quality of recovery

回收质量
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    多模式镇痛在增强术后恢复中起着关键作用。在这里,我们描述了一项研究羟考酮与羟考酮的作用的试验方案。基于舒芬太尼的患者自控镇痛联合腰方肌阻滞(QLB)与腹横肌平面阻滞(TAPB)对腹腔镜胃肠大手术后恢复质量的影响。
    和分析:这是一个前瞻性的,随机化,2×2阶乘设计的对照临床试验。共有120名接受腹腔镜胃肠大手术的成人患者将被随机分配,以1:1:1:1的比例,接受两种患者自控镇痛方案之一(基于羟考酮或舒芬太尼)和两种区域阻滞方案之一(QLB或TAPB)。该试验的主要结果指标是手术后24小时的恢复质量,使用15项恢复质量(QoR-15)量表进行评估。次要结局包括术后48小时和72小时的QoR-15评分;术后1、6、24和48小时休息和咳嗽时的内脏和切口疼痛;术后0-24小时和24-48小时内的镇痛剂消耗;需要抢救镇痛;术后肛门排气时间;术后不良事件(镇静,恶心和呕吐,使用止吐药,呼吸抑制,和头晕);以及术后住院时间。
    该试验的结果将为最佳的多模式镇痛策略提供证据,以提高接受腹腔镜胃肠大手术的患者的恢复质量。
    该试验已在中国临床试验注册中心注册(www。chictr.org.cn,标识符:ChiCTR2400080766)。
    UNASSIGNED: Multimodal analgesia plays a key role in enhanced recovery after surgery. Herein, we describe a trial protocol investigating the effects of oxycodone-vs. sufentanil-based patient-controlled analgesia in combination with quadratus lumborum block (QLB) vs. transverse abdominis plane block (TAPB) on quality of recovery following major laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery.
    UNASSIGNED: and analysis: This is a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial with a 2 × 2 factorial design. A total of 120 adult patients undergoing laparoscopic major gastrointestinal surgery will be randomized, in a 1:1:1:1 ratio, to receive one of two patient-controlled analgesia regimens (based on oxycodone or sufentanil) and one of two regional blocks (QLB or TAPB). The primary outcome measure of this trial is the quality of recovery at 24 h after surgery, assessed using the 15-item quality of recovery (QoR-15) scale. The secondary outcomes include QoR-15 scores at 48 and 72 h after surgery; visceral and incisional pain at rest and while coughing at 1, 6, 24 and 48 h postoperatively; analgesic consumption within 0-24 h and 24-48 h postoperatively; need for rescue analgesia; postoperative flatus time; postoperative adverse events (sedation, nausea and vomiting, use of antiemetics, respiratory depression, and dizziness); and length of postoperative hospital stay.
    UNASSIGNED: The results of this trial will provide evidence for the optimal multimodal analgesic strategy to improve the quality of recovery for patients undergoing laparoscopic major gastrointestinal surgery.
    UNASSIGNED: This trial was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (www.chictr.org.cn, identifier: ChiCTR2400080766).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:右美托咪定(Dex)作为神经阻滞手术的局部麻醉佐剂可以提高患者的恢复质量。然而,目前尚不清楚使用Dex作为局部麻醉辅助治疗锯齿肌前平面阻滞(SAPB)手术对接受耳部重建术的儿童恢复质量的影响.
    方法:84例自体肋软骨(ACC)耳部重建患者随机分为两组(n=42/组),其中SAPB单用罗哌卡因(R组)和Dex和罗哌卡因(DR组)。主要结果是手术后第1天和第2天的患者15项恢复质量(QoR-15)量表评分。次要结果包括术后休息和咳嗽数字评定量表(NRS)胸痛评分,镇痛持续时间,口服救护镇痛药的用法,和阿片类药物相关的副作用。
    结果:每组40名患者完成研究。DR组术后第1天和第2天的QoR-15评分相对于R组显著增加(126.35±9.81vs.115.53±8.58和131.78±8.67vs.122.80±8.59,均P<0.001)。DR组术后2、4、8、12、24h休息和咳嗽NRS胸痛评分均显著低于R组(均P<0.05)。DR组的镇痛时间也明显延长(P<0.001),口服救护镇痛药使用率和阿片类药物相关副作用发生率显著降低(均P<0.05)。
    结论:将Dex和罗哌卡因联合应用于ACC耳部重建术儿童的SAPB可显著提高恢复质量,镇痛质量,和镇痛持续时间。
    BACKGROUND: Dexmedetomidine (Dex) as a local anesthesia adjuvant for nerve block procedures can improve the quality of patient recovery. However, the impact of using Dex as a local anesthetic adjuvant for serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) procedures on recovery quality for children undergoing ear reconstruction remains unclear.
