OBJECTIVE: High-grade gliomas (HGGs) are highly malignant, aggressive, and have a high incidence and mortality rate. The aim of this study was to investigate survival outcomes and prognostic factors in patients with HGGs.
METHODS: In this retrospective study, a total of 159 patients with histologically confirmed HGGs were included. The recruitment period was from January 2011 to December 2019. We evaluated patient demographic data, tumor characteristics, treatment methods, immunocytochemistry results, overall survival (OS) time, and progression-free survival (PFS) time using Kaplan-<>Meier survival analysis with log-rank testing. Additionally, we employed Cox regression analysis to identify independent factors associated with survival outcomes.
RESULTS: Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed that the 1-, 2-, and 5-years OS rates were 81.8%, 50.3%, and 12.6%, respectively. Similarly, the 1-, 2-, and 5-years PFS rates were 50.9%, 22.4%, and 3.1%, respectively. The median OS duration was 35.0 months. The univariate analysis indicated that postoperative pathological classification, grade, and age were significantly associated with patient outcomes (p < 0.01). Among the patients, 147 received concurrent chemoradiotherapy, while 12 did not. The immunohistochemical markers of ki-67, MGMT, IDH1R132H, and p53 demonstrated statistically significant differences in their prognostic impact (p = 0.001, p = 0.020, p = 0.003, and p = 0.021, respectively). In conclusion, we found that grades, age, pathological classification, ki-67, MGMT, and IDH1R132H expression were statistically significantly associated with PFS (p < 0.01, p = 0.004, p = 0.003, p = 0.001, p = 0.036, and p = 0.028). Additionally, immunohistochemical expressions of TRIB3 and AURKA were significantly higher in patients with shorter survival (p = 0.015 and p = 0.023).
CONCLUSIONS: Tumor grade and the use of concurrent chemoradiotherapy after surgery were independent prognostic factors that significantly influenced patient survival. Additionally, tumor grade and MGMT expression were found to be independent factors affecting progression-free survival (PFS). Notably, the expression of TRIB3 and AURKA was higher in patients with poor survival outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to determine the value of autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (aHSCT) as a therapeutic intervention for progressive multiple sclerosis (PMS) based on a systematic review of the current literature.
METHODS: All studies from the databases PubMed and Google Scholar published in English before February 2024 which provided individual data for PMS patients were systematically reviewed. PICO was defined as population (P), primary progressive MS and secondary progressive MS patients; intervention (I), treatment with aHSCT; comparison (C), none, disease-modifying therapy treated/relapsing-remitting MS cohorts if available; outcome (O), transplant-related mortality, progression-free survival (PFS) and no evidence of disease activity.
RESULTS: A total of 15 studies met the criteria including 665 patients with PMS (74 primary progressive MS, 591 secondary progressive MS) and 801 patients with relapsing-remitting MS as controls. PFS data were available for 647 patients. PMS patients showed more severe disability at baseline than relapsing-remitting MS patients. The average transplant-related mortality for PMS in 10 studies was 1.9%, with 10 deaths in 528 patients. PFS ranged from 0% to 78% in PMS groups 5 years after treatment initiation, demonstrating a high variability. No evidence of disease activity scores at 5 years ranged from 0% to 75%.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on the available data, aHSCT does not halt progression in people with PMS. However, there appears to be evidence of improved outcome in selected patients. Due to the heterogeneity of the available data, more comprehensive clinical trials assessing the efficacy of aHSCT across different patient groups are urgently needed to reduce variability and improve patient stratification.

BACKGROUND: Early detection of high-risk nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) recurrence is essential. We created a machine learning-derived prognostic signature (MLDPS) by combining three machine learning (ML) models to predict progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with non-metastatic NPC.
