popliteal

pop 肌
  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    背景:传统上通过开放修复(OR)治疗p动脉瘤(PAA)。血管内修复(ER)已成为一种新的医治战略。本系统综述和荟萃分析的目的是评估和比较OR和ER在PAA急诊治疗中的当前结果。
    方法:对PubMed/Medline数据库进行了系统的文献检索。结果是30天死亡率,发病率,主要截肢率(30天),主要截肢率(1年),1年主要通畅率,1年二次通畅率和1年生存率。此外,我们纳入了2009年至2021年在Martin-LutherUniversityHalle-Wittenberg接受治疗的pop动脉瘤患者的临床数据.
    结果:我们从2014年和2015年确定了两项队列研究,共有199例患者接受了紧急手术(39ER和160OR)。我们还包括来自我们机构的26名患者。对于紧急治疗,30天大截肢率(18%对3%,赔率比5.82,95%CI[1.75;19.30],p=.004),30天死亡率(10%对1%,赔率比5.57,95%CI[1.01;30.58],p=.05),1年主要截肢率(15%vs6%赔率3.61,95%CI[1.18;11.09],p=.02),1年原发性通畅性丧失(54%vs23%,赔率比3.19,95%CI[0.91;11.20],p=.07),和1年二次通畅性损失(44%对12%,赔率比6.91,95%CI[3.01;15.83],与OR组相比,ER组的p<0.05)更高。
    结论:腔内修复术是PAA急诊治疗的一种替代方法。来自现有非随机研究的有限证据表明,接受ER的患者预后不良。然而,结果容易出现选择偏差,只有将ER与OR进行比较的随机试验才可能揭示,在急诊情况下,ER作为PAA的主要治疗方案是否会使患者亚组受益.
    BACKGROUND: Popliteal artery aneurysms (PAA) were traditionally treated by open repair (OR). Endovascular repair (ER) has become a new treatment strategy. The aim of this systemic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate and compare the current outcomes of OR and ER in the emergency treatment of PAA.
    METHODS: A systematic literature search of the PubMed/Medline database was carried out. Outcomes were 30-day mortality, morbidity, major amputation rate (30 days), major amputation rate (1 year), 1-year primary patency rate, 1-year secondary patency rate and 1-year survival. Additionally, we included clinical data of patients with popliteal aneurysms treated between 2009 and 2021 at the Martin-Luther University Halle-Wittenberg.
    RESULTS: We identified two cohort studies from 2014 and 2015 with a total of 199 patients that underwent emergent surgery (39 ER and 160 OR). We also included 26 patients from our institution. For emergency treatment, 30-day major amputation rates (18% vs 3%, Odds Ratio 5.82, 95% CI [1.75; 19.30], p = .004), 30-day mortality rates (10% vs 1%, Odds Ratio 5.57, 95% CI [1.01; 30.58], p = .05), 1-year major amputation rates (15% vs 6% Odds Ratio 3.61, 95% CI [1.18; 11.09], p = .02), 1-year loss of primary patency (54% vs 23%, Odds Ratio 3.19, 95% CI [0.91; 11.20], p = .07), and 1-year loss of secondary patency (44% vs 12%, Odds Ratio 6.91, 95% CI [3.01; 15.83], p < .05) were higher in the ER group when compared to the OR group.
    CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular repair represents an alternative approach for the emergency treatment of PAA. Limited evidence from the available non-randomized studies shows unfavorable outcomes for patients undergoing ER. However, the results are prone to selection bias, and only randomized trials comparing ER to OR might reveal whether a subgroup of patients would benefit from ER as primary treatment of PAA in an emergency setting.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    pop动脉卡压综合征(PAES)是胚胎性肌腱变异或小腿肌肉肥大对pop动脉的压迫。PAES需要及时诊断并完全释放截留的脉管系统,以缓解症状并防止慢性累积血管损伤。我们的患者是一名27岁的女性,因进行性双侧跛行而转诊。检查结果与双侧PAES一致,术前影像学发现胫骨前动脉的非典型近端起源,它也被包裹在pop肌的前面。术前血管造影证实了诊断,并在术后4个月内完成手术释放症状。
    Popliteal artery entrapment syndrome (PAES) is compression of the popliteal artery from embryologic myotendinous variation or calf muscle hypertrophy. PAES necessitates prompt diagnosis and complete release of the entrapped vasculature for symptom relief and to prevent chronic cumulative vascular damage. Our patient is a 27-year-old female referred for progressive bilateral claudication. Workup was consistent with bilateral PAES with preoperative imaging notable for an atypically proximal origin of the anterior tibial artery, which was also encased anterior to the popliteus muscle. Preoperative angiogram confirmed the diagnosis, and complete surgical release resolved symptoms by 4 months postoperatively.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    据估计,在30%至50%的外周动脉疾病(PAD)患者中存在血管钙化,并且是血管内治疗的主要挑战之一。与其他动脉相比,the动脉是独特的,因为它在膝盖运动过程中暴露于显着的变形和生物力学应力。血管内碎石术(IVL)是一种新颖的技术,使用声压波来引起内膜和内壁钙化内的微骨折。血管内碎石术是安全的股骨和膝下病变,但缺乏后续研究。因此,这项研究的目的是描述IVL在the和the下动脉疾病中的首次随访结局。
    这个前景,多中心队列研究包括在4个部位的pop动脉和pop下动脉接受IVL治疗的所有患者。预定在6至8周和12个月进行双工超声检查的标准化随访。主要安全终点是30天主要不良事件(MAE)的复合。主要疗效终点是主要通畅,肢体抢救,12个月时无截肢生存期(AFS)。次要终点为原发辅助通畅性和无靶病变血运重建(TLR)。对患有慢性威胁肢体缺血(CLTI)和间歇性跛行(IC)的患者进行终点分布,并使用Kaplan-Meier方法进行估算。
    在2021年4月至2023年3月之间,对29例30肢的患者进行了治疗。62.1%和80.0%的患者存在糖尿病(DM)和CLTI,分别。在32个治疗的病变中,84.4%的患者出现严重钙化,12.5%的患者需要支架置入.30天内发生4次MAE:1次关闭装置故障,1大截肢,2人死亡,两者均与研究设备无关。主要的通畅性,初级辅助通畅,免于TLR,肢体抢救,12个月的AFS为68.8%,90.0%,93.3%,83.9%,CLTI患者为57.1%,分别。再狭窄无事件发生,重新遮挡,TLR,严重截肢,或IC患者的死亡率。
    这项首次分析显示了静脉内静脉内静脉内静脉内静脉内静脉内静脉内静脉内静脉内静脉内静脉内静脉内静脉内静脉内静脉内静脉内静脉内静脉内静脉内静脉内静脉内静脉内静脉内静脉内静脉内静脉内静脉内静脉内静脉内静脉内静脉内静脉内静脉内静脉内静脉内静脉内静脉内静脉内静脉内静脉内静脉内静脉内
    结论:血管钙化是外周动脉疾病(PAD)的共同特征,是血管内治疗的主要挑战之一。在膝关节运动过程中,the动脉受到生物力学应力,这使得支架置入术没有吸引力,并且经常导致更差的临床结果。这项研究旨在描述IVL在the和the下动脉疾病中的首次随访结果。与以前的研究一样,未发现相关的手术并发症,支架的纾困率仅为12.5%.此外,在复杂的患者群体中,这项研究显示了有希望的安全性和有效性结局.有必要将IVL与单独的血管成形术或其他血管准备装置进行比较,以治疗the和the下动脉疾病。
    UNASSIGNED: Vessel calcification is estimated to be present in 30% to 50% of patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and is one of the main challenges in endovascular treatment. The popliteal artery is unique compared with other arteries due to its exposure to significant deformation and biomechanical stress during knee motion. Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) is a novel technique that uses acoustic pressure waves to cause microfractures within the intimal and medial wall calcification. Intravascular lithotripsy is safe in femoropopliteal and infrapopliteal lesions, but follow-up studies are lacking. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to describe the first follow-up outcomes of IVL in popliteal and infrapopliteal arterial disease.
