Bladder paraganglioma is a rare neuroendocrine neoplasm, either functional or non-functional, arising from the urinary bladder. Functional variants present with catecholamine-related symptoms, while non-functional variants pose diagnostic challenges, mimicking urothelial carcinoma. Misdiagnosis risks underscore the importance of accurate identification for appropriate patient management. In this case, a 52-year-old man, diagnosed incidentally with hypertension and reported occasional post-micturition tachycardia, underwent abdominal ultrasound for known hepatic cyst follow-up, revealing an oval hypoechoic bladder mass. Initial consideration of bladder urothelial carcinoma prompted further investigation with contrast-enhanced CT scan and cystoscopy that confirmed extrinsic mass nature, and subsequent robotic-assisted partial cystectomy was performed. Histologically, the removed mass exhibited characteristic features of bladder paraganglioma. Postoperative recovery was uneventful, with resolution of post-micturition tachycardia at 1 month. Follow-up includes endocrinological evaluation and a 6-month CT scan. In conclusion, bladder paraganglioma should be considered in para-vesical mass differentials. This case highlights the importance of meticulous history collection, even in asymptomatic patients, the need for a multidisciplinary approach for accurate diagnosis and management of this rare condition, and the robotic approach as a viable option.

A challenging task in routine practice is finding the distinction between benign and malignant paragangliomas and pheochromocytomas. The aim of this study is to conduct a comparative analysis of angiogenesis by assessing intratumoral microvascular density (MVD) with immunohistochemical (IHC) markers (CD31, CD34, CD105, ERG), and S100 immunoreactivity, Ki67 proliferative index, succinate dehydrogenase B (SDHB) expressiveness, tumor size with one the most utilized score Pheochromocytoma of Adrenal Gland Scales Score (PASS), using tissue microarray (TMA) with 115 tumor samples, 61 benign (PASS < 4) and 54 potentially malignant (PASS ≥ 4). We found no notable difference between intratumoral MVD and potentially malignant behavior. The group of potentially malignant tumors is significantly larger in size, has lower intratumoral MVD, and a decreased number of S100 labeled sustentacular cells. Both groups have low proliferative activity (mean Ki67 is 1.02 and 1.22, respectively). Most tumors maintain SDHB expression, only 6 cases (5.2%) showed a loss of expression (4 of them in PASS < 4 group and 2 in PASS ≥ 4). PASS score is easily available for assessment and complemented with markers of biological behavior to complete the risk stratification algorithm. Size is directly related to PASS score and malignancy. Intratumoral MVD is extensively developed but it is not crucial in evaluating the malignant potential.