METHODS: A cohort of 653 patients with non-metastatic NPC was divided into a training (n = 457) and validation (n = 196) dataset (7:3 ratio). The study included clinicopathological characteristics, hematologic markers, and MRI findings in three machine learning models-random forest (RF), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO)-to predict progression-free survival (PFS). A Venn diagram identified the overlapping signatures from the three ML algorithms. Cox proportional hazard analysis determined the MLDPS for PFS.
RESULTS: The RF, XGBoost, and LASSO algorithms identified six consensus factors from the 33 signatures. Cox proportional hazards analysis showed that the MLDPS includes age, lymphocyte count, number of positive lymph nodes, and regional lymph node density. Additionally, MLDPS effectively stratified prognosis, with low-risk individuals showing better PFS than high-risk individuals (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: MLDPS, based on clinicopathological characteristics, hematologic markers, and MRI findings, is crucial for guiding clinical management and personalizing treatments for patients with non-metastatic NPC.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of local treatment (LT), including radiotherapy (RT) and cytoreductive prostatectomy (CRP), in improving outcomes for patients with oligometastatic prostate cancer (OmPCa).
METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of articles from PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science published between 2010 and November 2023 were conducted. The study included 11 articles, comprising three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and eight retrospective analyses. The study assessed overall survival (OS), radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) PFS, cancer-specific survival (CSS), and complication rate (CR).
RESULTS: OS was significantly improved in the LT group, with both RCTs and non-RCTs showing statistical significance [hazard ratios (HR) = 0.64; 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs), 0.51-0.80; p < 0.0001; HR = 0.55; 95% CIs, 0.40-0.77; p = 0.0004]. For rPFS, RCTs did not show statistically significant outcomes (HR = 0.60; 95% CIs, 0.34-1.07; p = 0.09), whereas non-RCTs demonstrated significant results (HR = 0.42; 95% CIs, 0.24-0.72; p = 0.002). Both RCTs and non-RCTs showed a significant improvement in PSA-PFS (HR = 0.44; 95%CI, 0.29-0.67; p = 0.0001; HR = 0.51; 95% CIs, 0.32-0.81; p = 0.004). For CSS, RCTs demonstrated statistical differences (HR = 0.65; 95% CIs, 0.47-0.90; p = 0.009), whereas non-RCTs did not (HR = 0.61; 95% CIs, 0.29-1.27; p = 0.19). Regarding CR, the risk difference was -0.22 (95% CIs, -0.32 to -0.12; p < 0.00001).
CONCLUSIONS: LT significantly improved OS and PFS in patients with OmPCa. Further RCTs are necessary to confirm these results.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fruquintinib-based therapy as a salvage therapy for patients with advanced or metastatic sarcoma, including soft tissue sarcoma (STS) and bone sarcoma.
METHODS: Patients with advanced or metastatic sarcoma were divided into two groups. One group received fruquintinib monotherapy, while the other received fruquintinib combined therapy. Safety and efficacy of fruquintinib-based therapy were recorded and reviewed retrospectively, including progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), and adverse events (AEs).
RESULTS: Between August 2021 and December 2022, 38 sarcoma patients were retrospectively included. A total of 14 patients received fruquintinib alone (including 6 STS and 8 bone sarcoma), while 24 were treated with fruquintinib combined therapy (including 2 STS and 22 bone sarcoma). The median follow-up was 10.2 months (95% CI, 6.4-11.5). For the entire population, the median PFS was 8.0 months (95% CI, 5.5-13.0). The ORR was 13.1%, while the disease control rate (DCR) was 86.8%. The univariate analysis showed that radiotherapy history (HR, 4.56; 95% CI, 1.70-12.24; p = 0.003), bone sarcoma (HR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.14-0.87; p = 0.024), and treatment method of fruquintinib (HR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.15-0.85; p = 0.021) were significantly associated with PFS. The multivariate analysis showed that patients without radiotherapy history were associated with a better PFS (HR, 3.71; 95% CI: 1.31-10.55; p = 0.014) than patients with radiotherapy history. Patients in combination group reported pneumothorax (8.3%), leukopenia (33.3%), thrombocytopenia (12.5%), diarrhea (4.2%), and anemia (4.2%) as the most frequent grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs), while there was no severe TEAEs occurred in the monotherapy group.