    METHODS: Eighty-four patients who underwent ear reconstruction with autogenous costal cartilage (ACC) were randomized into two groups (n = 42/group) in which SAPB was performed with ropivacaine alone (R group) and with Dex and ropivacaine (DR group). Primary outcomes were patient 15-item quality of recovery (QoR-15) scale scores on days 1 and 2 post-surgery. Secondary outcomes included postoperative rest and coughing numerical rating scale (NRS) chest pain scores, duration of analgesia, oral rescue analgesic usage, and opioid-related side effects.
    RESULTS: Forty patients per group completed the study. QoR-15 scores on days 1 and 2 post-surgery in the DR group were significantly increased relative to the R group (126.35 ± 9.81 vs. 115.53 ± 8.58 and 131.78 ± 8.67 vs. 122.80 ± 8.59, all P < 0.001). Rest and coughing NRS chest pain scores at 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 h postoperatively in the DR group were all significantly lower relative to the R group (all P < 0.05). The DR group also exhibited significantly longer analgesic duration (P < 0.001) and significantly reduced incidences of oral rescue analgesic usage and opioid-related side effect (all P < 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: Combining Dex and ropivacaine for SAPB in children undergoing ear reconstruction with ACC can significantly improve the quality of recovery, quality of analgesia, and analgesic duration.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    评估全身麻醉手术后瑞马唑仑和丙泊酚之间的恢复质量。
    我们在EMBASE中纳入了符合条件的随机对照试验(RCT),PubMed,CochraneCentral,Scopus,和截至2024年6月26日的WebofScience,用于比较全身麻醉后瑞马唑仑和丙泊酚的恢复质量。主要结果是术后第1天的总恢复质量-15(QoR-15)和QoR-15的五个维度(POD1)。次要结果是不良事件,POD1的恢复质量-40(QoR-40)以及术中和术后时间特征。
    13个RCT共1,305名患者纳入本荟萃分析。我们的统计分析表明,雷米咪唑坦组在POD1上的QoR-15得分较高,没有显着差异(平均差异(MD)=1.24;95%置信区间(CI),[-1.67-4.15];I2=75%;P=0.41)。在QoR-15的五个维度中,在身体独立性方面,雷米唑仑组优于丙泊酚组(MD=0.79;95%CI[0.31-1.27];I2=0%;P=0.001)。雷米唑仑组低血压发生率低于丙泊酚组(风险比(RR)=0.48;95%CI[0.40-0.59];I2=14%;P<0.00001),心动过缓(RR=0.18;95%CI[0.08-0.38];I2=0%;P<0.0001)和注射疼痛(RR=0.03;95%CI[0.01-0.12];I2=48%;P<0.00001),分别。两组术中、术后时间特征及QoR-40相似。
    我们的分析表明,雷米马唑仑组在全身麻醉后的恢复质量与丙泊酚组相似,而瑞米唑仑组的不良事件发生率较低。作为一种潜在的麻醉剂,瑞咪唑安定可替代丙泊酚用于手术全身麻醉。
    UNASSIGNED: To evaluate the recovery quality between remimazolam and propofol after general anesthesia surgery.
    UNASSIGNED: We included eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane Central, Scopus, and Web of Science up to June 26, 2024 for comparison the recovery quality of remimazolam and propofol after general anaesthesia. The primary outcomes were the total Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) and five dimensions of QoR-15 on postoperative day 1 (POD1). Secondary outcomes were adverse events, the Quality of Recovery-40 (QoR-40) on POD1, and the intraoperative and postoperative time characteristics.