    UNASSIGNED: This prospective, multicenter cohort study included all patients treated with IVL in the popliteal and infrapopliteal arteries at 4 sites. Standardized follow-up with duplex ultrasonography was scheduled at 6 to 8 weeks and 12 months. The primary safety endpoint was a composite of major adverse events (MAEs) at 30 days. Primary efficacy endpoints were primary patency, limb salvage, and amputation-free survival (AFS) at 12 months. Secondary endpoints were primary-assisted patency and freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR). Endpoints were distributed for patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) and intermittent claudication (IC) and estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
    UNASSIGNED: Between April 2021 and March 2023, 29 patients with 30 limbs were treated. Diabetes mellitus (DM) and CLTI were present in 62.1% and 80.0% of patients, respectively. Within the 32 treated lesions, severe calcification was present in 84.4% and bailout stenting was necessary in 12.5% of the lesions. Four MAEs occurred within 30 days: 1 closure device failure, 1 major amputation, and 2 deaths, neither of which was related to the study device. The primary patency, primary-assisted patency, freedom from TLR, limb salvage, and AFS at 12 months were 68.8%, 90.0%, 93.3%, 83.9%, and 57.1% for CLTI patients, respectively. No events occurred in restenosis, re-occlusion, TLR, major amputation, or mortality in patients with IC.
    UNASSIGNED: This first-ever analysis on follow-up outcomes of IVL in the popliteal and infrapopliteal arteries demonstrated promising safety and efficacy outcomes with a low rate of bailout stenting.
    CONCLUSIONS: Vessel calcification is a common feature in peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and is one of the main challenges in endovascular treatment. The popliteal artery is subjected to biomechanical stress during knee motion, which makes stenting unappealing and often leads to worse clinical outcomes. This study aimed to describe the first follow-up outcomes of IVL in popliteal and infrapopliteal arterial disease. As in line with previous studies, no relevant procedural complications were found and the rate of bail-out stenting was only 12.5%. Moreover, in a complex patient population, this study demonstrated promising safety and efficacy outcomes. The comparison of IVL with angioplasty alone or other vessel preparation devices for popliteal and infrapopliteal arterial disease is warranted.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    背景:在儿科人群中从未描述过感染的pop动脉假性动脉瘤。医生需要意识到它的呈现和管理,为了充分诊断和治疗这种疾病。
    方法:我们描述了一个14岁男孩的案例,他在打篮球后出现了以po窝为中心的肌炎和蜂窝织炎。开始静脉内治疗头孢唑啉。5天后,他经历了膝盖疼痛发作,结果是一种伴pop动脉假性动脉瘤的pop化脓性肌炎。对pop动脉进行了隐静脉移植旁路,并切除了pop假性动脉瘤。连续静脉注射头孢唑林6周,预防性使用乙酰水杨酸6个月。
    结论:该病例强调,如果软组织感染患者在使用适当的抗生素几天后出现持续性疼痛,则重复进行放射学检查的重要性。pop假性动脉瘤可以通过超声成像诊断,并通过pop-pop旁路治疗。我们的病人需要在手术后6个月的静脉移植物处进行导管引导的吻合术扩张,然后发展良好,并在扩张后6个月回到打篮球。
    BACKGROUND: An infected popliteal pseudoaneurysm has never been described in the pediatric population. Physicians need to be aware of its presentation and management, in order to diagnose and treat this medical condition adequately.
    METHODS: We describe the case of a 14-year-old boy who developed myositis and cellulitis centered at the popliteal fossa after playing basketball. A treatment of intravenous cefazolin was started. 5 days later, he experienced a knee pain flare-up, which turned out to be a popliteal pyomyositis with a pseudoaneurysm of the popliteal artery. A saphenous vein graft bypass of the popliteal artery and an excision of the popliteal pseudoaneurysm were performed. Intravenous cefazolin was continued for 6 weeks and prophylactic acetylsalicylic acid for 6 months.