CONCLUSIONS: Fruquintinib-based therapy displayed an optimal tumor control and an acceptable safety profile in patients with advanced or metastatic sarcoma.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib radiofrequency ablation (RFA) sequential therapy for certain hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients.
METHODS: One hundred and nineteen patients with unresectable HCC in the intermediate stage with Child-Pugh A were retrospectively recruited in a multicenter setting. Those in the lenvatinib RFA sequential therapy group received lenvatinib initially, followed by RFA and the retreatment with lenvatinib. The study compared overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), tumor response, and adverse events (AEs) between patients undergoing sequential therapy and lenvatinib monotherapy.
RESULTS: After propensity score matching, 25 patients on sequential therapy and 50 on monotherapy were evaluated. Independent factors influencing OS were identified as sequential therapy, modified albumin-bilirubin (mALBI) grade, and relative dose intensity (%) with hazard ratios (HRs) of 0.381 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.186-0.782), 2.220 (95% CI, 1.410-3.493), and 0.982 (95% CI, 0.966-0.999), respectively. Stratified analysis based on mALBI grades confirmed the independent influence of treatment strategy across all mALBI grades for OS (HR, 0.376; 95% CI, 0.176-0.804). Furthermore, sequential therapy was identified as an independent factor of PFS (HR, 0.382; 95% CI, 0.215-0.678). Sequential therapy significantly outperformed monotherapy on survival benefits (OS: 38.27 vs. 18.96 months for sequential therapy and monotherapy, respectively, p = 0.004; PFS: 13.80 vs. 5.32 months for sequential therapy and monotherapy, respectively, p < 0.001). Sequential therapy was significantly associated with complete response by modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (odds ratio, 63.089). Ten of 119 patients experienced grade 3 AEs, with no AE beyond grade 3 observed.
CONCLUSIONS: Lenvatinib RFA sequential therapy might offer favorable tolerability and potential prognostic improvement compared to lenvatinib monotherapy.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to explore the long-term prognostic risk factors associated with patients diagnosed with retroperitoneal paraganglioma (RPGL) and examine their clinical and pathological characteristics.
METHODS: Expressions of biomarkers were identified using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and case databases were retrospectively searched. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox risk regression to identify the factors that influence the postoperative progression-free survival of patients with RPGL.
RESULTS: A total of 105 patients, most of whom had tumors situated in the paraaortic region, and whose average tumor size was 8.6 cm, were enrolled in this study. The average follow-up duration was 51 months, with a mortality rate of 19% and a recurrence and metastasis rate of 41.9%. Tumors were assessed using the modified Grading system for Adrenal Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma (GAPP), and SDHB, S-100, and Ki-67 were stained using IHC in all cases. Out of the total cases examined, negative in SDHB expression were observed in 18.1% of cases, S-100 expression was negative in 36.2% of cases, and endovascular tumor enboluswas present in approximately 25.7% of cases. The results of the univariate analysis indicated that several factors significantly influenced the progression-free survival of patients with PGL as follow: maximum tumor diameter (>5.5 cm), tumor morphological features, tumor grading (modified GAPP score > 6), SDHB negative, S-100 negative, and expression of proliferation index Ki-67 (>3%) (X2 = 4.217-27.420, p < 0.05). The results of the multivariate analysis indicated that negative of S-100 (p = 0.021) and SDHB (p = 0.038), as well as intravascular tumor thrombus (p = 0.047) expression were independent risk factors for progression-free survival in patients.
CONCLUSIONS: RPGL is characterized by diverse biological features and an elevated susceptibility to both recurrence and metastasis. Both SDHB and S-100 can be employed as traditional IHC indicators to predict the metastatic risk of PGL, whereas the tumor histomorphology-endovascular tumor enbolus assists in determining the metastasis risk of RPGL.