    UNASSIGNED: Thirteen RCTs with a total of 1,305 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Our statistical analysis showed that remimazolam group had higher QoR-15 score on POD1, with no significant difference (Mean Difference (MD) = 1.24; 95% confidence interval (CI), [-1.67-4.15]; I2 = 75%; P = 0.41). In the five dimensions of QoR-15, remimazolam group was superior to propofol group in terms of physical independence (MD = 0.79; 95% CI [0.31-1.27]; I2 = 0%; P = 0.001). Remimazolam group was lower than propofol group in incidence of hypotension (Risk Ratio (RR) = 0.48; 95% CI [0.40-0.59]; I2 = 14%; P < 0.00001), bradycardia (RR = 0.18; 95% CI [0.08-0.38]; I2 = 0%; P < 0.0001) and injection pain (RR = 0.03; 95% CI [0.01-0.12]; I2 = 48%; P < 0.00001), respectively. The intraoperative and postoperative time characteristics and the QoR-40 were similar in the two groups.
    UNASSIGNED: Our analysis showed that the recovery quality of the remimazolam group after general anaesthesia was similar to propofol group, while the incidence of adverse events was low in remimazolam group. As a potential anesthetic, remimazolam can be used in place of propofol for surgical general anesthesia.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    OBJECTIVE: Recent studies have reported the use of the obstetric-specific quality of recovery tool (ObsQoR-10) to assess the quality of recovery in parturients after childbirth; however, the correlation between ObsQoR-10 scores and important postpartum outcomes are unclear. The primary aim of the present study was to investigate the correlations between ObsQoR-10 scores at 24 hr after Cesarean delivery and breastfeeding, depressive symptomatology, overall health, and pain at seven days postpartum.
    METHODS: We recruited parturients who underwent elective Cesarean delivery at KK Hospital in Singapore. Parturients provided responses to post-Cesarean questionnaires at 1) 24 hr (ObsQoR-10, EuroQol EQ-Visual Analogue Scale, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale), 2) 48 hr (ObsQoR-10, EQ-Visual Analogue Scale), and 3) seven days after Cesarean delivery (ObsQoR-10, Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale-Short form, EQ-Visual Analogue Scale, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, pain survey).
    RESULTS: We enrolled 222 participants, 200 (90%) of whom completed the seven-day follow-up between September 2022 and April 2023. There was limited correlation between ObsQoR-10 at 24 hr with the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (r = 0.135), EQ-Visual Analogue Scale (r = 0.158), Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale-Short form (r = 0.225), and averaged pain scores (r = -0.107) at seven days postpartum. ObsQoR-10 breastfeeding sub-score at 24 hr was weakly correlated with Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale-Short form at seven days postpartum (r = 0.307).
    CONCLUSIONS: ObsQoR-10 at 24 hr postpartum had limited correlation with breastfeeding, depressive symptomatology, overall health, and pain at seven days.
    BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT04989894 ); first submitted 4 July 2021.
    RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Des études récentes ont rapporté l’utilisation de l’outil de qualité de récupération spécifique à l’obstétrique (ObsQoR-10) pour évaluer la qualité de la récupération chez les personnes parturientes après l’accouchement; cependant, la corrélation entre les scores sur l’outil ObsQoR-10 et les devenirs post-partum importants n’est pas claire. L’objectif principal de la présente étude était d’examiner les corrélations entre les scores ObsQoR-10 obtenus 24 heures après l’accouchement par césarienne et l’allaitement, la symptomatologie dépressive, l’état de santé général et la douleur sept jours après l’accouchement. MéTHODE: Nous avons recruté des personnes parturientes qui ont bénéficié d’un accouchement par césarienne programmée à l’Hôpital KK de Singapour. Les personnes parturientes ont répondu aux questionnaires post-césarienne à 1) 24 heures (ObsQoR-10, échelle visuelle analogique EuroQol EQ-Visual Analogue Scale, Échelle de dépression postnatale d’Édimbourg), 2) 48 heures (ObsQoR-10, EQ-Visual Analogue Scale), et 3) sept jours après la césarienne (ObsQoR-10, Échelle abrégée d’auto-efficacité de l’allaitement [Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale-Short form], EQ-Visual Analogue Scale, Échelle de dépression postnatale d’Edimbourg, enquête sur la douleur). RéSULTATS: Nous avons recruté 222 participant·es, dont 200 (90 %) ont terminé le suivi de sept jours entre septembre 2022 et avril 2023. Il y avait une corrélation limitée entre l’ObsQoR-10 à 24 heures et l’Échelle de dépression postnatale d’Édimbourg (r = 0,135), l’échelle EQ-Visual Analogue Scale (r = 0,158), l’échelle d’auto-efficacité de l’allaitement maternel forme courte (r = 0,225) et les scores moyens de douleur (r = -0,107) sept jours après l’accouchement. Le sous-score d’allaitement ObsQoR-10 à 24 heures était faiblement corrélé à l’échelle d’auto-efficacité de l’allaitement maternel à sept jours après l’accouchement (r = 0,307). CONCLUSION: L’ObsQoR-10 à 24 heures après l’accouchement avait une corrélation limitée avec l’allaitement, la symptomatologie dépressive, l’état de santé général et la douleur à sept jours. ENREGISTREMENT DE L’éTUDE: ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT04989894 ); première soumission le 4 juillet 2021.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    NiEochagain及其同事报告说,在连续竖脊肌平面(ESP)阻滞导管中编程的间歇性推注和连续输注方案产生了相似的恢复质量(QoR-15)评分,疼痛评分,以及电视胸腔镜手术后救援阿片类药物的使用。对于没有使用具有编程的间歇性推注功能的泵的从业者来说,这是一个令人放心的发现。然而,根据具体的输注参数,一种方案相对于另一种方案的获益可能会有所不同,这仍然是合理的.对于优化编程的间歇推注递送和给药方案以及确定这种输注模式的最合适的临床应用仍有研究的余地。
    Ni Eochagain and colleagues report that programmed intermittent bolus and continuous infusion regimens in continuous erector spinae plane (ESP) block catheters produced similar quality of recovery (QoR-15) scores, pain scores, and use of rescue opioids after video-assisted thoracic surgery. This is a reassuring finding for practitioners without access to pumps with programmed intermittent bolus functionality. Nevertheless, it remains plausible that the benefit of one regimen over another might vary depending on the specific infusion parameters. There continues to be scope for research into optimising programmed intermittent bolus delivery and dosing regimens and identifying the most appropriate clinical applications for this mode of infusion.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本荟萃分析探讨静脉硫酸镁对术后恢复质量的影响。如使用恢复质量(QoR)问卷评估的,成人手术患者。纳入7项随机对照试验,涉及622例患者。与安慰剂相比,硫酸镁显著改善了术后第1天的整体QoR评分(标准化平均差[SMD]:1.24;95%置信区间:0.70-1.78;p<0.00001).它还增强了特定的QoR维度,对疼痛(SMD:1,p<0.00001)和身体舒适度(SMD:0.85,p<0.0001)有实质性影响,对情绪状态的中等影响(SMD:0.65,p=0.002),身体独立性(SMD:0.43,p<0.00001)和心理支持(SMD:0.37,p<0.0001)略有改善。此外,硫酸镁减少了术中阿片类药物的消耗(SMD:-0.66,p<0.0001),术后疼痛严重程度,术后恶心和呕吐的发生率(风险比:0.48,p=0.008)。拔管时间不受影响,而麻醉后监护病房的住院时间稍长.这些发现强调了硫酸镁作为多模式镇痛和增强恢复的有价值的辅助手段的潜力。未来的研究应旨在阐明最佳给药策略,管理的时机,以及可能获得最大益处的特定手术人群。
