能,职业责任,和防御医学,在课程的第五或第六年提高。课程结束后,更多的学生会选择追求非临床和非手术的专业,特别是法医学,他们的居住权。
    结论:法医学课程的任务是确定法医的职责和责任,为未来的医生提供不可或缺的工具,不管他们未来的专业,限制了防御性医学的使用。总之,我们建议进一步进行多中心研究,以评估本科法医学课程对学生和实践质量的作用和直接影响。
    BACKGROUND: This study aims to assess students\' knowledge of forensic medicine concepts and their opinions regarding the course taught during the degree course in Medicine and Surgery in an Italian university. Consequently, the study aims to assess the impact of the course on the students\' knowledge and attitude in choosing a medical residency.
    METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted through an anonymous web-based survey of medical students at the Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore. Descriptive and univariate analysis were conducted.
    RESULTS: 1166 students completed the survey. The forensic medicine course appears to be extremely important in providing training in the fundamental concepts of forensic medicine, especially professional liability, defensive medicine, and forensic pathology. Attending autopsies is important during the course, and their number should be more than ten. Additionally, univariate analysis demonstrates that students\' awareness of forensic medicine topics, such as the function of the forensic physicians, professional liability, and defensive medicine, improves in the fifth or sixth year of the course. After the course, more students would choose to pursue a nonclinical and nonsurgical specialty, and forensic medicine specifically, for their residency.
    CONCLUSIONS: The forensic medicine course has the task of defining the duties and responsibilities of forensic physicians, providing indispensable tools for future medical practitioners, regardless of their future specialisation, and limiting the increasing use of defensive medicine. In conclusion, we recommend further multicenter studies to evaluate the role and direct effect of undergraduate forensic medicine courses on students and on the quality of practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Doximity已集成到居留申请过程中,没有任何明显的优点,比较基于声誉和研究的方案。我们的研究旨在收集项目主管和酋长/主席对Doximity排名系统的看法,并评估一个更好的系统可能需要什么。
    向177名项目主管和整形外科住院医师项目的主任/主席发送了一份16个问题的调查。问题涵盖三个类别:(1)人口统计信息;(2)Doximity排名感知;(3)输入更好的工具的特征。对反应进行统计分析。
    收到93份问卷(53%)。29名(31%)受访者代表东北部的项目,23(25%)南,20(21%)中西部,和21(23%)西部。73名(79%)受访者为男性,16名(17%)为女性。90%的受访者(n=84)认为Doximity排名不准确,所有这些都表明他们的机构应该排名更高。在项目地理和排名满意度之间没有观察到显著关联(p=0.75)。只有33%(n=31)的受访者知道Doximity方法。大多数受访者(95%;n=88)不建议医学生使用Doximity。大多数参与者(87%;n=81)愿意共享常驻案例日志以告知未来的工具。“技术培训/准备强度”被列为最重要的培训计划素质。
    这项计划领导力调查的结果表明,对Doximity系统的不满和缺乏了解。在考虑未来的步骤时,计划领导支持基于实力的分类系统和共享案例日志,以指导学生的决策。
    Doximity has become integrated into the residency application process without any clear merit, comparing programs based on reputation and research. Our study aims to gather program directors\' and Chiefs/Chairs\' perspectives on the Doximity ranking system and to assess what a better system might entail.
    A 16-question survey was sent to 177 program directors and Chief/Chairs of plastic surgery residency programs. The questions covered three categories: (1) demographic information; (2) Doximity ranking perceptions; (3) input on characteristics of a better tool. The responses were statistically analyzed.
    Ninety-three questionnaires were received (53%). Twenty-nine (31%) respondents represented programs in the Northeast, 23 (25%) South, 20 (21%) Midwest, and 21 (23%) West. Seventy-three (79%) respondents were male and 16 (17%) female. 90% of respondents (n = 84) believe Doximity rankings are not accurate, all indicating their institution should be ranked higher. No significant association between program geography and ranking satisfaction was observed (p = 0.75). Only 33% (n = 31) of respondents were aware of Doximity methodology. Most respondents (95%; n = 88) do not recommend the use of Doximity to medical students. Most participants (87%; n = 81) are willing to share resident case logs to inform a future tool. \"Strength of technical training/preparedness\" was ranked most highly as important training program qualities.
    The results of this program leadership survey show dissatisfaction with and a lack of understanding of the Doximity system. When considering future steps, program leadership support a strength-based categorization system and sharing case logs to guide student decision-making.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景技术居留计划网站是潜在申请人在申请计划时广泛使用的重要资源。我们研究的目的是使用既定标准评估加拿大麻醉学住院医师计划网站上可用的计划内容,并确定任何需要改进的地方。方法在这项横断面研究中,我们评估了认可的麻醉学住院医师培训计划网站上可用的内容,在2021年7月至8月之间,使用以下领域提供的54条标准:招聘;教师;居民;教育和研究;临床工作;激励;健康;和环境。网站得分使用描述性统计进行分析,并以中位数(四分位数间距)表示,百分比(%),和范围。结果我们确定了17个具有公开功能网站的程序。总的来说,居住计划符合54个网站标准中的28个(四分位距:18-36个)(51.9%)。教育和研究是住院医师课程中得分最高的领域(达到标准的中位数为77.8%),而居民信息和激励措施最低(14.3%)。结论加拿大麻醉学住院医师计划网站包括与潜在申请人相关的许多领域的信息,包括教育和研究。然而,大多数网站需要教师信息的改进和内容更新,居民信息,激励机制,健康,和环境。
    Background Residency program websites are an important resource widely used by prospective applicants when applying to programs. The objectives of our study were to evaluate the program content available on Canadian anesthesiology residency program websites using established criteria and identify any areas for improvement.  Methods In this cross-sectional study, we evaluated the content available on accredited anesthesiology residency training program websites, between July and August 2021, using 54 criteria provided in the following domains: recruitment; faculty; residents; education and research; clinical work; incentives; wellness; and environment. Website scores were analyzed using descriptive statistics and presented as median (interquartile range), percentage (%), and range. Results We identified 17 programs with publicly available functional websites. Overall, residency programs met a median of 28 (interquartile range: 18-36) website criteria out of 54 (51.9%). Education and research was the highest-scoring domain among residency programs (median 77.8% of criteria met), while resident information and incentives were the lowest (14.3%). Conclusion Canadian anesthesiology residency program websites include information on many domains relevant to prospective applicants, including education and research. However, most websites require improvement and content updates for faculty information, resident information, incentives, wellness, and environment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号