rescue therapy

抢救治疗
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本综述旨在评估免疫球蛋白轻链(AL)淀粉样变性复发/难治性患者接受预先达雷木单抗为基础的治疗方案。
    结果:AL淀粉样变性的治疗前景已经发生了根本性的变化,这要归功于daratumumab与硼替佐米的联合使用,环磷酰胺和地塞米松(DaraCyBorD)改善患者预后,增加血液和器官反应率。然而,许多患者最终复发或对达雷妥单抗无效,最佳的挽救治疗尚未明确.在这场比赛中,我们回顾了daratumumab失败后可用的治疗选择,我们着眼于目前Bcl-2抑制剂的进展,新型免疫治疗剂,如嵌合抗原受体(CAR-T)治疗和双特异性抗体(bsAbs)。复发/难治性AL淀粉样变性代表未满足的临床需求,新的靶向药物需要紧急前瞻性评估。
    OBJECTIVE: This review aims to assess the therapeutic strategies available for relapsed/refractory patients with immunoglobulin light chain (AL) amyloidosis who received upfront daratumumab-based regimens.
    RESULTS: The treatment landscape of AL amyloidosis has changed radically thanks to the introduction in the upfront setting of daratumumab in combination with bortezomib, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone (DaraCyBorD) which improved patients\' outcomes increasing the rate of hematologic and organ responses. However, many patients eventually relapse or are refractory to daratumumab and the best salvage therapy is not well defined yet. In this contest, we reviewed the available therapeutic options after daratumumab failure, and we look towards the current advances in Bcl-2 inhibitors, novel immunotherapeutic agents as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR-T) therapy and bispecific antibodies (bsAbs). Relapsed/refractory AL amyloidosis represent an unmet clinical need and novel targeted drugs require urgent prospective assessment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    地西泮是一种基石的即时使用的抗癫痫治疗,可以延长癫痫患者癫痫发作之间的持续时间。然而,由于缺乏合适的临床前模型,我们对间歇性抢救治疗对疾病进展的机制理解受到限制.具体来说,地西泮的药代动力学在人类和实验动物之间差异很大。这里,我们在大鼠中开发了一种新的重复挽救疗法给药模式,以维持在人类中观察到的延长的治疗浓度.大鼠接受了三个剂量的地西泮,间隔1小时(0.75、1.5或3mg/kg,腹膜内);最后一次给药后10分钟和1、3或6小时收集血浆和大脑。血浆和脑浓度遵循剂量依赖性增加,重复3mg/kg范例(180ng/mL)后的峰值浓度相当于地西泮鼻喷雾剂人体研究中观察到的血浆水平。在这种范例中,脑血浆比增加表明地西泮在大脑中的积累可能在作用部位起长效作用。总的来说,我们重复地西泮给药模式模拟了在人类中看到的药物浓度和积累,提供了一种临床前工具来研究苯二氮卓类药物抢救治疗对啮齿动物癫痫模型中癫痫发作集群生物学的影响。简单语言总结:还有更多关于地西泮如何在24小时内仅在两次或更多次癫痫发作时使用它的人的大脑中发挥作用(这被称为癫痫发作集群)。动物的伦理研究可用于了解体内药物的更多信息。在这项研究中,我们发现,在大鼠体内服用三剂地西泮给人的药物量与一剂相同。我们现在可以测试患有癫痫的大鼠,看看这种药物如何在需要癫痫发作时服用的人身上起作用。
    Diazepam is a cornerstone immediate-use antiseizure rescue therapy that may extend the duration between seizure clusters in people living with epilepsy. However, our mechanistic understanding of intermittent rescue therapy on disease progression is limited by the lack of suitable preclinical models. Specifically, the pharmacokinetics of diazepam varies widely between humans and laboratory animals. Here, we developed a novel repeat rescue therapy dosing paradigm in rats to maintain prolonged therapeutic concentrations seen in humans. Rats received three diazepam doses separated by 1 h (0.75, 1.5, or 3 mg/kg, intraperitoneal); plasma and brains were collected at 10 min and 1, 3, or 6 h following the last dose. Plasma and brain concentrations followed a dose-dependent increase with peak concentrations following the repeat 3 mg/kg paradigm (180 ng/mL) being equivalent to plasma levels observed in human studies with diazepam nasal spray. Increased brain-to-plasma ratios in this paradigm indicate that diazepam accumulation in the brain may be long-acting at the site of action. Overall, our repeat diazepam dosing paradigm mimics drug concentrations and accumulation seen in humans, offering a preclinical tool to study the impact of benzodiazepine rescue therapy on seizure-cluster biology in rodent models of epilepsy. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: There is more to learn about how diazepam works in the brains of people who use it only when they have two or more seizures in 24 h (this is called a seizure cluster). Ethical studies in animals can be used to learn more about medicines in the body. In this study, we showed that three doses of diazepam in rats give about the same amount of the drug as one dose for a person. We can now test rats with epilepsy to see how the drug might work in people who take it when needed for seizure clusters.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    神经昼夜节律的影响,包括睡眠/觉醒过渡,进程(例如,荷尔蒙变化),和行为模式(例如,食用食物和口服药物),可能会影响癫痫发作模式。据报道,癫痫发作的具体昼夜节律模式取决于类型,发病位置,和严重程度;然而,关于癫痫群集患者的模式和一天中时间的抢救治疗有效性的数据有限.
