potato peel compost

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    将稻壳灰(PHA)和土豆皮等农副产品与有机肥料相结合的意义在于提高土壤肥力,增加作物产量,减少对传统有机肥料的依赖,如农家肥(FYM)或堆肥。以可持续农业和养分管理框架为基础,这项研究考察了农业废物产生的不同配方对生产力的影响,营养效率,以及木豆-蔬菜芥末-秋葵种植系统的盈利能力。在ICAR-IARI进行的为期两年的现场实验(2020-2022年),新德里测试了七种营养源。,(T1)控制,(T2)100%RDN通过FYM,(T3)100%RDN通过改进的RRC,(T4)100%RDN通过基于PHA的配方,(T5)75%RDN通过基于PHA的配方,(T6)通过基于PPC的制剂的100%RDN和(T7)通过基于PPC的制剂的75%RDN,其在RBD中测试并重复三次。T4处理对木豆种子产量有显著影响(1.89±0.09和1.97±0.12tha-1),蔬菜芥菜的叶片产量(81.57±4.59和82.97±4.17tha-1),轮作秋葵的果实产量(13.54±0.82和13.78±0.81tha-1),随后治疗T6和T2在这两年分别超过控制。增强了系统对N的吸收,P和K以及T4的系统总回报率和净回报率增长了78.9%,83.8%,72.4%,第一年分别为54.4%和56.8%和77.5%,80.8%,77.7%,第二年为54.8%和57.4%,分别,过度控制。处理T4显著提高了木豆的表观恢复66.3%和69.2%,蔬菜芥末中的64.7%和47.9%,在T3期间,秋葵的平均发病率为72.7%和79.4%。基于上述发现,(T4)100%RDN通过基于PHA的配方,和(T6)对于缺乏FYM但稻壳灰/土豆皮可用于可持续农业废物和改善可持续性的地区,建议通过基于PPC的配方100%RDN。
    The significance of integrating agricultural by-products such as paddy husk ash (PHA) and potato peels with organic fertilizers lies in enhancing soil fertility, increasing crop yields, and reducing reliance on traditional organic fertilizers like farmyard manure (FYM) or compost alone. Grounded in sustainable agriculture and nutrient management frameworks, this study examines the impact of diverse formulations derived from agricultural waste on productivity, nutrient efficiency, and profitability in a pigeon pea-vegetable mustard-okra cropping system. A two-year field experiment (2020-2022) at ICAR-IARI, New Delhi tested seven nutrient sources viz., (T1) control, (T2) 100% RDN through FYM, (T3) 100% RDN through improved RRC, (T4) 100% RDN through PHA based formulation, (T5) 75% RDN through PHA based formulation, (T6) 100% RDN through PPC based formulation and (T7) 75% RDN through PPC based formulation that were tested in RBD and replicated thrice. Treatment T4 had significant effect on seed yield of pigeon pea (1.89 ± 0.09 and 1.97 ± 0.12 t ha-1), leaf yield of vegetable mustard (81.57 ± 4.59 and 82.97 ± 4.17 t ha-1), and fruit yield of okra (13.54 ± 0.82 and 13.78 ± 0.81 t ha-1) grown in rotation, followed by treatment T6 and T2 during both the years respectively over control. Enhanced system uptake of N, P and K along with system gross and net returns in T4, showed increases of 78.9%, 83.8%, 72.4%, 54.4% and 56.8% in the first year and 77.5%, 80.8%, 77.7%, 54.8% and 57.4% in the second year, respectively, over control. Treatment T4 significantly improved apparent recovery by 66.3% and 69.2% in pigeon pea, 64.7% and 47.9% in vegetable mustard, and 72.7% and 79.4% in okra over T3, averaged across two years. Based on the above findings, (T4) 100% RDN through PHA-based formulation, and (T6) 100% RDN through PPC-based formulation can be recommended for areas with a shortage of FYM but availability of rice husk ash/potato peels for sustainable agricultural wastes and improved sustainability.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    利用农业和工业废物,强大的营养库,通过堆肥滋养土壤和作物体现了废物管理和有机农业的可持续方法。为了调查这一点,在ICAR-IARI进行了为期2年的现场实验,新德里,专注于木豆-蔬菜芥末-秋葵种植系统。测试了七种营养来源,包括控件(T1),100%推荐剂量的氮(RDN)通过农家肥(T2),100%RDN通过改良米渣堆肥(T3),100%RDN通过稻壳灰(PHA)为基础的配方(T4),75%RDN通过基于PHA的配方(T5),100%RDN通过马铃薯皮堆肥(PPC)为基础的配方(T6),和75%RDN通过基于PPC的制剂(T7)。