    This meta-analysis investigated the effects of intravenous magnesium sulfate on the postoperative recovery quality, as assessed using the Quality of Recovery (QoR) questionnaire, in adult surgical patients. Seven randomized controlled trials involving 622 patients were included. Compared with the placebo, magnesium sulfate significantly improved the global QoR score on postoperative day 1 (standardized mean difference [SMD]: 1.24; 95% confidence interval: 0.70-1.78; p < 0.00001). It also enhanced specific QoR dimensions, with substantial effects on pain (SMD: 1, p < 0.00001) and physical comfort (SMD: 0.85, p < 0.0001), a moderate effect on emotional state (SMD: 0.65, p = 0.002), and small improvements in physical independence (SMD: 0.43, p < 0.00001) and psychological support (SMD: 0.37, p < 0.0001). In addition, magnesium sulfate reduced the intraoperative opioid consumption (SMD: -0.66, p < 0.0001), postoperative pain severity, and the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (risk ratio: 0.48, p = 0.008). The extubation times were unaffected, whereas the post-anesthesia care unit stay was slightly prolonged. These findings highlight the potential of magnesium sulfate as a valuable adjunct for multimodal analgesia and enhanced recovery. Future studies should aim to elucidate the optimal dosing strategies, timing of administration, and specific surgical populations that may derive maximum benefits.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:患者满意度和康复质量(QoR)是重要的患者报告结果和质量指标。这两种结果之间的关系是复杂的,研究表明,在非产科人群中,它们之间的相关性较弱。我们试图评估剖腹产后产科人群患者满意度与QoR评分之间的相关性。作为次要目标,我们的目的是确定手术的紧迫性和麻醉方式对患者满意度和QoR评分的影响,以及确定满意度和不满意度的驱动因素.
    方法:在剖腹产后24h,邀请女性完成剖宫产产妇满意度量表(MSCS)和产科恢复质量评分(ObsQoR-11)问卷。使用Spearman秩检验分析相关性。使用主题内容分析对定性数据进行分析。
    结果:数据来自300名女性。ObsQoR-11与MSCS评分呈显著正相关(r=0.31,P<0.001)。麻醉方式(P<0.001)和手术紧迫性(P=0.005)对相关性有显著影响。对于给定的QoR评分,接受脊髓麻醉的患者和接受定期剖腹产的患者的满意度更高。沟通质量,与员工的互动和产后物理环境方面是满意度和不满意度的重要决定因素.
    结论:产妇满意度和产科QoR是不同的实体,两个变量之间的相关性较弱。手术的紧迫性和麻醉方式是满意度与恢复质量评分之间相关性的重要预测因素。许多满意度驱动因素是可以修改的,包括沟通质量和产后恢复的舒适物理空间。
    BACKGROUND: Patient satisfaction and quality of recovery (QoR) are important patient-reported outcomes and quality metrics. The relationship between these two outcomes is complex, with studies showing a weak correlation between them in the non-obstetric population. We sought to evaluate the correlation between patient satisfaction and QoR scores in the obstetric population after caesarean delivery. As secondary aims, we aimed to determine the influence of urgency of procedure and mode of anaesthetic on patient satisfaction and QoR scores as well as determining drivers of satisfaction and dissatisfaction.
    METHODS: Women were invited to complete the Maternal Satisfaction Scale for Caesarean Section (MSCS) and Obstetric Quality of Recovery Score (ObsQoR-11) questionnaires at 24 h after caesarean delivery. Correlations were analysed using Spearman\'s rank tests. Qualitative data were analyzed using thematic content analysis.
    RESULTS: Data were collected from 300 women. There was a significant but weak positive correlation between ObsQoR-11 and MSCS scores (r = 0.31, P < 0.001). Correlation was significantly influenced by mode of anaesthesia (P < 0.001) and urgency of procedure (P = 0.005), with greater satisfaction amongst patients receiving spinal anaesthesia and those undergoing scheduled caesarean deliveries for a given QoR score. Quality of communication, interactions with staff and aspects of the postpartum physical environment were significant determinants of satisfaction and dissatisfaction.
