preanalytics

预分析
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    使用细胞外囊泡(EV)的临床研究的标准化主要集中在分离和表征所采用的程序;然而,样品收集的分析前方面,处理和储存也显著影响结果的可重复性。我们在GEIVEX(GrupoEspañoldeInvestigaciónVesiculasExtracelulares)成员中进行了基于SPREC(标准预分析代码)的在线调查,以探讨不同实验室如何处理用于EV分析的流体生物标本。我们收到了来自43个不同实验室的70项调查:44%的调查集中在血浆上,9%的血清和16%的尿液。调查表明,分析前方法的变异性达到94%。此外,在某些情况下,研究人员无法获得样品的所有相关分析前细节,某些样本方面对EV隔离/表征有潜在影响,但未在当前版本的SPREC中编码。我们的研究强调了使用通用标准操作程序(SOP)控制分析前条件的重要性。SPREC的应用代表了一种编码和配准分析前条件的合适方法。将SPREC集成到实验室/生物库的SOP中,将提供有价值的信息来源,并通过提高可重复性和可信性,为EV研究提供了进步。
    The standardization of clinical studies using extracellular vesicles (EVs) has mainly focused on the procedures employed for their isolation and characterization; however, preanalytical aspects of sample collection, handling and storage also significantly impact the reproducibility of results. We conducted an online survey based on SPREC (Standard PREanalytical Code) among members of GEIVEX (Grupo Español de Investigación en Vesiculas Extracelulares) to explore how different laboratories handled fluid biospecimens destined for EV analyses. We received 70 surveys from forty-three different laboratories: 44% focused on plasma, 9% on serum and 16% on urine. The survey indicated that variability in preanalytical approaches reaches 94%. Moreover, in some cases, researchers had no access to all relevant preanalytical details of samples, with some sample aspects with potential impact on EV isolation/characterisation not coded within the current version of SPREC. Our study highlights the importance of working with common standard operating procedures (SOP) to control preanalytical conditions. The application of SPREC represents a suitable approach to codify and register preanalytical conditions. Integrating SPREC into the SOPs of laboratories/biobanks will provide a valuable source of information and constitute an advance for EV research by improving reproducibility and credibility.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    胰高血糖素的血浆浓度,GLP-1和GIP在许多临床试验中被报道为结果指标,但缺乏分析前指南。我们讨论了代谢研究中常用的血液容器对胰高血糖素测量的影响,人的GLP-1和GIP。
    对17名超重个体进行过夜禁食,然后静脉输注氨基酸以刺激激素分泌。将血液取样到五个容器中:补充有DMSO(对照)的EDTA包被的管,一种脑啡肽酶抑制剂,抑肽酶(激肽释放酶抑制剂)或DPP-4抑制剂,和P800管。在离心之前和之后将血浆保持在冰上,并在-80摄氏度下储存,直到使用验证的夹心ELISA或放射免疫测定(RIA)进行批量分析。
    空腹血浆胰高血糖素的测量不依赖于取样容器,无论是通过ELISA或RIA测量。当将血液收集到P800管或含抑肽酶的管中时,氨基酸诱导的高胰高血糖素血症的数值更高。与对照管相比,使用p800管通过RIA导致更高浓度的GLP-1,但不用于夹心ELISA的测量。通过ELISA测量的GIP的血浆浓度在对照管中较高,并且受到P800和抑肽酶添加的负面影响。
    血液容器的选择会影响胰高血糖素血浆浓度的测量,GLP-1和GIP,根据这项研究,我们建议使用不含蛋白酶抑制剂的EDTA涂层管或P800管来测量胰高血糖素,临床试验中的GLP-1和GIP。
    UNASSIGNED: Plasma concentrations of glucagon, GLP-1 and GIP are reported in numerous clinical trials as outcome measures but preanalytical guidelines are lacking. We addressed the impact of commonly used blood containers in metabolic research on measurements of glucagon, GLP-1 and GIP in humans.
