BACKGROUND: Intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) aims at achieving highly conformal dose distribution and, at the same time, attaining rapid dose falloff outside the treatment target. SRS is performed using different techniques including dynamic conformal arcs (DCA) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT).
OBJECTIVE: In this study, we compare dose conformity and falloff in DCA and VMAT plans for SRS with a single target.
METHODS: To compare dose conformity in SRS plans, we employ a novel conformity index C I d e x p $C{I}_{{d}_{exp}}$ , RTOG conformity index ( C I R T O G $C{I}_{RTOG}$ ), and Riet-Paddick conformity index ( C I R P $C{I}_{RP}$ ). In addition, we use indices R 50 % $R50\\% $ , V 10 G y ${V}_{10Gy}$ , and V 12 G y ${V}_{12Gy}$ to evaluate dose falloff. For each of the considered 118 cases of SRS, two plans were created using DCA and VMAT. A two-tailed Student\'s t-test was used to evaluate the difference between the employed indices for the DCA and VMAT plans.
RESULTS: The studied VMAT plans were characterized by higher dose conformity than the DCA plans. The differences between the conformity indices for the DCA plans and VMAT plans were statistically significant. The DCA plans had a smaller number of monitor units (MUs) and smaller indices R50%, V10 Gy, and V12 Gy than the VMAT plans. However, the differences between R50%, V10 Gy, and V12 Gy for the DCA and VMAT plans were not statistically significant.
CONCLUSIONS: Although the studied VMAT plans had higher dose conformity, they also had larger MUs than the DCA plans. In terms of dose falloff characterized by parameters R50%, V10 Gy, and V12 Gy, DCA serves as a reasonable alternative to VMAT in the case of a single brain metastasis.

UNASSIGNED: Since 1964, there has been a scarcity of reported cases of primary ameloblastoma (AM) or ameloblastic carcinoma (AMCa) of the skull. The clinical presentation and distinctive features of this uncommon condition at specific anatomical sites remain unclear. We report a case of malignant transformation of a primary AM of the skull situated in the frontal-temporal-parietal region and highlight its similarities to other cases reported in the literature.
UNASSIGNED: A 53-year-old female patient presented with a 20-day history of headaches and bilateral lower limb weakness for 10 days. Physical examination revealed slow and unsteady gait. An occupying lesion was observed in the right frontal-temporal-parietal region of the skull on the Cranial imaging. A right cranial bone tumor margin expansion resection was performed. The patient\'s motor functions recovered normally after surgery. Postoperative imaging examinations showed10 tumor resection. Follow-up imaging examinations showed tumor recurrence. The patient underwent resection of the recurrent tumor. Postoperative pathological analysis revealed malignant transformation of the AM.Follow-up imaging examinations showed tumor recurrence again. The patient was admitted for stereotactic radiotherapy. Follow-up imaging examinations demonstrated no evidence of tumor recurrence and subsequent chest CT revealed no signs of metastasis.
UNASSIGNED: Primary AM or AMCa of the skull is increasingly being described in the literature, but detailed reports on the malignant transformation of primary AM of the skull are lacking. The pathogenesis of this condition remains unclear. Aggressive treatment and close follow-up may be crucial for preventing disease recurrence and malignant transformation.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate whether variations in cranial angles and treatment accuracy during CyberKnife robotic radiosurgery necessitate adjustment of the margins of the planning target volume. Patients and Methods: Data from 66 patients receiving CyberKnife treatment for brain tumors were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were immobilized using a thermoplastic mask and headrest. The cranial angle was measured on planning CT and patients were divided into 2 groups: ≤10° (Group A) and >10° (Group B). Intrafractional motion was recorded using the CyberKnife tracking system over 50 min. Translational and rotational errors were compared between groups, and planning target volume margins were calculated. Results: In Group A, significant translational error differences were found along with the X-axis over time (P < .02). In Group B, significant differences occurred along with the Z-axis (P < .03). No significant rotational or 3-dimensional vector differences were found in either group. Group A had significantly lower Y-axis (P < .045) and roll axis (P < .005) errors compared to Group B. Estimated planning target volume margins in Group A were 0.56 mm (X), 0.46 mm (Y), and 0.47 mm (Z). In Group B, margins were 0.62 mm (X), 0.48 mm (Y), and 0.46 mm (Z). Margins covering 95% of intrafraction motion were 0.49 to 0.50 mm (X, Y, Z) and 0.69 mm (3-dimensional vector) for Group A, and 0.48 to 0.60 mm and 0.79 mm for Group B. With a 1-mm margin, complete coverage was achieved in Group A while 2.1% of vectors in Group B exceeded 1 mm. Conclusion: Adjusting cranial angle to ≤10° during thermoplastic mask molding provided better or similar intrafractional stability compared to >10°.