    CONCLUSIONS: Maternal satisfaction and obstetric QoR are distinct entities with a weak correlation between the two variables. Urgency of procedure and mode of anaesthesia are significant predictors of the correlation between satisfaction and quality of recovery scores. Many of the drivers of satisfaction were modifiable including quality of communication and a comfortable physical space for postpartum recovery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:已经证明了竖脊肌平面阻滞(ESPB)在后路开放腰椎手术中的有效性和可靠性;但是,很少有关于腰椎ESPB(L-ESPB)在腰椎单侧双门内窥镜(UBE)手术中的随机对照试验报道.
    方法:共120例患者,年龄在18~65岁(在全身麻醉下接受了选择性腰椎UBE手术,美国麻醉医师协会的身体状况为I~III)以1:1的比例随机分为ESPB组和对照组.ESPB组进行超声(US)引导单侧单次注射0.25%罗哌卡因L-ESPB,但不在对照组。所有患者的术后镇痛策略:患者自控静脉镇痛(PCIA,手术后立即开始与口服复方磷酸可待因和布洛芬缓释片(1片含有布洛芬200mg和可待因13mg,1片/q12h)术后6h开始。我们收集并比较了以患者为中心的术中和术后48小时的相关性。主要结果是术中和术后阿片类药物的消耗和术后恢复质量15(QoR-15)评分。
    结果:与对照组(n=56)相比,ESPB组(n=58)显着降低了术中瑞芬太尼的消耗量(估计中位数差异-280mcg,95%置信区间[CI]-360至-200,p<0.001,功率=100%);术后24小时显着减少芬太尼的消耗(估计中位数差异-80mcg,95%[CI]-128至-32,p=0.001,功率=90%);并在术后24小时显着提高了QoR-15评分(估计中位数差异11,95%[CI]8至14,p<0.001,功率=100%)。与对照组相比,ESPB组提高静息数字评定量表(NRS)评分,直至术后8小时,术后4小时内主动运动NRS评分。术后恶心呕吐(PONV)发生率(p=0.015,功率=70%),腹胀(p=0.024,功率=64%),ESPB组的小腿肌肉静脉血栓形成(MCVT)(p=0.033,功率=58%)低于对照组。此外,本文未发现L-ESPB相关不良反应的发生。
    结论:美国指导的L-ESPB减少了术中和术后24h的阿片类药物消耗,并改善了患者术后24h的QoR-15评分。L-ESPB可以安全有效地应用于腰椎UBE手术。
    背景:中国临床试验注册中心,ChiCTR2200061908,注册日期:2022年7月10日。注册表URL。
    BACKGROUND: The efficacy and reliability of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) in posterior open lumbar spine surgery has been demonstrated; however, few randomized controlled trials of lumbar ESPB (L-ESPB) in lumbar unilateral bi-portal endoscopic (UBE) surgery have been reported.
    METHODS: A total of 120 patients, aged 18 to 65 (who underwent elective lumbar UBE surgery under general anesthesia and exhibited an American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status of I to III) were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to the ESPB group and the Control group. Ultrasound(US)-guided unilateral single-shot 0.25% ropivacaine L-ESPB was performed in the ESPB group, but not in the control group. Postoperative analgesic strategy for all patients: patient controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA, diluted and dosed with fentanyl alone) was initiated immediately after surgery combined with oral compound codeine phosphate and ibuprofen sustained release tablets (1 tablet containing ibuprofen 200 mg and codeine 13 mg, 1 tablet/q12h) commenced 6 h postoperatively. We collected and compared patient-centred correlates intraoperatively and 48 h postoperatively. The primary outcomes were intraoperative and postoperative opioid consumption and postoperative quality of recovery-15 (QoR-15) scores.
    RESULTS: Compared to the control group (n = 56), the ESPB group (n = 58) significantly reduced intraoperative remifentanil consumption (estimated median difference - 280 mcg, 95% confidence interval [CI] - 360 to - 200, p < 0.001, power = 100%); significantly reduced fentanyl consumption at 24 h postoperatively (estimated median difference - 80mcg, 95%[CI] - 128 to - 32, p = 0.001, power = 90%); and significantly enhanced the QoR-15 score at 24 h postoperatively (estimated median difference 11, 95%[CI] 8 to 14, p < 0.001, power = 100%). Compared to the control group, the ESPB group enhanced the resting numeric rating scale (NRS) score up to 8 h postoperatively, and the active movement NRS score up to 4 h postoperatively. The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) (p = 0.015, power = 70%), abdominal distension (p = 0.024, power = 64%), and muscular calf vein thrombosis (MCVT) (p = 0.033, power = 58%) was lower in the ESPB group than in the control group. Moreover, the occurrence of L-ESPB related adverse reactions was not found herein.