    UNASSIGNED: Seventeen overweight individuals were subjected to an overnight fast followed by an intravenous infusion of amino acids to stimulate hormonal secretion. Blood was sampled into five containers: EDTA-coated tubes supplemented with DMSO (control), a neprilysin inhibitor, aprotinin (a kallikrein inhibitor) or a DPP-4 inhibitor, and P800 tubes. Plasma was kept on ice before and after centrifugation and stored at -80 Celsius until batch analysis using validated sandwich ELISAs or radioimmunoassays (RIA).
    UNASSIGNED: Measures of fasting plasma glucagon did not depend on sampling containers, whether measured by ELISA or RIA. Amino acid-induced hyperglucagonemia was numerically higher when blood was collected into P800 tubes or tubes with aprotinin. The use of p800 tubes resulted in higher concentrations of GLP-1 by RIA compared to control tubes but not for measurements with sandwich ELISA. Plasma concentrations of GIP measured by ELISA were higher in control tubes and negatively affected by P800 and the addition of aprotinin.
    UNASSIGNED: The choice of blood containers impacts on measurements of plasma concentrations of glucagon, GLP-1 and GIP, and based on this study, we recommend using EDTA-coated tubes without protease inhibitors or P800 tubes for measurements of glucagon, GLP-1 and GIP in clinical trials.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    体液内的无细胞DNA(cfDNA)分子的累积池代表高密度和多维信息库。这个“生物镜子”提供了对构图的实时见解,函数,以及体内不同基因组的动态,实现个性化分子医学的重大进步。然而,有效使用这些信息需要对不同的cfDNA亚型进行精确的分类。虽然来自不同来源的cfDNA分子表现出许多遗传,表观遗传,和物理化学变化,它们还具有使分析复杂化的共同特征。在绘制cfDNA特征的景观方面已经取得了相当大的进展,它们的临床相关性,优化提取程序,分析方法,生物信息学管道,和机器学习算法。然而,分析前工作流,尽管它们对cfDNA测量产生了深远的影响,没有以相应的速度前进。在这篇透视文章中,我们强调了强大的预分析程序在cfDNA分析的开发和临床整合中的关键作用,强调持续存在的障碍和新出现的挑战。
    The cumulative pool of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) molecules within bodily fluids represents a highly dense and multidimensional information repository. This \"biological mirror\" provides real-time insights into the composition, function, and dynamics of the diverse genomes within the body, enabling significant advancements in personalized molecular medicine. However, effective use of this information necessitates meticulous classification of distinct cfDNA subtypes with exceptional precision. While cfDNA molecules originating from different sources exhibit numerous genetic, epigenetic, and physico-chemical variations, they also share common features that complicate analyses. Considerable progress has been achieved in mapping the landscape of cfDNA features, their clinical correlations, and optimizing extraction procedures, analytical approaches, bioinformatics pipelines, and machine learning algorithms. Nevertheless, preanalytical workflows, despite their profound impact on cfDNA measurements, have not progressed at a corresponding pace. In this perspective article, we emphasize the pivotal role of robust preanalytical procedures in the development and clinical integration of cfDNA assays, highlighting persistent obstacles and emerging challenges.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    最近的研究评估了影响基于核酸的方法确认SARS-CoV-2的结果的分析前因素,阐明了识别促进准确测试的变量的重要性。同时有效利用稀缺资源。大多数实验室错误发生在分析前阶段。虽然有许多资源来识别和描述自动化平台上主要实验室测试的机制,了解影响传染病准确分子诊断检测的重要分析前和环境因素的综合资源较少。这篇综述确定了基于证据的因素,这些因素已被证明会影响基于核酸的分子技术诊断传染病的结果。