    我们使用地西泮鼻喷雾剂3期安全性研究的患者日记数据进行了事后分析,适用于年龄≥6岁的癫痫患者的癫痫发作集群的急性治疗。给予患者基于年龄和体重的剂量;如果需要控制癫痫发作群,可以给予第二剂量。我们评估了癫痫发作-集群发作的时钟时间以及第二剂量的使用作为有效性的代表。记录治疗引起的不良事件。
    在早晨和深夜,癫痫发作通常最高,在傍晚和深夜最低。第二剂量的使用与一天中的特定时间并不一致。安全性与先前地西泮鼻喷雾剂研究的预期一致。
    这些结果表明,地西泮鼻喷雾剂可以在一天中的任何时间有效给药。
    UNASSIGNED: Neurologic circadian influences, including sleep/wake transitions, processes (e.g., hormonal variation), and behavioral patterns (e.g., consumption of food and oral medications), may affect seizure patterns. Specific circadian patterns of seizures have been reported depending on type, onset location, and severity; however, data on patterns for patients with seizure clusters and effectiveness of rescue therapy by time of day are limited.
    UNASSIGNED: We conducted post hoc analyses using patient diary data from the phase 3 safety study of diazepam nasal spray, which is indicated for acute treatment of seizure clusters in patients with epilepsy aged ≥6 years. Patients were administered age- and weight-based doses; second doses could be administered if needed to control a seizure cluster. We assessed clock timing of seizure-cluster onset along with second-dose use as a proxy for effectiveness. Treatment-emergent adverse events were recorded.
    UNASSIGNED: Seizure-cluster onset was observed to be generally highest during mornings and late evenings and lowest in the early evening and middle of the night. Second-dose use was not consistently associated with a specific time of day. The safety profile was consistent with that expected from previous studies of diazepam nasal spray.
    UNASSIGNED: These results suggest that diazepam nasal spray can be effectively administered at any time of day.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    SARS病毒家族的最新病毒称为急性综合征-冠状病毒-2(SARS-CoV-2),导致COVID-19疾病,于2019年底在中国确定。2020年3月,在它传播到另外29个国家之后,世界卫生组织(WHO)宣布它为大流行。SARS-CoV-2感染主要通过呼吸道开始,并引起从无症状感染到急性呼吸窘迫综合征并伴有多器官衰竭和血管麻痹性休克的广泛症状。在已研究用于治疗COVID-19的许多免疫调节和抗病毒药物中,亚甲蓝(MB)可能起着重要作用。本文回顾了MB应用程序的历史,MB对SARS-CoV-2的抗病毒作用,以及MB在COVID-19中使用的体内和体外研究结果。根据研究,由于其多种特性,MB可以同时影响SARS-CoV-2感染引起的大多数宿主的有害反应,包括抗低氧血症,抗氧化剂,免疫系统调节剂,和抗病毒。MB的使用与感染可能性的降低有关,和死亡率,可以用作保险箱,有效,便宜,和可用的治疗选择,副作用最小,可用于COVID-19的临床管理。
    The newest virus from the SARS family of viruses called acute syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), which causes COVID-19 disease, was identified in China at the end of 2019. In March 2020, after it spread to 29 additional countries, it was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO). SARS-CoV-2 infection mainly starts through the respiratory tract and causes a wide spectrum of symptoms from asymptomatic infections to acute respiratory distress syndrome with multi-organ failure and vasoplegic shock. Among the many immunomodulatory and antiviral drugs that have been studied for the treatment of COVID-19, methylene blue (MB) may play an influential role. This article reviews the history of MB applications, the antiviral effects of MB against SARS-CoV-2, and the results of in vivo and in vitro studies of the use of MB in COVID-19. Based on studies, MB can simultaneously affect most of the host\'s harmful responses caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection due to its multiple properties, including anti-hypoxemia, anti-oxidant, immune system modulator, and antiviral. The use of MB is associated with a reduction in the possibility of getting infection, and mortality, and can be used as a safe, effective, cheap, and available treatment option with minimal side effects for the clinical management of COVID-19.