    CONCLUSIONS: US-guided L-ESPB reduces intraoperative and 24 h postoperative opioid consumption and improves patients\' QoR-15 scores at 24 h postoperatively. L-ESPB can be safely and effectively utilized in lumbar UBE surgery.
    BACKGROUND: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2200061908 , date of registration: 10/07/2022. Registry URL.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:尽管在手术和麻醉技术方面取得了进步,急性和持续性术后疼痛仍然是一个共同的挑战。术后疼痛对个体患者的护理和预后有直接影响,以及给有限的医疗资源带来压力。已经描述了几种术后疼痛的预测方法。一种这样的方法是评估外周静脉插管(VCP)期间的疼痛。不知道是否有不同的麻醉和镇痛方法,根据对术后疼痛风险的评估,可以改善结果。这项研究的目的是评估个体化麻醉和镇痛是否会影响术后疼痛和术后恢复,在VCP分层的患者中。
    方法:计划进行腹腔镜手术的成年患者在手术当天使用VCP进行疼痛敏感性分层。在视觉模拟评分(疼痛敏感)上VCP≥2.0的患者被随机分配到阿片类药物或标准护理的多模式麻醉和镇痛。评分为VCP≤1.9(耐痛)的患者被随机分配到无阿片类药物麻醉或标准护理。主要结果是在术后监护室用数字评分量表测量的急性术后疼痛。次要结果包括24小时后疼痛分析,持续的术后疼痛和恢复质量。
    结论:个体化围手术期疼痛管理有可能改善患者护理。这项研究将检查不同的麻醉和镇痛方案的影响,在不同疼痛敏感性的患者中,术后疼痛。
    背景:前瞻性地发布在ClinicalTrials.gov上,标识符NCT04751812。
    BACKGROUND: Despite advancements in surgical and anesthesia techniques, acute and persistent postoperative pain are still a common challenge. Postoperative pain has direct effects on individual patient care and outcome, as well as putting strain on limited health care resources. Several prediction methods for postoperative pain have been described. One such method is the assessment of pain during peripheral venous cannulation (VCP). It is not known if different approaches to anesthesia and analgesia, depending on the evaluation of risk for postoperative pain, can improve outcome. The aim of this study is to evaluate if individualized anesthesia and analgesia can affect postoperative pain and recovery after surgery, in patients stratified by VCP.
    METHODS: Adult patients scheduled for laparoscopic surgery undergo pain-sensitivity stratification using VCP on the day of surgery. Patients scoring VCP ≥2.0 on the visual analogue scale (pain-sensitive) are randomized to multimodal anaesthesia and analgesia with opioids or standard of care. Patients scoring VCP ≤1.9 (pain-tolerant) are randomized to opioid-free anaesthesia or standard of care. The primary outcome is acute postoperative pain measured with numeric rating scale in the postoperative care unit. Secondary outcomes include analysis of pain after 24 h, persistent postoperative pain and quality of recovery.
    CONCLUSIONS: Individualized perioperative pain management has the potential to improve patient care. This study will examine the impact of different anesthesia and analgesia regimes, in patients with differing pain sensitivity, on postoperative pain.