    Recent studies evaluating the preanalytical factors that impact the outcome of nucleic-acid based methods for the confirmation of SARS-CoV-2 have illuminated the importance of identifying variables that promoted accurate testing, while using scarce resources efficiently. The majority of laboratory errors occur in the preanalytical phase. While there are many resources identifying and describing mechanisms for main laboratory testing on automated platforms, there are fewer comprehensive resources for understanding important preanalytical and environmental factors that affect accurate molecular diagnostic testing of infectious diseases. This review identifies evidence-based factors that have been documented to impact the outcome of nucleic acid-based molecular techniques for the diagnosis of infectious diseases.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    对组织活检的蛋白质组学分析以揭示病理生理学和鉴定生物标志物的兴趣日益增长。目前用于收集组织活检以保存蛋白质组和翻译后修饰的金标准是在液氮(LN2)中快速冷冻。然而,在许多临床环境中,这不是一个选择,由于LN2的可用性,也没有受过快速生物样本处理的人员。为了满足这一需求,我们开发了一种概念验证快速冷冻原型装置,可在护理点快速冷冻生物样本,从而在不需要LN2的情况下保存磷酸蛋白质组.我们的目标是开发这个装置,展示易用性,确认通过现有冷链物流运输的能力,并评估冷却性能(即,在<60秒内将组织样本冷却至<0°C,在<120秒内低于-8°C,并在保持组织生物样本中的蛋白质组的情况下保持温度<0°C>60分钟)。为了证明可行性,原型的性能以LN2中的快速冷冻为基准,使用鼠黑色素瘤患者来源的异种移植模型,该模型接受全身照射以在DNA损伤应答网络中引发磷酸信号传导.切除肿瘤并进行四分法,肿瘤的两个部分在LN2中快速冷冻,其余两个部分在原型快速冷冻生物样本容器中快速冷却。磷蛋白通过液相色谱串联质谱法进行分析,并通过靶向多反应监测MS进行定量。总的来说,在使用快速冷冻容器处理的生物样本中,磷酸蛋白质组等同于使用LN2金标准的生物样本,尽管与LN2冷冻标本相比,装置冷冻标本中磷酸肽亚组的测量结果差异更大.原型装置形成了用于开发商业装置的框架,该商业装置将改善用于测量重要的磷酸信号分子的组织活检保存。
    There is growing interest in proteomic analyses of tissue biopsies to reveal pathophysiology and identify biomarkers. The current gold standard for collecting tissue biopsies for preserving the proteome and post-translational modifications is flash freezing in liquid nitrogen (LN2). However, in many clinical settings, this is not an option due to unavailability of LN2 nor trained personnel for rapid biospecimen processing. To address this need, we developed a proof-of-concept quick-freeze prototype device to rapidly freeze biospecimens at the point-of-care to preserve the phosphoproteome without the need for LN2. Our objectives were to develop the device, demonstrate the ease of use, confirm the ability to ship through existing cold chain logistics, and evaluate the cooling performance (i.e., cool a tissue sample to <0°C in <60 seconds, below -8°C in <120 seconds, and maintain temperature <0°C for >60 minutes) in the context of preserving the proteome in a tissue biospecimen. To demonstrate feasibility, the performance of the prototype was benchmarked against flash freezing in LN2 using a murine melanoma patient-derived xenograft model subjected to total body irradiation to elicit phosphosignaling in the DNA damage response network. Tumors were harvested and quadrisected, with two parts of the tumor being snap frozen in LN2, and the remaining two parts being rapidly cooled in the prototype quick-freeze biospecimen containers. Phosphoproteins were profiled by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry and quantified by targeted multiple reaction monitoring MS. Overall, the phosphoproteome was equivalent in biospecimens processed using the quick-freeze containers to those using the LN2 gold standard, although the measurements of a subset of phosphopeptides in the device-frozen specimens were more variable than LN2-frozen specimens. The prototype device forms the framework for development of a commercial device that will improve tissue biopsy preservation for measurement of important phosphosignaling molecules.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    鉴于线粒体作为主要细胞能量提供者的关键作用及其对肿瘤生长的贡献,化学抗性,和癌细胞可塑性,线粒体DNA(mtDNA)可以作为相关的生物标志物。因此,mtDNA突变和拷贝数变异的分析因其在人类癌症的早期诊断和监测治疗中的可能作用而受到越来越多的关注.这尤其适用于高度侵袭性的胰腺癌,这往往是诊断晚,并与不良预后有关。由于当前的诊断程序基于成像,组织组织学,和特异性相当低的蛋白质生物标志物,从全血中检测到的肿瘤来源的mtDNA突变代表了向早期癌症诊断的潜在重大飞跃。然而,对于未来在临床环境中的常规使用,与全血中mtDNA表征相关的预分析必须彻底标准化,控制,并有适当的质量保证,然而,这在很大程度上是缺乏的。因此,在这项研究中,我们进行了全面的分析前检查,比较了不同的mtDNA提取方法,并测试了重要的分析前步骤,例如使用不同的采血管,不同的储存温度,存储时间的长度,血浆中的产量与全血。为了识别分析和分析前的差异,所有变量均在健康受试者和胰腺癌患者中进行了测试.我们的结果表明,在一些分析前工作流程中,癌症患者和健康受试者之间存在显着差异,而其他工作流程未能产生统计学上的显著差异。这强调了在基于mtDNA测量的临床测定的开发中控制和标准化分析前程序的重要性。