Objective: To investigate the dosimetric effects of using individualized silicone rubber (SR) bolus on the target area and organs at risk (OARs) during postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT), as well as evaluate skin acute radiation dermatitis (ARD). Methods: A retrospective study was performed on 30 patients with breast cancer. Each patient was prepared with an individualized SR bolus of 3 mm thickness. Fan-beam computed tomography (FBCT) was performed at the first and second fractions, and then once a week for a total of 5 times. Dosimetric metrics such as homogeneity index (HI), conformity index (CI), skin dose (SD), and OARs including the heart, lungs, and spinal cord were compared between the original plan and the FBCTs. The acute side effects were recorded. Results: In targets\' dosimetric metrics, there were no significant differences in Dmean and V105% between planning computed tomography (CT) and actual treatments (P > .05), while the differences in D95%, V95%, HI, and CI were statistically significant (P < .05). In OARs, there were no significant differences between the Dmean, V5, and V20 of the affected lung, V5 of the heart and Dmax of the spinal cord (P > .05) except the V30 of affected lung, which was slightly lower than the planning CT (P < .05). In SD, both Dmax and Dmean in actual treatments were increased than plan A, and the difference was statistically significant (P < .05), while the skin-V20 and skin-V30 has no difference. Among the 30 patients, only one patient had no skin ARD, and 5 patients developed ARD of grade 2, while the remaining 24 patients were grade 1. Conclusion: The OR bolus showed good anastomoses and high interfraction reproducibility with the chest wall, and did not cause deformation during irradiation. It ensured accurate dose delivery of the target and OARs during the treatment, which may increase SD by over 101%. In this study, no cases of grade 3 skin ARD were observed. However, the potential of using OR bolus to reduce grade 1 and 2 skin ARD warrants further investigation with a larger sample size.

Recent innovations in image guidance, treatment delivery, and adaptive radiotherapy (RT) have created a new paradigm for planning target volume (PTV) margin design for patients with prostate cancer. We performed a review of the recent literature on PTV margin selection and design for intact prostate RT, excluding post-operative RT, brachytherapy, and proton therapy. Our review describes the increased focus on prostate and seminal vesicles as heterogenous deforming structures with further emergence of intra-prostatic GTV boost and concurrent pelvic lymph node treatment. To capture recent innovations, we highlight the evolution in cone beam CT guidance, and increasing use of MRI for improved target delineation and image registration and supporting online adaptive RT. Moreover, we summarize new and evolving image-guidance treatment platforms as well as recent reports of novel immobilization strategies and motion tracking. Our report also captures recent implementations of artificial intelligence to support image guidance and adaptive RT. To characterize the clinical impact of PTV margin changes via model-based risk estimates and clinical trials, we highlight recent high impact reports. Our report focusses on topics in the context of PTV margins but also showcase studies attempting to move beyond the PTV margin recipes with robust optimization and probabilistic planning approaches. Although guidelines exist for target margins conventional using CT-based image guidance, further validation is required to understand the optimal margins for online adaptation either alone or combined with real-time motion compensation to minimize systematic and random uncertainties in the treatment of patients with prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate set-up error for head and neck cancer (HNC) patients according to each neck lymph node (LN) level. And clinical factors affecting set-up error were analyzed.
METHODS: Reference points (RP1, RP2, RP3, and RP4) representing neck LN levels I to IV were designated. These RP were contoured on simulation computed tomography (CT) and cone-beam CT of 89 HNC patients with the same standard. After image registration was performed, movement of each RP was measured. Univariable logistic regression analyses were performed to analyze clinical factors related to measured movements.
RESULTS: The mean value of deviation of all axes was 1.6 mm, 1.3 mm, 1.8 mm, and 1.5 mm for RP1, RP2, RP3, and RP4, respectively. Deviation was over 3 mm in 24 patients. Movement of more than 3 mm was observed only in RP1 and RP3. In RP1, it was related to bite block use. Movement exceeding 3 mm was most frequently observed in RP3. Primary tumor and metastatic LN volume change were clinical factors related to the RP3 movement.
CONCLUSIONS: Planning target volume margin of 4 mm for neck LN level I, 3 mm for neck LN level II, 5 mm for neck LN level III, and 3 mm for neck LN level IV was required to include all movements of each LN level. In patients using bite block, changes in primary tumor volume, and metastatic LN volume were related to significant movement.