    CONCLUSIONS: This case highlighted the importance of repeating radiologic investigations if a patient suffering from soft tissue infection has persistent pain after several days of appropriate antibiotics. A popliteal pseudoaneurysm can be diagnosed with ultrasound imaging and treated with a popliteal-popliteal bypass. Our patient needed a catheter-guided dilation of the anastomosis at the vein graft 6 months post-surgery, and then evolved favorably and went back to playing basketball 6 months post-dilation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:膝盖很可能会因过度负重而受伤,它被强烈张紧的韧带包围,连接体和肌肉。这些高活性结构嵌入脂肪组织中。膝盖的脂肪和松散的结缔组织最近在研究中得到了复兴。虽然腹侧膝盖的霍法脂肪体在过去几年引起了人们的注意,我们调查了一个较小的,背部脂肪体,腹侧到足肌。这种脂肪的身体以前没有被描述过。
    方法:研究了11个新鲜标本的11个膝盖。所有肌肉都被切除了,除了the肌。the肌从胫骨起源释放,并向其肌腱插入解剖。因此,显示了周围脂肪(SFB)。评估相关血管和神经。测量了身体的大小。组织学切片的实例用HE染色并针对神经丝进行免疫染色。
    结果:SFB位于胫骨后凹的pop肌腹侧,并附着于骨膜和pop肌。它不附着在后十字韧带上。它通过从腓骨头导出的薄片与pop下凹陷分开。可见动脉和静脉血管进入SFB,源自the动脉或胫前动脉。可以看到胫神经的一个分支到达SFB。可以在MRI扫描和塑化中识别SFB。
    结论:主要是,SFB为胫骨上方的pop肌的移动部分提供了滑行空间。SFB位于胫骨凹腔内,腹侧到足肌。这正是胚胎学的地方,the动脉穿过,在后期对卷之前。因此,SFB可能显示前血管周围自主神经,包括胚胎产生的动脉,从那里我们看到了动脉残留物。这里看到的神经形成神经血管束,这可能是疼痛的来源,压缩时。这种解剖结构可以解释膝盖深外侧区域疼痛的自主神经成分。SFB是功能性脂肪,与霍法腹侧膝盖的脂肪垫相当。
    BACKGROUND: The knee is likely to get hurt due to its excessive weight-bearing, for which it is surrounded by strongly tensioned ligaments, connectives and muscles. These highly active structures are imbedded in fatty tissue. The Fatty and loose connective tissue of the knee recently gained a renaissance in research. While the Hoffa fat body in the ventral knee attracted attention over the last years, we have investigated a smaller, dorsal fat body, ventral to the popliteus muscle. This fat body has not been described before.
    METHODS: 11 knees of 11 fresh specimens were investigated. All muscles but the popliteus muscle were removed. The popliteus was released from its tibial origin and dissected towards its tendinous insertion. Thereby, a subpopliteal fat body (SFB) was shown. The related vessels and nerves were evaluated. The size of the body was measured. Examples of histological slices were stained with HE and immunostained against neurofilament.
    RESULTS: The SFB lies ventral of the popliteus muscle at the concave posterior tibia and attaches to the periosteum and the popliteus muscle. It is not attached to the posterior cruciate ligament. It is separated from the subpopliteal recess by a lamella deriving from the fibular head. Arterial and venous vessels are seen entering the SFB, deriving from the popliteal artery or the anterior tibial artery. A subbranch of the tibial nerve was seen to reach the SFB. The SFB could be identified in MRI scans and in plastinations.