    Given the crucial role of mitochondria as the main cellular energy provider and its contribution towards tumor growth, chemoresistance, and cancer cell plasticity, mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) could serve as a relevant biomarker. Thus, the profiling of mtDNA mutations and copy number variations is receiving increasing attention for its possible role in the early diagnosis and monitoring therapies of human cancers. This applies particularly to highly aggressive pancreatic cancer, which is often diagnosed late and is associated with poor prognosis. As current diagnostic procedures are based on imaging, tissue histology, and protein biomarkers with rather low specificity, tumor-derived mtDNA mutations detected from whole blood represents a potential significant leap forward towards early cancer diagnosis. However, for future routine use in clinical settings it is essential that preanalytics related to the characterization of mtDNA in whole blood are thoroughly standardized, controlled, and subject to proper quality assurance, yet this is largely lacking. Therefore, in this study we carried out a comprehensive preanalytical workup comparing different mtDNA extraction methods and testing important preanalytical steps, such as the use of different blood collection tubes, different storage temperatures, length of storage time, and yields in plasma vs. whole blood. To identify analytical and preanalytical differences, all variables were tested in both healthy subjects and pancreatic carcinoma patients. Our results demonstrated a significant difference between cancer patients and healthy subjects for some preanalytical workflows, while other workflows failed to yield statistically significant differences. This underscores the importance of controlling and standardizing preanalytical procedures in the development of clinical assays based on the measurement of mtDNA.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    临床实验室通常在肿瘤学组测序中使用福尔马林固定石蜡包埋(FFPE)组织或细胞块细胞学样本来鉴定可以预测患者对靶向治疗的反应的突变。要了解由于FFPE处理而导致的技术错误,使用具有强烈特征的二倍体细胞系来创建具有四种不同的组织前福尔马林固定时间的FFPE样品。然后将总共96个FFPE切片分发给不同的实验室,由四个人进行靶向测序分析。并确定了技术错误导致的变体。
    失败更频繁的组织切片显示低细胞性,低于推荐的文库制备DNA输入,或目标测序深度。重要的是,块表面的截面更有可能显示FFPE特定的错误,类似于组织学上的“边缘效应”,而内部样品没有显示与固定时间相关的质量下降。
    为了确保结果可靠,我们建议避免阻断表面部分,并将突变检测限制在高置信度的基因组区域.
    Clinical laboratories routinely use formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue or cell block cytology samples in oncology panel sequencing to identify mutations that can predict patient response to targeted therapy. To understand the technical error due to FFPE processing, a robustly characterized diploid cell line was used to create FFPE samples with four different pre-tissue processing formalin fixation times. A total of 96 FFPE sections were then distributed to different laboratories for targeted sequencing analysis by four oncopanels, and variants resulting from technical error were identified.
    Tissue sections that fail more frequently show low cellularity, lower than recommended library preparation DNA input, or target sequencing depth. Importantly, sections from block surfaces are more likely to show FFPE-specific errors, akin to \"edge effects\" seen in histology, while the inner samples display no quality degradation related to fixation time.
