背景:尽管公认的阻力训练(RT)在提高五人制足球运动员的身体表现方面的重要性。,在五人制足球运动员的身体和技术表现上,RT和复杂训练(CT)的相对有效性仍未得到充分探索。本研究旨在比较RT与RT的效果。业余五人制足球运动员的身体和技术表现的CT。方法:将两支业余五人制球队的球员分配给RT(一支16名球员;18岁)和CT(一支16名球员;18岁),以每周两次进行为期8周的干预。RT进行了深蹲和硬拉(6组6-10次重复,最大一次重复75%-85%(1RM),而CT进行了下蹲+下蹲跳跃和硬拉+高拉(3组4-6+10-12次重复,75%-85%1RM)。干预前和干预后的评估包括五人制足球特别表现测试(FSPT),重复冲刺能力(RSA),sprint递减量(Sdec),冲刺时间在10米(T10),10-20-m(T10-20),和20米(T20),1RM后蹲(1RMBS),等距大腿中部拉力(IMTP),和反运动跳跃(CMJ)。结果:在基线,对于任何变量分析,组间均无显著差异(p>0.05).8周后,CT与CT之间存在显著差异FSPT的RT(-10.8%vs.-3.4%;p<0.05),T10(-5.2%与-0.1%;p<0.05),IMTP(7.8%与5.1%;p<0.05),和CMJ(10.2%与4.5%;p<0.05)。另一方面,CT与CT之间没有显着差异观察到RSA的RT(-2.0%vs.-1.2%;p>0.05),Sdec(-7.6%与-3.5%;p>0.05),T10-20(-0.9%与-0.9%;p>0.05),T20(-1.8%与-1.7%;p>0.05),和1RMBS(5.7%与4.5%;p>0.05)培训计划后。两组FSPT明显改善,T20,1RMBS,IMTP,虽然只有CT显著改善了RSA,Sdec,T10和CMJ。结论:结果表明,CT可能对改善业余五人制足球运动员的特定表现参数有价值。在增强力量和力量方面比RT有一些优势。这些发现支持为五人制足球运动员量身定制的训练协议,以优化表现。
Background: Despite the acknowledged importance of resistance training (RT) in enhancing physical performance in futsal players., the comparative effectiveness of RT and complex training (CT) on both physical and technical performance in futsal players remains underexplored. This study aimed to compare the effects of RT vs. CT on physical and technical performance in amateur futsal players. Method: Players from two amateur futsal teams were assigned to RT (one team of 16 players; 18 years) and CT (one team of 16 players; 18 years) to perform an 8-week intervention with two weekly sessions. The RT performed the squat and deadlift (6 sets of 6-10 repetitions at 75%-85% one-repetition maximum (1RM), while the CT performed the squat + squat jump and deadlift + high pull (3 sets of 4-6 + 10-12 repetitions at 75%-85% 1RM). Pre- and post-intervention assessments included the Futsal Special Performance Test (FSPT), repeated sprint ability (RSA), sprint decrement (Sdec), sprint times at 10-m (T10), 10-20-m (T10-20), and 20-m (T20), 1RM back squat (1RM BS), isometric mid-thigh pull (IMTP), and countermovement jump (CMJ). Results: At baseline, no significant differences between groups were observed for any variable analyzed (p > 0.05). After 8 weeks, there were significant differences between CT vs. RT on FSPT (-10.8% vs. -3.4%; p < 0.05), T10 (-5.2% vs. -0.1%; p < 0.05), IMTP (7.8% vs. 5.1%; p < 0.05), and CMJ (10.2% vs. 4.5%; p < 0.05). On the other hand, no significant differences between CT vs. RT were observed for RSA (-2.0% vs. -1.2%; p > 0.05), Sdec (-7.6% vs. -3.5%; p > 0.05), T10-20 (-0.9% vs. -0.9%; p > 0.05), T20 (-1.8% vs. -1.7%; p > 0.05), and 1RM BS (5.7% vs. 4.5%; p > 0.05) after the training program. Both groups significantly improved FSPT, T20, 1RM BS, and IMTP, while only CT significantly improved RSA, Sdec, T10, and CMJ. Conclusion: The results suggest that CT may be valuable for improving specific performance parameters in amateur futsal players, with some advantages over RT in enhancing strength and power. These findings support tailored training protocols for futsal players to optimize performance.