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    SARS病毒家族的最新病毒称为急性综合征-冠状病毒-2(SARS-CoV-2),导致COVID-19疾病,于2019年底在中国确定。2020年3月,在它传播到另外29个国家之后,世界卫生组织(WHO)宣布它为大流行。SARS-CoV-2感染主要通过呼吸道开始,并引起从无症状感染到急性呼吸窘迫综合征并伴有多器官衰竭和血管麻痹性休克的广泛症状。在已研究用于治疗COVID-19的许多免疫调节和抗病毒药物中,亚甲蓝(MB)可能起着重要作用。本文回顾了MB应用程序的历史,MB对SARS-CoV-2的抗病毒作用,以及MB在COVID-19中使用的体内和体外研究结果。根据研究,由于其多种特性,MB可以同时影响SARS-CoV-2感染引起的大多数宿主的有害反应,包括抗低氧血症,抗氧化剂,免疫系统调节剂,和抗病毒。MB的使用与感染可能性的降低有关,和死亡率,可以用作保险箱,有效,便宜,和可用的治疗选择,副作用最小,可用于COVID-19的临床管理。
    The newest virus from the SARS family of viruses called acute syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), which causes COVID-19 disease, was identified in China at the end of 2019. In March 2020, after it spread to 29 additional countries, it was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO). SARS-CoV-2 infection mainly starts through the respiratory tract and causes a wide spectrum of symptoms from asymptomatic infections to acute respiratory distress syndrome with multi-organ failure and vasoplegic shock. Among the many immunomodulatory and antiviral drugs that have been studied for the treatment of COVID-19, methylene blue (MB) may play an influential role. This article reviews the history of MB applications, the antiviral effects of MB against SARS-CoV-2, and the results of in vivo and in vitro studies of the use of MB in COVID-19. Based on studies, MB can simultaneously affect most of the host\'s harmful responses caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection due to its multiple properties, including anti-hypoxemia, anti-oxidant, immune system modulator, and antiviral. The use of MB is associated with a reduction in the possibility of getting infection, and mortality, and can be used as a safe, effective, cheap, and available treatment option with minimal side effects for the clinical management of COVID-19.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:描述安全性,并发症,需要住院治疗英夫利昔单抗治疗急性克罗恩病(CD)发作的患者需要紧急手术。
    背景:英夫利昔单抗越来越多地用于急性重症溃疡性结肠炎住院患者的抢救治疗;然而,对因CD耀斑住院患者的最佳管理仍不清楚.
    方法:对2008年至2020年收治的18岁以上急性克罗恩病发作患者进行单机构回顾性研究,需要进行抢救英夫利昔单抗治疗。结果包括术后和药物相关的并发症以及紧急手术的需要。
    结果:52例患者被纳入分析;8%的患者在入院时需要手术,19%的患者在英夫利昔单抗治疗90天内需要手术治疗.术后并发症包括吻合口瘘1例,3浅表伤口感染,3延长肠梗阻,1例泌尿系感染。输注英夫利昔单抗无不良反应,医疗并发症发生率低。穿透性疾病患者在英夫利昔单抗治疗90天内更有可能接受手术(43%vs8%;P=.01)。与未接受治疗的患者相比,在治疗后90天内接受手术的患者的平均LOS更长(13.4天vs8.3天,P=.04)。
    结论:除了标准的类固醇治疗外,住院抢救英夫利昔单抗对于治疗急性克罗恩病发作是安全的。大多数因克罗恩病发作而住院的患者需要抢救英夫利昔单抗避免了手术,术后并发症和药物相关并发症较低。需要更多的研究来阐明最佳的抢救英夫利昔单抗治疗剂量。
    OBJECTIVE: Describe the safety, complications, and need for urgent surgery in patients requiring inpatient rescue infliximab for acute Crohn\'s disease (CD) flare.