采用随机区组设计,重复三次,结果表明,处理T4表现出木豆的最高种子产量(1.89±0.09和1.97±0.12tha-1)和秸秆产量(7.83±0.41和8.03±0.58tha-1),蔬菜芥菜的叶片产量(81.57±4.69和82.97±4.17tha-1),与对照(T1)相比,在两个研究年中,秋葵的果实(13.54±0.82和13.78±0.81tha-1)和stover(21.64±1.31和22.03±1.30tha-1)产量。处理T4与T2和T6的木豆种子和秸秆产量相当,还有秋葵,和蔬菜芥末的叶片产量。此外,T4在土壤中的NH4-N和NO3-N水平显着增加了124.1%和158.2%,分别,在控制上。土壤中有效氮(N)和有效磷(P)的增强状态,加上土壤有机碳增加(0.41%),细菌总数(21.1%),真菌(37.2%),放线菌(44.6%),和微生物生物量碳(28.5%),进一步强调了T4与对照组相比的积极影响.治疗T2和T6表现出与T4相当的结果,关于有效氮的变化,P,土壤有机碳,细菌总数,真菌,放线菌,和微生物生物质碳。总之,处理T4和T6成为有机肥料的可行来源,特别是在面临农家肥短缺的地区。这些配方提供了实质性的优势,包括提高产量,改善土壤质量,和高效肥料利用,从而为可持续农业实践做出重大贡献。
    Utilizing agricultural and industrial wastes, potent reservoirs of nutrients, for nourishing the soil and crops through composting embodies a sustainable approach to waste management and organic agriculture. To investigate this, a 2-year field experiment was conducted at ICAR-IARI, New Delhi, focusing on a pigeon pea-vegetable mustard-okra cropping system. Seven nutrient sources were tested, including a control (T1), 100% recommended dose of nitrogen (RDN) through farmyard manure (T2), 100% RDN through improved rice residue compost (T3), 100% RDN through a paddy husk ash (PHA)-based formulation (T4), 75% RDN through PHA-based formulation (T5), 100% RDN through a potato peel compost (PPC)-based formulation (T6), and 75% RDN through PPC-based formulation (T7). Employing a randomized block design with three replications, the results revealed that treatment T4 exhibited the significantly highest seed (1.89 ± 0.09 and 1.97 ± 0.12 t ha-1) and stover (7.83 ± 0.41 and 8.03 ± 0.58 t ha-1) yield of pigeon pea, leaf yield (81.57 ± 4.69 and 82.97 ± 4.17 t ha-1) of vegetable mustard, and fruit (13.54 ± 0.82 and 13.78 ± 0.81 t ha-1) and stover (21.64 ± 1.31 and 22.03 ± 1.30 t ha-1) yield of okra during both study years compared to the control (T1). Treatment T4 was on par with T2 and T6 for seed and stover yield in pigeon pea, as well as okra, and leaf yield in vegetable mustard over both years. Moreover, T4 demonstrated notable increase of 124.1% and 158.2% in NH4-N and NO3-N levels in the soil, respectively, over the control. The enhanced status of available nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) in the soil, coupled with increased soil organic carbon (0.41%), total bacteria population (21.1%), fungi (37.2%), actinomycetes (44.6%), and microbial biomass carbon (28.5%), further emphasized the positive impact of T4 compared to the control. Treatments T2 and T6 exhibited comparable outcomes to T4 concerning changes in available N, P, soil organic carbon, total bacteria population, fungi, actinomycetes, and microbial biomass carbon. In conclusion, treatments T4 and T6 emerge as viable sources of organic fertilizer, particularly in regions confronting farmyard manure shortages. These formulations offer substantial advantages, including enhanced yield, soil quality improvement, and efficient fertilizer utilization, thus contributing significantly to sustainable agricultural practices.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号