    CONCLUSIONS: Primarily, the SFB provides a gliding space for the mobile part of the popliteus muscle over the tibia. The SFB lies within the tibial concavity, ventral to the popliteus muscle. This is exactly where embryologically, the popliteal artery passes through, before its involution in later stages. Therefore, the SFB may show the former perivascular autonomic nerves which encompass the embryologically created arteries, from which we have seen the arterial remnants. The nerves seen here form neurovascular bundles which could be a source of pain, when compressed. This anatomy may explain the autonomic component of pain in the deep lateral region of the knee. The SFB is functional fat, comparable to the Hoffa\'s fat pad in the ventral knee.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    髌骨肿胀是骨科实践中常见的主诉。尽管影像学检查有助于术前诊断pop骨肿胀,明确的诊断通常是通过术后肿胀的组织病理学报告获得的。贝克囊肿出现在内侧,因此通常保留位于后外侧的神经血管束,直到其尺寸变大。血栓形成的动脉瘤在计算机断层扫描(CT)成像中可以模仿Baker囊肿的位置,并且病变内没有造影剂。神经或血管压迫引起的pop肿胀的诊断并不那么简单,外科医生应充分意识到术中发现可能与术前诊断不同。细致的探索对于确定肿胀的起源和与之相关的结构是相关的。应尽可能在术前进行肿胀的MRI成像。
    Popliteal swelling is a common complaint seen in the practice of orthopaedics. Although imaging is useful to aid in the diagnosis of popliteal swelling pre-operatively, definitive diagnosis is often obtained post-operatively through histopathological report of the swelling. Baker\'s cyst arises medially and hence usually spares the posterolaterally located neurovascular bundle until it becomes larger in size. A thrombosed aneurysm can mimic that of Baker\'s cyst on computed tomography (CT) imaging in view of its location and the absence of contrast within the lesion. Diagnosis of a popliteal swelling with neural or vascular compression is not as straightforward and surgeons should be well aware that intra-operative findings may differ from diagnosis made pre-operatively. Meticulous exploration is pertinent in identifying the origin of the swelling and structures related to it. MRI imaging of the swelling should be done pre-operatively whenever possible.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    如果没有适当的诊断和管理,动脉瘤与严重的并发症有关。周围动脉瘤是最常见的,会引起疼痛,神经压迫,缺血和肢体丢失。血管外科是普外科的新兴专业,以预防死亡和肢体丧失为主要目标。本文总结了流行病学,血管和非血管学员的the动脉动脉瘤的调查和管理。
    Aneurysms are associated with significant complications if not diagnosed and managed appropriately. Popliteal arterial aneurysms are the most common peripheral aneurysm, and can cause pain, nerve compression, ischaemia and limb loss. Vascular surgery is an emerging specialty under the remit of general surgery, with the primary objectives of preventing death and limb loss. This article summarises the epidemiology, investigation and management of popliteal arterial aneurysms for vascular and non-vascular trainees.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:分析在急性髂股股动脉静脉血栓形成(IFPVT)导管内直接溶栓(CDT)的可行性和结果。
    方法:从2020年6月至2021年6月,共纳入26例(26条下肢)接受CDT治疗IFPVT的患者。根据血管通路,将患者分为UOA组(n=11,10条左肢和1条右肢)和同侧髂静脉(ILPV)组(n=15,15条左肢)。比较两组患者术前特点和技术细节的差异。
    结果:UOA组患者年龄大于ILPV组患者(67.64±4.11岁VS。52.73±15.63年,p=.003)。UOA组BMI显著高于ILPV接入组(26.03±1.62kg/m2VS24.71±1.46kg/m2,p=.039)。UOA组同时有三种合并症的患者明显多于ILPV接入组(45.5%vs.0,p=.043)。与ILPV接入组相比,UOA组的手术时间和透视时间明显延长(20.64±3.41minvs.10.20±1.42min,p<.001;18.18±2.99minvs.6.13±0.92min,p<.001),但技术成功率明显较低(54.5%vs.100%,p=.007)。在UOA组中,手术相关并发症的发生,包括导管偏离骶外侧静脉(9.1%),腹膜后血肿(9.1%),和血栓脱落进入过滤器(9.1%)。
    结论:UOA可在不能倾向的患者中尝试,但这种途径不是CDT的最佳途径。
    OBJECTIVE: To analyze the feasibility and results of up-and-over access (UOA) for catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) in acute iliofemoral popliteal venous thrombosis (IFPVT).
    METHODS: From June 2020 to June 2021, a total of 26 patients (26 lower limbs) undergoing CDT for IFPVT were included. According to the vascular access, the patients were divided into UOA group (n = 11, 10 left limbs and 1 right limb) and ipsilateral popliteal vein (ILPV) (n = 15, 15 left limbs) access group. The differences in preoperative characteristics and technical details between the two groups were compared.