BACKGROUND: Thalidomide-containing regimens cause adverse events (AEs) that may require a reduction in treatment intensity or even treatment discontinuation in patients with multiple myeloma. As thalidomide toxicity is dose-dependent, identifying the most appropriate dose for each patient is essential.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the effects of a thalidomide dose step-up strategy on treatment response and progression-free survival (PFS).
RESULTS: This prospective observational study included 93 patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) who received bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (VTD). The present study assessed the incidence of thalidomide dose reduction and discontinuation, the overall dose intensity, and their effects on therapeutic efficacy. Furthermore, this study used Cox proportional hazard models to analyze the factors contributing to thalidomide intolerability. The results showed the overall response rates in all patients and the evaluable patients were 78.5% and 98.7%, respectively. The median PFS in the study cohort was not reached. The most common thalidomide-related AEs were constipation (32.3%) and skin rash (23.7%), resulting in dose reduction and discontinuation rates of 22.6% and 21.5%, respectively. The responders had a significantly higher average thalidomide dose intensity than the nonresponders (88.6% vs. 42.9%, p < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: The thalidomide dose step-up approach is a viable option for patients with NDMM receiving VTD induction therapy with satisfactory efficacy and tolerability. However, thalidomide intolerance may lead to dose reduction or discontinuation due to unpredictable AEs, leading to lower dose intensity and potentially inferior treatment outcomes. In addition to a dose step-up strategy, optimal supportive care is critical for patients with multiple myeloma receiving VTD induction therapy.

Time-to-event endpoints are widely used as measures of patients\' well-being and indicators of prognosis. In imaging-based biomarker studies, there are increasingly more studies that focus on examining imaging biomarkers\' prognostic or predictive utilities on those endpoints, whether in a trial or an observational study setting. In this educational review article, we briefly introduce some basic concepts of time-to-event endpoints and point out potential pitfalls in the context of imaging biomarker research in hope of improving radiologists\' understanding of related subjects. Besides, we have included some review and discussions on the benefits of using time-to-event endpoints and considerations on selecting overall survival or progression-free survival for primary analysis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 3.

Follicular lymphoma (FL) is the most common indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Circulating lymphoma (CL) cells can be seen at diagnosis in some FL patients, however, previous studies evaluating this have shown mixed results. Therefore, we sought to evaluate the impact of CL at diagnosis on outcomes in patients with newly diagnosed FL using data from a single center. Patients were divided into CL+ and CL- based on immunophenotyping via peripheral blood (PB) flow cytometry. CL was defined as detectable clonally restricted B-cells that matched the actual or expected B-cell immunophenotype of FL. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) after first-line treatment and secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), diagnosis to treatment interval (DTI), progression of disease within 2 years of diagnosis (POD24), and cumulative incidence of transformation between the two groups. Among the 541 patients with FL, 204 had PB flow cytometry performed at diagnosis, and after excluding patients not meeting the eligibility criteria, 147 cases remained with 24 (16%) CL+ at diagnosis. Patients in the CL+ group were younger (53 vs. 58 years, p = 0.02), had more extranodal involvement (83% vs. 44%, p < 0.01), follicular lymphoma international prognostic index 3-5 (55% vs. 31%, p = 0.01), and a higher proportion received first-line immunochemotherapy (75% vs. 43%, p = 0.01) compared to the CL-group. The median PFS was not significantly different between CL+ (6.27 years, 95% CI = 3.61-NR) and CL- (6.61 years, 95% CI = 5.10-9.82) cohorts regardless of the first-line treatment or level of absolute PB CL cells. There was no significant difference in ORR, median OS, DTI, POD24, and cumulative incidence of transformation between the two groups. In our study, we found that the presence of CL cells at diagnosis in FL in the contemporary era did not impact outcomes and survival.