ChIP-qPCR offers the opportunity to identify interactions of DNA-binding proteins such as transcription factors and their respective DNA binding sites. Thereby, transcription factors can interfere with gene expression, resulting in up- or downregulation of their target genes. Utilizing ChIP, it is possible to identify specific DNA binding sites that are bound by the DNA-binding proteins in dependence on treatment or prevailing conditions. During ChIP, DNA-binding proteins are reversibly cross-linked to their DNA binding sites and the DNA itself is fragmented. Using bead-captured antibodies, the target proteins are isolated while still binding their respective DNA response element. Using quantitative PCR, these DNA fragments are amplified and quantified. In this protocol, DNA binding sites of the glucocorticoid receptor are identified by treatment with the synthetic glucocorticoid Dexamethasone in murine bone marrow-derived macrophages.

Background: Infectious endocarditis (IE) remains a critical condition despite all the medical advances in recent decades. Reliable pathogen identification is indispensable for precise therapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic and therapeutic benefit of additional polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in comparison with microbiological culture alone based on intraoperative tissue sampling for patients operated on due to IE. Methods: A total of 224 patients diagnosed with acute or subacute IE were analyzed. Intraoperatively resected infectious tissue was analyzed using both PCR and microbiological culture. Subsequently, the results of the detection of bacteria obtained based on intraoperative measurements from tissue via culture and PCR were compared with preoperative blood culture results. Furthermore, we evaluated the therapeutic impact of the culture and/or PCR results obtained from cardiac tissue. Results: The 224 patients were 63 ± 17 years old, and 64 (29%) were female. In total, 149 (67%) suffered from aortic valve endocarditis, 45 (45%) had mitral valve endocarditis, and 39 (18%) were afflicted with double-valve endocarditis. Prosthetic valve endocarditis was present in 70 (31%) patients. Pathogens were detected in 70% of the cases analyzed via PCR using cardiac valve tissue and in 25% of those analyzed via a culture of cardiac valve tissue; this figure was only 64% for preoperative blood culture. Overall, a pathogen was identified in 197 patients (88%), leading to antibiotic therapy. Targeted antibiotic therapy, based on the PCR results, was carried out in 37 cases and was conducted based on a culture from cardiac valve tissue in three cases. Finally, in 12% of patients, the causative pathogen remained unclear. Conclusions: For patients suffering endocarditis, PCR analysis is indispensable and superior to preoperative blood culture and intraoperative culture in detecting bacteria. Based on PCR testing, antibiotic therapy can be individually adjusted. The high precision of pathogen identification may lead to a significant reduction in IE-associated morbidity and mortality.

Background and objective The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has imposed a significant burden on healthcare systems worldwide. This highlights the need for simple, rapid, and affordable diagnostic tests that can serve as alternatives to the existing costly and demanding polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay, especially in resource-limited countries like Ghana. In light of this, we aimed to assess the diagnostic efficacy of three COVID-19 rapid immunochromatographic antigen test kits vs. real-time reverse transcriptase-PCR (rRT-PCR). Methods This study evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of three COVID-19 rapid immunochromatographic antigen test kits: DG Rapid, SD Rapid, and SS Rapid. They were compared with the gold standard RT-PCR for the detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) nucleocapsid antigen in 75 randomly selected archived nasopharyngeal samples. Results Of the 75 samples tested, 38 (50.7%) were positive and 37 (49.3%) were negative for SARS-CoV-2 RNA by rRT-PCR assay. No false positives were recorded. On the other hand, the DG Rapid kit detected 30 (78.9%) true positives and eight (21.1%) false negatives. SD Rapid kit detected 28 (73.7%) true positives and 10 (26.3%) false negatives, while the SS Rapid kit detected 19 (50.0%) true positives and 19 (50.0%) false negatives. While the specificity of each test kit was 100% (95% CI), the sensitivity of the DG Rapid, SD Rapid, and SS Rapid kits was 79%, 74%, and 50% (95% CI), respectively. Higher sensitivities were recorded among samples with cycle threshold (Ct) values <29.99 for each kit. Also, the DG Rapid kit demonstrated 79% excellent agreement with rRT-PCR, while the SD Rapid and SS Rapid kits demonstrated good agreement with rRT-PCR with 73% and 50% Cohen\'s kappa values, respectively. Conclusions Based on our findings, DG Rapid and SD Rapid kits are reliable alternatives to rRT-PCR for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection, especially in resource-limited settings like Ghana.

In this study, we conducted polymerase chain reaction (PCR) experiments using Escherichia coli (E. coli) and a Mars sand simulant (Mars Global Simulant MGS-1, Exolith Lab) to detect and analyze potential extraterrestrial life. The targeted DNA sequence is common among the bacterial kingdom on Earth. PCR experiments conducted after alkaline heat extraction, wherein samples with varying amounts of Mars sand simulant were compared, revealed that the simulant interfered with DNA detection. We then conducted PCR experiments following treatment with a sand DNA extraction kit on samples with various E. coli densities. DNA bands for a minimum E. coli density of 900 cells/(g sand) were confirmed, while no DNA bands were visible in the 90 cells/(g sand) sample with and without the Mars sand simulant. The total DNA mass contained in 900 cells was calculated to be 15.3 pg (i.e., 1.53 pg in 0.1 g sand sample we evaluated). We tested and compared the influence of the eluate of Mars sand simulant and DNA adsorption onto Mars sand simulant based on optical absorbance measurements. Our findings suggest that the mechanism by which the Mars sand simulant prevents PCR is through the adsorption of DNA onto the Mars sand simulant.