    RESULTS: Patients in UOA group were older than those in ILPV access group (67.64 ± 4.11 years VS. 52.73 ± 15.63 years, p = .003). The BMI of UOA group was significantly higher than that of ILPV access group (26.03 ± 1.62 kg/m2 VS 24.71 ± 1.46 kg/m2, p = .039). There were significantly more patients with simultaneous three comorbidities in UOA group than in ILPV access group (45.5% vs. 0, p = .043). Compared with ILPV access group, the duration of operation and fluoroscopy of UOA group were significantly longer (20.64 ± 3.41 min vs. 10.20 ± 1.42 min, p < .001; 18.18 ± 2.99 min vs. 6.13 ± 0.92 min, p < .001), but the technical success rate was significantly lower (54.5% vs. 100%, p = .007). In UOA group, the operation-related complications occurred, including catheter straying into lateral sacral vein (9.1%), retroperitoneal hematoma (9.1%), and thrombus shedding into filter (9.1%).
    CONCLUSIONS: The UOA may be attempted in patients who are unable to be prone, but this access is not an optimal pathway for CDT.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    区域麻醉是成功的骨科手术不可或缺的组成部分。神经轴麻醉通常用于手术麻醉,而周围神经阻滞通常用于术后镇痛。患者对区域麻醉的评估应包括神经系统,肺,心血管,和血液学评估。神经轴块包括脊柱,硬膜外,联合脊髓硬膜外。上肢外周神经阻滞包括肌间沟,锁骨上,锁骨下,和腋窝。下肢周围神经阻滞包括股神经阻滞,隐神经阻滞,坐骨神经阻滞,iPACK块,踝关节阻滞和腰丛阻滞。区域麻醉的选择是外科医生的一致决定,麻醉师,和病人的风险收益评估。区域区块的选择取决于患者的合作,病人姿势,手术结构,手术操作,止血带的使用和术后运动阻滞对物理治疗开始的影响。区域麻醉是安全的,但具有固有的失败风险和相对较低的并发症发生率,如局部麻醉全身毒性(LAST)。神经损伤,falls,血肿,感染和过敏反应。超声应用于区域麻醉程序,以提高疗效并最大程度地减少并发症。在区域麻醉管理期间,应随时提供LAST治疗指南和抢救药物(intralipal)。
    Regional anesthesia is an integral component of successful orthopedic surgery. Neuraxial anesthesia is commonly used for surgical anesthesia while peripheral nerve blocks are often used for postoperative analgesia. Patient evaluation for regional anesthesia should include neurological, pulmonary, cardiovascular, and hematological assessments. Neuraxial blocks include spinal, epidural, and combined spinal epidural. Upper extremity peripheral nerve blocks include interscalene, supraclavicular, infraclavicular, and axillary. Lower extremity peripheral nerve blocks include femoral nerve block, saphenous nerve block, sciatic nerve block, iPACK block, ankle block and lumbar plexus block. The choice of regional anesthesia is a unanimous decision made by the surgeon, the anesthesiologist, and the patient based on a risk-benefit assessment. The choice of the regional block depends on patient cooperation, patient positing, operative structures, operative manipulation, tourniquet use and the impact of post-operative motor blockade on initiation of physical therapy. Regional anesthesia is safe but has an inherent risk of failure and a relatively low incidence of complications such as local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST), nerve injury, falls, hematoma, infection and allergic reactions. Ultrasound should be used for regional anesthesia procedures to improve the efficacy and minimize complications. LAST treatment guidelines and rescue medications (intralipid) should be readily available during the regional anesthesia administration.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    pite动脉动脉瘤(PAA)是一种罕见的疾病,患病率为0.1%至1%。前几年,尽管缺乏高水平的证据,但与开放手术修复(OSR)相比,PAA的血管内修复(ER)更频繁.2014年,POPART注册开始验证PAA修复的当前治疗方案。
    POPART是一个多国的多中心注册,记录PAA的ER和OSR的围手术期和术后结局。使用在线调查工具SurveyMonkey记录了数据集(可在以下网址获得:https://www。surveymonkey.com/)。对数据集进行定期监测和合理性检查,以确保可靠性。本研究的目的是报告POPART登记册的调查结果,其中包括来自41个中心的数据。