    BACKGROUND: Infliximab is increasingly used for patients hospitalized with acute severe ulcerative colitis as rescue therapy; however, optimal management for patients hospitalized for CD flares remains unclear.
    METHODS: A single-institution retrospective study of patients aged 18+ admitted from 2008 to 2020 with acute Crohn\'s flare requiring induction of rescue infliximab therapy. Outcomes included postoperative and medication-related complications and need for urgent surgery.
    RESULTS: 52 patients were included in analysis; 8% required surgery on index admission, and 19% required surgery within 90 days of infliximab. Postoperative complications included 1 anastomotic leak, 3 superficial wound infections, 3 prolonged ileus, and 1 urinary infection. There were no adverse reactions to infliximab infusion, and medical complication rates were low. Patients with penetrating disease were more likely to undergo surgery within 90 days of infliximab (43% vs 8%; P = .01). Mean LOS was longer for patients undergoing surgery within 90 days of therapy compared to those who did not (13.4 vs 8.3 days, P = .04).
    CONCLUSIONS: Inpatient rescue infliximab is safe for treating acute Crohn\'s disease flare in addition to standard steroid therapy. The majority of patients hospitalized with Crohn\'s flare requiring rescue infliximab avoided surgery with low postoperative and medication-related complications. More research is needed to clarify the optimal rescue infliximab therapy dosage.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    Yu等人在《世界胃肠病学杂志》(2023年)上的研究介绍了沃诺拉赞-阿莫西林双重疗法联合布拉氏酵母菌(S.boulardii)用于针对幽门螺杆菌(H.pylori),引起消化性溃疡和胃癌的病原体。沃诺拉赞是一种钾竞争性酸阻滞剂,以其快速和持久的酸抑制作用而闻名。受进餐时间的影响最小。与质子泵抑制剂相比,不可逆地与H+/K+-ATP酶泵中的半胱氨酸残基结合,Vonoprazan与K+离子竞争,防止离子与泵结合并阻止酸分泌。对抗生素耐药性增加的担忧,对肠道微生物群的影响,患者依从性,和副作用导致幽门螺杆菌双重治疗方案的出现。先前的研究表明,布拉氏链球菌在稳定肠屏障中发挥作用,从而提高幽门螺杆菌的根除率。具有可接受的安全性,无论以前的治疗失败和抗生素耐药性如何,双重辅助方案都是有效的,从而加强在临床环境中的适用性。尽管如此,布拉氏链球菌有各种配方和剂量,有必要进一步探索抢救治疗中补充的最佳剂量。此外,较大,随机化,有必要进行双盲对照试验以证实这些有希望的结果.
    Yu et al\'s study in the World Journal of Gastroenterology (2023) introduced a novel regimen of Vonoprazan-amoxicillin dual therapy combined with Saccharomyces boulardii (S. boulardii) for the rescue therapy against Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori), a pathogen responsible for peptic ulcers and gastric cancer. Vonoprazan is a potassium-competitive acid blocker renowned for its rapid and long-lasting acid suppression, which is minimally affected by mealtime. Compared to proton pump inhibitors, which bind irreversibly to cysteine residues in the H+/K+-ATPase pump, Vonoprazan competes with the K+ ions, prevents the ions from binding to the pump and blocks acid secretion. Concerns with increasing antibiotic resistance, effects on the gut microbiota, patient compliance, and side effects have led to the advent of a dual regimen for H. pylori. Previous studies suggested that S. boulardii plays a role in stabilizing the gut barrier which improves H. pylori eradication rate. With an acceptable safety profile, the dual-adjunct regimen was effective regardless of prior treatment failure and antibiotic resistance profile, thereby strengthening the applicability in clinical settings. Nonetheless, S. boulardii comes in various formulations and dosages, warranting further exploration into the optimal dosage for supplementation in rescue therapy. Additionally, larger, randomized, double-blinded controlled trials are warranted to confirm these promising results.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:炎症性肠病是一种慢性,复发,和缓解炎症性疾病,尽管在药物治疗方面取得了进展,但通常需要住院治疗,以静脉注射皮质类固醇治疗急性耀斑。许多患者对皮质类固醇无反应,需要英夫利昔单抗或环孢素作为抢救治疗。如果药物治疗失败,需要明确的手术管理。最近,Janus激酶抑制剂,包括upadacitinib,已被提议作为替代抢救疗法。
    目的:我们假设upadacitinib可能有效治疗急性重度结肠炎。
    方法:对接受upadacitinib诱导治疗的12例因急性重度结肠炎入院的炎症性肠病患者进行回顾性分析。手术率,重复或长期使用类固醇,并在住院90天内再次入院。需要用upadacitinib重新诱导,改变药物治疗,临床缓解率,梅奥6分部分得分的变化,和实验室炎症标志物作为次要结局.