    BACKGROUND: Prospectively posted at ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT04751812.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    直肌鞘阻滞是一种新兴的技术,可提供有效的围手术期镇痛,并与降低围手术期阿片类药物的消耗和减少阿片类药物相关的不良反应有关。本研究旨在探讨直肌鞘阻滞对经腹中线妇科手术患者康复质量的影响。
    90例择期经腹中线妇科手术的女性患者纳入研究。患者被随机分为R组(n=45),后者接受术前超声引导下使用0.4%罗哌卡因的RSB或C组(n=45)。主要结果是术后第一天的恢复质量。通过40项恢复质量问卷(QoR-40)评估恢复质量。次要结果包括术中阿片类药物的消耗,第一次排气的时间和第一次从床上排出的时间,术后恶心呕吐,患者满意度。
    两组患者具有相当的基线特征。R组术后整体QoR-40评分明显优于C组(165.0[159.5-170.0]vs155.0[150.0-157.0],分别为;中位数差异12[95%置信区间:8-15,P<0.001])。术前RSB减少术中阿片类药物的消耗,减少了第一次排气的时间,首次出院的时间和麻醉后护理单元的出院时间。此外,R组患者满意度更高。
    术前单次给予罗哌卡因可改善经腹中线妇科手术后患者的恢复质量。
    虽然腹腔镜手术在妇科手术中所占比例较高,开放性妇科手术对于一些患者来说仍然是不可替代的。从开放式妇科手术中恢复是身体伤害和心理挑战的结合。因此,加速功能恢复,减轻此类患者的不适感和改善康复质量是我们需要关注的临床问题。QoR40量表是一种患者报告的评估工具,可在五个维度上评估恢复质量。超声引导直肌鞘阻滞是一种安全有效的腹壁神经阻滞,用于脐和正中腹纵切口的麻醉和镇痛。本研究采用QoR40量表探讨直肌鞘阻滞对妇科开腹手术后恢复质量的影响。参与者被随机分为两组:直肌鞘阻滞治疗和对照组仅接受标准护理。直肌鞘阻滞提高了妇科开腹手术患者术后一天的恢复质量,无不良影响,成功地从长凳到床边进行了快速康复。
    UNASSIGNED: Rectus sheath block is an emerging technique that provide effective perioperative analgesia and is related to lower perioperative opioid consumption and decrease opioid-related adverse effects. The present research is designed to explore the effect of rectus sheath block on recovery quality in patients following transabdominal midline gynecological surgery.
    UNASSIGNED: Ninety female patients following elective transabdominal midline gynecological surgery were enrolled. Patients were randomized to group R (n = 45) which receive preoperative ultrasound-guided RSB with 0.4% ropivacaine or group C which is control group (n = 45). The primary outcome was the quality of recovery on the first postoperative day. The quality of recovery was assessed by the 40-item Quality of Recovery questionnaire (QoR-40). Secondary outcomes included the intraoperative opioid consumption, time to first flatus and time to first discharging from bed, postoperative nausea and vomiting, and patient satisfaction.
    UNASSIGNED: The patients in two groups had comparable baseline characteristics. Postoperative global QoR-40 scores were significantly better in group R than in group C (165.0[159.5-170.0] vs 155.0[150.0-157.0], respectively; median difference 12[95% confidence interval: 8-15, P<0.001]). Preoperative RSB reduced intraoperative opioid consumption, reduced the time to first flatus, time to first discharging from bed and the post anaesthesia care unit discharge time. Furthermore, group R showed greater patient satisfaction.
    UNASSIGNED: A single preoperative administration of RSB with ropivacaine improved the quality of recovery in patients following transabdominal midline gynecological surgery.
    Although laparoscopic surgery accounts for a higher proportion of gynecological procedures, open gynecological surgery remains irreplaceable for some patients. Recovery from open gynecological surgery is a combination of physical injuries and psychological challenges. Consequently, accelerating functional recovery, alleviating discomfort and improving the quality of recovery in such patients is a clinical issue that we need to focus on. The QoR 40 scale is a patient-reported assessment tool which evaluates the quality of recovery in five dimensions. Ultrasound-guided rectus sheath block is a safe and effective abdominal wall nerve block for anesthesia and analgesia of umbilical and median abdominal longitudinal incisions. This study investigated the impact of rectus sheath block on the quality of postoperative recovery after open gynecological surgery using the QoR40 scale. Participants were randomized to two groups: rectus sheath block treatments and a control group receiving standard care only. Rectus sheath block improves the quality of recovery in patients undergoing open gynecological surgery one day after surgery without adverse effects, which has successfully made rapid rehabilitation from bench to bedside.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号