BACKGROUND: To retrospectively analyze the accuracy of radiotherapy using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), Styrofoam fixation, and breast bracket fixation in the chest wall target area and supraclavicular lymphatic drainage area (supraclavicular target area) of patients with breast cancer.and compare the setting efficiency and comfort satisfaction.
METHODS: A total of 65 patients with postoperative lymphatic metastasis of breast cancer, including 36 cases of Styrofoam fixation and 29 cases of breast bracket fixation, were recruited from March 2021 to August 2022 and retrospectively analyzed. All the patients underwent CBCT scans weekly, and the setup errors of the chest wall and supraclavicular target volume were compared and recorded. The planning target volume (PTV) margins of the two groups were calculated using the correlation MPTV = 2.5Σ + 0.7σ. The setup time and comfort satisfaction scores of the two groups were recorded and analyzed. The correlations among errors in each direction were analyzed using the Pearson correlation analysis.
RESULTS: There was a significant difference in the left-right direction (X) axis of the chest wall target area between the Styrofoam and breast bracket groups (1.59 ± 1.47 mm vs. 2.05 ± 1.64 mm, P = 0.012). There were statistical differences in the ventrodorsal direction (Z) and bed angle of the supraclavicular target area, the data were (1.36 ± 1.27 mm vs. 1.75 ± 1.55 mm, P = 0.046; 0.47 ± 0.47° vs. 0.66 ± 0.59°, P = 0.006, respectively). In the X, Y, and Z directions, the respective PTV margins of the two groups in the chest wall target area were 5.01 mm, 5.99 mm, and 5.47 mm in the Styrofoam group, while those in the breast bracket group were 6.10 mm, 6.34 mm, and 6.10 mm, respectively. Moreover, the PTV margins of the supraclavicular target in the three directions were 3.69 mm, 3.86 mm, and 4.28 mm in the Styrofoam group, while those in the breast bracket group were 3.99 mm, 3.72 mm, and 5.45 mm, respectively. The setup time of the two groups was 3.4 ± 1.1 min and 5.5 ± 3.1 min (P = 0.007). The subjective comfort satisfaction scores of the two groups were 27.50 ± 1.24 and 25.44 ± 1.23 (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The application of Styrofoam fixation in radiotherapy of breast cancer in the supraclavicular lymph node area has several advantages as compared to breast bracket fixation, including higher positioning accuracy, smaller external expansion boundary, improved work efficiency, and patients\' comfort, which might provide a reference for clinical work.

U-Net, based on a deep convolutional network (CNN), has been clinically used to auto-segment normal organs, while still being limited to the planning target volume (PTV) segmentation. This work aims to address the problems in two aspects: 1) apply one of the newest network architectures such as vision transformers other than the CNN-based networks, and 2) find an appropriate combination of network hyper-parameters with reference to recently proposed nnU-Net (\"no-new-Net\"). VT U-Net was adopted for auto-segmenting the whole pelvis prostate PTV as it consisted of fully transformer architecture. The upgraded version (v.2) applied the nnU-Net-like hyper-parameter optimizations, which did not fully cover the transformer-oriented hyper-parameters. Thus, we tried to find a suitable combination of two key hyper-parameters (patch size and embedded dimension) for 140 CT scans throughout 4-fold cross validation. The VT U-Net v.2 with hyper-parameter tuning yielded the highest dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of 82.5 and the lowest 95% Haussdorff distance (HD95) of 3.5 on average among the seven recently proposed deep learning networks. Importantly, the nnU-Net with hyper-parameter optimization achieved competitive performance, although this was based on the convolution layers. The network hyper-parameter tuning was demonstrated to be necessary even for the newly developed architecture of vision transformers.