The occurrence of DNA looping is ubiquitous. This process plays a well-documented role in the regulation of prokaryotic gene expression, such as in regulation of the Escherichia coli lactose (lac) operon. Here we present two complementary methods for high-resolution in vivo detection of DNA/protein binding within the bacterial nucleoid by using either chromatin immunoprecipitation combined with phage λ exonuclease digestion (ChIP-exo) or chromatin endogenous cleavage (ChEC), coupled with ligation-mediated polymerase chain reaction (LM-PCR) and Southern blot analysis. As an example, we apply these in vivo protein-mapping methods to E. coli to show direct binding of architectural proteins in the Lac repressor-mediated DNA repression loop.

Early diagnosis of infectious uveitis can lead to prompt initiation of treatment to minimize vision-threatening sequelae. As various infectious etiologies of uveitis share similar clinical features, advancements in polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and metagenomic next-generation sequencing (MDS) have shown significant promise in improving diagnostic capabilities. Various techniques of PCR, including real-time, multiplex, comprehensive, and broad-range, have increased the armamentarium for infectious uveitis diagnosis. Additionally, metagenomic deep sequencing technology has provided a methodology to identify causative pathogens as well as novel etiologies of uveitis. This review discusses the diagnostic tools available for infectious uveitis and highlights the advantages and disadvantages of the techniques.

BACKGROUND: Fine-needle aspiration specimens from soft tissue tumors are complicated by lack of tissue architecture and limited material for ancillary testing. There are little data on the feasibility of next-generation sequencing techniques for fusion detection on soft tissue cytology specimens. This study explored the role of an anchored multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based gene fusion assay in aiding the diagnosis of mesenchymal neoplasms on cytology samples.
METHODS: The laboratory information system was queried for cytology specimens that had undergone testing by anchored multiplex PCR. After exclusion of epithelial and hematolymphoid neoplasms, clinical and pathologic information was collected on the remaining cases.
RESULTS: There were 1609 cytology specimens tested with anchored multiplex PCR. Of these, 48 (3%) were cytology specimens from mesenchymal tumors. Anchored multiplex PCR was positive for a reportable fusion transcript in 14 of 48 cases (29%); there was no fusion detected in 32 cases (67%), and there was insufficient tissue for analysis in two cases (4%). The detectable fusion partners included ALK (n = 4), STAT6 (n = 4), EWSR1 (n = 3), and one each of SS18, YAP1, and PHF1. Of the cases in which a fusion partner was detected, eight of 14 were disease-defining on cytology preparation, and six of 14 provided molecular confirmation of a metastatic focus of a previously diagnosed tumor.
CONCLUSIONS: The anchored, multiplex PCR-based gene fusion assay is a powerful orthogonal tool in helping diagnose mesenchymal neoplasms on cytology specimens. The material obtained for cytologic analysis yields sufficient quality/quantity of tissue in the majority of cases tested.

A paper-based surface enhancement of a Raman scattering substrate consisting of silver-nanowires stacked on glass-fiber filter paper was prepared. At the same time, the DNA-embedding molecule Eva Green was introduced as a signaling molecule for surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) detection. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used to amplify target genes and the method was developed into a rapid molecular diagnostic system. The total detection time of the developed detection method was 40 min, including 30 min of PCR amplification and 10 min of SERS measurement. After 30 PCR cycles, bacterial DNA with an initial concentration of 20 fg/μL and a bacterial suspension with an initial concentration of 7.2 × 101 CFUs/mL could be detected. When the enrichment culture time was 4 h, target bacteria with an initial contamination inoculation volume of 1.5 CFUs/mL could be detected in artificially contaminated samples. The method is fast and highly sensitive, and has not been applied to the detection of V. parahaemolyticus.

Aeromonas hydrophila is a Gram-negative bacterium that has been linked to serious illnesses in both humans and animals. The presence of hemolysin, a virulence factor, is critical in the development of A. hydrophila-related illnesses. As a result, precise and timely detection of the hemolysin gene is critical for efficient diagnosis and prevention of many illnesses. The PCR is used in this study to detect the hemolysin gene of A. hydrophila in a novel, fast, and highly sensitive one-step technique. Specific primers were constructed to amplify a conserved area within the hemolysin gene to achieve both specificity as well as sensitivity. The PCR assay was rigorously optimized, taking temperature, primer concentration, and reaction time into account, in order to maximize the efficiency and reliability of this method. In conclusion, this method\'s simplicity, sensitivity, and specificity make it highly promising for regular diagnostic applications. Its application would allow for the early detection of A. hydrophila infections, allowing for more effective treatment and control methods.

Melon (Cucumis melo L.) is a global commercial crop that is sensitive to seed-borne wilt infections caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. melonis (Fom). To address the challenge of detecting Fom contamination, we designed a probe-based real-time PCR method, TDCP2, in combination with rapid or column-based DNA extraction protocols to develop reliable molecular detection methods. Utilizing TDCP2, the detection rate reached 100% for both artificially Fom-inoculated (0.25-25%) and pod-inoculated melon seeds in conjunction with DNA samples from either the rapid or column-based extraction protocol. We performed analyses of precision, recall, and F1 scores, achieving a maximum F1 score of 1 with TDCP2, which highlights the robustness of the method. Additionally, intraday and interday assays were performed, which revealed the high reproducibility and stability of column-based DNA extraction protocols combined with TDCP2. These metrics confirm the reliability of our developed protocols, setting a foundation for future enhancements in seed pathology diagnostics and potentially broadening their applicability across various Fom infection levels. In the future, we hope that these methods will reduce food loss by improving the control and management of melon diseases.