    结果:5例患者达到了主要复合终点,其中4例需要手术治疗,另外1例患者在出院后90天内不能停用类固醇。一名患者需要在90天内使用upadacitinib重新诱导,90天内没有患者需要改变药物治疗。大多数未接受手术的患者在90天内临床缓解,并显示出临床改善,部分Mayo评分降低了6分。
    结论:Upadacitinib可能是治疗急性重度结肠炎的有效挽救性治疗,但需要更大的对照试验来验证这些结果.
    BACKGROUND: Inflammatory bowel disease is a chronic, relapsing, and remitting inflammatory disorder that despite advances in medical therapy often requires hospitalization for treatment of acute flares with intravenous corticosteroids. Many patients will not respond to corticosteroids and require infliximab or cyclosporine as rescue therapy. If medical therapy fails, definitive surgical management is required. Recently, Janus Kinase inhibitors, including upadacitinib, have been proposed as an alternative rescue therapy.
    OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that upadacitinib may be effective in treating acute severe colitis.
    METHODS: A retrospective review of 12 inflammatory bowel disease patients admitted for acute severe colitis who received upadacitinib induction therapy was performed. The rates of surgery, repeat or prolonged steroid use, and re-admission within 90 days of index hospitalization were measured. The need for re-induction with upadacitinib, change in medical therapy, rates of clinical remission, change in 6-point partial Mayo score, and laboratory markers of inflammation were measured as secondary outcomes.
    RESULTS: Five patients met the primary composite endpoint including four patients requiring surgery and one additional patient being unable to withdraw steroids within 90 days of hospital discharge. One patient required re-induction with upadacitinib within 90 days and no patients required change in medical therapy within 90 days. Most patients who did not undergo surgery were in clinical remission within 90 days and showed clinical improvement with decreased 6-point partial Mayo scores.
    CONCLUSIONS: Upadacitinib may be effective salvage therapy for acute severe colitis, but larger controlled trials are required to validate these results.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    急性重度溃疡性结肠炎(ASUC)是危及生命的并发症之一,发生在五分之一的溃疡性结肠炎(UC)患者中,发病率很高,估计死亡率高达1%。ASUC没有经过验证的临床评分系统。静脉注射皮质类固醇仍然是ASUC患者管理的基石。1/3的患者是激素难治性患者,在前生物时代需要结肠切除术或在后生物时代需要挽救治疗.目前可用的对类固醇和挽救疗法无反应的预测因子是次优的。此外,有必要为ASUC患者制定明确的结局指标.尽管英夫利昔单抗和环孢菌素都是有效的挽救治疗,他们仍然有一定的治疗失败率。因此,在结肠切除术前探索替代治疗方案的需求尚未得到满足,特别是在既往英夫利昔单抗暴露的患者中.这可能包括引入快速起效的小分子作为补救或序贯疗法,以及在与环孢菌素“桥接”后使用缓慢起效的其他生物疗法。在这篇文章中,我们探讨了当前最佳的循证实践,并详细说明了ASUC管理中的知识差距.
    Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is one of life-threatening complications that occur in one-fifth of ulcerative colitis (UC) patients with significant morbidity and an estimated mortality rate up to 1%. There are no validated clinical scoring systems for ASUC. Intravenous corticosteroids remain the cornerstone for the management of ASUC patients However, one-third of patients are steroid refractory and require colectomy in the pre-biologic era or salvage therapy in the post-biologic era. The currently available predictors of non-response to steroids and salvages therapy are sub-optimal. Furthermore, there is a need for the development of clear outcome measures for ASUC patients. Although infliximab and cyclosporin are both effective as salvage therapy, they still carry a rate of treatment failure. Hence, there is an unmet need to explore alternative therapeutic options before colectomy particularly in prior infliximab-exposed patients. This may include the introduction of small molecules with rapid onset of action as a salvage or sequential therapy and the use of slow-onset other biological therapy after \"bridging\" with cyclosporine. In this article, we explore the current best evidence-based practice and detail the gaps in knowledge in the management of ASUC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial, Phase III
    目的:癫痫发作需要及时的药物治疗,以尽量减少进展为癫痫持续状态的可能,增加医疗保健使用,以及对日常生活的干扰。孤立性癫痫发作可能表现出周期性模式,包括昼夜节律和更长的节奏。然而,对癫痫发作群中的周期性模式知之甚少。这种事后分析的数据来自长期,阶段3,开放标签,地西泮鼻喷雾剂的重复剂量安全性研究模拟了治疗的癫痫发作集群的周期性。
    方法:混合效应余弦分析评估昼夜节律,和使用12和24小时的单组分余弦用于计算余弦参数(例如,节奏的中线统计,波浪安培,andacrophase[peak]).对完整队列和一致队列的参与者进行了分析,这些参与者在四个中的每一个中都有两个或更多个癫痫发作集群,3个月期间。还分析了癫痫类型对cosinor参数的影响。
    结果:在24小时内绘制的癫痫发作簇事件显示出双峰分布,顶相(峰)在〜06:30和〜18:30。12小时的图显示在~06:30有一个单峰。Cosinor分析了完整且一致的队列,两种模型的顶体期均可在24小时量表上的〜23:30和12小时量表上的〜07:30预测癫痫发作活动的峰值。一致的队列与基线和峰值癫痫发作簇活动的增加有关。按癫痫类型进行的分析确定了不同的趋势。局灶性癫痫组的癫痫发作群在晚上达到高峰(顶期19:19),而全身性癫痫组的事件在早晨达到高峰(顶期04:46)。它们共同构成了在24小时内观察到的双峰聚类。
    结论:对使用地西泮鼻喷雾剂治疗的癫痫群集的分析显示,癫痫群集在12小时和24小时的时间范围内周期性发生,与孤立性癫痫的报告相似。进一步阐明这些模式可能为患者护理提供重要信息,从改善以患者为中心的结果到癫痫发作群集预测。
    OBJECTIVE: Seizure clusters require prompt medical treatment to minimize possible progression to status epilepticus, increased health care use, and disruptions to daily life. Isolated seizures may exhibit cyclical patterns, including circadian and longer rhythms. However, little is known about the cyclical patterns in seizure clusters. This post hoc analysis of data from a long-term, phase 3, open-label, repeat-dose safety study of diazepam nasal spray modeled the periodicity of treated seizure clusters.
    METHODS: Mixed-effects cosinor analysis evaluated circadian rhythmicity, and single component cosinors using 12 and 24 h were used to calculate cosinor parameters (e.g., midline statistic of rhythm, wave ampitude, and acrophase [peak]). Analysis was completed for the full cohort and a consistent cohort of participants with two or more seizure clusters in each of four, 3-month periods. The influence of epilepsy type on cosinor parameters was also analyzed.
    RESULTS: Seizure-cluster events plotted across 24 h showed a bimodal distribution with acrophases (peaks) at ~06:30 and ~18:30. A 12-h plot showed a single peak at ~06:30. Cosinor analyses of the full and consistent cohort aligned, with acrophases for both models predicting peak seizure activity at ~23:30 on a 24-h scale and ~07:30 on a 12-h scale. The consistent cohort was associated with increases in baseline and peak seizure-cluster activity. Analysis by epilepsy type identified distinct trends. Seizure clusters in the focal epilepsy group peaked in the evening (acrophase 19:19), whereas events in the generalized epilepsy group peaked in the morning (acrophase 04:46). Together they compose the bimodal clustering observed over 24 h.
    CONCLUSIONS: This analysis of seizure clusters treated with diazepam nasal spray demonstrated that seizure clusters occur cyclically in 12- and 24-h time frames similar to that reported with isolated seizures. Further elucidation of these patterns may provide important information for patient care, ranging from improved patient-centered outcomes to seizure-cluster prediction.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号