    To assure reliable results, we recommend avoiding the block surface portion and restricting mutation detection to genomic regions of high confidence.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    仰卧位抽血诊断嗜铬细胞瘤和副神经节瘤(PPGL)的结果是血浆去甲肾上腺素的假阳性率低于坐位采样。目前尚不清楚住院患者与门诊测试以及其他分析前因素如何影响假阳性。
    我们旨在确定分析前的预防措施,以最大程度地减少血浆间肾上腺素的假阳性结果。
    评估了不同采血条件对血浆间肾上腺素的影响,包括门诊和住院测试,半卧位与完全卧位的血液采样,使用套管与直接静脉穿刺,和外界温度的差异。共有10个三级转诊中心的3147名患者接受了PPGL测试,包括278个有肿瘤和2869个没有肿瘤。分析假阳性结果的比率。
    门诊而不是住院患者取样导致血浆浓度升高44%,去甲肾上腺素的假阳性结果增加3.4倍。低温,半卧位,与其他采样条件相比,直接静脉穿刺也导致血浆浓度和血浆去甲肾上腺素的假阳性结果率明显更高,尽管影响小于门诊抽样。与温暖的温度相比,血浆去甲肾上腺素的浓度较高和假阳性结果率仅在门诊采样时才明显。分析前因素对PPGL患者的血浆间肾上腺素没有影响。
    虽然住院患者血液取样对于筛查疑似PPGL患者来说在很大程度上是不切实际的,其他分析前预防措施(例如,套管,温暖的测试条件)可能是有用的。住院患者采样可能会保留用于难以区分真实和假阳性结果的患者的随访。
    Sampling of blood in the supine position for diagnosis of pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma (PPGL) results in lower rates of false positives for plasma normetanephrine than seated sampling. It is unclear how inpatient vs outpatient testing and other preanalytical factors impact false positives.
    We aimed to identify preanalytical precautions to minimize false-positive results for plasma metanephrines.
    Impacts of different blood sampling conditions on plasma metanephrines were evaluated, including outpatient vs inpatient testing, sampling of blood in semi- vs fully recumbent positions, use of cannulae vs direct venipuncture, and differences in outside temperature. A total of 3147 patients at 10 tertiary referral centers were tested for PPGL, including 278 with and 2869 without tumors. Rates of false-positive results were analyzed.
    Outpatient rather than inpatient sampling resulted in 44% higher plasma concentrations and a 3.4-fold increase in false-positive results for normetanephrine. Low temperature, a semi-recumbent position, and direct venipuncture also resulted in significantly higher plasma concentrations and rates of false-positive results for plasma normetanephrine than alternative sampling conditions, although with less impact than outpatient sampling. Higher concentrations and rates of false-positive results for plasma normetanephrine with low compared with warm temperatures were only apparent for outpatient sampling. Preanalytical factors were without impact on plasma metanephrines in patients with PPGL.
    Although inpatient blood sampling is largely impractical for screening patients with suspected PPGL, other preanalytical precautions (eg, cannulae, warm testing conditions) may be useful. Inpatient sampling may be reserved for follow-up of patients with difficult to distinguish true- from false-positive results.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    考虑到无细胞DNA(cfDNA)的生物学特性和片段化的测定可以改善液体活检的性能。然而,在碎片组学分析中,个体之间的分析前和生理差异定义不清。
    我们分析了收集管的影响,等离子体处理时间,和生理学对cfDNA大小分布的影响,它们的全基因组代表性,和使用浅层全基因组测序在cfDNA片段末端的序列多样性。
    不同的稳定收集管和处理时间都不会影响cfDNA片段的大小,但可能会影响整个基因组的片段模式和cfDNA的片段末端序列。此外,除了性别差异之外,在63个个体之间测试的生理状况(年龄,身体质量指数,使用药物,和慢性病)对碎片组学方法的结果影响最小。
    碎片组学方法有可能在临床上实施,有待分析和生理因素的明确可追溯性。
    Assays that account for the biological properties and fragmentation of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) can improve the performance of liquid biopsy. However, preanalytic and physiological differences between individuals on fragmentomic analysis are poorly defined.
    We analyzed the impact of collection tube, plasma processing time, and physiology on the size distribution of cfDNA, their genome-wide representation, and sequence diversity at the cfDNA fragment ends using shallow whole-genome sequencing.
    Neither different stabilizing collection tubes nor processing times affected the cfDNA fragment sizes, but could impact the genome-wide fragmentation patterns and fragment-end sequences of cfDNA. In addition, beyond differences depending on the gender, the physiological conditions tested between 63 individuals (age, body mass index, use of medication, and chronic conditions) minimally influenced the outcome of fragmentomic methods.
    Fragmentomic approaches have potential for implementation in the clinic, pending clear traceability of analytical and physiological factors.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号