背景:由于自体移植骨周围的限制,外科医生已经转向骨诱导剂来增强脊柱融合。有关并发症和疗效可疑的报告减缓了这些替代品的采用。重组人血小板衍生生长因子B同型二聚体(rhPDGF-BB)已被食品和药物管理局(FDA)批准(Augment)用于促进骨科其他领域的融合,但其在脊柱融合中的表征尚未得到测试。这项研究的目的是表征宿主对PDGF-BB的体内反应。
方法:使用四种植入物类型之一,对80只雌性Fischer大鼠进行L4-5后外侧融合:(b)含乙酸钠缓冲液的β-TCP/牛胶原基质(β-TCP/Col),(c)β-TCP/Col,剂量为0.3mg/mL,\"或(d)含3.0mg/mL\"高剂量\"rhPDGF-BB的β-TCP/Col。动物在第4、7、10和21天接受磁共振成像(MRI)和血清细胞因子定量,术后。处理组织用于Ki67和vonWillebrand因子(vWF)的免疫荧光染色以评估新血管形成。
结果:MRI显示四个治疗组在任何时间点的液体积聚没有差异。血清细胞因子分析显示在27种细胞因子中的20种治疗组之间没有临床上的显著差异。炎性细胞因子IFN-γ,IL-1β,IL-18,MCP-1,MIP-1α,rhPDGF-BB不诱导TNF-α。组织学显示细胞浸润没有差异,Ki67和vWF免疫荧光染色组间相似。
结论:与β-TCP/Col基质递送的rhPDGF-BB与ilia骨同基因同种异体骨或对照载体相比,不会产生严重的全身或局部宿主炎症反应。rhPDGF-BB与β-TCP/Col基质混合可能是脊柱融合中同基因同种异体移植物的可行且安全的生物替代品。需要进行进一步的研究以评估这种情况下的疗效。
BACKGROUND: Due to the constraints surrounding autograft bone, surgeons have turned to osteoinductive agents to augment spinal fusion. Reports of complications and questionable efficacy slowed the adoption of these alternatives. Recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor B homodimer (rhPDGF-BB) has been Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved (Augment) to promote fusion in other areas of orthopedics, but its characterization in spine fusion has not yet been tested. The purpose of this study is to characterize the host response to PDGF-BB in vivo.
METHODS: Eighty female Fischer rats underwent L4-5 posterolateral fusion using one of four implant types: (a) iliac crest syngeneic allograft harvested from syngeneic donors, (b) β-TCP/bovine collagen matrix (β-TCP/Col) with sodium acetate buffer, (c) β-TCP/Col with 0.3 mg/mL \"low dose,\" or (d) β-TCP/Col with 3.0 mg/mL \"high dose\" of rhPDGF-BB. Animals underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and serum cytokine quantification at 4, 7, 10, and 21 days, postoperatively. Tissues were processed for immunofluorescence staining for Ki67 and von Willebrand factor (vWF) to assess neovascularization.
RESULTS: MRI demonstrated no differences in fluid accumulation among the four treatment groups at any of the time points. Serum cytokine analysis showed no clinically significant differences between treatment groups in 20 of the 27 cytokines. Inflammatory cytokines IFN-γ, IL-1β, IL-18, MCP-1, MIP-1α, TNF-α were not induced by rhPDGF-BB. Histology showed no differences in cell infiltration, and Ki67 and vWF immunofluorescence staining was similar among groups.
CONCLUSIONS: rhPDGF-BB delivered with a β-TCP/Col matrix exerts no exaggerated systemic or local host inflammatory response when compared to iliac crest syngeneic allograft bone or the control carrier. rhPDGF-BB mixed with a β-TCP/Col matrix could be a viable and safe biologic alternative to syngeneic allograft in spine fusion. Further studies need to be performed to evaluate efficacy in this setting.