BACKGROUND: Evaluation of dose conformity is important to ensure minimum dose to normal tissue and sufficient dose coverage of the planning target volume (PTV). The existing conformity indices depend on the PTV volume and do not differentiate between two different scenarios: overdosing normal tissue and underdosing PTV.
OBJECTIVE: In this study, we introduce a novel index to assess conformity of dose distributions in radiotherapy.
METHODS: The suggested conformity index C I d e x p $C{I_{{d_{exp}}}}$ is defined by the ratio of the volume representing actual \"non-conformity\" of the planned dose and the volume representing acceptable \"non-conformity.\" The latter volume is produced by expanding the PTV. If both the average distance ( d ¯ $\\overline d $ ) between the reference isodose surface and planning target volume and arbitrarily selected PTV expansion margin ( d e x p ${d_{exp}}$ ) are much smaller than the size of the PTV, C I d e x p $C{I_{{d_{exp}}}}$ approximately equals the ratio d ¯ d e x p $\\dfrac{{\\bar d}}{{{d_{exp}}}}$ . In this work, C I d e x p $C{I_{{d_{exp}}}}$ was utilized to analyze 90 cases of brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiation therapy (SRS) and 102 cases of lung cancer treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT).
RESULTS: For d e x p ${d_{exp}}$  = 0.1 cm, all considered SRS treatment plans were characterized by C I d e x p < 1 $C{I_{{d_{exp}}}} < 1$ while 2 out of 102 SBRT plans had C I d e x p > 1 $C{I_{{d_{exp}}}} > 1$ . The average values of C I d e x p $C{I_{{d_{exp}}}}$ for SRS and SBRT plans were 0.31 and 0.43, respectively. For d e x p ${d_{exp}}$  = 0.2 cm, all studied treatment plans had C I d e x p < 1 $C{I_{{d_{exp}}}} < 1$ , and the average values of C I d e x p $C{I_{{d_{exp}}}}$ for SRS and SBRT plans were 0.15 and 0.25, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The suggested conformity index C I d e x p $C{I_{{d_{exp}}}}$ varies less with PTV volume than the RTOG and Riet-Paddick indices frequently used for evaluation of dose conformity. In addition, C I d e x p $C{I_{{d_{exp}}}}$ can be expressed as a sum of two terms which describe \"over-coverage\" and \"under-coverage\" of the treatment target. The results confirm that C I d e x p $C{I_{{d_{exp}}}}$ can be used for evaluation of dose conformity in SRS and SBRT.

BACKGROUND: A system for stabilizing and monitoring eye movements during LINAC-based photon beam one single fraction stereotactic radiotherapy was developed at our Institution. This study aimed to describe the feasibility and the efficacy of our noninvasive optical localization system that was developed, tested, and applied in 20 patients treated for uveal melanoma.
METHODS: Our system consisted of a customized thermoplastic mask to immobilize the head, a gaze fixation LED, and a digital micro-camera. The localization procedure, which required the active collaboration of the patient, served to monitor the eye movements during all phases of the treatment, starting from the planning computed tomography up to the administration of radiotherapy, and allowed the operators to suspend the procedure and to interact with the patient in case of large movements of the pupil.
RESULTS: Twenty patients were treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (27 Gy in one fraction) for primary uveal melanoma. All patients showed a good tolerance to the treatment; until now, all patients were in local control during the follow up and one died for distant progression 6 months after radiosurgery.
CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that this noninvasive technique, based on eye position control, is appropriate and can contribute to the success of LINAC-based stereotactic radiotherapy. A millimetric safety margin to the clinical target volume was adequate to take account for the organ movement. All patients treated till now showed a good local control; failures in the disease control were due to metastatic spread.