    从2014年6月到2019年8月,POPART注册表中记录了794例病例。662例患者进行了OSR,106例患者进行了ER;23例患者接受了保守治疗。在原发性内质网组的106名患者中,4需要转换为OSR。ER患者明显年龄较大(ER,中位数,71年;OSR,中位数,67岁;P<0.05)。人口统计数据中没有其他显著差异,合并症,或动脉瘤的形态在两组之间。在OSR组的662名患者中,在ER组106例患者中,50.3%有症状,而有症状者为29.2%(P<0.05)。因急性缺血急诊治疗,严重缺血,OSR组149例患者(22.5%)和ER组11例患者(10.3%)需要破裂或破裂.术后最常见的并发症是伤口愈合受损(OSR,n=47[7.1%];ER,n=3[2.8%];P>.05)和大出血(OSR,n=26[3.9%];ER,n=3[2.8%];P>0.05)。OSR组的住院时间明显长于ER组(中位数,10天;范围,3-65天;与中位数相比,7天;范围,1-73天)。12个月和24个月后,OSR和ER组的总体通畅率分别为83.2%和44.7%(P<.005)和74.2%和29.1%(P<.005),分别。OSR组的假体移植物与自体静脉的结果明显较差(主要通畅性,12个月时71.4%vs88.1%)。
    为了评估新的治疗技术,例如用于PAA的ER,现实世界的数据至关重要。POPART注册表的首次结果的当前分析显示,在流出血管良好的无症状患者中,PAA的血管内治疗的围手术期效果良好。围手术期并发症发生率较低,术后住院时间较OSR后短。然而,与接受开放修复治疗的患者相比,ER组12个月和24个月后的通畅率较低.进一步解释需要更多的后续数据;登记册中的数据集正在完成。
    Popliteal artery aneurysm (PAA) is a rare disease with a prevalence of 0.1% to 1%. Within previous years, endovascular repair (ER) of PAAs has been performed more frequently despite the lack of high-level evidence compared with open surgical repair (OSR). In 2014, the POPART registry was initiated to validate the current treatment options for PAA repair.
    POPART is a multinational multicenter registry of the peri- and postoperative outcomes of ER and OSR for PAAs. Data sets were recorded using the online survey tool SurveyMonkey (available at: https://www.surveymonkey.com/). Regular monitoring and plausibility checks of the data sets are performed to ensure reliability. The aim of the present study was to report the findings from the POPART registry, which includes data from 41 centers.
    From June 2014 to August 2019, 794 cases had been recorded in the POPART registry. OSR had been performed in 662 patients and ER in 106 patients; 23 patients had been treated conservatively. Of the 106 patients in the primary ER group, 4 had required conversion to OSR. The ER patients were significantly older (ER, median, 71 years; OSR, median, 67 years; P < .05). No other significant differences were present in the demographic data, comorbidities, or aneurysm morphology between the two groups. Of the 662 patients in the OSR group, 50.3% were symptomatic compared with 29.2% of the 106 patients in the ER group (P < .05). Emergency treatment because of acute ischemia, critical ischemia, or rupture was necessary for 149 patients (22.5%) in the OSR group and 11 patients (10.3%) in the ER group. The most frequent postoperative complications were impaired wound healing (OSR, n = 47 [7.1%]; ER, n = 3 [2.8%]; P > .05) and major bleeding (OSR, n = 26 [3.9%]; ER, n = 3 [2.8%]; P > .05). The in-hospital length of stay was significantly longer for the OSR group than for the ER group (median, 10 days; range, 3-65 days; vs median, 7 days; range, 1-73 days). The overall patency for the OSR and ER groups after 12 and 24 months was 83.2% and 44.7% (P < .005) and 74.2% and 29.1% (P < .005), respectively. The outcomes with a prosthetic graft vs an autologous vein were significantly poorer in the OSR group (primary patency, 71.4% vs 88.1% at 12 months).
    To evaluate new treatment techniques such as ER for PAAs, real-world data are of essential importance. The present analysis of the first results for the POPART registry shows good perioperative results for endovascular treatment of PAA in asymptomatic patients with good outflow vessels. The perioperative complication rate is low and the postoperative hospital stay is shorter than after OSR. However, the patency rates after 12 and 24 months are low in the ER group compared to patients treated with open repair. More follow-up data is required for further interpretation; the completion of the data sets in the registry is ongoing.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号